help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2004-0005
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Articles by Funder, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Articles by Funder, J. W.
Endocrinology Vol. 145, No. 7 3153-3157
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Eplerenone, But Not Steroid Withdrawal, Reverses Cardiac Fibrosis in Deoxycorticosterone/ Salt-Treated Rats

Morag Young and John W. Funder

Prince Henry’s Institute for Medical Research, Clayton, 3168 Victoria, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Morag Young, Prince Henry’s Institute for Medical Research, P.O. Box 5152, Clayton, 3168 Victoria, Australia. E-mail: morag.young{at}phimr.monash.edu.au.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aldosterone has been thought to act primarily on epithelia to regulate fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. Mineralocorticoid receptors (MR), however, are also expressed in nonepithelial tissues, such as the heart and vascular smooth muscle. Recently, pathophysiological effects of nonepithelial MR activation by aldosterone have been demonstrated in the context of inappropriate mineralocorticoid levels for salt status, including coronary vascular inflammation and cardiac fibrosis. These effects are mostly prevented by the concomitant administration of MR antagonists, but to date, no equivalent studies have determined whether MR blockade can reverse established inflammation and fibrosis. Uninephrectomized rats maintained on 0.9% NaCl solution to drink were treated as follows: group 1 served as controls; group 2 received deoxycorticosterone (DOC; 20 mg/wk) for 4 wk until death, and group 3 received DOC for 8 wk. Group 4 received DOC for 4 wk and no steroid from wk 5–8; group 5 received DOC for 8 wk and eplerenone in their chow during wk 5–8. DOC progressively raised cardiac collagen accumulation at 4 and 8 wk. Rats given DOC for 4 wk and killed at 8 wk showed levels of fibrosis identical to those in animals killed at 4 wk, i.e. persistently elevated above control values. Rats given DOC for 8 wk and eplerenone for the second half of the period showed cardiac collagen levels indistinguishable from control values. Values for inflammatory marker and NAD(P)H oxidase subunit expression in coronary vessels showed a similar pattern of response, with minor variation. Thus, MR antagonists do not only prevent cardiac fibrosis, but also reverse cardiac fibrosis once it is established. In addition, the continuing vascular inflammatory response and fibrosis after DOC withdrawal (group 4) support a role for activation of vascular MR by endogenous glucocorticoids in the context of tissue damage and generation of reactive oxygen species.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
INAPPROPRIATE ACTIVATION of mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) by elevated plasma aldosterone in the context of a high salt intake produces vascular and perivascular inflammatory responses, followed by perivascular and interstitial fibrosis (1, 2, 3). It is now clear that this inflammatory response is a direct humoral effect, rather than secondary to hemodynamic changes. First, the fibrosis is equally marked in right and left ventricles (2, 3). Secondly, coadministered spironolactone (4) or potassium canrenoate (5) blocks cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis at doses that lower blood pressure minimally if at all. Third, rats infused peripherally with aldosterone and intracerebroventricularly with an MR antagonist (RU28318) remain normotensive, but show cardiac effects indistinguishable from those in hypertensive, aldosterone-infused littermates (6).

Studies addressing the time course of these cardiac responses have shown no increase in collagen deposition until the first 3–4 wk of aldosterone administration (7, 8), although a more rapid time course has been reported after bolus doses of deoxycorticosterone (DOC) (9, 10). From shorter time-course studies using DOC or aldosterone the intramural vasculature was identified as a site for initiation of early responses; primary markers of inflammation, measurable at 1 wk (9, 11), either plateau or continue to increase from 2–4 wk (11). In all instances, the elevations in inflammatory markers and the morphological changes were reduced to near control levels by concomitant MR blockade.

To date investigators have addressed the role of MR antagonists in development of the inflammatory and fibrotic responses (4, 5, 12) rather than investigating a possible role in the reversal of established inflammation and cardiac fibrosis. Studies addressing potential reversal have been reported in the context of progressive heart failure in both humans (13) and dogs (14); those studies in the rat were limited and over a very short time course (15). The current studies were thus designed to explore whether MR blockade can reverse coronary vascular inflammation and established cardiac fibrosis in the mineralocorticoid/salt model of cardiovascular damage, and if so, whether MR blockade is more effective than steroid withdrawal alone.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Protocols for animal use were approved by the Monash University animal ethics committee. Male Sprague Dawley rats (190–210 g starting weight) were uninephrectomized under anesthesia with ilium xylazil (8 mg/kg; Troy Laboratories, Smithfield, Australia) and ketamine (60 mg/kg; Parke-Davis, Auckland, New Zealand), with carprofen (5 mg/kg, given once sc; Pfizer, New York, NY) for postoperative analgesia. Rats were then maintained on chow ad libitum and 0.9% NaCl solution to drink and were allocated into five treatment groups as follows: 1) control, with no further treatment for 8 wk (n = 8); 2) DOC (20 mg in corn oil, sc) once a week from d 2 for 4 wk (DOC4; n = 7; Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO); 3) DOC as for group 2, but for 8 wk (DOC8; n = 7); 4) DOC for 4 wk, then no treatment for 4 wk (DOC404; n = 8); and 5) DOC for 8 wk plus eplerenone (100 mg/kg·d) for 5–8 wk (DOC8EPL4; n = 8; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Skokie, IL; eplerenone was incorporated into the chow by Glenforest Stock Feeders, Perth, Australia).

Animals were killed by CO2 in air at 8 wk, except for the DOC4 group, which was killed at 4 wk. Hearts were excised, weighed, and bisected, and one half was fixed in buffered paraformaldehyde for 6 h, then rinsed and stored overnight in PBS before paraffin embedding. Tissue samples stored for longer times before embedding were placed in 70% ethanol. The remainder of the fresh tissue was used for RT-PCR, as detailed below.

Histological analysis
Tissue blocks were sectioned in the midcoronal plane at 5-µm thickness onto glass slides, and myocardial (perivascular plus interstitial) collagen levels were determined by picrosirius red staining analyzed by AIS computer image analysis software (AIS, version 4.0 Beta 1.5, Imaging Research, Inc., St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). Immunochemistry for inflammatory cytokines used antibodies as previously described (9). The collagen content and level of inflammatory marker expression are expressed as a percentage of area per field analyzed; for each marker, 10–12 fields were analyzed for each rat. Small and medium-sized coronary arteries were scored on a scale of 0–3 for marker expression in vessel wall. Values for individual animals were averaged so that one value per animal was used for statistical comparison by one-way ANOVA.

RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared from freshly isolated rat heart tissues with Ultraspec (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). First strand cDNA synthesis from 500 ng total RNA was performed after deoxyribonuclease treatment using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) primed by random hexamers. PCR reactions were carried out using the following primer sets (all 5'->3'): p22phox: sense, CCC CCG GGG AAA GAG GAA AA; antisense, GCA GGC GAC AGC ACT AAG; gp 91phox: sense, CCA TTC GGA GGT CTT ACT TTG; antisense, CTG GGC ACT CCT TTA TTT TTC; and NOX-4: sense, GAA CCT CAA CTG CAG CCT GAT C; and antisense, CCT TTG TCC AAC AAT CTT CTT GTT CTC. Expression levels were normalized to those of the 18S ribosomal subunit: (18S sense, CGG CTA CCA CAT CCA AGG AA; antisense, GCT GGA ATT ACC GCC GCT). To validate the real-time PCR protocol, gene-specific standard curves for p22phox and ribosomal 18S were generated from one in 10 serial dilutions of previously prepared standards. Standards were diluted as follows: from 10 to 0.1 pg/µl for 18S and from 500 to 0.5 fg/µl for all other transcripts. Real-time PCR amplification was performed on the LightCycler (Roche) using SYBR Green reaction mix (Roche) and the primers described above. cDNA samples were diluted 1:20 in water immediately before use for p22phox and 18S; gp91phox and NOX-4 were analyzed undiluted.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Figure 1Go shows levels of the inflammatory markers ED-1 (for estimation of macrophage infiltration, top panel), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2; center), and osteopontin in the five groups of animals. The three markers overall show a commonality of response, with minor variations between them in terms of time course, extent of change, and significant differences between groups. For ED-1, for example, the values at 8 wk are higher than those at 4 wk of DOC treatment, whereas no significant difference was seen between 4 and 8 wk for the other two markers studied. For all three markers, the steroid withdrawal group (DOC404) showed levels of staining persistently higher than control values, and no different from those in animals killed after 4 wk of DOC (DOC4). In all three groups, the mean values for the eplerenone-treated group were lower than those in the other treated groups; for COX-2 and osteopontin these values are not significantly different from controls, signifying complete reversal, whereas for ED-1 DOC8E4 levels, though clearly diminished vs. DOC8, remained significantly above the controls (P < 0.05).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Vascular and perivascular inflammatory marker expression in DOC/salt-treated rats as determined by semiquantitative scoring (from 0–3). CON, Control; DOC4, DOC treatment for 4 wk; DOC8, DOC for 8 wk; DOC404 DOC for 4 wk and no steroid during wk 5–8; DOC8EPL4, DOC for 8 wk plus eplerenone during wk 5–8. Staining after steroid withdrawal (DOC404) was significantly lower than that at 8 wk, but not that at 4 wk. *, P < 0.05 vs. CON; **, P < 0.05 vs. all other groups; {dagger}, P < 0.05 vs. DOC404.

 
The contribution of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to many cardiovascular disease states is now well documented (16, 17, 18, 19). Vascular smooth muscle cells have been identified as a key site for NADPH-mediated ROS generation (20, 21), and recent studies have suggested that mineralocorticoids induce oxidative stress by activation of NADPH oxidases (22). Figure 2Go shows RT-PCR data for components of the NADPH oxidase system implicated in the generation of ROS in the five experimental groups. The NADPH oxidases catalyze the one electron reduction of molecular oxygen to superoxide anion (O2=) as a multisubunit complex composed of two main subunits, p22phox and gp91phox (23). As for the downstream markers of tissue inflammation shown in Fig. 1Go, the three components of the enzyme system measured by RT-PCR also show a commonality of response, with similar, although perhaps lesser, variation. For the widely expressed p22phox (Fig. 2Go, top panel) values increase from 4 to 8 wk; those 4 wk after DOC withdrawal (DOC404) are not significantly different from those in animals killed after 4 wk of DOC (DOC4), and values in animals receiving eplerenone over the last 4 wk (DOC8E4) return to control levels. Very similar patterns of response are seen for gp91phox (center panel) and VSMC-specific NOX-4 (lower panel), although in each case substantial variation within groups is seen, at 8 wk in particular.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Myocardial NAD(P)H oxidase subunit mRNA expression relative to 18S rRNA. See Fig. 1Go for details of groups. Values after DOC withdrawal (DOC404) were significantly lower than those at 8 wk, but not those at 4 wk. *, P < 0.05 vs. CON.

 
In that the NADPH oxidase subunits and the tissue markers (ED-1, COX-2, and osteopontin) are mediators of the inflammatory response that follows inappropriate MR activation, it is perhaps not unexpected that 4-wk treatment with an MR antagonist would bring their levels back to those in control animals, i.e. would essentially completely reverse the inflammatory response. Perivascular fibrosis, in contrast, is a structural consequence of the inflammatory response and might be expected to show a different time course from, or even be refractory to, MR blockade. That this is not the case is shown by the results in Fig. 3Go for fibrosis determined by picrosirius red staining. For the inflammatory markers, levels at 8 wk are higher than those at 4 wk of DOC; levels 4 wk after DOC withdrawal (DOC404) are not significantly different from those for DOC4; levels after 8 wk of DOC and eplerenone from wk 5–8 are identical to control values and, importantly, are significantly different from those seen with steroid withdrawal alone (DOC404; P < 0.05).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Perivascular and interstitial cardiac fibrosis percent area of left and right ventricles. See Fig. 1Go for details of groups. Staining after DOC withdrawal (DOC404) was significantly lower than that at 8 wk, but not that at 4 wk. *, P < 0.05 vs. CON; **, P < 0.05 (vs. all other groups). {dagger}, P < 0.05 (vs. DOC404).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There appear to be three findings in the present study that warrant discussion. The first is the overall commonality and minor variation in the pattern of inflammatory markers and fibrotic response. The second is the lack of reversal of the inflammatory and fibrotic responses after steroid withdrawal, as shown by comparison of the DOC4 and the DOC404 groups. The third is that of the ability of MR blockade to reverse established inflammation and fibrosis, even in the context of continuing DOC/salt administration.

In previous studies of the vascular inflammatory response to aldosterone/salt and the effects of coadministered eplerenone, Rocha and co-workers (11) described variations in time course over the first 4 wk. For macrophage inflammatory protein-1, a modest progressive rise was seen from wk 1–2 and from wk 2–4, not inconsistent with our finding of a continued increase between wk 4–8 of DOC/salt treatment. For COX-2, they found a progressive increase over the first 2 wk, but plateau levels between wk 2 and 4, again consistent with our findings of plateau levels from wk 4–8. For osteopontin, levels rose steeply over the course of the previous study, with much higher levels at wk 4 than at wk 2; our finding of not dissimilar levels at wk 4 and 8 suggest that wk 4 may represent maximal levels for this marker, as opposed to wk 2 for COX-2, and (at the earliest) wk 8 for ED-1. What is also noteworthy in comparing the two studies is that concomitant administration of eplerenone (at comparable doses to the present study) reduced the inflammatory response very markedly, but often to levels still above those in control rats. The demonstration in the present study that in the DOC8E4 group levels for some indexes remain above control values is thus not inconsistent with previous studies and suggests that the time course of some markers of inflammation may be longer than that for the other indexes in terms of both increment (e.g. ≥8 wk for ED-1) and reversal (e.g. >4 wk for osteopontin).

Expression patterns for NAD(P)H oxidase subunits were similar, with elevated mRNA expression at 4 wk and further increases after 8 wk of DOC treatment. For each subunit, mean values were higher in the steroid withdrawal group than in the reversal group, but this was not significant on a group basis. Based on previous studies, we consider this increase in expression to be indicative of a commensurate increase in ROS production (24, 25, 26), which may be responsible for the initiation of vascular damage and inflammatory processes. Further studies are required to determine the signaling pathways responsible for translating MR activation into changes in cellular redox state, but including those on the rapid MR signaling effects on sodium hydrogen exchanger1 activity (27, 28).

The findings for the steroid withdrawal group (DOC404) are of potential importance in two respects. First, they are higher in terms of mean values across the board than those for the eplerenone-treated group (despite continuation of DOC administration in the latter) and are significantly higher on a group basis for some indexes (e.g. fibrosis). Secondly, they are in no case significantly different from values in animals killed after 4 wk of DOC administration. Taken together, these findings suggest that the inflammatory process may continue, more or less at plateau levels, over the 4 wk after steroid withdrawal. The process is clearly not equivalent to continuing administration of DOC, as mean values for the DOC404 group are consistently lower than those for the DOC8 group, in some instances (e.g. fibrosis) significantly so, on a group basis.

A possible explanation for the continuing submaximal inflammatory response in the DOC404 group may be activation of vascular wall MR by endogenous glucocorticoids, in the context of the tissue damage consequent upon 4 wk of DOC/salt administration. In many tissues, under normal circumstances the physiological glucocorticoids occupy MR in a tonic inhibitory mode (29, 30); under other circumstances [11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßHSD2) type 2 blockade and tissue damage], glucocorticoids appear capable of not only occupying, but also activating, MR (9, 31). In recent studies we have shown that the vascular inflammatory effects of DOC/salt administration can be mimicked by giving carbenoxolone to block 11ßHSD2; importantly, the effects of carbenoxolone are completely reversed by eplerenone, indicating that the endogenous glucocorticoid effects are via MR activation (9). In previous studies in experimental angioplasty in pigs, we have also shown that eplerenone preserves the coronary artery luminal diameter (31). In these studies the animals were receiving no aldosterone or salt supplement to their regular diet; it is formally possible that the eplerenone is blocking profibrotic effects of normal levels of aldosterone in the absence of added salt, although in previous rat studies even high doses of aldosterone (0.75 µg/h) were shown to be ineffective on a low salt diet (2). A more plausible explanation is that activation of vascular wall MR by endogenous glucocorticoids in the context of tissue damage and generation of reactive oxygen species may alter the intracellular redox state in a similar manner as 11ßHSD2 blockade by carbenoxolone. In the current report we hypothesis that a similar mechanism may be responsible for the sustained inflammatory and fibrotic responses seen in the DOC404 group, i.e. vascular damage and the production of reactive oxygen species may sufficiently change the intracellular environment in terms of NAD+:NADH to allow endogenous glucocorticoids to act as agonists at the MR. A fuller exposition of this hypothesis can be found in several recent reviews (32, 33).

If this is the case, the question may be reasonably asked why continued DOC administration is clearly more proinflammatory/profibrotic than steroid withdrawal even if in the latter group the process is at least to some extent being sustained over wk 5–8 by endogenous corticosterone activating vascular wall MR. One possible answer to this question is a countervailing antiinflammatory effect in the DOC404 group, over wk 5–8, of endogenous glucocorticoids via vascular wall glucocorticoid receptors (GR). Such receptors have affinity for corticosterone more than an order of magnitude lower than that of MR and thus will be occupied and activated more or less over the diurnal range of circulating steroid levels. In the DOC8 animals this is much less likely to be the case, as DOC is a GR antagonist as well as an MR agonist. This property of DOC may also contribute to what appears to be a more marked effect on vascular inflammation (3) than that seen with aldosterone, which is a low affinity GR agonist rather than a GR antagonist.

Finally, the salient finding of the study is the ability of MR blockade to reverse the indexes of inflammation (with the exception of osteopontin) and fibrosis to control levels over 4 wk despite continued administration of DOC. Brown and colleagues (15), in a study comparing captopril, candesartan, and spironolactone for 3–4 wk, showed all three to attenuate or reverse some, but not all, of the changes seen in rats given DOC (25 mg/4 d) for 4 wk at both mRNA and functional levels. In a substudy of RALES, Zannad et al. (13) found that reduction of circulating levels of PIIINP (the N-terminal fragment of procollagen III) correlated with a positive effect of spironolactone in terms of survival in severe heart failure; these data were reasonably interpreted as evidence for the possibility that MR blockade decreased collagen turnover in a proportion of patients, which was to their advantage in terms of the progression of disease. In subsequent dog studies, Suzuki et al. (14) demonstrated that eplerenone similarly halted the progression of experimental heart failure on a variety of indexes compared with a vehicle-treated control group over 3 months; on none of these indexes, however, was their any indication of reversal, perhaps not unexpectedly given the context of experimentally induced heart failure.

The present studies represent a time-telescoped model of inappropriate MR activation, and extrapolation to the clinical conditions of aldosterone excess, as in Conn’s syndrome, or other situations predisposing to vasculitis, should be made with considerable caution. Given this caveat, the essentially complete reversal of vasculitis and fibrosis by eplerenone, despite the continuing inappropriate mineralocorticoid/salt status in these animals, indicates the potential importance of extending such studies to the clinical area. The laggardly response to steroid withdrawal compared with MR blockade would appear to underscore the potential importance of the latter in terms of the potential therapeutic impact to reverse established inflammatory effects and remodeling in the cardiovascular system.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: COX, Cyclooxygenase; DOC, deoxycorticosterone; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; 11ßHSD2, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; MR, mineralocorticoid receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Received January 5, 2004.

Accepted for publication March 26, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Robert V, Silvestre JS, Charlemagne D, Sabri A, Trouve P, Wassef M, Swynghedauw B, Delcayre C 1995 Biological determinants of aldosterone-induced cardiac fibrosis in rats. Hypertension 26:971–978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Brilla CG, Weber KT 1992 Mineralocorticoid excess, dietary sodium, and myocardial fibrosis. J Lab Clin Med 120:893–901[Medline]
  3. Young M, Fullerton M, Dilley R, Funder J 1994 Mineralocorticoids, hypertension, and cardiac fibrosis. J Clin Invest 93:2578–2583
  4. Brilla CG, Matsubara LS, Weber KT 1993 Anti-aldosterone treatment and the prevention of myocardial fibrosis in primary and secondary hyperaldosteronism. J Mol Cell Cardiol 25:563–575[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Young MJ, Funder JW 1996 The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in experimental mineralocorticoid-salt-induced cardiac fibrosis. Am J Physiol 271:E883–E888
  6. Young MJ, Funder JW 1996 Mineralocorticoids, salt, hypertension: effects on the heart. Steroids 61:233–235[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Robert V, Van Thiem N, Cheav SL, Mouas C, Swynghedauw B, Delcayre C 1994 Increased cardiac types I and III collagen mRNAs in aldosterone-salt hypertension. Hypertension 24:30–36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Campbell SE, Janicki JS, Weber KT 1995 Temporal differences in fibroblast proliferation and phenotype expression in response to chronic administration of angiotensin II or aldosterone. J Mol Cell Cardiol 27:1545–1560[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Young MJ, Moussa L, Dilley R, Funder JW 2003 Early inflammatory responses in experimental cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis: effects of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inactivation. Endocrinology 144:1121–1125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fujisawa G, Dilley R, Fullerton MJ, Funder JW 2001 Experimental cardiac fibrosis: differential time course of responses to mineralocorticoid-salt administration. Endocrinology 142:3625–3631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rocha R, Rudolph AE, Frierdich GE, Nachowiak DA, Kekec BK, Blomme EA, McMahon EG, Delyani JA 2002 Aldosterone induces a vascular inflammatory phenotype in the rat heart. Am J Physiol 283:H1802–H1810
  12. Rocha R, Chander PN, Khanna K, Zuckerman A, Stier Jr CT 1998 Mineralocorticoid blockade reduces vascular injury in stroke-prone hypertensive rats. Hypertension 31:451–458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Zannad F, Alla F, Dousset B, Perez A, Pitt B 2000 Limitation of excessive extracellular matrix turnover may contribute to survival benefit of spironolactone therapy in patients with congestive heart failure: insights from the randomized aldactone evaluation study (RALES). Rales Investigators. Circulation 102:2700–2706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Suzuki G, Morita H, Mishima T, Sharov VG, Todor A, Tanheco EJ, Rudolph AE, McMahon EG, Goldstein S, Sabbah HN 2002 Effects of long-term monotherapy with eplerenone, a novel aldosterone blocker, on progression of left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in dogs with heart failure. Circulation 106:2967–2972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brown L, Duce B, Miric G, Sernia C 1999 Reversal of cardiac fibrosis in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats by inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. J Am Soc Nephrol 10(Suppl 11):S143–S148
  16. Ball AM, Sole MJ 1998 Oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of heart failure. Cardiol Clin 16:665–675, viii–ix[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Jeremy JY, Yim AP, Wan S, Angelini GD 2002 Oxidative stress, nitric oxide, and vascular disease. J Card Surg 17:324–327[Medline]
  18. Kameda K, Matsunaga T, Abe N, Hanada H, Ishizaka H, Ono H, Saitoh M, Fukui K, Fukuda I, Osanai T, Okumura K 2003 Correlation of oxidative stress with activity of matrix metalloproteinase in patients with coronary artery disease. Possible role for left ventricular remodelling. Eur Heart J 24:2180–2185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sorescu D, Griendling KK 2002 Reactive oxygen species, mitochondria, and NAD(P)H oxidases in the development and progression of heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 8:132–140[Medline]
  20. Lassegue B, Sorescu D, Szocs K, Yin Q, Akers M, Zhang Y, Grant SL, Lambeth JD, Griendling KK 2001 Novel gp91phox homologues in vascular smooth muscle cells: nox1 mediates angiotensin II-induced superoxide formation and redox-sensitive signaling pathways. Circ Res 88:888–894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ushio-Fukai M, Zafari AM, Fukui T, Ishizaka N, Griendling KK 1996 p22phox is a critical component of the superoxide-generating NADH/NADPH oxidase system and regulates angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 271:23317–23321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sun Y, Zhang J, Lu L, Chen SS, Quinn MT, Weber KT 2002 Aldosterone-induced inflammation in the rat heart: role of oxidative stress. Am J Pathol 161:1773–1781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hamilton CA, Brosnan MJ, Al-Benna S, Berg G, Dominiczak AF 2002 NAD(P)H oxidase inhibition improves endothelial function in rat and human blood vessels. Hypertension 40:755–762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Griendling KK, Sorescu D, Lassegue B, Ushio-Fukai M 2000 Modulation of protein kinase activity and gene expression by reactive oxygen species and their role in vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:2175–2183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Li T, Danelisen I, Bello-Klein A, Singal PK 2000 Effects of probucol on changes of antioxidant enzymes in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy in rats. Cardiovasc Res 46:523–530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gorlach A, Brandes RP, Nguyen K, Amidi M, Dehghani F, Busse R 2000 A gp91phox containing NADPH oxidase selectively expressed in endothelial cells is a major source of oxygen radical generation in the arterial wall. Circ Res 87:26–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Alzamora R, Michea L, Marusic ET 2000 Role of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in nongenomic aldosterone effects in human arteries. Hypertension 35:1099–1104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Young M, Funder J 2003 Mineralocorticoid action and sodium-hydrogen exchange: studies in experimental cardiac fibrosis. Endocrinology 144:3848–3851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Funder J, Myles K 1996 Exclusion of corticosterone from epithelial mineralocorticoid receptors is insufficient for selectivity of aldosterone action: in vivo binding studies. Endocrinology 137:5264–5268[Abstract]
  30. Qin W, Rudolph AE, Bond BR, Rocha R, Blomme EA, Goellner JJ, Funder JW, McMahon EG 2003 Transgenic model of aldosterone-driven cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Circ Res 93:69–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ward MR, Kanellakis P, Ramsey D, Funder J, Bobik A 2001 Eplerenone suppresses constrictive remodeling and collagen accumulation after angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation 104:467–472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Funder JW 2004 Is aldosterone bad for the heart? Trends Endocrinol Metab 15:139–142[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Funder JW 2003 The role of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of cardiac failure. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 12:1963–1969[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. Messaoudi, P. Milliez, J.-L. Samuel, and C. Delcayre
Cardiac aldosterone overexpression prevents harmful effects of diabetes in the mouse heart by preserving capillary density
FASEB J, July 1, 2009; 23(7): 2176 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Michea, A. Villagran, A. Urzua, S. Kuntsmann, P. Venegas, L. Carrasco, M. Gonzalez, and E. T. Marusic
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy and Prevents Oxidative Stress in Uremic Rats
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 295 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. Matsui, K. Ando, H. Kawarazaki, A. Nagae, M. Fujita, T. Shimosawa, M. Nagase, and T. Fujita
Salt Excess Causes Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Rats With Metabolic Disorder
Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. M. C. Connell, S. M. MacKenzie, E. M. Freel, R. Fraser, and E. Davies
A Lifetime of Aldosterone Excess: Long-Term Consequences of Altered Regulation of Aldosterone Production for Cardiovascular Function
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 133 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Rickard, J. W. Funder, J. Morgan, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young
Does Glucocorticoid Receptor Blockade Exacerbate Tissue Damage after Mineralocorticoid/Salt Administration?
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4829 - 4835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Grossmann, A. W. Krug, R. Freudinger, S. Mildenberger, K. Voelker, and M. Gekle
Aldosterone-induced EGFR expression: interaction between the human mineralocorticoid receptor and the human EGFR promoter
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1790 - E1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Fejes-Toth and A. Naray-Fejes-Toth
Early Aldosterone-Regulated Genes in Cardiomyocytes: Clues to Cardiac Remodeling?
Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1502 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Susic, J. Varagic, J. Ahn, L. Matavelli, and E. D. Frohlich
Long-term mineralocorticoid receptor blockade reduces fibrosis and improves cardiac performance and coronary hemodynamics in elderly SHR
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H175 - H179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Rickard, J. W. Funder, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young
The Role of the Glucocorticoid Receptor in Mineralocorticoid/Salt-Mediated Cardiac Fibrosis
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5901 - 5906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Y. M. Lam, J. W. Funder, D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade But Not Steroid Withdrawal Reverses Renal Fibrosis in Deoxycorticosterone/Salt Rats
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3623 - 3629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
T. R. Marcy and T. L. Ripley
Aldosterone antagonists in the treatment of heart failure
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 1, 2006; 63(1): 49 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. J. Fuller and M. J. Young
Mechanisms of Mineralocorticoid Action
Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1227 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. D. Barish, M. Downes, W. A. Alaynick, R. T. Yu, C. B. Ocampo, A. L. Bookout, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and R. M. Evans
A Nuclear Receptor Atlas: Macrophage Activation
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 19(10): 2466 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
J. M C Connell and E. Davies
The new biology of aldosterone
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
D. Susic, J. Varagic, J. Ahn, L. C. Matavelli, and E. D. Frohlich
Beneficial Cardiovascular Actions of Eplerenone in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2005; 10(3): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Articles by Funder, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Articles by Funder, J. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals