help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2005-0341
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
146/8/3445    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fei, X.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fei, X.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Endocrinology Vol. 146, No. 8 3445-3451
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Methoxychlor Disrupts Uterine Hoxa10 Gene Expression

Xiaolan Fei, Hajin Chung and Hugh S. Taylor

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Hugh S. Taylor, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. E-mail: hugh.taylor{at}yale.edu.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Methoxychlor (MXC) is a pesticide that has adverse effects on reproductive capability in mice. MXC and its metabolites bind the estrogen receptor and function as endocrine disruptors. MXC diminishes the uterine decidual cell response, necessary for the support of pregnancy. Hoxa10 is an estrogen-regulated gene that is an essential mediator of the decidual response and necessary for pregnancy. Here we demonstrate that a mechanism by which MXC disrupts uterine function is by suppressing Hoxa10 expression. MXC treatment of mice produced a mild uterotropic response as measured by increased uterine weight and epithelial height. MXC treatment of uterine Ishikawa cells in vitro induced Hoxa10 expression. Estrogen receptor (ER) binding to the HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) was promoted by treatment with estradiol (E2); however, MXC disrupted E2/ER/ERE complex formation and gel shift. MXC alone allowed weak ER/ERE binding. In vivo MXC blocked the effect of E2 on Hoxa10 expression. Neonatal MXC treatment resulted in an immediate suppression and cellular restriction of Hoxa10 expression as well as a permanent generalized decrease in expression that persisted in the adult. MXC inhibited the expression of Hoxa10, a gene necessary for uterine development and function. One common mechanism by which endocrine disrupting chemicals produce lasting reproductive tract defects is through permanent alteration of developmental gene expression.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THERE ARE A LARGE number of chemicals used in pesticides, industrial agents, and household products that can mimic the action of hormones and in some instances interfere with endocrine function. Such agents are referred to as endocrine disruptors (1). Multiple hormones are targets of endocrine disruption; however, the best-characterized endocrine disruptors are those that bind estrogen receptors and exert estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects (2, 3). Reproductive tract development is profoundly influenced by estrogen; estrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals have been shown to induce histologic and morphological abnormalities in the murine female reproductive tract. At critical time points during development, hormones involved in differentiation permanently activate or repress the expression of specific genes (4, 5, 6). Exposure in utero or during the neonatal period to endocrine disruptors can interfere with the action of hormones essential to development of the reproductive tract, resulting in permanent alterations in gene expression and in subsequent organ function. Some of these alterations may be detected in the fetus or newborn, whereas others such as changes in the functioning of reproductive organs may only become apparent upon sexual maturation (7).

We previously demonstrated that a mechanism by which developmental anomalies occur in diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposed offspring is by altering the spatial pattern and level of Hox gene expression (8). Uterine development continues in the neonatal period, and exposure to DES in this window has been shown to result in altered uterine development and adverse reproductive effects in rodents. Hox genes impart developmental identity to multiple vertebrate embryonic axes including the central nervous system, vertebrae, limb, and the reproductive tract (9, 10, 11). Positional identity results from the particular combination of Hox genes expressed in a given location. The appropriate patterning of the developing Müllerian duct depends on the ordered expression of Hox genes (12, 13). We have previously shown that genes of the Hoxa cluster are differentially expressed in the developing Müllerian duct and lead to its differentiation into discreet adult structures (12). Hoxa9 is expressed in the anlage of the oviduct, Hoxa10 in the presumptive uterus, and Hoxa11 in the developing lower uterine segment and cervix. DES exposure in utero results in altered Hox gene expression and has been demonstrated to be a molecular mechanism by which uterine anomalies occur in exposed female offspring (8, 14, 15, 16, 17). A number of agents with estrogen-like activity induce organ-specific developmental changes in the female reproductive tract. It is unknown whether other endocrine disrupting agents also alter Hox gene expression, potentially making this a common mechanism by which these agents lead to reproductive tract anomalies.

One widely used endocrine disruptor is methoxychlor, an organochloride pesticide with estrogen activity (18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Methoxychlor (MXC) has been demonstrated to mimic estradiol (E2) action in the female rodent reproductive tract, causing a uterotropic response in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. MXC and E2 regulate the transcription of shared uterine proteins, including epidermal growth factor receptor (23), uterine peroxidase (19), and estrogen receptor (ER) (24, 25). As is described for many selective estrogen receptor modulators, MXC can also antagonize E2 action. For example, reproductive tract weight changes and induction of uterine albumin levels by E2 are blocked with coadministration of MXC (26). MXC has both ER agonist and antagonist properties in vivo. MXC is metabolized in vivo into mono- and bisphenol demethylated derivatives that demonstrate estrogenic activity in vivo. Hydroxylation also occurs in some cell types in vitro.

Prenatal or postnatal MXC exposure in mice impairs the female reproductive system; the ovaries are atrophic or cystic, whereas the uterus is hypertrophied and lacks the normal decidual response necessary for implantation (27, 28). Because Hox genes are necessary for decidualization, we examined the uterine response to MXC and its effect on Hoxa10 expression in adult female and newborn mice; we also examined the effect of in vitro treatment on HOXA10 expression in Ishikawa cells.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals
Methoxychlor was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Animals
CD-1 mice have previously been shown to be an accurate predictor of developmental effects of DES in humans (29). Nulliparous reproductive age female CD1 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories(Wilmington, MA). The mice were housed in a temperature-controlled room (22 C) with a 14-h light, 10-h dark cycle. Animals were housed in standard polypropylene mouse cages. Food (Purina Chow, Purina Mills., Richmond, IN) and water were provided ad libitum. All mice weighed 20–25 g. The Yale University Animal Use and Care Committee approved all animal experiments.

For the uterotrophic assay, on d 0 (1 week after arrival), bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) was performed via a single mid-dorsal incision. On d 14 (2 wk after bilateral ovariectomy), the mice were randomly divided into four groups. The groups received MXC (1 mg/d) dissolved in DMSO; E2 2 µg/kg·d; DES 40µg/kg·d; or vehicle only. All injections were intraperitoneal. For histological analysis, sections of the miduterus were fixed in formalin; 5-µm tissue sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Tissue sections were evaluated for epithelial cell height using a microscope (Olympus Corp., New Hyde Park, NY). Cell height was determined by obtaining three measurements from five areas from five mice.

For neonatal exposure CD-1 mice were treated with MXC (2 or 0.2 mg/kg·d) or vehicle control by ip injection from d 1 until d 14. Analysis was performed on 2-wk-old and 8-wk exposed female offspring.

Animals were killed by cervical dislocation under anesthesia using CO2 inhalation. Uteri were removed, blotted, and weight determined. The uteri were then fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin for histological and immunohistochemical analysis.

Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analysis of Hoxa10 expression was performed as previously described (30). Slides were deparaffinized and dehydrated through a serious of xylene and ethanol washes, followed by permeabilization in 95% cold ethanol. After a 5-min rinse in distilled water, slides were steamed in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer for 20 min and cooled for 20 min. Slides were rinsed for 5 min in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST), and sections were circumscribed with a hydrophobic pen. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min followed by a 5-min PBST wash. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 1.5% normal horse serum in PBST for 1 h at room temperature. The primary Hoxa10 antibody (sc-17159) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Slides were incubated in the primary antibody overnight at 4 C. Normal goat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a negative control. Horse {alpha}-goat biotinylated secondary antibody was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) and applied for 1 h at 4 C. Slides were washed in 1x PBST, incubated in ABC Elite (Vector) for 15 min at room temperature, washed in 1x PBST, and incubated for 5 min in diaminobenzidine (Vector). A 20-sec exposure to hematoxylin was used as a counterstain. All slides were processed simultaneously. Slides were rehydrated through 3-min ethanol and xylene washes and mounted with Permount. Each group consisted of at least four mice.

Fluorescence microscopy
Uteri were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min and washed again. For Hoxa10 staining, sections were incubated with primary antibody dilutions of 1:200 in PBS/1% BSA for 30 min. Samples were then washed three times with PBS followed by staining with the secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-linked antibody diluted in PBS/1% BSA. After three final washes with PBS, cells were analyzed by using a microscope (Zeiss, New York, NY).

Cell culture
Ishikawa cells are a well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line that has previously been used to model human endometrial epithelial cells. Ishikawa cells express ERs, progesterone receptors, and other markers of endometrial function (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). HOX gene expression has been previously well characterized in these cells (37, 38, 39).

Ishikawa cells were maintained in 25-cm2 flasks using DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum. Cells were maintained at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere (5% C02 in air) and allowed to reach confluency. Ishikawa cells were passaged by standard methods of trypsinization and plated in 96-well culture dishes until they reached 80% confluence. The cells were then treated with serum-free, phenol red-free media for 24 h before MXC treatment. After a 24-h incubation to serum-free, phenol-red-free media, the media were removed from the confluent Ishikawa cells and the cells treated with DMEM containing MXC at concentrations ranging from 10–3 to 5 x 10–2 M for 24 h. Control cells were treated with an equivalent concentration of diluent (DMSO).

Western analysis
Ishikawa cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM NaSO4, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 2 min at 4 C and supernatant collected. The protein content was quantified by the Bradford method using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Sixty-microgram aliquots were loaded onto a 6% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel, size fractioned, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a transblot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories) at 100 V for 2 h at 4 C. The membrane was immersed in a 3% gelatin-Tris-buffered saline [TBST; 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 8.0)] blocking solution for 30 min at room temperature, washed for 10 min in TBST [20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 (pH 7.5)], and then incubated overnight at 4 C with a 1 µg/ml dilution of HOXA10 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The membrane was washed with TBST for 5 min at room temperature and incubated for 1 h with a 6 µg/ml dilution of goat antimouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membrane was then washed twice in TBS for 5 min at room temperature and immersed in a horseradish peroxidase color developer buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 30 min. Photographs were taken immediately after color development.

Real-time RT-PCR
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed using the LightCycler SYBR Green RT-PCR kit from Roche (Stockholm, Sweden). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed in 20 µl of reaction mixture containing l0 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and deoxythymidine triphosphate; 20 pmol oligo(dT); 40 U/µl ribonuclease inhibitor, l0 U/µl avian myeloblastosis virus-reverse transcriptase, and 10 x AMV-RT buffer for 30 min at 61 C. PCR for Hoxa10 was performed for 45 cycles of 95 C for 2 sec; 65 C for 5 sec; and 72 C for 18 sec. PCR for control ß-actin was performed for 45 cycles of 95 C for 2 sec; 61 C for 5 sec; and 72 C for 18 sec. The Hoxa10 intron-spanning primers were selected using the primer selection program Primer3 developed by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Cambridge, MA). The primers selected yield a 211-bp reaction product from mRNA, and a 1389-bp DNA reaction product from DNA, which allowed control for possible DNA contamination (sense: 5'-GCCCTTCCGAGAGCAGCAAAG-3', antisense: 5'-AGGTGGACGCTGCGGCTAATCTCTA-3').

The Roche LightCycler monitored the increasing fluorescence of PCR products during amplification. A quantitative standard curve was then created. Quantitation of samples were determined with the Roche LightCycler and adjusted to the quantitative expression of ß-actin from these same samples. Melting curve analysis was conducted to determine the specificity of the amplified products and to ensure the absence of primer-dimer formation. All products obtained yielded the predicted melting temperature. Three independent experiments were conducted at each concentration.

EMSA
EMSAs were performed as previously described (40, 41, 42). Complementary single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized and annealed to incorporate the ER binding site and flanking sequences located the 5' of the transcription site of the HOXA10 gene. Sequence of HOXA10 ERE oligonucleotide is as described previously (15). Cells treated with E2 (10–8 M) alone, MXC (25 or 50 µM), or both were used as a source of nuclear extracts. Nuclei were isolated and nuclear extracts prepared from Ishikawa cells growing at log phase by the method described by Dignam et al. (43). Binding reactions were performed on ice for 30 min using 2 µg Ishikawa cell nuclear extract and 80,000 cpm of labeled DNA in a final volume of 25 µl containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 10% glycerol. All samples were fractionated for 3 h at 200 V in a 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 1 x TBE at 4 C. The gel was dried under a vacuum at 80 C for 45 min and exposed overnight on X-OMAT film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) and subsequently developed.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Uterotrophic response to MXC
The uterotrophic response to ip administration of MXC (1 mg/kg), E2, DES, or vehicle control was assessed after 3 d. The wet uterine weight was evaluated in three OVX animals from each group. Figure 1AGo shows the uterine weight after administration of E2, DES, MXC, or control (OVX). Intraperitoneal injection of E2, DES, or MXC resulted in a rapid increase in uterine wet weight of approximately 1.25- (MXC) to 5 (DES)-fold, consistent with previous findings. Results from the treated animals were compared with control using Student’s t test. All treatments were significantly different from control. E2 or DES treatment resulted in a significantly greater increase in uterine weight than treatment with MXC.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Uterotrophic assay. A, Uterine wet weight was obtained after treatment of OVX mice with E2, DES, MXC, or control (Ctl) vehicle (OVX) for a period of 3 d. Each treatment group consisted of at least three mice. E2 and DES each induced a significant increase in uterine weight, compared with OVX vehicle-treated controls (*, P < 0.01). MXC treatment resulted in a smaller change in uterine weight (**, P < 0.05). Error bars, SE. B, Uterine epithelial height was measured on each of the above uteri after weighing. An average of five measurements was obtained from each horn. Presented are the mean values for each treatment group. Uterine epithelial height was affected by E2, DES, and to a lesser degree MXC. *, P < 0.01, compared with OVX control.

 
Similarly uterine endometrial epithelial height was measured histologically after administration of the same compounds. Each compound induces a change in epithelial height, compared with the OVX control mice uterine epithelium. E2 or DES each induced a greater increase in height than did MXC (Fig. 1BGo).

Effects of MXC on HOXA10 expression in vitro
To develop a cell model of adult uterine exposure, the effect of MXC on HOXA10 expression was evaluated in Ishikawa cells. Ishikawa cells are a well-differentiated human uterine adenocarcinoma line in which HOX gene expression has been previously well characterized (37, 38, 39). mRNA and protein expression was determined by real-time RT-PCR and Western analysis, respectively, after treatment with MXC, E2, or DES. Ishikawa cells were treated with either 10–8 M E2 or DES or with MXC at concentration ranging from 1 to 50 µM. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a diluent and served as the diluent control. HOXA10 mRNA expression was measured using both real-time RT-PCR normalized to actin expression and presented as fold induction, compared with diluent, or Northern analysis normalized to glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression.

HOXA10 mRNA levels, as measured by real-time RT-PCR after MXC treatment, are demonstrated in Fig. 2AGo. A dose-responsive increase in HOXA10 expression is noted with increasing concentrations of MXC. Ishikawa cell HOXA10 mRNA levels were increased 6- to 8-fold after treatment with 25 or 50 µM MXC. A small, but significant, increase was detected after treatment with 1 µM MXC.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. MXC induces HOXA10 expression in vitro. A, HOXA10 mRNA expression was increased in response to MXC in Ishikawa cells. Ishikawa cells were treated with either vehicle control or MXC at concentrations from 1 to 50 µM. RNA was extracted and subject to real-time RT-PCR analysis. Shown is fold HOXA10 mRNA induction as measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and normalized to actin expression. MXC results in minimal induction of HOXA10 expression at 1 µM concentration. A 6- to 8-fold increase was noted at higher concentrations. Results are the mean of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01, compared with control. #, P < 0.05, compared with control. **, P < 0.01, 1 µM, compared with 25 µM. B, To compare the effect of MXC administration to other estrogenic compounds, Ishikawa cells were treated with E2 (10–8 M), DES (10–8 M), or MXC (25 x 10–3 M). E2 induced maximal expression, compared with control vehicle-treated cells. DES and MXC each resulted in similar Hoxa10 expression. Results are representative of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05, compared with control.. C, MXC induced HOXA10 protein expression as demonstrated by Western analysis. Ishikawa cells were treated with MXC, vehicle control, or Hoxa10 expression vector pcDNA/HOXA10. BT-20 cells serve as a negative control (Neg). The vehicle control lane (Ctl) shows basal HOXA10 expression characteristic of this cell line, whereas the pcDNA/HOXA10 transfected cells (Pos) demonstrate relatively high levels of HOXA10 protein. MXC induces HOXA10 protein expression in a dose-responsive fashion.

 
Compared with the control diluent-treated cells, as previously described, E2 increased HOXA10 mRNA expression and DES minimally increased mRNA expression in this cell line (Fig. 2BGo). MXC at 25 x 10–3 M increased HOXA10 mRNA expression nearly to the level seen with 10–8 M DES treatment.

Induction of HOXA10 protein expression in response to MXC treatment was measured in Ishikawa cells using Western analysis as demonstrated in Fig. 2CGo. Positive control cells were treated with a vector that constitutively expressed HOXA10, as previously described (40, 44). The negative control consisted of BT20 cells known not to express HOXA10 (40). Treatment with diluent control resulted in low but detectable HOXA10 protein expression. One to 50 µM MXC treatment results in a dose-responsive increase in HOXA10 protein expression. The dose-responsive increase was verified by densitometry.

Effects of neonatal MXC exposure on Hoxa10 expression
Neonatal exposure occurred from d 1 to 14 post partum with examination of the 2-wk-old exposed offspring. Seven mice were treated with MXC and three with vehicle control (DMSO). The 2-wk-old exposed female mice were killed and the uteri examined for gross and histologic anomalies. Immunohistochemistry was performed for Hoxa10 expression. No gross or histologic changes were seen in the MXC-treated uteri, compared with control. To identify both spatial and quantitative alterations in Hoxa10 expression, immunohistochemistry was performed on the exposed uteri. Hoxa10 spatial boundaries of expression were identical in the control and MXC-treated mice. Figure 3Go demonstrates the expression of Hoxa10 in the uterus of control and MXC-treated mice. Neonatal exposure results in decreased expression of this gene. Whereas a small number of cells still demonstrated a signal representing Hoxa10 expression, most cells did not express Hoxa10 at levels above background.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Effect of neonatal MXC exposure on Hoxa10 expression in vivo. Newborn female mice were treated from postpartum d 1 until d 14 with MXC or vehicle control (DMSO). Hoxa10 expression was determined in the uteri immediately after treatment. Immunofluorescence was used to semiquantitatively assess level of expression as well as spatial localization. Representative photomicrographs are shown. A dramatic decrease in the number of cells expressing Hoxa10 was noted in the treatment group, compared with untreated control or vehicle (DMSO)-treated mice. Representative results are displayed. MXC exposure is longer to illustrate the few cells expressing Hoxa10 at low level. The MXC group consisted of seven mice, whereas three mice were treated with DMSO alone and an additional three received no treatment (CTL).

 
Effects of neonatal MXC on subsequent adult Hoxa10 expression
To evaluate the effect of neonatal MXC exposure on adult Hoxa10 expression, mice were treated with MXC or vehicle control as described above. Four mice were treated in each group. Animals were killed 8 wk after termination of exposure. Figure 4Go demonstrates Hoxa10 protein expression. Whereas uteri from vehicle control-treated animals express abundant Hoxa10, MXC-treated animals demonstrate significantly reduced expression. Neonatal MXC treatment produces lasting changes in Hoxa10 expression.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Neonatal MXC exposure decreases Hoxa10 expression in the adult. To determine the effect of neonatal exposure on adult Hoxa10 expression, mice as described above were treated with MXC in the neonatal period. Animals were killed 8 wk after termination of exposure and immunohistochemistry performed on uterine sections. HOXA10 was expressed in the nuclei of uterine stromal cells from vehicle-treated controls (top panel). Hoxa10 expression remained persistently decreased 8 wk after MXC exposure (bottom panel). Expression was no longer restricted to a limited number of cells; rather it was diffusely lower. Representative photomicrographs are shown from a total of four mice in each group. Center panel is the negative control with absent primary antibody.

 
Effects of MXC on ER binding to the HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE)
We have previously shown that ER{alpha} and ERß bind to the HOXA10 ERE and that the affinity of binding is not altered by DES (15). Here we investigated the effect of methoxychlor on ER binding to the HOXA10 ERE. EMSA was used to assess ER binding to the HOXA10 ERE in the absence and presence of methoxychlor. ER{alpha} and ERß from Ishikawa cell nuclear extract have previously been shown to bind and retard electrophoretic mobility of this element (15). Labeled HOXA10 ERE was used to bind Ishikawa cell nuclear extract, previously shown to contain both ER{alpha} and ERß (15). As demonstrated in Fig. 5Go, migration of the HOXA10 ERE through polyacrylamide was retarded by nuclear extract from Ishikawa cultured in the presence of 10–8 M E2. The addition of 25 µM MXC to the culture media with E2 results in a significantly decreased amount of shifted probe, compared with that shifted in the presence of E2 alone. MXC alone induces limited ER binding to the HOXA10 ERE; this degree of binding was greater than seen using nuclear extract from untreated cells (not shown). MXC disrupts E2-induced binding of ER; however; MXC alone will permit limited ER binding to the ERE in vitro.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. MXC disrupts ER{alpha} binding to the HOXA10 ERE. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Ishikawa cells. We previously demonstrated an electrophoretic mobility shift generated by either ER using Ishikawa cell nuclear extract and the HOXA10 ERE. Binding reactions were performed on ice for 30 min using 2 µg Ishikawa cell nuclear extract and 80,000 cpm of labeled DNA. The lane labeled FP contains labeled ERE-free probe only. The lanes labeled E2, M, or E2 + M contain labeled probe and nuclear extract from cells treated with E2, MXC (M), or both (E2 +M), respectively. A significant change in the shifted ER/ERE complex is detected using nuclear extract from cells treated with E2. Treatment with E2 and MXC together disrupts the formation of the ER/ERE complex. MXC treatment alone results in weak ER/ERE complex formation. Binding of the HOXA10 ERE by ER is disrupted by MXC.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
MXC is a widely used pesticide. It was developed as an alternative to dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane; however; it may also have the originally unanticipated property of interfering with the endocrine action of estradiol. Here we examined the effect of MXC on an estrogen-responsive gene necessary for uterine development and adult function. Targeted disruption of Hoxa10 or blocking maternal Hoxa10 with antisense results in a failure of uterine function, namely the ability to support embryo implantation (16, 17). Hoxa10 expression is regulated by estrogens in both humans and mice, and an ERE mediating this effect has recently been characterized (14, 15, 39). Exposure to the well-known nonsteroidal estrogen DES results in uterine anomalies, in part by disrupting the normal pattern of Hox gene expression (8). Here we hypothesized that MXC would also result in altered Hoxa10 expression and would disrupt ER binding to the Hoxa10 ERE.

In vitro MXC induced HOXA10 expression in Ishikawa cells. At high concentration MXC induced HOXA10 expression nearly as well as a low dose of DES but not to the level seen after E2 treatment. This finding was at first surprising, considering the in vivo findings of reduced Hoxa10 expression after MXC treatment. Furthermore, MXC is thought to derive estrogenic activity after conversion to its hydroxy and bis-hydroxy metabolites (18, 45, 46). However, commercial preparations of MXC are known to contain small amounts of these metabolites and may account for the estrogenic activity at high doses (47). We have also not excluded the possibility of Ishikawa cells metabolizing MXC, resulting in the active compounds.

In vivo, neonatal MXC exposure decreases Hoxa10 expression. The neonatal reproductive tract is undergoing significant morphogenesis and development for approximately 14 d after birth. Normally Hoxa10 is expressed in most uterine stromal cells; MXC exposure resulted in a dramatic and rapid restriction of HOXA10 expression to a small number of cells. Although there was no obvious morphological effect of this altered Hox gene expression, there is similarly no obvious histological difference between wild-type mice and mice lacking Hoxa10. Hoxa10 (–/–) mice are unable to support embryo implantation (17). Diminished Hoxa10 expression in mice treated with MXC may similarly affect subsequent reproductive function. One mechanism by which lasting effects on the reproductive tract occur after exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals is by permanently altering developmental gene expression.

The apparent contrast in the in vitro and in vivo effects is likely due in part to more efficient metabolism of MXC in the mouse than in vitro. As discussed above, hydroxy and bis-hydroxy metabolites of MXC are more potent endocrine disruptors. Additionally, in vitro (in the absence of E2) MXC functioned as a weak E2 agonist, whereas in the presence of E2, in vivo MXC functioned as an E2 antagonist. As demonstrated by the EMSA results, MXC allowed ER binding to the HOXA10 ERE in the absence of E2; however, MXC disrupted E2-induced ER binding. In vivo, in the presence of E2, MXC likely functions by preventing E2-driven ER binding and activation of transcription from the HOXA10 ERE. Additional effects of MXC may be mediated by non-ER-dependent mechanisms as previously reported (48).

The effect of neonatal exposure persists in the adult; subsequent Hox gene expression is diffusely diminished. The resulting reproductive competence of these animals was not tested here because other investigators have documented a deleterious effect on fertility (49). Exposure in early pregnancy produces a dose-dependent decline in the number of implantation sites (20). MXC exposure blocks the decidual cell response, inhibiting implantation and support of the early embryo (28). Similarly, Hoxa10 is necessary for decidualization; targeted disruption of Hoxa10 results in defective decidualization and lack of implantation (50). The diminished Hoxa10 expression seen here after MXC exposure may be the molecular mechanism for the defective decidual response and failed implantation seen with exposure to this agent.

In utero exposure to endocrine disruptors may produce biochemical and functional defects in offspring that are not as immediately apparent as structural anomalies. Many phenotypes may become relevant only at particular junctures, such as reproduction, or only when combined with other defects or environmental challenges. For example, the effects of DES exposure in humans were often subtle, delayed, dose dependent, and varied with timing of exposure. Only a subset develops cancer or experience adverse reproductive outcomes. MXC has a lasting effect on the expression of a gene required for reproductive tract development and function. The effect of MXC exposure in humans is not well characterized and, like the effects of DES exposure, may be subtle. Because MXC and DES have similar effects on developmental gene expression in exposed animals, the effect of human exposure to either of these two endocrine disruptors may be similar.


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants ES10610 and HD36887.

First Published Online May 12, 2005

Abbreviations: DES, Diethylstilbestrol; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; E2, estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; MXC, methoxychlor; OVX, ovariectomized; PBST, PBS with 0.1% Tween 20; TBST, Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20.

Received March 22, 2005.

Accepted for publication May 3, 2005.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Colborn T, vom Saal FS, Soto AM 1993 Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect 101:378–384[Medline]
  2. Colborn T, Smolen MJ, Rolland R 1998 Environmental neurotoxic effects: the search for new protocols in functional teratology. Toxicol Ind Health 14:9–23[Medline]
  3. National Research Council 1999 Hormonally active agents in the environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
  4. Lyn-Cook BD, Blann E, Payne PW, Bo J, Sheehan D, Medlock K 1995 Methylation profile and amplification of proto-oncogenes in rat pancreas induced with phytoestrogens. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 208:116–119[Abstract]
  5. Li S, Washburn KA, Moore R, Uno T, Teng C, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA, Negishi M 1997 Developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol elicits demethylation of estrogen-responsive lactoferrin gene in mouse uterus. Cancer Res 57:4356–4359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Holliday R 1987 The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science 238:163–170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Johnson LD, Driscoll SG, Hertig AT, Cole PT, Nickerson RJ 1979 Vaginal adenosis in stillborns and neonates exposed to diethylstilbestrol and steroidal estrogens and progestins. Obstet Gynecol Surv 34:845–846[Medline]
  8. Block K, Kardana A, Igarashi P, Taylor HS 2000 In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure alters Hox gene expression in the developing mullerian system. FASEB J 14:1101–1108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Du H, Taylor HS 2004 Molecular regulation of mullerian development by hox genes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1034:152–165[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Krumlauf R 1994 Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78:191–201[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R 1992 Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283–302[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Taylor HS, Vandenheuvel GB, Igarashi P 1997 A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system—late establishment and persistent adult expression of the hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod 57:1338–1345[Abstract]
  13. Warot X, Fromental-Ramain C, Fraulob V, Chambon P, Dolle P 1997 Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. Development 124:4781–4791[Abstract]
  14. Ma L, Benson GV, Lim H, Dev SK, Maas RL 1998 Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev Biol 238:224–238
  15. Akbas GE, Song J, Taylor HS 2004 A HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) is differentially regulated by 17ßestradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES). J Mol Biol 340:1013–1023[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Bagot CN, Troy PJ, Taylor HS 2000 Alteration of maternal Hoxa10 expression by in vivo gene transfection affects implantation. Gen Ther 7:1378–1384[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Satokata I, Benson G, Maas R 1995 Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10 deficient mice. Nature 374:460–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Bulger WH, Muccitelli RM, Kupfer D 1978 Studies on the in vivo and in vitro estrogenic activities of methoxychlor and its metabolites. Role of hepatic mono-oxygenase in methoxychlor activation. Biochem Pharmacol 27:2417–2423[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Cummings AM, Metcalf JL 1994 Mechanisms of the stimulation of rat uterine peroxidase activity by methoxychlor. Reprod Toxicol 8:477–486[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Cummings AM, Gray Jr LE 1989 Antifertility effect of methoxychlor in female rats: dose- and time-dependent blockade of pregnancy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 97:454–462[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Cummings AM 1997 Methoxychlor as a model for environmental estrogens. Crit Rev Toxicol 27:367–379[Medline]
  22. Gray LE, Ostby JS, Ferrell JM, Sigmon ER, Goldman JM 1988 Methoxychlor-induces estrogen-like alterations of behavior and the reproductive tract in the female rat and hamster: effects on sex behavior, running wheel activity, and uterine morphology. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 96:525–540[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Metcalf JL, Laws SC, Cummings AM 1996 Methoxychlor mimics the action of 17ß-estradiol on induction of uterine epidermal growth factor receptors in immature female rats. Reprod Toxicol 10:393–399[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Eroschenko VP, Rourke AW, Sims WF 1996 Estradiol or methoxychlor stimulates estrogen receptor (ER) expression in uteri. Reprod Toxicol 10:265–271[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Alworth LC, Howdeshell KL, Ruhlen RL, Day JK, Lubahn DB, Huang TH, Besch-Williford CL, von Saal FS 2002 Uterine responsiveness to estradiol and DNA methylation are altered by fetal exposure to diethylstilbestrol and methoxychlor in CD-1 mice: effects of low versus high doses. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 183:10–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Eroschenko VP, Johnson TJ, Rourke AW 2000 Estradiol and pesticide methoxychlor do not exhibit additivity or synergism in the reproductive tract of adult ovariectomized mice. J Toxicol Environ Health A 60:407–421[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Hall DL, Payne LA, Putnam JM, Huet-Hudson YM 1997 Effect of methoxychlor on implantation and embryo development in the mouse. Reprod Toxicol 11:703–708[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Cummings AM, Gray Jr LE 1987 Methoxychlor affects the decidual cell response of the uterus but not other progestational parameters in female rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90:330–336[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Newbold R 1995 Cellular and molecular effects of developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol: implications for other environmental estrogens. Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 7):83–87
  30. Sarno JL, Kliman HJ, Taylor HS 2005 HOXA10, Pbx2, and Meis1 protein expression in the human endometrium: formation of multimeric complexes on HOXA10 target genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:522–528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Holinka CF, Hata H, Kuramoto H, Gurpide E 1986 Effects of steroid hormones and antisteroids on alkaline phosphatase activity in human endometrial cancer cells (Ishikawa line). Cancer Res 46:2771–2774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lessey BA, Ilesanmi AO, Castelbaum AJU, Yuan L, Somkuti SG, Satyaswaroop PG, Schwalisz K 1996 Characterization of the functional progesterone receptor in an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line (Ishikawa): progesterone-induced expression of the a-1 integrin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 59:31–39[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Markiewicz L, Gurpide E 1997 Estrogenic and progestagenic activities of physiologic and synthetic androgens, as measured by in vitro bioassays. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 19:215–222[Medline]
  34. Tada A, Sasaki H, Nakamura J, Yoshihama M, Terashima Y 1993 Aromatase activity and the effect of estradiol and testosterone on DNA synthesis in endometrial carcinoma cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 44:661–666[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Littlefield BA, Gurpide E, Markiewicz L, McKinley B, Hochberg RB 1990 A simple and sensitive microtiter plate estrogen bioassay based on stimulation of alkaline phosphatase in Ishikawa cells: estrogenic action of {Delta}5 adrenal steroids. Endocrinology 127:2757–2762[Abstract]
  36. Holinka CF, Gurpide E 1992 Growth-promoting effects of progesterone in a human endometrial cancer cell line (Ishikawa-Var I). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 43:635–640[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Cermik D, Selam B, Taylor HS 2003 Regulation of HOXA10 expression by testosterone in vitro and in the endometrium of patients with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:238–243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, Arici A 1999 Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1129–1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P 1998 HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest 101:1379–1384[Medline]
  40. Troy PJ, Daftary GS, Bagot CN, Taylor HS 2003 Transcriptional repression of peri-implantation EMX2 expression in mammalian reproduction by HOXA10. Mol Cell Biol 23:1–13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Taylor HS 1998 A regulatory element of the empty spiracles homeobox gene is composed of three distinct conserved regions that bind regulatory proteins. Mol Reprod Dev 49:246–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Daftary GS, Troy PJ, Bagot CN, Young SL, Taylor HS 2002 Direct regulation of ß-3 integrin subunit gene expression by HOXA10 in endometrial cells. Mol Endocrinol 16:571–579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM, Roeder RG 1983 Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 11:1475–1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Chu MC, Selam B, Taylor HS 2004 HOXA10 regulates p53 expression and matrigel invasion in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther 3:568–572[Medline]
  45. Gaido KW, Maness SC, McDonnell DP, Dehal SS, Kupfer D, Safe S 2000 Interaction of methoxychlor and related compounds with estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß, and androgen receptor: structure-activity studies. Mol Pharmacol 58:852–858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Gaido KW, Leonard LS, Maness SC, Hall JM, McDonnell DP, Saville B, Safe S 1999 Differential interaction of the methoxychlor metabolite 2,2-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane with estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Endocrinology 140:5746–5753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Bulger WH, Muccitelli RM, Kupfer D 1978 Interactions of methoxychlor, methoxychlor base-soluble contaminant, and 2,2-bis(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane with rat uterine estrogen receptor. J Toxicol Environ Health 4:881–893[Medline]
  48. Ghosh D, Taylor JA, Green JA, Lubahn DB 1999 Methoxychlor stimulates estrogen-responsive messenger ribonucleic acids in mouse uterus through a non-estrogen receptor (non-ER) {alpha} and non-ER ß mechanism. Endocrinology 140:3526–3533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Gray Jr LE, Ferrell J, Ostbly J 1986 Methoxychlor-induced (M) alterations of reproductive development in rats. Toxicologist 6:295
  50. Lim H, Ma L, Ma WG, Maas RL, Dey SK 1999 Hoxa-10 regulates uterine stromal cell responsiveness to progesterone during implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol 13:1005–1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
J. Varayoud, J. G. Ramos, V. L. Bosquiazzo, M. Munoz-de-Toro, and E. H. Luque
Developmental Exposure to Bisphenol A Impairs the Uterine Response to Ovarian Steroids in the Adult
Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5848 - 5860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. E. Akbas, X. Fei, and H. S. Taylor
Regulation of HOXA10 expression by phytoestrogens
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2007; 292(2): E435 - E442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 FASEB J.Home page
C. C. Smith and H. S. Taylor
Xenoestrogen exposure imprints expression of genes (Hoxa10) required for normal uterine development
FASEB J, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. S. Daftary and H. S. Taylor
Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 331 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
D. Crews and J. A. McLachlan
Epigenetics, Evolution, Endocrine Disruption, Health, and Disease
Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s4 - s10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
146/8/3445    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fei, X.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fei, X.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals