| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Prince Henrys Institute for Medical Research, Clayton, 3168 Victoria, Australia
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Morag Young, Prince Henrys Institute for Medical Research, P.O. Box 5152, Clayton, 3168 Victoria, Australia. E-mail: morag.young{at}phimr.monash.edu.au.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies addressing the time course of these cardiac responses have shown no increase in collagen deposition until the first 34 wk of aldosterone administration (7, 8), although a more rapid time course has been reported after bolus doses of deoxycorticosterone (DOC) (9, 10). From shorter time-course studies using DOC or aldosterone the intramural vasculature was identified as a site for initiation of early responses; primary markers of inflammation, measurable at 1 wk (9, 11), either plateau or continue to increase from 24 wk (11). In all instances, the elevations in inflammatory markers and the morphological changes were reduced to near control levels by concomitant MR blockade.
To date investigators have addressed the role of MR antagonists in development of the inflammatory and fibrotic responses (4, 5, 12) rather than investigating a possible role in the reversal of established inflammation and cardiac fibrosis. Studies addressing potential reversal have been reported in the context of progressive heart failure in both humans (13) and dogs (14); those studies in the rat were limited and over a very short time course (15). The current studies were thus designed to explore whether MR blockade can reverse coronary vascular inflammation and established cardiac fibrosis in the mineralocorticoid/salt model of cardiovascular damage, and if so, whether MR blockade is more effective than steroid withdrawal alone.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals were killed by CO2 in air at 8 wk, except for the DOC4 group, which was killed at 4 wk. Hearts were excised, weighed, and bisected, and one half was fixed in buffered paraformaldehyde for 6 h, then rinsed and stored overnight in PBS before paraffin embedding. Tissue samples stored for longer times before embedding were placed in 70% ethanol. The remainder of the fresh tissue was used for RT-PCR, as detailed below.
Histological analysis
Tissue blocks were sectioned in the midcoronal plane at 5-µm thickness onto glass slides, and myocardial (perivascular plus interstitial) collagen levels were determined by picrosirius red staining analyzed by AIS computer image analysis software (AIS, version 4.0 Beta 1.5, Imaging Research, Inc., St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). Immunochemistry for inflammatory cytokines used antibodies as previously described (9). The collagen content and level of inflammatory marker expression are expressed as a percentage of area per field analyzed; for each marker, 1012 fields were analyzed for each rat. Small and medium-sized coronary arteries were scored on a scale of 03 for marker expression in vessel wall. Values for individual animals were averaged so that one value per animal was used for statistical comparison by one-way ANOVA.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared from freshly isolated rat heart tissues with Ultraspec (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). First strand cDNA synthesis from 500 ng total RNA was performed after deoxyribonuclease treatment using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) primed by random hexamers. PCR reactions were carried out using the following primer sets (all 5'
3'): p22phox: sense, CCC CCG GGG AAA GAG GAA AA; antisense, GCA GGC GAC AGC ACT AAG; gp 91phox: sense, CCA TTC GGA GGT CTT ACT TTG; antisense, CTG GGC ACT CCT TTA TTT TTC; and NOX-4: sense, GAA CCT CAA CTG CAG CCT GAT C; and antisense, CCT TTG TCC AAC AAT CTT CTT GTT CTC. Expression levels were normalized to those of the 18S ribosomal subunit: (18S sense, CGG CTA CCA CAT CCA AGG AA; antisense, GCT GGA ATT ACC GCC GCT). To validate the real-time PCR protocol, gene-specific standard curves for p22phox and ribosomal 18S were generated from one in 10 serial dilutions of previously prepared standards. Standards were diluted as follows: from 10 to 0.1 pg/µl for 18S and from 500 to 0.5 fg/µl for all other transcripts. Real-time PCR amplification was performed on the LightCycler (Roche) using SYBR Green reaction mix (Roche) and the primers described above. cDNA samples were diluted 1:20 in water immediately before use for p22phox and 18S; gp91phox and NOX-4 were analyzed undiluted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous studies of the vascular inflammatory response to aldosterone/salt and the effects of coadministered eplerenone, Rocha and co-workers (11) described variations in time course over the first 4 wk. For macrophage inflammatory protein-1, a modest progressive rise was seen from wk 12 and from wk 24, not inconsistent with our finding of a continued increase between wk 48 of DOC/salt treatment. For COX-2, they found a progressive increase over the first 2 wk, but plateau levels between wk 2 and 4, again consistent with our findings of plateau levels from wk 48. For osteopontin, levels rose steeply over the course of the previous study, with much higher levels at wk 4 than at wk 2; our finding of not dissimilar levels at wk 4 and 8 suggest that wk 4 may represent maximal levels for this marker, as opposed to wk 2 for COX-2, and (at the earliest) wk 8 for ED-1. What is also noteworthy in comparing the two studies is that concomitant administration of eplerenone (at comparable doses to the present study) reduced the inflammatory response very markedly, but often to levels still above those in control rats. The demonstration in the present study that in the DOC8E4 group levels for some indexes remain above control values is thus not inconsistent with previous studies and suggests that the time course of some markers of inflammation may be longer than that for the other indexes in terms of both increment (e.g.
8 wk for ED-1) and reversal (e.g. >4 wk for osteopontin).
Expression patterns for NAD(P)H oxidase subunits were similar, with elevated mRNA expression at 4 wk and further increases after 8 wk of DOC treatment. For each subunit, mean values were higher in the steroid withdrawal group than in the reversal group, but this was not significant on a group basis. Based on previous studies, we consider this increase in expression to be indicative of a commensurate increase in ROS production (24, 25, 26), which may be responsible for the initiation of vascular damage and inflammatory processes. Further studies are required to determine the signaling pathways responsible for translating MR activation into changes in cellular redox state, but including those on the rapid MR signaling effects on sodium hydrogen exchanger1 activity (27, 28).
The findings for the steroid withdrawal group (DOC404) are of potential importance in two respects. First, they are higher in terms of mean values across the board than those for the eplerenone-treated group (despite continuation of DOC administration in the latter) and are significantly higher on a group basis for some indexes (e.g. fibrosis). Secondly, they are in no case significantly different from values in animals killed after 4 wk of DOC administration. Taken together, these findings suggest that the inflammatory process may continue, more or less at plateau levels, over the 4 wk after steroid withdrawal. The process is clearly not equivalent to continuing administration of DOC, as mean values for the DOC404 group are consistently lower than those for the DOC8 group, in some instances (e.g. fibrosis) significantly so, on a group basis.
A possible explanation for the continuing submaximal inflammatory response in the DOC404 group may be activation of vascular wall MR by endogenous glucocorticoids, in the context of the tissue damage consequent upon 4 wk of DOC/salt administration. In many tissues, under normal circumstances the physiological glucocorticoids occupy MR in a tonic inhibitory mode (29, 30); under other circumstances [11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßHSD2) type 2 blockade and tissue damage], glucocorticoids appear capable of not only occupying, but also activating, MR (9, 31). In recent studies we have shown that the vascular inflammatory effects of DOC/salt administration can be mimicked by giving carbenoxolone to block 11ßHSD2; importantly, the effects of carbenoxolone are completely reversed by eplerenone, indicating that the endogenous glucocorticoid effects are via MR activation (9). In previous studies in experimental angioplasty in pigs, we have also shown that eplerenone preserves the coronary artery luminal diameter (31). In these studies the animals were receiving no aldosterone or salt supplement to their regular diet; it is formally possible that the eplerenone is blocking profibrotic effects of normal levels of aldosterone in the absence of added salt, although in previous rat studies even high doses of aldosterone (0.75 µg/h) were shown to be ineffective on a low salt diet (2). A more plausible explanation is that activation of vascular wall MR by endogenous glucocorticoids in the context of tissue damage and generation of reactive oxygen species may alter the intracellular redox state in a similar manner as 11ßHSD2 blockade by carbenoxolone. In the current report we hypothesis that a similar mechanism may be responsible for the sustained inflammatory and fibrotic responses seen in the DOC404 group, i.e. vascular damage and the production of reactive oxygen species may sufficiently change the intracellular environment in terms of NAD+:NADH to allow endogenous glucocorticoids to act as agonists at the MR. A fuller exposition of this hypothesis can be found in several recent reviews (32, 33).
If this is the case, the question may be reasonably asked why continued DOC administration is clearly more proinflammatory/profibrotic than steroid withdrawal even if in the latter group the process is at least to some extent being sustained over wk 58 by endogenous corticosterone activating vascular wall MR. One possible answer to this question is a countervailing antiinflammatory effect in the DOC404 group, over wk 58, of endogenous glucocorticoids via vascular wall glucocorticoid receptors (GR). Such receptors have affinity for corticosterone more than an order of magnitude lower than that of MR and thus will be occupied and activated more or less over the diurnal range of circulating steroid levels. In the DOC8 animals this is much less likely to be the case, as DOC is a GR antagonist as well as an MR agonist. This property of DOC may also contribute to what appears to be a more marked effect on vascular inflammation (3) than that seen with aldosterone, which is a low affinity GR agonist rather than a GR antagonist.
Finally, the salient finding of the study is the ability of MR blockade to reverse the indexes of inflammation (with the exception of osteopontin) and fibrosis to control levels over 4 wk despite continued administration of DOC. Brown and colleagues (15), in a study comparing captopril, candesartan, and spironolactone for 34 wk, showed all three to attenuate or reverse some, but not all, of the changes seen in rats given DOC (25 mg/4 d) for 4 wk at both mRNA and functional levels. In a substudy of RALES, Zannad et al. (13) found that reduction of circulating levels of PIIINP (the N-terminal fragment of procollagen III) correlated with a positive effect of spironolactone in terms of survival in severe heart failure; these data were reasonably interpreted as evidence for the possibility that MR blockade decreased collagen turnover in a proportion of patients, which was to their advantage in terms of the progression of disease. In subsequent dog studies, Suzuki et al. (14) demonstrated that eplerenone similarly halted the progression of experimental heart failure on a variety of indexes compared with a vehicle-treated control group over 3 months; on none of these indexes, however, was their any indication of reversal, perhaps not unexpectedly given the context of experimentally induced heart failure.
The present studies represent a time-telescoped model of inappropriate MR activation, and extrapolation to the clinical conditions of aldosterone excess, as in Conns syndrome, or other situations predisposing to vasculitis, should be made with considerable caution. Given this caveat, the essentially complete reversal of vasculitis and fibrosis by eplerenone, despite the continuing inappropriate mineralocorticoid/salt status in these animals, indicates the potential importance of extending such studies to the clinical area. The laggardly response to steroid withdrawal compared with MR blockade would appear to underscore the potential importance of the latter in terms of the potential therapeutic impact to reverse established inflammatory effects and remodeling in the cardiovascular system.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 5, 2004.
Accepted for publication March 26, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Michea, A. Villagran, A. Urzua, S. Kuntsmann, P. Venegas, L. Carrasco, M. Gonzalez, and E. T. Marusic Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy and Prevents Oxidative Stress in Uremic Rats Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 295 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Matsui, K. Ando, H. Kawarazaki, A. Nagae, M. Fujita, T. Shimosawa, M. Nagase, and T. Fujita Salt Excess Causes Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Rats With Metabolic Disorder Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 287 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. C. Connell, S. M. MacKenzie, E. M. Freel, R. Fraser, and E. Davies A Lifetime of Aldosterone Excess: Long-Term Consequences of Altered Regulation of Aldosterone Production for Cardiovascular Function Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 133 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rickard, J. W. Funder, J. Morgan, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young Does Glucocorticoid Receptor Blockade Exacerbate Tissue Damage after Mineralocorticoid/Salt Administration? Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4829 - 4835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grossmann, A. W. Krug, R. Freudinger, S. Mildenberger, K. Voelker, and M. Gekle Aldosterone-induced EGFR expression: interaction between the human mineralocorticoid receptor and the human EGFR promoter Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1790 - E1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fejes-Toth and A. Naray-Fejes-Toth Early Aldosterone-Regulated Genes in Cardiomyocytes: Clues to Cardiac Remodeling? Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1502 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Susic, J. Varagic, J. Ahn, L. Matavelli, and E. D. Frohlich Long-term mineralocorticoid receptor blockade reduces fibrosis and improves cardiac performance and coronary hemodynamics in elderly SHR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H175 - H179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rickard, J. W. Funder, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young The Role of the Glucocorticoid Receptor in Mineralocorticoid/Salt-Mediated Cardiac Fibrosis Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5901 - 5906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Y. M. Lam, J. W. Funder, D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, P. J. Fuller, and M. J. Young Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockade But Not Steroid Withdrawal Reverses Renal Fibrosis in Deoxycorticosterone/Salt Rats Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3623 - 3629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Marcy and T. L. Ripley Aldosterone antagonists in the treatment of heart failure Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 1, 2006; 63(1): 49 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Fuller and M. J. Young Mechanisms of Mineralocorticoid Action Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1227 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Barish, M. Downes, W. A. Alaynick, R. T. Yu, C. B. Ocampo, A. L. Bookout, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and R. M. Evans A Nuclear Receptor Atlas: Macrophage Activation Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 19(10): 2466 - 2477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M C Connell and E. Davies The new biology of aldosterone J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 1 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Susic, J. Varagic, J. Ahn, L. C. Matavelli, and E. D. Frohlich Beneficial Cardiovascular Actions of Eplerenone in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, July 1, 2005; 10(3): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |