| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
-Aminobutyric Acid Inputs to Hypothalamic Magnocellular Neurons
Division of Neurobiology (S.D., J.G.T.), Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience Program (R.M.-L., J.G.T.), Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118; and Neuroscience Center of Excellence (V.L.M., N.G.B.), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jeffrey G. Tasker, Ph.D., Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-5698. E-mail: tasker{at}tulane.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release onto magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus and paraventricular nucleus, suppressing glutamate release and facilitating GABA release by activating a putative membrane receptor. The glucocorticoid effect on both glutamate and GABA release was blocked by inhibiting postsynaptic G protein activity, suggesting a dependence on postsynaptic G protein signaling and the involvement of a retrograde messenger. Biochemical analysis of hypothalamic slices treated with dexamethasone revealed a glucocorticoid-induced rapid increase in the levels of the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). The glucocorticoid suppression of glutamate release was blocked by the type I cannabinoid receptor cannabinoid receptor antagonist, AM251, and was mimicked and occluded by AEA and 2-AG, suggesting it was mediated by retrograde endocannabinoid release. The glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release was also blocked by AM251 but was not mimicked by AEA, 2-AG, or a synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212–2, nor was it blocked by vanilloid or ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists, suggesting that it was mediated by a retrograde messenger acting at an AM251-sensitive, noncannabinoid/nonvanilloid receptor at presynaptic GABA terminals. The combined, opposing actions of glucocorticoids mediate a rapid inhibition of the magnocellular neuroendocrine cells, which in turn should mediate rapid feedback inhibition of the secretion of oxytocin and vasopressin by glucocorticoids during stress activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Glucocorticoids also have been reported to have rapid inhibitory effects on neurohypophysial oxytocin and vasopressin secretion from hypothalamic magnocellular neurons. Corticosterone inhibits osmotically stimulated vasopressin secretion from hypothalamic explants (4), and the inhibitory effect appears to be mediated by a membrane corticosteroid receptor (7) and linked to the osmotic activation of glutamatergic synaptic inputs (8). Here we studied the rapid actions of glucocorticoids on magnocellular neuroendocrine cells of the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus (SON) and PVN to determine whether the fast inhibitory glucocorticoid effect on neurohypophyseal oxytocin and vasopressin secretion is mediated by steroid actions similar to those seen in PVN parvocellular neuroendocrine cells. Similar to our previous findings in parvocellular neurons, we found that glucocorticoids activate a putative membrane G protein-coupled receptor in magnocellular neurons that leads to the suppression of glutamate synaptic inputs via release of a retrograde endocannabinoid messenger. In contrast, we present evidence for the opposite effect of glucocorticoids on synaptic -aminobutyric acid (GABA) release in magnocellular neurons, a rapid facilitation, which was not seen in parvocellular neurons (6). The facilitatory effect of glucocorticoids on GABA release was mediated by an unknown retrograde messenger.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Electrophysiological methods
Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (1.65 mm outer diameter, 1.2 mm inner diameter; KG33; Garner Glass, Claremont, CA) with a Flaming/Brown P-97 micropipette puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) to a resistance of 3–4 M
. Pipette solutions contained either (in millimoles) 120 K-gluconate, 10 KCl, 1 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 10 EGTA, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, and 10 HEPES or 110 D-gluconic acid, 110 CsOH, 10 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 10 EGTA, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, and 10 HEPES. pH was adjusted to 7.3 with KOH or CsOH. The osmolarity of the solution was adjusted to 300 mOsmol with 20 mM D-sorbitol.
Hemislices were transferred one at a time from the holding chamber to a submerged recording chamber, in which they were secured to the floor of the chamber with platinum wire and perfused with aCSF at a rate of 2 ml/min. Most recordings were conducted at a temperature of 32–34 C, whereas some early recordings of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) were conducted at room temperature, as indicated in the text. The slices were allowed to equilibrate in the recording chamber for at least 15 min before starting recordings. Magnocellular neurons were then visualized via a cooled CCD camera using infrared illumination and differential interference contrast optics (IR-DIC). Upon obtaining the whole-cell recording configuration, series resistance and whole cell capacitance were adjusted and were continually monitored throughout experiments. Cells with unstable input resistance or series resistance were discarded. Only one cell was recorded from each hemislice to avoid sampling bias. All recordings were performed in voltage clamp mode using an Axopatch 1-D or Multiclamp 700 amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and were monitored continuously on a digital storage oscilloscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Data were low pass filtered at 2 kHz, converted to digital video format at 22 kHz using a Neuro-Corder (NeuroData Instruments, New York, NY) and stored on videotape for off-line analysis. Selected data were subsequently digitized at 4 kHz and recorded on a personal computer using the Digidata 1200 interface and pCLAMP 7.0 or 9.0 software (Axon Instruments).
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed in putative magnocellular neurons in the SON and PVN, which were identified on the basis of their location, their relatively large size under IR-DIC visualization and their electrical properties (9, 10). External solutions contained tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 µM) to block spike-mediated transmitter release, and magnocellular neurons were held at a holding potential of –60 mV to record mEPSCs or 0 mV (with the cesium-containing patch solution) to record miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs). To focus on the fast, nongenomic actions of glucocorticoids, 3-min epochs of mEPSCs or mIPSCs were collected at 7–10 min of bath application of glucocorticoid and compared with 3-min control epochs acquired just before the glucocorticoid application. The traces obtained were analyzed for mean frequency, amplitude, and decay time (defined as the time from peak to 63% decay of the mEPSC/mIPSC) using the Minianalysis 5.0 program (Synaptosoft Inc., Decatur, GA).
Drug application
Water-soluble forms of the steroids dexamethasone (DEX; 0.01–1000 µM), corticosterone (1 µM), and cholesterol (5 µM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were dissolved directly in aCSF to their final concentrations and applied in the perfusion bath. The DEX-BSA conjugate (Steraloids Inc., Newport, RI) was dissolved in the aCSF with 25% ß-cyclodextrin (Sigma-Aldrich) as a carrier to increase its solubility. The concentration of DEX-BSA (10 µM) was selected to obtain an effective concentration of dexamethasone of about 1 µM because the BSA conjugation reduces the effectiveness of receptor binding by a factor of about 10. TTX (1 µM, Sigma-Aldrich), 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX, 20 µM),D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5, 50 µM), LY341495 (100 µM), bicuculline methiodide (30 µM), and CGP 54626 (3 µM) (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO) were dissolved in sterile water and stored in stock solutions at –20 C. The physiologically inactive steroid, isopregnanalone (5 µM), the intracellular types I and II corticosteroid receptor antagonists, respectively, spironolactone (10 µM) and mifepristone (RU486, 10 µM) (Sigma-Aldrich), and the cannabinoid reagents WIN 55,212–2 (1 µM) and AM 251 (1 µM) (Tocris) were stored as 100-mM stock solutions in dimethylsulfoxide at –20 C and were dissolved to their final concentrations in aCSF before bath application. The endogenous cannabinoids, anandamide (AEA, 0.1–1 µM) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG, 0.5–2 µM) (Tocris), were prepared and applied under low-light conditions due to their photosensitivity. The dimethylsulfoxide, ß-cyclodextrin, and the standard plain emulsion (Tocris) used to dissolve AEA were tested and had no effect on synaptic currents at the concentrations used. The nonhydrolyzable guanylyl nucleotide GDP-ß-S (500 µM; Sigma-Aldrich) and, in some cases, DEX (1 µM) were included in the patch solution for intracellular application. To prevent drugs applied intracellularly from leaking from the patch pipette into the extracellular space before seal formation, the tips of the patch pipettes were filled with regular patch solution and the pipettes were then backfilled with the drug solution.
Single-cell RT-PCR
The single-cell RT-PCR procedure was similar to that described previously (6). The cell cytoplasm was aspirated into the patch pipette under visual control, taking care to avoid aspiration of the nucleus, and transferred into 5 µl of lysis buffer containing 2.9 µl diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water, 0.7 µl BSA, 0.7 µl Oligo dT (0.5 µg/µl), and 0.7 µl RNasin (40 U/µl), which was maintained on ice prior and subsequent to receiving harvested cytoplasm. The cell lysates were stored at –80 C or used immediately for reverse transcription (RT). For the RT, the lysate-buffer mixture was heated to 70 C for 10 min and then incubated on ice for 1 min, after which 15 µl of final RT master mix, including 8.0 µl diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water, 2 µl 10x first-strand buffer, 2 µl MgCl2 (25 mM), 2 µl dithiothreitol (0.1 M), and 1 µl mixed deoxynucleotide triphosphates (10 mM), were added. Single-stranded cDNA was reverse transcribed from the cellular mRNA by adding SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (0.7 µl, 200 U/µl) and incubating at 42 C for 50 min, after which the reaction was terminated by heating to 70 C for 15 min. The RNA strand in the RNA-DNA hybrid was removed by adding 0.5 µl RNase H (2 U/µl) for 20 min at 37 C. All reagents were obtained from Life Technologies (Madison, WI).
PCR amplification of the reverse-transcribed mRNAs was performed in a thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA) using a fraction of the single-cell cDNA as a template. Reaction mixtures contained (in 30 µl final volume): 2.2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM of each of the deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 1.5 µM of primers, 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 2.9 µl of 10x buffer, and 4 µl of the cDNA template made from the single-cell RT reaction. The thermal cycler was set at 94 C for 45 sec, 60 C for 45 sec, and 72 C for 1.1 min for 50 cycles. Primers for oxytocin, vasopressin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were taken from Glasgow et al. (11) and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). The primer pairs used were: oxytocin, 5'-GAC GGT GGA TCT CGG ACT GAA-3' and 5'-CGC CCC TAA AGG TAT CAT CAC AAA-3' (462 bp); vasopressin, 5'-CCT CAC CTC TGC CTG CTA CTT-3' and 5'-GGG GGC GAT GGC TCA GTA GAC-3' (440 bp); and GAPDH, 5'-GGA CAT TGT TGC CAT CAA CGA C-3' and 5'-ATG AGC CCT TCC ACG ATG CCA AAG-3' (441 bp). Each of the primers was used in every cell analyzed. Final PCR products were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide after separation by electrophoresis in 1.5–2% agarose gels. The forward and reverse GAPDH primers were designed to span an intron to detect genomic DNA in each cellular template. In addition to the single-cell GAPDH RT-PCR, whole hypothalamic slices were run in parallel with the single-cell reactions as positive controls for the primers. Negative controls for contamination from extraneous and genomic DNA were also run for every batch of neurons by running pure water and omitting the RT step from the reaction, respectively. None of the cells tested showed a genomic DNA PCR product.
Quantitative biochemical analysis of endocannabinoids
Hypothalamic slices containing the SON were prepared identically to those described above for whole-cell recordings, except that they were trimmed to restrict biochemical analysis to the SON and surrounding tissue. Thus, slices were bisected along the midline (i.e. at the third ventricle) and the hemislices were trimmed dorsally 2 mm dorsal to ventral surface and laterally 1 mm lateral to the optic chiasm. Two hemislices were subjected to drug treatment and their contralateral pairs were used as controls in each rat. After equilibration in an oxygenated holding chamber for 1.5–2 h, hemislices were secured to the floor of a perfusion chamber with platinum wire and perfused with oxygenated, heated aCSF (32–34 C). To measure DEX-induced endocannabinoid production, hemislices were perfused with DEX (1 µM) for 10 min. Control hemislices were perfused with aCSF for 10 min. Immediately after DEX or control treatment, slices were collected and homogenized in 1 ml of ice-cold methanol in preparation for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis.
LC-MS-MS analysis of the endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG was performed on chloroform methanol (2:1) lipid extracts, which were loaded with deuterated standard mixture (AEA-d8, 2-AG-d8) and purified by SPE extraction on C18 columns (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA). Samples were eluted with 10 ml of 1% methanol in ethyl acetate and concentrated on an N2 stream evaporator before LC-MS-MS analysis. Samples were loaded on a Biobasic-AX column (100 mm x 2.1 mm, 5 µm particle size; Thermo-Hipersyl-Keystone, Bellefonte, PA). The column was run with a 45-min gradient protocol starting with solvent solution A [40:60:0.01 methanol/water/acetic acid (pH 4.5)] at a flow rate of 300 µl/ min, reached 100% of solvent B (99.99:0.01 methanol/acetic acid) in 30 min, and run isocratic for 5 min, after which the system returned to 100% solvent solution A in 10 min. LC effluents were diverted to an electrospray-ionization probe on a TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo-Finnigan, San Jose, CA) running on negative ion detection mode. Electrospray voltage was 3 kV; sheath gas was argon at 1.5 mTorr. The instrument runs on full-scan mode to detect MS2-spectra and selected reaction mode for quantitative analysis to detect parent/daughter ion pairs simultaneously. The selected parent/daughter ion pairs were 346.3/259.3, 377.2/285.2, 353.2/266.3, and 385.4/310.2 m/z for AEA, 2-AG, AEA-d8, and 2-AG-d8, respectively.
Data analysis
All data are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical comparisons of electrophysiological data were performed using the Student’s paired t test for within-group cell comparisons, the Student’s unpaired t test for between-group comparisons. For comparison of LC-MS-MS data, two slices containing SON from each rat were bisected down the midline, and hemislices from one side of the hypothalamus served as the control and the other as the experimental sample; n’s reflect numbers of animals tested. These were compared statistically using the Student’s paired t test. P <0.05 was considered significant for all comparisons.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Rapid glucocorticoid inhibition of glutamate release
The glucocorticoids DEX and corticosterone applied in the bath perfusion suppressed glutamatergic synaptic activity by more than 10% in 18 of 21 PVN magnocellular neurons tested and 14 of 16 SON magnocellular neurons tested. Whereas most cells were recorded at a temperature of 32–34 C, a few neurons at an early stage of the study were recorded at room temperature. There was no significant difference in the response to glucocorticoids observed under the two recording conditions; therefore, the data were pooled for further analysis. Bath application of the synthetic glucocorticoid agonist DEX (1 µM) for 10 min caused a 37.6 ± 6.5 and 36.5 ± 6.2% decrease in the frequency of mEPSCs in PVN and SON magnocellular neurons, respectively (PVN: from 3.4 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.4 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 21; SON: from 2.1 ± 0.4 to 1.1 ± 0.2 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 16) but had no effect on mEPSC amplitudes (PVN: 26.6 ± 2.0 vs. 26.0 ± 2.4 pA; P = 0.55; SON: 25.6 ± 1.6 vs. 27.1 ± 2.0 pA; P = 0.29) or decay times (PVN: 3.0 ± 0.2 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2 msec, P = 0.27; SON: 2.9 ± 0.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.2 msec, P = 0.44) (Fig. 1
, A–D). The results obtained from PVN and SON magnocellular neurons were not significantly different (mEPSC frequency, P = 0.91; amplitude, P = 0.12; and decay time, P = 0.25), so the data from the two groups were pooled for all further analyses. The inhibitory effect of DEX on mEPSC frequency was dose dependent, with a threshold concentration between 10 and 100 nM and a saturating concentration of 1–10 µM (EC50 = 474 nM) (Fig. 1E). The endogenous glucocorticoid, corticosterone (1 µM), had an effect of approximately the same magnitude as DEX on mEPSCs, causing a 27.7 ± 4.9% decrease in mEPSC frequency (from 1.0 ± 0.3 to 0.7 ± 0.2 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 5) (Fig. 1F) without affecting either mEPSC amplitude (45.4 ± 11.1 vs. 44.1 ± 10.5 pA; P = 0.18) or decay time (3.1 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8 msec; P = 0.18). The effect of the glucocorticoids was steroid specific because the steroid precursor, cholesterol (5 µM), and the physiologically inactive steroid, isopregnanolone (5 µM), had no effect on mEPSC frequency (Fig. 1F). The glucocorticoid effect did not reverse within 60 min of washout of the steroid. These data indicated that glucocorticoids exert a fast inhibitory effect on glutamate release onto hypothalamic magnocellular neurons.
|
, A–D). The results obtained from PVN and SON magnocellular neurons were not significantly different (mIPSC frequency, P = 0.59; amplitude, P = 0.73; decay time, P = 0.33), so the data from each group were pooled for further analyses. The excitatory effect of dexamethasone on mIPSC frequency showed an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve (Fig. 2E), such that DEX caused an increase in mIPSC frequency at concentrations between 1 and10 µM but had no effect at both low (0.01–0.1 µM) and high (100–1000 µM) concentrations. Corticosterone (1 µM) had an effect of approximately the same magnitude as DEX and caused a similar 31.9 ± 6.1% increase in mIPSC frequency (from 0.9 ± 0.4 to 1.1 ± 0.4 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 5) without affecting either the mIPSC amplitude (47.2 ± 8.8 vs. 50.2 ± 6.1 pA; P = 0.26) or decay time (7.4 ± 0.4 vs. 7.5 ± 0.5 msec; P = 0.39) (Fig. 2D). The glucocorticoid effect did not reverse within 60 min of washout of the steroid. These data indicated that glucocorticoids have a fast facilitatory effect on GABA release onto magnocellular neurons.
|
3 min) on both mEPSCs and mIPSCs suggested a nongenomic mechanism of steroid action. We conducted, therefore, a series of experiments to determine whether the glucocorticoid effects on glutamate and GABA release were mediated by activation of the classical intracellular corticosteroid receptors (Fig. 3, A and B). Bath application of the membrane-impermeant conjugate DEX-BSA (10 µM) retained the steroid effects on glutamate and GABA release, decreasing the mEPSC frequency by 34% (from 1.9 ± 0.7 to 1.3 ± 0.5 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 4) and increasing the mIPSC frequency by 25% (from 1.3 ± 4 to 1.6 ± 0.5 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 5). DEX (1 µM) applied intracellularly by including it in the patch pipette had no effect on the frequency of mEPSCs (101.5 ± 6.5% of baseline, n = 5). Antagonists of the types I and II corticosteroid receptors did not block the DEX effect. Thus, in the presence of the type II receptor antagonist, mifepristone (RU486, 10 µM), DEX (1 µM) caused a 47% decrease in the frequency of mEPSCs (from 1.8 ± 0.2 to 1.0 ± 0.4 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 7) and a 29% increase in mIPSCs (from 1.7 ± 0.5 to 2.1 ± 0.6 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 5). In the presence of the type I receptor antagonist, spironolactone (10 µM), DEX (1 µM) caused a 24.2% decrease in the frequency of mEPSCs (from 1.2 ± 0.4 to 0.8 ± 0.2 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 7). The effect of spironolactone on mIPSCs was not tested. These data indicated, therefore, that the glucocorticoid actions to suppress glutamate release and facilitate GABA release were not mediated by activation of the classical intracellular corticosteroid receptors and suggested mechanisms involving a membrane-associated receptor.
|
).
We found previously that the rapid glucocorticoid effects on glutamate release onto PVN parvocellular neurons are mediated by a postsynaptic G protein-dependent signaling mechanism (6), so we tested for a similar glucocorticoid signaling mechanism in magnocellular neurons. Intracellular application in magnocellular neurons of the G protein antagonist, GDP-ß-S (0.5 mM), via the patch pipette blocked completely both the DEX-induced decrease in mEPSC frequency (96.5 ± 6.8% of baseline; P = 0.16; n = 5) and increase in mIPSC frequency (99.0 ± 10.3% of baseline; P = 0.38; n = 5) (Fig. 4). Because the GDP-ß-S effect was restricted to the postsynaptic cell, this indicated that the glucocorticoid effect was G protein dependent and that its site of action was postsynaptic on the magnocellular neuronal membrane. This suggested, therefore, that the glucocorticoid effects on both glutamate and GABA release are mediated by the actions of one or more retrograde messengers.
|
).
|
, A, B, and F). The high-affinity synthetic cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55,212–2, and the endocannabinoids, AEA and 2-AG, mimicked the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on glutamate release. Thus, WIN 55,212–2 (1 µM) reduced the mEPSC frequency by 35.8 ± 3.2% (P < 0.01; n = 8) without affecting either mEPSC amplitude (99.4 ± 3.5%) or decay time (107.1 ± 4.5%) (Fig. 5, C–F); AEA (1 µM) reduced the mEPSC frequency by 37.5 ± 4.8% (P < 0.01; n = 4) without affecting either mEPSC amplitude (102.2 ± 4.8%) or decay time (95.2 ± 7.6%), and 2-AG (1 µM) reduced mEPSC frequency by 39.6 ± 3.8% (P < 0.01; n = 6) without affecting either mEPSC amplitude (99.7 ± 10.5%) or decay time (104.5 ± 6.1%) (Fig. 6F). Therefore, the rapid decrease in mEPSC frequency caused by glucocorticoids was blocked by a selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist and mimicked by three different CB1 receptor agonists. This suggests that the glucocorticoid-induced increase in endocannabinoid levels observed in our LC-MS-MS analysis is responsible for the glucocorticoid effect on glutamate release and, therefore, that the retrograde messenger(s) that mediates this effect is an endocannabinoid. The mechanism of rapid glucocorticoid suppression of glutamate release in magnocellular neurons is similar, therefore, to that reported previously in parvocellular neurons (6).
|
, A, B, and F). However, the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212–2 (1 µM, n = 7), had no consistent effect on mIPSC frequency (+4.3 ± 10.1%), and the endocannabinoids 2-AG and AEA had the opposite effect on mIPSC frequency when compared with DEX. Thus, 2-AG caused a dose-dependent reduction in mIPSC frequency of 10–23% at the doses tested (0.5 µM: from 1.1 ± 0.2 to 1.0 ± 0.1 Hz, P < 0.05, n = 6; 1 µM: from 2.5 ± 0.5 to 2.1 ± 0.5 Hz, P < 0.05, n = 9; 2 µM: from 1.8 ± 0.6 to 1.4 ± 0.6 Hz, P < 0.05, n = 3) (Fig. 7, C–E); AEA also caused a dose-dependent reduction in mIPSC frequency of 14–23% (0.1 µM: from 1.6 ± 0.5 to 1.6 ± 0.5 Hz, P = 0.25, n = 3; 0.5 µM: from 1.3 ± 0.2 to 1.1 ± 0.2 Hz, P < 0.05, n = 5; 1 µM: from 1.7 ± 0.6 to 1.3 ± 0.5 Hz, P < 0.05, n = 4) (Fig. 7E). We also tested for a possible combined presynaptic effect of glucocorticoids and endocannabinoids on GABA release by applying DEX (1 µM) and 2-AG (1 µM) together in the perfusion bath while blocking the postsynaptic glucocorticoid-induced release of endogenous cannabinoids with intracellular infusion of GDP-ß-S (0.5 mM) via the patch pipette. The 2-AG effect on GABA release in the presence of DEX was similar to the 2-AG effect alone, causing a decrease in mIPSC frequency of 19.8 ± 3.9% (from 1.6 ± 0.6 to 1.3 ± 0.5 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 4).
|
). Therefore, the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release was not mediated by endocannabinoid actions at presynaptic vanilloid receptors.
We also determined whether the facilitatory effect of glucocorticoids on GABA release onto magnocellular neurons was caused by the suppressive effect of glucocorticoid-induced endocannabinoids on glutamate release from upstream axo-axonic glutamate synapses rather than by a direct facilitatory effect of a retrograde messenger at presynaptic GABA axon terminals. We did this by testing for a role of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors in the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release. Blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors with DNQX (20 µM) and AP-5 (50 µM) did not prevent the DEX-induced enhancement of GABA release onto magnocellular neurons. Thus, mIPSC frequency was increased by 20.1% (from 0.8 ± 0.1 to 1.0 ± 0.1 Hz; P < 0.05; n = 4) in the presence of DNQX and AP-5 (Fig. 7G). Similarly, blockade of both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors did not block the glucocorticoid effect on GABA release. DEX caused a 23.4% increase in the frequency of mIPSCs (from 0.7 ± 0.2 to 0.9 ± 0.3 Hz; P < 0.01; n = 5) in the presence of DNQX (20 µM), AP-5 (50 µM), and the mGluR antagonist LY341495 (100 µM) (Fig. 7G). Therefore, the glucocorticoid-mediated increase in mIPSC frequency was blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 but was not mimicked by CB1 receptor agonists or blocked by either a vanilloid receptor or a battery of pre- and postsynaptic glutamate receptor antagonists, suggesting that the glucocorticoid-induced retrograde messenger facilitates GABA release by acting at an AM251-sensitive, noncannabinoid receptor on presynaptic GABA axon terminals.
Both oxytocin and vasopressin neurons respond to glucocorticoids
In several of the magnocellular neurons in which the glucocorticoid suppression of mEPSCs was recorded, the expression of oxytocin and vasopressin mRNA was tested after experiments using single-cell RT-PCR. Of 30 magnocellular neurons showing glucocorticoid-mediated inhibition of glutamate release and tested for the expression of both oxytocin and vasopressin, 11 expressed oxytocin mRNA and 10 expressed vasopressin mRNA (Fig. 8); five of these cells coexpressed both oxytocin and vasopressin mRNA. The effect of DEX on mEPSC frequency did not differ between oxytocin- and vasopressin-expressing neurons. The mEPSC frequency decreased by 33.9 ± 3.5% in the neurons that expressed exclusively oxytocin mRNA (n = 6) and 30.9 ± 4.0% in the neurons that expressed exclusively vasopressin mRNA (n = 5). These findings indicate that the glucocorticoid-induced suppression of glutamate synaptic inputs occurs in both oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic magnocellular neurons, which suggests a generalized rapid inhibitory feedback role of glucocorticoids in the regulation of magnocellular peptide hormone secretion.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
We showed that glucocorticoids facilitate GABA release in the SON and PVN, also by activating a postsynaptic membrane receptor on magnocellular neurons and stimulating the release of a retrograde messenger. Paradoxically, the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release was blocked by a selective CB1 receptor antagonist but was not mimicked by cannabinoid agonists. On the contrary, bath application of the endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG suppressed GABA release, causing, therefore, an effect opposite to that of glucocorticoids. The observation that endocannabinoids suppress GABA release onto hypothalamic magnocellular neurons is consistent with reports of endocannabinoid negative regulation of GABA release in diverse brain areas, including the hippocampus and cerebellum (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Endocannabinoids are endogenous ligands for the capsaicin-sensitive vanilloid receptors (26, 27), and the endocannabinoid activation of these receptors often leads to a facilitation of transmitter release (28). However, the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release in the SON was not blocked by blocking VR1 receptors, indicating that it was not mediated by retrograde endocannabinoid effects at presynaptic vanilloid receptors. Nor was the glucocorticoid effect on GABA release blocked by antagonists of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors, indicating that it was not due to endocannabinoid actions at intervening axo-axonic glutamate synapses. It appears, therefore, that the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release is mediated by a retrograde messenger that acts at presynaptic AM251-sensitive, non-CB1 receptors on GABA axon terminals.
It would appear unlikely, at first glance, that this retrograde messenger is an endogenous cannabinoid because neither AEA nor 2-AG applied exogenously caused an increase in mIPSC frequency and because the actions of retrograde endocannabinoids at most central GABA synapses studied to date have been uniformly reported as suppressing GABA release (17). Nevertheless, it is possible that the effect was mediated by a different endogenous cannabinoid released by glucocorticoids that acts at an as-yet-unknown, AM251-sensitive, CB receptor. Since the discoveries of AEA (29) and 2-AG (30, 31), several other lipid messengers with cannabinoid-like properties have been described, and many of these have been shown to have significantly lower affinity for CB1 receptors (32). Studies in CB1/2 receptor knockout mice have provided evidence for non CB1/2 receptors, or CB(x) receptors, in the hippocampus (33) and hypothalamus (34). However, in contrast to our observations here, the putative CB(x) receptors in the hippocampus are found on presynaptic glutamate, and not GABA, terminals and their activation is not blocked by AM251, and the CB(x) receptors in the hypothalamus are activated by AEA (34).
Another possible explanation for our findings is that the endocannabinoid released from magnocellular neurons by glucocorticoids, rather than acting at presynaptic GABA terminals directly, activates CB1 receptors on upstream axo-axonic GABA synapses onto presynaptic GABA terminals, reducing GABA release and effectively disinhibiting the GABA release onto the magnocellular neurons. Still another possibility is that endocannabinoids interact with other neurotransmitters to modulate GABA release because there is a large body of evidence for endocannabinoid interactions with several other neurotransmitter systems (35, 36, 37). Finally, the glucocorticoid effect on GABA release may be mediated by another, noncannabinoid retrograde messenger. A possible candidate messenger is nitric oxide, which acts as a retrograde messenger and has been shown to cause an increase in GABA release onto magnocellular neurons in the PVN (38, 39). Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanism responsible for the glucocorticoid facilitation of GABA release observed in this study.
By decreasing glutamate release and increasing GABA release onto magnocellular neurons, glucocorticoids would be expected to cause a marked reduction in the excitability of these cells in vivo. Stress and stress levels of corticosteroids have been shown to inhibit vasopressin release (40) as well as oxytocin release and the milk ejection reflex in lactating animals and delay parturition in parturient animals (41, 42). Exogenous cannabinoids have also been shown to inhibit vasopressin and oxytocin release. For example, marijuana and 
9-tetrahydrocannabinol cause increased diuresis in humans and rats, which is thought to be mediated by central inhibitory cannabinoid actions on vasopressin release (18, 43, 44). In lactating rats, 9-tetrahydrocannabinol blocks suckling-induced milk ejection mediated by the secretion of oxytocin (45). The glucocorticoid-induced endocannabinoid synthesis and release described here may underlie and link these inhibitory effects of glucocorticoids and cannabinoids on neurohypophysial hormone secretion.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online June 30, 2005
Abbreviations: aCSF, Artificial cerebral spinal fluid; AEA, anandamide; 2-AG, 2-arachidonoylglycerol; AP-5, D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid; CB1, type I cannabinoid receptor; DEX, dexamethasone; DNQX, 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; GABA, -aminobutyric acid; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IR-DIC, infrared illumination and differential interference contrast optics; LC-MS-MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; mEPSC, miniature excitatory postsynaptic current; mGluR, metabotropic glutamate receptor; mIPSC, miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; RT, reverse transcription; SON, supraoptic nucleus; TTX, tetrodotoxin.
Received May 20, 2005.
Accepted for publication June 24, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
9-tetrahydrocannabinol, hydrocortisone and aspirin in various rat paw edema models. Life Sci. 15:251–260
9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Endocrinology 123:469–472This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. Butler and M. Korbonits Cannabinoids for clinicians: the rise and fall of the cannabinoid antagonists Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 161(5): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Prager and L. R. Johnson Stress at the Synapse: Signal Transduction Mechanisms of Adrenal Steroids at Neuronal Membranes Sci. Signal., September 1, 2009; 2(86): re5 - re5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Campolongo, B. Roozendaal, V. Trezza, D. Hauer, G. Schelling, J. L. McGaugh, and V. Cuomo From the Cover: Endocannabinoids in the rat basolateral amygdala enhance memory consolidation and enable glucocorticoid modulation of memory PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4888 - 4893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Di, M. M. Maxson, A. Franco, and J. G. Tasker Glucocorticoids Regulate Glutamate and GABA Synapse-Specific Retrograde Transmission via Divergent Nongenomic Signaling Pathways J. Neurosci., January 14, 2009; 29(2): 393 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Kano, T. Ohno-Shosaku, Y. Hashimotodani, M. Uchigashima, and M. Watanabe Endocannabinoid-Mediated Control of Synaptic Transmission Physiol Rev, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 309 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Rossi, V. De Chiara, A. Musella, H. Kusayanagi, G. Mataluni, G. Bernardi, A. Usiello, and D. Centonze Chronic Psychoemotional Stress Impairs Cannabinoid-Receptor-Mediated Control of GABA Transmission in the Striatum J. Neurosci., July 16, 2008; 28(29): 7284 - 7292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. R. de Kloet and R. A. Sarabdjitsingh Everything Has Rhythm: Focus on Glucocorticoid Pulsatility Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3241 - 3243. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Christ-Crain, B. Kola, F. Lolli, C. Fekete, D. Seboek, G. Wittmann, D. Feltrin, S. C. Igreja, S. Ajodha, J. Harvey-White, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates glucocorticoid-induced metabolic changes: a novel mechanism in Cushing's syndrome FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1672 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Yang, L. H. Li, S. Y. Shin, S. Lee, S. Y. Lee, S. K. Han, and P. D. Ryu Adrenalectomy Potentiates Noradrenergic Suppression of GABAergic Transmission in Parvocellular Neurosecretory Neurons of Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Rossi, V. Gasperi, R. Paro, D. Barsacchi, S. Cecconi, and M. Maccarrone Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Activates Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase by Protein Kinase A and Aromatase-Dependent Pathways in Mouse Primary Sertoli Cells Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1431 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Denver Endocannabinoids Link Rapid, Membrane-Mediated Corticosteroid Actions to Behavior Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 490 - 492. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Tasker, S. Di, and R. Malcher-Lopes Rapid Glucocorticoid Signaling via Membrane-Associated Receptors Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5549 - 5556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Derbenev, M. J. Monroe, N. R. Glatzer, and B. N. Smith Vanilloid-mediated heterosynaptic facilitation of inhibitory synaptic input to neurons of the rat dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. J. Neurosci., September 20, 2006; 26(38): 9666 - 9672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 389 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G. Kozoriz, J. B. Kuzmiski, M. Hirasawa, and Q. J. Pittman Galanin Modulates Neuronal and Synaptic Properties in the Rat Supraoptic Nucleus in a Use and State Dependent Manner J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 154 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Malcher-Lopes, S. Di, V. S. Marcheselli, F.-J. Weng, C. T. Stuart, N. G. Bazan, and J. G. Tasker Opposing crosstalk between leptin and glucocorticoids rapidly modulates synaptic excitation via endocannabinoid release. J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6643 - 6650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Di, C. Boudaba, I. R. Popescu, F.-J. Weng, C. Harris, V. L. Marcheselli, N. G. Bazan, and J. G. Tasker Activity-dependent release and actions of endocannabinoids in the rat hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus J. Physiol., December 15, 2005; 569(3): 751 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |
