| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (W.P., Y.Y., C.M.C., A.J.K.), Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (F.N.), Uppsala University, Uppsala S-75124, Sweden; and Institute Cochin (P.O.C.), Department of Cellular Biology, Paris 75654, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Weihong Pan, M.D., Ph.D., Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808. E-mail: weihong.pan{at}pbrc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(5, 6), and other cytokines that are even larger than GH (7). The speculation that GH crosses the BBB comes from several lines of evidence. First, there are studies showing that exogenous GH used as a supplementary therapy can improve human cognitive function, mood, memory, and sleep (8, 9). Second, not only can GH affect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of various neuropeptides, amino acids, and monoamine metabolites (10, 11), but it also can be recovered from the CSF after peripheral administration (12). Third, GH receptors are present in the CNS (13). Recently, the distribution of mRNA for the GH receptor was mapped in rat brainstem and spinal cord (14). GH also can cause age-dependent up-regulation of its own receptor and change N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit gene transcripts in the hippocampus (15). Thus, it is possible that GH penetrates the BBB to exert its effects directly upon the brain. If so, a saturable transport system for GH would be more likely than the process of simple diffusion to be subject to regulation in pathophysiological states, thereby providing a target for therapeutic intervention.
The many CNS effects of GH provide a good reason to determine its mechanism of passage across the BBB. In addition to its effects on cognitive function, mood, memory, and sleep in humans (8, 9), GH also can exert neuroprotective actions in animal models of spinal cord injury (16, 17), and hypoxic ischemia (18). After spinal cord injury in the rat by thoracic dorsal horn incision, there is an age-dependent increase in trauma-induced permeability to GH (19). If the increased entry of GH to the injured spinal cord is beneficial for neuroregeneration, delivery of therapeutic doses of GH by way of its transport system could further facilitate locomotor recovery.
In addition, GH alters appetite and feeding behavior (20). It is not known whether these effects occur outside or within the BBB, and if inside, whether by direct action or indirect alteration of other neurotransmitters in response to GH. Thus, a better understanding of the interactions of GH with the BBB could assist in the design of strategies to control feeding.
Despite considerable indirect evidence suggesting that GH may cross the BBB, the possible penetration of GH into the CNS has not been established by pharmacokinetic quantification. In this study, we determined the pharmacokinetics of BBB permeation of radioactively labeled GH by use of multiple-time regression analysis (21) designed to assess the influx transfer of slowly penetrating substances across the BBB. We found that GH had significant entry from blood to brain while remaining intact, and that significantly more of the injected GH entered brain parenchyma than was associated with the cerebral vasculature. However, the entry of GH was not mediated by a saturable transport system. The effects of protamine and poly-L-lysine to increase the internalization of GH by RBE4 cells suggest that heparin sulfate proteoglycan is involved in the interactions between GH and the BBB. Thus, simple diffusion of GH across the BBB provides an explanation of the dose-dependent effect of peripheral GH on CNS function.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Multiple-time regression analyses
To determine whether rat GH enters the mouse brain and whether it does so by saturable transport, two groups of mice were studied: one with radioactively labeled compounds only and a similar group with inclusion of 1 µg/mouse of unlabeled GH. The injection solution of lactated Ringers with 1% BSA (LR/BSA) was prepared fresh each time. There were seven mice in each group. A mixture of 30,000 cpm/µl each of 125I-GH and 131I-albumin in 100 µl of injectate was delivered to the left jugular vein at time 0. At various times between 1 and 30 min, blood was collected from a cut in the right common carotid artery and the mouse was decapitated immediately afterwards. The radioactivity in the whole brain and 50 µl of serum was measured, and the brain/serum ratio of 125I-GH and 131I-albumin in each gram of brain was calculated separately. Based on the exponential decay pattern of serum radioactivity, the exposure time was calculated for each time point. The exposure time is the integral of serum radioactivity over time divided by the serum radioactivity at a given time (21). The linear regression correlation between the brain/serum ratio and exposure time was determined by use of GraphPad Statistical Software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The unidirectional influx transfer constant (Ki) was determined from the slope of the linear regression line, and the initial volume of distribution (Vi) was determined from the intercept. Differences of the regression lines between the two groups were compared by the least square method by use of the GraphPad program.
To determine the dose of excess unlabeled GH required for potential saturation, the experiment was repeated with higher doses of GH. To test the species specificity of BBB permeation, human and rat 125I-GH were used separately in the studies on mice, and rat 125I-GH was used in both young male CD1 mice and Wistar rats.
In addition to multiple-time regression analyses, single-time uptake of 125I-GH was determined at 10 min after iv injection in mice and the potential modulatory effect of excess GH and insulin was determined by one-way ANOVA (n = 6/group).
Degradation assays by HPLC, acid precipitation, and gel autoradiography
Each mouse received an iv injection of 34 µCi of 125I-GH in 100 µl of injection at time 0. At 20 min, arterial blood and brain were obtained and processed on ice. The brain was homogenized in 1 ml of LR/BSA in the presence of Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma). To assess the extent of ex vivo degradation, a processing control was generated by addition of 125I-GH into the blood-collection tube and brain homogenate. About 30,000 cpm of brain supernatant or serum was injected onto the reversed phase HPLC or precipitated by 15% of trichloroacetic acid. The mobile phase of HPLC was acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid that was increased from 10100% over 40 min.
For gel autoradiography, protein from the serum and brain homogenate was fractionated with 8% SDS-PAGE. There were five groups: serum and brain samples of the processing control and mice receiving 125I-GH iv, and the stock solution. The proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and exposed to x-ray film at 80 C.
In situ brain perfusion
The composition of the perfusion buffer and the conditions for perfusion have been described previously (22). In brief, a group of eight to 10 mice that received 125I-GH and 131I-albumin was studied in parallel with a group that received additional unlabeled GH at 20 µg/ml. After clamping of the abdominal aorta and severing of the jugular veins of the anesthetized mice, the oxygenated perfusate was delivered at 2 ml/min for various time intervals between 1 and 10 min. The perfusion buffer contained about 2000 cpm/µl of 125I-GH and 131I-albumin. Each mouse received a prewash of 2 min to clear the cerebral vasculature and 1 min of postwash to remove radioisotopes that had not entered the brain. At the end of the procedure at each time point, the mouse was decapitated, and the brain/perfusate ratio of radioactivity per gram of brain was measured. Statistical analysis was performed as above.
Capillary depletion
Four groups of mice (n = 4/group) were studied. The groups were mice receiving 125I-GH and 131I-albumin with or without cardiac perfusion to wash out residual radioactivity in the cerebral vasculature, and mice receiving additional excess GH at 10 µg/mouse with or without cardiac perfusion with 20 ml of LR. At the end of the study (10 min after iv injection), blood and brain were collected. The cerebral cortex was homogenized in capillary buffer (22) and mixed thoroughly with dextran to yield a final concentration of dextran of about 18.4%. The mixture was centrifuged at 9000 x g for 30 min at 4 C with a swing bucket rotor to achieve effective separation of brain parenchyma from the capillaries. After measurement in a
-counter, the ratios of tissue/serum radioactivity for 125I-GH and 131I-albumin were calculated and expressed per gram of cerebral cortex. Group means are presented with their SEs, statistically significant differences being determined by ANOVA followed by Tukeys post hoc test.
Cellular uptake assays
The control group with 125I-GH only was studied simultaneously (triplicated wells/group) with the following potential modulators: excess unlabeled GH (1 mg/ml), 500 mM monodansylcadeverine (an inhibitor of adsorptive endocytosis), 300 mM protamine, 300 mM poly-L-lysine (both being positively charged proteins that also inhibit adsorptive endocytosis), and hypertonic sucrose (1.2 M). Equal numbers of immortalized rat brain microvessel endothelial cells RBE4 (kind gift from NeuroTech, Paris, France) were seeded to six-well plates precoated with rat tail collagen. Radiotracer uptake assays were performed when the cells grew confluent. The cells were preequilibrated for 15 min in 1 ml of transport buffer that contained equal amounts of
MEM and F10, supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and 0.05% BSA. 125I-GH (700,000 cpm/ml) was added in 1 ml of transport buffer prewarmed to 37 C, and the plates were gently agitated for 20 min. At this time, internalization of 125I-GH was terminated by transferring the plates to ice, followed by rapid removal of the transport buffer and three washes with ice-cold PBS. Afterwards, specific cell surface binding was determined by incubation of the cells with ice-cold stop-strip buffer [0.2 N acetic acid in PBS (pH 2.5)] for 10 min and collection of this and subsequent washes with stop-strip buffer. The cells were then lysed and collected. The maximal potential internalization represents the amount of radioactivity from the acid-resistant binding combined with the amount internalized at the same time point. The percent of surface binding and maximal potential internalization were determined by normalization of the values of individual wells to the total amount of 125I-GH added at time 0.
Separate groups were studied at 0 C to inhibit endocytosis and compared with groups studied at 37 C. For the 0 C groups, the plates were kept on ice the entire time. Group means were expressed with their SEs, and statistically significant changes were determined by an overall ANOVA for each fraction, followed by Tukeys post hoc test.
In contrast to continuous uptake of 125I-GH for 20 min, the radiotracer pulse-chasing study was performed to determine the internalization at 20 min after binding equilibrium. The control group with 125I-GH only was studied simultaneously with the following five groups: 1 mg/ml of unlabeled GH, 300 mM of protamine, both protamine and unlabeled GH, 50 µg/ml of heparin, and 300 mM of poly-L-lysine. After equilibration of cells in ice-cold transport buffer for 15 min, the cells were incubated in ice-cold transport buffer containing 125I-GH with or without the above potential modulators (700,000 cpm/ml) at 4 C for 1 h. Afterwards the radioactively labeled tracer was removed by two washes with ice-cold PBS, and the plates were rapidly warmed up to 37 C in the presence of prewarmed transport buffer. At 20 min, surface binding and maximal potential internalization were determined as above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
A further study was performed with radioactively labeled rat GH injected iv into rats. The influx transfer constant to the whole brain was 0.32 ± 0.04 µl/g·min, and the initial volume of distribution was 19.27 ± 0.74 µl/g. Addition of 80 µg/rat of excess unlabeled GH did not cause a significant change in the influx rate [F (1, 19) = 0.6, P > 0.05] (Fig. 1C
). There was no significant regional difference in the influx transfer constant of 125I-GH among the dissected brain regions (frontal, parietal, occipital cortices, striatum, thalamus, hypothalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum). In each region, there was no significant effect of excess unlabeled GH that would have indicated saturable transport.
Degradation assays to determine that the radioactivity measured represented intact 125I-GH
After 20 min of iv circulation, HPLC showed that intact 125I-GH accounted for 91% of the total radioactivity in serum, similar to that in the serum of the processing control in which 125I-GH was mixed with blood in the test tube only. In serum samples, up to 90% in mouse 20 min after iv injection of 125I-GH and 95% of radioactivity in the processing control were acid precipitable. In the supernatant of brain homogenate, up to 81% in mouse 20 min after iv injection of 125I-GH and 94% in the processing control were also acid precipitable. Similarly, the radioactivity in the brain after 10 min of in situ brain perfusion mainly represented intact 125I-GH. The acid precipitable radioactivity was 90% in brain after 10 min of in situ perfusion of 125I-GH, and 89.4% in brain after perfusion of 125I-GH along with excess unlabeled GH. The results indicate that intact 125I-GH was present in the brain after iv delivery. This is further supported by the presence of a radioactive band at molecular mass of 22 kDa in gel autoradiography in all samples, correlating with intact 125I-GH.
In situ brain perfusion studies to determine the transfer of 125I-GH across the BBB
To eliminate the possibility that serum GH binding proteins interfered with detection of a saturable transport system, and to confirm that the radioactivity measured in the whole brain of mice after iv injection of 125I-GH had reached the brain compartment rather than remaining in the vasculature, in situ brain perfusion was performed with serum-free buffer. The control group received 125I-GH and 131I-albumin whereas the experimental group received 20 µg/ml of unlabeled GH in addition. The influx transfer constant of 125I-GH was 0.84 ± 0.08 µl/g·min without excess GH and 0.82 ± 0.10 µl/g·min in the presence of excess GH; there was no significant difference between the two groups (Fig. 2
). Therefore, the lack of saturation was not explained by the presence of serum binding proteins. This further supports the conclusion that the substantial entry of rat GH across the mouse BBB did not occur by a saturable transport system.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GH had a moderately high initial volume of distribution in the brain. The majority of the peripherally injected 125I-GH was retained in the cerebral vasculature 10 min after iv injection, although a significant amount (26.8%) entered brain parenchyma, whereas 10% was retained in the microvessel endothelial cells composing the BBB. Consistent with the capillary depletion studies, in situ brain perfusion showed that the perfusate-to-brain transfer of 125I-GH was about 35 times lower than that of nerve growth factor (22) and about 250 times lower than that of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (26). Similar to what we have seen for other proteins, the primary structure or the presence of receptors may not be the determining factor for BBB permeability. Regardless, a significant amount of GH can cross the BBB to exert CNS effects directly.
The permeation of GH, however, is a nonsaturable process, as shown both in vivo and in vitro. In studies with cultured cerebral microvessel endothelial cells (major components of the BBB), surface binding of 125I-GH did not seem to be mediated by specific GH receptors because excess unlabeled GH failed to inhibit the binding or internalization of 125I-GH. Although it is possible that glycosylated GH might be internalized by adsorptive endocytosis, modulators of adsorptive endocytosis (dansylcadeverine, protamine, and poly-L-lysine) failed to decrease the uptake of nonglycosylated GH in this study, thus ruling out the presence of adsorptive endocytosis (27) for this commonly used form of the hormone. The enhancing effect of protamine might be explained by its binding to GH, thereby increasing its positive charge so as to facilitate adsorptive endocytosis, as it does for albumin (28). However, adsorptive endocytosis is usually a specific process, but the uptake of 125I-GH was not saturable by coadministration of excess unlabeled GH. Nonetheless, naturally occurring GH may be glycosylated, which increases its chance of adsorptive endocytosis. Endogenous GH can exist in different forms due to posttranslational modifications, including deamidation, acylation, glycosylation, and oligomerization, thereby resulting in distinct kinetic patterns of clearance, receptor binding, and complexing with binding proteins (29). Although there do not seem to be major differences in biological activity among these forms (30), it is possible that different forms of GH penetrate the BBB in different ways.
The plasma concentration of GH has a distinctive circadian rhythm and ranges from 0250 ng/ml. Therefore, although the trace amount of I-GH would not increase the blood level of GH, the excess exogenous GH injected to test for saturation might affect the concentration of GH and the subsequent mediators of its function. This could be an issue for long-term effects in survival studies. Nonetheless, it should not affect the conclusions from the acute in vivo studies.
Based on the lack of inhibition by a large excess of GH in the in vivo and in vitro experiments, we conclude that it is unlikely the GH receptor or other carrier systems are involved in the blood-to-brain transfer of GH. This means that the permeation of GH probably occurs by the process of simple diffusion dependent on the physiochemical properties of GH. In pathological conditions in which the BBB is partially disrupted, such as CNS trauma, hypoxia/ischemia, tumor, and certain developmental or degenerative stages, more GH could reach its brain targets than by a process limited by saturation. The permeation of peripheral GH across the BBB does not override the importance of neuronal sources of GH, such as in the hypothalamic region of rats (31) and retina of embryonic chicks (32), which play important roles in neuromodulation.
It has been suggested that peripheral GH can be detected in the brain and CSF; however, there has not been direct demonstration whether and how the BBB is involved. Because the choroid plexus has a high level of expression of GH receptors, receptor-mediated transport is possible there. Despite the theoretical possibility that the blood-CSF barrier may possess a specific transport system, our pharmacokinetic study on mice and rats ruled out receptor-mediated transport for GH at the BBB. Results from cultured cerebral microvessel endothelial cells also ruled out high-capacity adsorptive endocytosis. Despite the lack of a specific transport system, GH was relatively stable in blood within the first 10 min after iv delivery and underwent limited simple diffusion across the BBB. The majority of GH entering the cerebral circulation was retained in the cerebral vasculature, but significant penetration to brain parenchyma did occur. These studies add definitive value to the long dispute whether and how GH crosses the BBB.
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online August 11, 2005
Abbreviations: BBB, Blood-brain barrier; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Ki, unidirectional influx rate; LR, lactated Ringers; Vi, initial volume of distribution.
Received May 16, 2005.
Accepted for publication July 22, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
across the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res Bull 23:433437[CrossRef][Medline]
, murine IL-1
and murine IL-1ß are transported from blood to brain in the mouse by a shared saturable mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259:988996
is transported across the endothelial blood-spinal cord barrier in mice. J Physiol 479:257264
is transported from blood to brain in the mouse. J Neuroimmunol 47:169176[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. McEwen Physiology and Neurobiology of Stress and Adaptation: Central Role of the Brain Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 873 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. LeBaron, T. J. Ahonen, M. T. Nevalainen, and H. Rui In Vivo Response-Based Identification of Direct Hormone Target Cell Populations Using High-Density Tissue Arrays Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 989 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-J. Yang, B. T. Nasipak, and D. B. Kelley Direct action of gonadotropin in brain integrates behavioral and reproductive functions PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2477 - 2482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fry, T. D. Hoyda, and A. V. Ferguson Making Sense of It: Roles of the Sensory Circumventricular Organs in Feeding and Regulation of Energy Homeostasis Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2007; 232(1): 14 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Sonntag, C. Bennett, R. Ingram, A. Donahue, J. Ingraham, H. Chen, T. Moore, J. K. Brunso-Bechtold, and D. Riddle Growth hormone and IGF-I modulate local cerebral glucose utilization and ATP levels in a model of adult-onset growth hormone deficiency Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2006; 291(3): E604 - E610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yu, A. J. Kastin, and W. Pan Reciprocal Interactions of Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Receptor-Mediated Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 2611 - 2615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |