| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Unité Mixte de Recherche 549 (P.Z., J.E., M.T.B.-P.), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paris 5, 75014 Paris, France; and IPSEN (H.H., J.T., J.Z.D., R.D., M.D.C.), Milford, Massachusetts 01757
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: J. Epelbaum, Unité Mixte de Recherche 549, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale-Paris 5, 2ter rue dAlésia, 75014 Paris, France. E-mail: jacques.epelbaum{at}broca.inserm.fr.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Membranes were prepared for radioligand binding studies by homogenization of CHO-K1 cells expressing the human recombinant GHS-R1a in 20 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl with a Brinkmann Polytron (Westbury, NY) (setting 6, 15 sec). The homogenates were washed twice by centrifugation (39,000 x g for 10 min), and the final pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% BSA. For assay, aliquots (0.4 ml) were incubated with 0.05 nM [125I]h-ghrelin (
2000 Ci/mmol), with and without 0.05 ml of unlabeled competing test peptide. After a 60-min incubation (4 C), the bound [125I]h-ghrelin was separated from the free by rapid filtration through GF/C filters (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD), which had been previously soaked in 0.5% polyethyleneimine/0.1% BSA. The filters were then washed three times with 5-ml aliquots of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl and 0.1% BSA, and the bound radioactivity trapped on the filters was counted by
-spectrometry (Wallac LKB, Gaithersburg, MD). Specific binding was defined as the total [125I]h-ghrelin bound minus that bound in the presence of 1000 nM unlabeled h-ghrelin (Bachem, Torrance, CA).
Intracellular calcium mobilization assay.
CHO-K1 cells, expressing the GHS-R1a, were harvested by incubating in a 0.3% EDTA/PBS solution (25 C) and washed twice by centrifugation. The washed cells were resuspended in Hanks buffered saline solution for loading of the fluorescent calcium indicator fura-2AM. Cell suspensions of approximately 106 cells/ml were incubated with 2 mM fura-2AM for 30 min at 25 C. Unloaded fura-2AM was removed by centrifugation twice in Hanks buffered saline solution, and the final suspensions were transferred to a spectrofluorometer (Hitachi F-2000) equipped with a magnetic stirring mechanism and a temperature-regulated cuvette holder. After equilibration to 37 C, the h-ghrelin analogs were added for measurement of intracellular calcium mobilization. The excitation and emission wavelengths were 340 and 510 nm, respectively.
In vivo experiments
Acute in vivo GH stimulation.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250 g) were anesthetized and fit with a jugular-right atrial cannula 18 h before the experiment. To determine basal hormone levels, blood samples were withdrawn into heparinized syringes at time 10 and 0 min. To demonstrate antagonist activity, immediately after the time 0 blood sample, the rats were injected with either BIM-28163 (1000 µg/kg) or vehicle via the indwelling cannula. Ten minutes later, a blood sample was withdrawn, and the rats were immediately injected with either h-ghrelin (10 µg/kg) or vehicle via the cannula. Subsequent blood samples were withdrawn 10, 20, and 40 min after injection of h-ghrelin or vehicle. Plasma was separated and stored until assay for GH.
Chronic in vivo treatments.
Four weeks before sampling experiments, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 100125 g (Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Larbresle, France) were housed individually in transparent plastic containers placed in a soundproof room with controlled temperature (2224 C) and illumination (12 h light, 12 h dark schedule with lights off at 1900 h). They had free access to food and water and were regularly handled and weighed to minimize stress effects. Guidelines of the National Institute of Health for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals were followed.
Subcutaneous treatment.
Six days before the experiment, an osmotic minipump (Alzet model 2002, flow rate 0.5 µl/h for 14 d) (Charles River) was connected to a polyethylene catheter and implanted sc in the back of the animals under ether anesthesia. The catheter had previously been filled with a combination of saline and BIM or saline. This resulted in delivery of saline during 144 h followed by BIM-28163 (6 µg/h) or saline during 10 h. On the day of the experiment (d 0), sc treatment started at 0900 h, and rats received ip injection of 300 µg/0.2 ml BIM-28163 or 0.2 ml NaCl at 1000 h.
Intracerebroventricular (icv) treatment.
Six days before the experiment, a chronic icv cannula (Alzet Brain Infusion Kit II; Charles River) was inserted into the lateral ventricle of the brain under pentobarbital anesthesia (60 mg/kg of body weight ip; Centravet, Plancoet, France). The following coordinates were used: anterior 0.8 mm to the bregma; lateral 1.5 mm to the midline; height 3.8 mm to the bregma, with the incisor bar set at 3.3 mm below the interaural line. The cannula was secured to the skull of the animal with stainless steel and dental cement and connected to an osmotic minipump (Alzet model 2002; flow rate, 0.5 µl/h for 14 d) (Charles River) implanted under the dorsal skin of the animal. The flow moderator of the pump was connected to the polyethylene catheter containing 72 µl saline, which was administered during the first 6 d in all animals. A small air bubble was inserted to separate the saline solution from an additional 24 µl BIM-28163 (5 µg/h) or saline to be delivered for an additional 48 h. Treatment started at 0800 h on d 0 until 0800 h on d 2.
Blood sampling schedule
Experiments were performed on freely moving rats. Two days before data collection, an indwelling cannula was inserted into the right atrium under ether anesthesia as previously described (18). Two hours before the sampling and recording period, the distal extremity of the cannula was connected to a polyethylene catheter filled with 25 IU/ml heparinized saline. Blood samples were withdrawn every 20 min and centrifuged immediately. Red blood cells were resuspended in saline and reinjected every hour to attenuate hemodynamic modifications. Plasma was stored at 20 C until assayed for GH.
Feeding behavior
Experiments on food and water intake were performed on a separate group of animals that underwent the same treatments. Food and water intake were measured continuously with a PC-controlled monitoring system (feeding/drinking monitor; Technical and Scientific Equipment, Bad Homburg, Germany). Animals were acclimated to this new environment for 1 wk before actual monitoring.
Hormonal determinations
Plasma GH concentrations were measured by enzyme immunoassay as previously described (19). Values are reported in terms of rGH-RP2, with sensitivity of 5 ng/ml and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation less than 7%.
Plasma insulin, total leptin, and IGF-I levels were determined with RIA kits following manufacturer instructions (Linco, Saint Charles, MO, and DSL, Webster, TX, respectively). The sensitivity was 0.2, 0.5, and 160 ng/ml, respectively. For all assays, the intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 10%.
Statistical analysis
GH pulse analysis was performed using the Cluster program (20) with the t value set to 2 to maintain false positive rates under 1%. Cluster size was set to two prepeak and two postpeak nadir values. False positive error for peak detection was 7%.
Areas under the GH response curves (AUC) were calculated by mean of trapezoidal analysis.
Values are given as means ± SEM, and statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA and paired t test using the JMP IN 5.1 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the calcium mobilization assay, h-ghrelin induced concentration-dependent calcium mobilization in cells stably transfected with the human GHS-R1a between the concentrations of 0.1 and 100 nM, with an EC50 of 5.4 ± 1.4 nM. In contrast, BIM-28163 had no effect on calcium mobilization, even when tested at concentrations as high as 106 M (data not shown). When added in combination, BIM-28168 attenuated the ability of h-ghrelin to induce calcium mobilization in a dose-dependent manner, with complete inhibition achieved with a ratio of 100:1 BIM-28163:h-ghrelin (Fig. 1
), indicating that BIM-28163 acts as a full, competitive antagonist of ghrelin at the GHS-R1a.
|
In vivo experiments
Acute in vivo GH stimulation.
Ghrelin-induced GH stimulation was maximal 10 min after injection (data not shown). As illustrated on Fig. 2
, injection of h-ghrelin (10 µg/kg) alone into freely moving, unanesthetized rats induced a significant increase in plasma GH, whereas injection of BIM-28163 (1000 µg/kg) was without effect. When BIM-28163 was injected 10 min before h-ghrelin, the h-ghrelin-induced increase in GH secretion was completely abolished.
|
|
|
The sc infusion of BIM-28163 changed neither plasma leptin nor insulin levels evaluated at 1200 and 1600 h. In contrast, icv BIM-28163 infusion slightly increased leptin and significantly increased insulin concentrations (Table 2
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, antagonism of the GHS-R1a in freely moving male rats does not impair the pulsatile pattern of GH secretion; however, it significantly lowers pulse amplitude. These results suggest that endogenous ghrelin acts to amplify the basic pulsatile pattern of GH established by the interplay of hypothalamic GHRH and somatostatin (21). Indeed, it has been established that concomitant administration of ghrelin and GHRH produces an increase in GH secretion significantly greater than that induced by either factor alone (22). The observation that antagonism of the GHS-R1a receptor with BIM-28163 lowers spontaneous GH pulse amplitude and total GH secretion without altering the basic pulsatile pattern agrees well with the observation of Chapman et al. (23) that treatment of elderly men with MK677, a nonpeptide ligand and agonist of the GHS-R1a, results in a significant increase in GH secretion without changing the underlying pulsatile pattern. Previously, repetitive injections of [D-Lys3]-GHRP6, a compound reported to be a GHS-R1a antagonist, did not significantly reduce plasma GH levels (24); however, a very low dose of [D-Lys3]-GHRP6 was used (750 ng, less than 1 nmol) considering the in vitro IC50 (3.2 x 106 M) of this particular analog (25) and its minimum effective dose on in vivo food intake (200 nM) (26). On the other hand, GH secretion was reduced in female (but not in male) transgenic rats expressing an antisense GHS-R mRNA under the control of the tyrosine hydroxylase promoter, thus selectively attenuating GHS-R protein expression in the arcuate nucleus (27). Moreover, in ghsr-null mice, serum IGF-I levels and body weight are reduced compared with wild-type littermates, suggesting decreased GH secretion (16). Taken together, these data suggest that endogenous ghrelin (or another, yet unidentified, ligand of GHS-R1a) acts as an amplifier of GH pulsatility. At the present time, a strict correlation has not been established between GH and ghrelin secretory episodes (11); however, only total ghrelin was monitored, and it cannot be excluded that a stronger correlation occurs between GH and acylated ghrelin, which represents only a minor proportion of total plasma ghrelin and has a very short half-life (28).
In the subchronic experimental paradigm used herein, total plasma IGF-I levels were not modified by BIM-28163 infusion. This lack of effect is in keeping with the data obtained on male transgenic rats expressing an antisense GHS-R mRNA in the arcuate nucleus (27) as well as another study in which chronic icv administration of ghrelin for 7 d did not affect IGF-I levels (29). Moreover, 95% of IGFs circulate bound to IGF binding proteins and have a half-life of 1215 h (30, 31); thus, it cannot be excluded that a longer treatment might affect IGF-I levels.
Interestingly, plasma leptin slightly and insulin concentrations were significantly elevated by icv BIM-28163 treatment but not by peripheral administration. The change in plasma leptin concentrations may represent triggering of counterregulatory mechanisms because leptin has been reported to suppress feeding, although the overt effect of ghrelin on feeding in the present study was minimal. Surprisingly, the effect on insulin secretion was observed only after icv administration of BIM-28163. Expression of the GHS-R1a has been described in the pancreas, yet direct interaction with BIM-28163 via peripheral administration produced no significant effect on insulin secretion. Results from both GHS-R (16) and ghrelin null (14) mice also suggest that ghrelin exerts only a minimal role in regulating insulin or leptin levels, because these parameters remain largely unchanged in both animal models. Indeed, the relationship between ghrelin and insulin secretion is far from clear because, depending on the dose, model, and species, ghrelin has been reported to both stimulate and suppress insulin secretion (32). The present results may suggest a central mechanism for stimulation of insulin secretion as well as provide evidence that this analog does not cross the blood-brain barrier; however, additional knowledge is clearly needed to fully interpret the present results on leptin and insulin secretion.
The fact that BIM-28163 treatment, either icv or sc, does not change feeding behavior is surprising because both GHS and exogenous ghrelin do stimulate food intake via GHS-R1a (16). Moreover, suppression of feeding has been reported in mice after icv injections, using two other antagonists: [D-Lys3]-GHRP6, an analog of one of the synthetic GHSs or [D-Arg,D-Phe,D-Trp,Leu]-substance P, an analog of substance P (26). Results with these compounds may be difficult to interpret because the first also binds to four of the melanocortin receptors (33) and the second antagonizes many peptide receptors (34, 35). A recent report indicated that the GHS-R1a displays a high constitutive activity and that [D-Arg,D-Phe,D-Trp,Leu]-substance P is a full inverse agonist, rather than a true antagonist (36). One might therefore hypothesize that the GHS-R1a involved in GH regulation and in food intake may have different levels of constitutive activity and, subsequently, different responses to inverse agonists and antagonists. Alternatively, it cannot be excluded that another, as yet unknown, ghrelin receptor may exist. Structural variants of GHS-R have been found in the human, swine, chicken, and fish genome (37, 38, 39). A truncated version of the GHS receptor, derived from alternative gene splicing, GHS-R1b, and not yet observed in the rat, cannot be the novel ghrelin receptor because it binds neither ghrelin nor any of the various GHS molecules. However, GHS-R1b, or another receptor, may interact with GHS-R1a, perhaps through receptor heterodimerization as shown in fish (39), thereby playing a counterregulatory role in controlling either GH secretion or food intake.
Another potential explanation of the discrepant results using GHS-R1a antagonists may rely on the central or peripheral location of the ghrelin systems involved. Central ghrelin probably stimulates food intake and GH secretion through neural mechanisms involving neuronal circuitry (40). An important site for GHS-R1a mediation of GH secretion is the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (41), where GHS-R mRNA is expressed on both GHRH and neuropeptide Y-expressing neurons (21). However, peripheral ghrelin can also modulate food intake and GH secretion via vagal afferent fibers (42). Blockade of the vagal afferent, either through vagotomy or through perivagal capsaicin application, totally blocks peripheral ghrelin effects on feeding, whereas it only attenuates the stimulation of GH secretion.
In summary, this study shows that pharmacological dissociation of the effects of endogenous ghrelin on GH secretion and feeding is possible. It will remain to be determined whether other effects of this interesting peptide, such as those on adiposity or cardiac function, can also be separately affected. At any rate, the present data support the feasibility of creating ghrelin analogs with selective actions on either GH or feeding behavior.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; GHS, GH secretagogue; GHS-R, GHS receptor; icv, intracerebroventricular.
Received February 18, 2005.
Accepted for publication May 20, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Nass, L. S. Farhy, J. Liu, C. E. Prudom, M. L. Johnson, P. Veldhuis, S. S. Pezzoli, M. C. Oliveri, B. D. Gaylinn, H. M. Geysen, et al. Evidence for Acyl-Ghrelin Modulation of Growth Hormone Release in the Fed State J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1988 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and C. Y. Bowers Estimation of the size and shape of GH secretory bursts in healthy women using a physiological estradiol clamp and variable-waveform deconvolution model Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1013 - R1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zizzari, R. Longchamps, J. Epelbaum, and M. T. Bluet-Pajot Obestatin Partially Affects Ghrelin Stimulation of Food Intake and Growth Hormone Secretion in Rodents Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1648 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Farhy, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Model-projected mechanistic bases for sex differences in growth hormone regulation in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1577 - R1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, A. Iranmanesh, K. Mielke, J. M. Miles, and C. Y. Bowers Estradiol Potentiates Ghrelin-Stimulated Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3559 - 3565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Iranmanesh, K. Mielke, J. M. Miles, P. C. Carpenter, and C. Y. Bowers Ghrelin Potentiates Growth Hormone Secretion Driven by Putative Somatostatin Withdrawal and Resists Inhibition by Human Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2441 - 2446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, and C. Y. Bowers Somatotropic and Gonadotropic Axes Linkages in Infancy, Childhood, and the Puberty-Adult Transition Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 101 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |