| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Teturou Satoh, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan. E-mail: tsato{at}showa.gunma-u.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as bait in yeast two-hybrid screen, we isolated partial cDNA identical with that of the C terminal of KIAA1769. KIAA1769 encodes a 2080-amino acid protein (molecular mass, 231 kDa) that was recently identified to interact with PPAR
and termed PPAR
-interacting cofactor 285 (here referred to as PPAR
-DBD-interacting protein 1 (PDIP1)-
). PDIP1 mRNA was expressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and THP-1 macrophages. We also identified the expression of the N terminal extended form of PDIP1
(referred to as PDIP1ß) consisting of 2649 amino acids (295 kDa) in human cultured cell lines by RT-PCR, and 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Ribonuclease protection assay revealed that PDIP1ß mRNA was expressed more abundantly than PDIP1
mRNA. The C-terminal region of PDIP1 directly binds DBD of PPAR
, and multiple LXXLL motifs in PDIP1 were not required for the interaction. PDIP1
and -ß similarly enhanced PPAR
-mediated transactivation in transfection assays and short interfering RNA targeting PDIP1 mRNA significantly reduced transactivation by PPAR
. No potent intrinsic activation domain was identified in either PDIP1 isoforms in mammalian one-hybrid assays, and mutation of all LXXLL motifs did not affect enhancement of PPAR
-mediated transactivation. PDIP1
and -ß similarly augmented transactivation by PPAR
, PPAR
, thyroid hormone receptor (TR)-
1, TRß1, and retinoid X receptor-
. PDIP1
also enhanced estrogen receptor
- and androgen receptor-mediated transactivation, whereas PDIP1ß did not. PDIP1
showed receptor-specific synergism with activation function-2-interacting coactivators in PPAR
- and TRß1-mediated transactivation. Together, PDIP1 might function as a transcriptional cofactor for a broad range of nuclear receptors, possibly in collaboration with specific activation function-2 interacting coactivators. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
belongs to the nuclear hormone receptor (NR) superfamily and is involved in a variety of biological processes such as insulin sensitization, adipogenesis, atherosclerosis, inflammation, and carcinogenesis (1, 2, 3). PPAR
binds to the PPAR response element (PPRE) as a heterodimer with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) and activates the transcription of target genes in a ligand-dependent manner (1, 2, 3). Recent cumulating evidence established that DNA-bound NRs cooperatively function with multiple cofactor proteins that capture NRs in a protein-protein interaction fashion (4, 5). Cofactors interacting in a ligand-dependent manner with the carboxyl-terminal activation function (AF)-2 of PPAR
include PPAR-binding protein (PBP)/thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein (TRAP) 220/vitamin D receptor-associated protein (DRIP) 205 (6, 7, 8), steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-1 (9), and cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP)/p300 (10). In addition to the AF2-interacting cofactors, the PPAR
-interacting coactivator (PGC)-1
that binds the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and part of the hinge region of PPAR
has been isolated (11) and its molecular and physiological functions intensively analyzed (12, 13, 14, 15). PGC-2 was also identified as an amino (N)-terminal AF1-interacting coactivator of PPAR
(16).
In addition to AF2 and AF1, the DBD of NRs has recently been shown to function as a direct interaction interface for other transcription factors (11, 17, 18, 19). Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we recently identified Tat-binding protein-1, a subunit of 26S proteasome, as a DBD-interacting coactivator specifically functioning with thyroid hormone receptor (TR) (18). Because the expression of PGC-1
, a key coactivator of PPAR
, is restricted in tissues such as adipose tissues, skeletal muscles, and liver (20), we speculated that additional tissue-specific cofactors binding to the DBD/hinge region of PPAR
might exist to exert the pleiotropic function of this NR on the body (1, 2, 3).
Using the DBD/hinge region of human PPAR
as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, we isolated a 2681-bp partial cDNA fragment apparently identical with that of a human expression sequence tag (EST), KIAA1769, whose gene product was recently identified to interact with PPAR
and is known as PPAR
-interacting cofactor (PRIC) 285 (21). In addition, we isolated an N-terminal extended isoform of PRIC285 generated by alternative splicing. We characterized the interaction domains between PRIC285 and PPAR
and examined whether functional differences between two PRIC isoforms exist in a variety of nuclear receptor-mediated transactivations.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, PPAR
, TR
1, TRß1, RXR
, estrogen receptor (ER)-
and androgen receptor (AR) were previously described (18). Firefly luciferase reporter plasmids, thyroid response element (TRE)-luciferase (Luc), PPRE/RXR-Luc, estrogen response element (ERE)-Luc and mouse mammary tumor virus-Luc were described previously. The full-length cDNA of KIAA1769 in pBluescript II SK+ was provided by Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Chiba, Japan) and subcloned into pSVSPORT1 (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). Expression vectors for SRC-1, CBP, and p300/CBP-associated factor (P/CAF) were described previously (18, 22). Partial cDNA fragments complementary to human CBP, TRAP220, fatty acid-binding protein (aP2) and scavenger receptor (CD36) were amplified by RT-PCR and subcloned into pGEM3Z or pGEMTeasy vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The nucleotide sequences of all PCR-amplified cDNA were verified by sequencing.
Yeast two-hybrid system
A yeast two-hybrid screen of a HeLa cell matchmaker cDNA library (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was performed as we described previously (18) using the DBD and part of the hinge region of hPPAR
1 [amino acids (aa) 108 to 197] as bait. Approximately 1 x 106 transformants were screened for interaction with PPAR
. The plasmids isolated from positive colonies were amplified on a large scale and the nucleotide sequences were determined using an autosequencer.
Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assay
[35S]methionine-labeled full-length and partial fragments of hPPAR
were synthesized in vitro using a TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). The PCR-amplified partial fragments of KIAA1769 cDNA (aa 460660, 14331674, 15661823, and 18242080) and PPAR
-DBD-interacting protein (PDIP)-1ß (aa 337579) were ligated in-frame into pGEX4T1 (Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Uppsala, Sweden). The GST fusion proteins were purified on glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and the interaction assays were performed as described previously (18).
Cell culture, transfection, and luciferase assay
CV-1, HeLa, HepG2, and 293 cells were grown as described previously (18). 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were cultured and differentiation to adipocytes was induced as described previously (23). THP-1 cells were grown and differentiation to macrophages was induced as previously described (24). Transient transfection was performed using a calcium phosphate precipitation method as described (18). The total amounts of transfected plasmids were adjusted by adding an empty expression vector in all experiments. Luciferase assays were performed and luciferase activity was normalized by the protein concentration as described previously (18). All transfection experiments were repeated at least twice with identical results. Troglitazone and fenofibrate were provided by Sankyo Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and Kaken Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Construction of mutant PDIP1 expression vector
A mutant PDIP1
vector in which all five LXXLL motifs were substituted to LXXAA (25) was constructed as follows. The cDNA fragments encompassing the first three or the last two LXXLL motifs were excised from pSVSPORT PDIP1
by EcoRI/BglII, or BamHI digestion and individually subcloned into pSG5 or pGEM3Z, respectively. Using QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and oligonucleotides containing point mutations, one of the LXXLL motifs in these fragments was first mutated and the mutant plasmid was amplified on a large scale. Using this mutant plasmid as template, mutation of another LXXLL motif was similarly introduced. By repeating this strategy, all LXXLL motifs were mutated and the wild-type cDNA fragments encompassing LXXLL motifs in pSVSPORT PDIP1
were finally substituted by the mutated fragments carrying LXXAA motifs. All mutations were confirmed by sequencing.
Mammalian one-hybrid assay
cDNAs corresponding to partial fragments of KIAA1769 (aa 1490, 1652, 11236, 11718, 491-1050, 10511565, 15662080, and 641-2080) and PDIP1ß (aa 1579 and 11238) were amplified by PCR and ligated in-frame into the EcoRI site of pMGAL4DBD (CLONTECH). These constructs were transfected with 3 x upstream activating sequence-thymidine kinase (UAS-TK) luciferase reporter (18) into 293 cells. The herpes simplex virus VP16 ligated to GAL4DBD (CLONTECH) was used as a positive control. Luciferase activities were measured as described above.
Northern blot analysis
[32P]-labeled antisense cRNA probes were synthesized from pGEM3ZKIAA1769, pGEM3ZPPAR
, pGEMTeasyCD36, pGEM3ZaP2, pGEMTCBP, and pGEMTTRAP220. Human multitissue blots (CLONTECH) were hybridized with the KIAA1769 antisense cRNA probe under conditions described previously (26). Total RNA was isolated from undifferentiated and differentiated 3T3-L1 and THP-1 cells using Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). Thirty micrograms of total RNA were electrophoresed and transferred to nylon membranes. Hybridization conditions were as described previously (26).
RT-PCR
RT-PCR was performed to amplify the N-terminal portion of two PDIP1 isoforms. Full-length PDIP1 cDNAs were also amplified by long RT-PCR and subcloned into pSVSPORT1. The PCR products were then subjected to sequencing using an autosequencer.
5'-rapid amplification of cDNA end (RACE)
5'-RACE was performed using Marathon-Ready HeLa cell cDNA (CLONTECH). Nested PCR amplification was carried out using two sets of adaptor primers (CLONTECH) and gene specific primers for PDIP1
or -ß cDNA. The PCR product was subcloned into pGEMTeasy vector (Promega) and multiple clones were subjected to sequence analysis.
Ribonuclease (RNase) protection assay
RNase protection assay was carried out using RNP III RNase protection assay kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturers instruction. An antisense cRNA probe to detect two PDIP1 isoform mRNAs was designed by comparing the PDIP1 cDNA sequences with the genomic sequence obtained from human genome database and prepared by PCR. The [32P]-labeled probe (1 x 105 cpm/reaction) was hybridized with 10 µg poly(A+) RNA purified from HeLa, HepG2, THP-1, and 293 cells ON at 42 C and RNase digestion using RNase A and T1 was carried out for 1 h at 37 C. The digested samples were subjected to sequencing gel electrophoresis and hybridization signals were analyzed using an image analyzer (BAS1800 II, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blot analysis
Full-length PDIP1 cDNAs amplified by long RT-PCR were also inserted into p3XFLAG-CMV7 vector (Sigma) and transfected into 293 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Whole-cell lysates were then prepared and 50 µg of protein were electrophoresed in SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond-P membranes (Amersham, Aylesbury, UK). Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously (18) using an anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) and signals were detected using ECL-plus detection reagents (Amersham) according to the manufacturers protocol.
Knockdown of PDIP gene by short interfering (si) RNA
A siRNA targeting both PDIP1
and -ß mRNA (siPDIP1) was designed and synthesized by Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). The nucleotide sequence of siPDIP1 was 5'-GCUGGCUCAAGAAGUUUCU-3'. As a negative control, control duplex VIII (Dharmacon) was transfected in parallel. Increasing amounts of siPDIP1 were introduced into HeLa cells in 60-mm dishes using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After 48 h of siRNA transfection, total RNA was isolated and the expression of PDIP1 mRNA was quantitated by Northern blot analysis as described above. In separate experiments, 24 h after lipofection of siRNA, DR-1 Luc and pKCR2PPAR
were cotransfected using the same reagent in the absence or presence of 10 µM troglitazone, and luciferase assay was performed after 24 h.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|

, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen of a HeLa cell cDNA library using the DBD and part of the hinge region (DBD-H) of hPPAR
as bait. Several positive clones were obtained and individually retransformed into yeast in the presence of pGBT9PPAR
DBD-H. Significant ß-galactosidase activity was observed with clone 1, stronger than that observed between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of PPAR
and the receptor-interaction domain of nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) (Fig. 1A
DBD-H or pACT2 clone 1 alone indicating the specificity of the interaction. Moreover, clone 1 did not interact with the LBD of PPAR
in the absence or presence of troglitazone (Tro), whereas the interaction between N-CoR and LBD of PPAR
was significantly reduced by Tro (Fig. 1A
|
|
in vitro, a GST pull-down assay was performed. The C-terminal portion of KIAA1769 obtained in the yeast two-hybrid screen was divided into two fragments (CN: aa 15661823 and CC: aa 18242080), and these polypeptides were expressed in Escherichia coli as GST fusion proteins (Fig. 2A
bound to GST-CN but not to GST-CC or GST itself. We next determined whether GST-CN could interact with domains other than the DBD of PPAR
. As shown in Fig. 2B
in vivo and in vitro.
|
, two KIAA1769 polypeptides containing three or two LXXLL motifs (aa 460660 and 14331674) were bacterially expressed, and their interaction with full-length PPAR
was analyzed in GST pull-down assays (Fig. 2C
in the absence or presence of Tro. These results suggest that five LXXLL motifs were not required for interaction with PPAR
and that the PPAR
-interaction domain in PDIP1 was finally mapped to the C-terminal region (aa 16751823). Based on the findings obtained by in vitro and in vivo binding assays, we referred to KIAA1769 as PDIP1 in this manuscript.
Tissue distribution of PDIP1 mRNA
To elucidate the physiological functions of PDIP1, the expression of the PDIP1 gene in human tissues was analyzed by Northern blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A
, a single mRNA species, approximately 10 kb in length, was ubiquitously expressed in multiple human tissues. Among them, a relatively high expression was observed in the heart, liver, skeletal muscle, and pancreas. The origin of a smaller band hybridized with pancreatic mRNA is currently unknown. PDIP1 mRNA was also detected in several tumor cell lines (Fig. 3B
). Because PPAR
has been established to play important physiological roles in adipocytes and macrophages (1, 2, 3), the expression of PDIP1 mRNA in mouse 3T3-L1 cells and a human macrophage cell line, THP-1, was examined. The differentiation of adipocytes and macrophages was monitored morphologically and by measuring the expression of differentiation markers including PPAR
, aP2, or CD36 mRNAs as reported previously (30). PDIP1 mRNA was detected at similar levels both in undifferentiated and differentiated adipocytes. In THP-1 cells, the expression of PDIP1 mRNA was highest before differentiation and slightly decreased after the induction of differentiation (Fig. 3C
). The expression patterns of PDIP1 mRNA in 3T3-L1 cells as well as in THP-1 cells closely resembled those of CBP and TRAP220 throughout their differentiation processes. These findings demonstrated that PDIP1 mRNA was expressed in a wide variety of tissues in which PPAR
exerts pivotal physiological functions.
|
did not interact with this LXXLL motif in the absence or presence of Tro in a GST pull-down assay (Fig. 4D
To further confirm the expression of PDIP1ß mRNA in human cells, 5'RACE was performed using HeLa cell cDNA to determine the nucleotide sequence of the 5'-untranslated region of PDIP1ß mRNA. In nested PCR amplification using two sets of adaptor primers and gene-specific primers (GSP) for PDIP1ß, a single band was amplified (Fig. 4E
). In contrast, we could not obtain PCR products using adaptor primers and PDIP1
-specific primers in nested PCR (data not shown). Comparison of the nucleotide sequence of the PCR product with PRIC285 gene sequence in human genome database revealed presence of an additional exon (44 bp) upstream of the exon containing the start codon (Fig. 4E
).
The relative expression of PDIP1
and -ß mRNA in human cells was more precisely quantitated by RNase protection assay using an antisense cRNA probe that distinguishes two isoform mRNAs after RNase digestion. As shown in Fig. 4F
, a band corresponding to PDIP1ß mRNA was clearly identified using poly(A+) RNA isolated from HeLa, 293, HepG2, and THP-1 cells, whereas a band representing PDIP1
mRNA was less faintly observed. No protected fragment was observed using yeast tRNA. These findings together with the results of 5'RACE suggested that PDIP1ß mRNA was more abundantly expressed than PDIP1
mRNA in these human cell lines.
Full-length cDNAs encoding two PDIP1 isoforms were then subcloned into an expression vector, and in vitro-translated proteins were synthesized and separated by SDS-PAGE. As expected, proteins of expected molecular mass were synthesized by in vitro translation (Fig. 4G
, left panel). Moreover, Western analyses demonstrated that two isoforms of expected molecular mass could be expressed as FLAG-tagged proteins in 293 cells by transient transfection (Fig. 4G
, right panel). These findings indicated that two PDIP1 isoforms could be translated in vivo and in vitro and conventional Northern blot analysis could not distinguish two PDIP1 mRNA species because of their size difference and/or uneven expression levels. For convenience, we thereafter termed the short and long isoforms as PDIP1
and -ß, respectively, in this manuscript. In the rat cDNA database, only PDIP1 cDNA encoding the N-terminal extended form (2926 aa, molecular mass, 330 kDa), homologous to human PDIP1ß, was registered (accession no. XM_230961).
PDIP1 potentiated ligand-dependent transactivation by PPAR
and other members of the NR family in mammalian cells
To evaluate whether PDIP1 affects PPAR
-mediated transactivation and whether functional differences between PDIP1
and -ß exist, transient transfection experiments were performed using vectors expressing full-length PDIP1
and -ß in CV-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 5A![]()
, PDIP1
cotransfection enhanced the PPAR
-mediated transactivation of the DR1 reporter in the presence of Tro. PDIP1ß similarly enhanced PPAR
-mediated transactivation. Mutation of five LXXLL motifs in PDIP1
did not affect enhancement of transactivation by PPAR
(Fig. 5B![]()
), further confirming that LXXLL motifs were not functionally required for the enhancement.
|
|
-mediated transactivation in vivo, the effect of knockdown of PDIP1 was studied by using siRNA targeting endogenous PDIP1 gene (siPDIP1). As shown in Fig. 5C
. The result suggested that endogenous PDIP1 might be essential for PPAR
-mediated transactivation in vivo.
Because PDIP1 was distributed in a wide variety of human tissues, we next examined whether PDIP1 affects transactivation mediated by other nuclear receptors. As shown in Fig. 5D![]()
, PDIP1ß augmented the PPAR
-mediated transactivation of DR1 reporter in the presence of fenofibrate, similar to PDIP1
. In addition, PDIP1
and -ß enhanced PPAR
-mediated transactivation. Both PDIP1
and -ß could indistinguishably enhance other NR-mediated transactivation including TR
1, TRß1, and RXR
in the presence of cognate ligands. Moreover, PDIP1
enhanced AR- and ER
-mediated transactivation in a dose-dependent manner, whereas PDIP1ß did not. These findings suggest that PDIP1 could augment a broad range of NR functions and that PDIP1 isoform-specific regulation occurred in AR- and ER
-mediated transactivation.
PDIP1
and -ß did not possess an autonomous activation domain
To determine whether PDIP1
and -ß possess intrinsic transactivation domains, PDIP1
was divided into overlapping eight fragments, and mammalian one-hybrid assays were performed. The function of the N-terminal portion specific for PDIP1ß was also examined in parallel. As shown in Fig. 6
, full-length PDIP1
and -ß stimulated the activity of the UAS-TK reporter by 2.5-fold, whereas none of the divided fragments of PDIP1
and -ß activated the reporter activity over GAL4DBD alone. These findings suggested that PDIP1
and -ß did not possess a strong intrinsic activation domain and required the whole structure for its transactivation function.
|
- and TRß1-mediated transactivation
and TRß1. As shown in Fig. 7A
enhanced the PPAR
-mediated transactivation similar to SRC-1, CBP, or P/CAF. Among these coactivators, PDIP1
synergistically augmented the ligand-dependent activation by PPAR
with SRC-1 and at lesser degree with P/CAF. CBP cotransfection revealed no synergistic enhancement of PPAR
-mediated transactivation with PDIP1. In contrast, PDIP1 synergistically enhanced T3-dependent activation with not only SRC-1 but also CBP and P/CAF in TRß1-mediated transactivation. These findings suggested that PDIP1 might exert receptor-specific synergism with AF-2 interacting coactivators in living cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(11), small heterodimer partner (31), small nuclear ring finger protein (17), GT198 (19), and Tat-binding protein 1 (18) function as coactivators of NRs. Using the DBD-H of PPAR
as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, we isolated KIAA1769, a human EST, whose function was unknown at the time of isolation. KIAA1769 has subsequently been identified as a component of multiprotein complexes that interact with full-length PPAR
and has been shown to enhance PPAR
-mediated transactivation (21). KIAA1769 was termed PRIC285, probably for the molecular mass of purified rat liver protein (21), although the calculated molecular mass of the rat ortholog of KIAA1769 was 330 kDa. We confirmed earlier findings by others (21) and extended the analysis to isolate and characterize the N-terminal extended isoform generated by alternative splicing by RT-PCR and 5'RACE. RNase protection assay revealed that the longer isoform mRNA was predominantly expressed in a subset of human culture cell lines. The predicted molecular mass of the long isoform was 295 kDa. In this yeast two-hybrid system and in vitro interaction experiments, KIAA1769 bound to DBD-H but not to the A/B domain or the LBD of PPAR
. Based on their binding characteristics and molecular mass, we termed the short and long isoforms as PDIP1
and -ß, respectively, in this manuscript.
PDIP1 possessed multiple LXXLL motifs, a characteristic NR interaction alignment identified in many coactivator proteins that bind the AF2 of NR in a ligand-dependent manner (29). Because PDIP1 bound to DBD-H, but not to the LBD of PPAR
, these motifs in PDIP1 were speculated to be dispensable for interaction with PPAR
. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of six LXXLL motifs in PDIP1 with those identified in other coactivators revealed that the amino acids in and around the LXXLL motifs in PDIP1 did not fit well with the proposed alignment rules (32). Indeed, three polypeptides containing these LXXLL motifs did not bind PPAR
in these GST pull-down assays, and mutation of LXXLL motifs in PDIP1
did not affect its function to enhance PPAR
-mediated transactivation. Moreover, the third and fourth LXXLL motifs in human PDIP1ß are not conserved in the rat counterpart. We therefore concluded that the C-terminal portion of PDIP1 would function as the PPAR
-interacting domain.
Although siRNA targeting PDIP1 mRNA significantly reduced PPAR
-mediated transactivation in cell culture system, PDIP1 did not possess a strong autonomous activation domain, and the whole structure was required for its transactivation function in the present mammalian one-hybrid assay. Although PDIP1 possessed amino acid alignments homologous to the RNB motif and the UvrD/REP helicase motif, the functional significance of these motifs is currently unknown. PDIP1 could synergistically augment the PPAR
-mediated transactivation with SRC-1 that interacts with the AF2 of PPAR
in a ligand-dependent manner. These characteristics of PDIP1 resembled those of PGC-1
, a key coactivator of PPAR
in adipogenesis, thermogenesis, and glyconeogenesis in the liver and muscles (12, 13, 14, 15). PGC-1
has been shown to bind the DBD-H of PPAR
and possess no potent intrinsic activation domain (11). PGC-1
could enhance the docking of coactivators such as SRC-1 by altering the conformation of PPAR
(33). These results, taken together, raised the possibility that PDIP1 may function in a manner similar to PGC-1
that facilitates the recruitment of other coactivator proteins to PPAR
, thereby activating target gene transcription. Interestingly, PDIP1
showed receptor-specific synergism with AF2-interacting coactivators in PPAR
- and TRß-mediated transcription. PDIP1 might preferentially cooperate with different coactivator complexes with histone acetyltransferase activities in a receptor-specific fashion.
PDIP1 also functions to potentiate the ligand-dependent transactivation of NRs other than PPAR
in mammalian cells. Although PDIP1 bound to the DBD-H of PPAR
, it possibly binds the AF2 of other NRs through multiple LXXLL motifs in a ligand-dependent manner. PGC-1
has recently been shown to interact with the AF2 of PPAR
, ER
, and RXR through the LXXLL motif that was not required for the PPAR
-interaction (34, 35, 36). Further studies are required to clarify whether these LXXLL motifs in PDIP1 are necessary for interaction with other NRs. Such differential interaction may explain the PDIP1 isoform-specific enhancement of ER
- and AR-mediated transactivation.
PGC-1
has been shown to be expressed in a highly tissue-specific manner and to be strongly induced by physiological stimuli such as cold exposure and fasting (11). In contrast, PDIP1 was ubiquitously expressed in human tissues. A relatively high PDIP1 gene expression was observed in tissues such as the heart, liver, skeletal muscles, and pancreas as well as 3T3-L1 adipocytes and human THP-1 macrophages in which PPAR
exerts diverse biological functions (1, 2, 3). Interestingly, the expression pattern of PDIP1 during the differentiation process of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes resembled the pattern of CBP and TRAP220. Recent studies showed that TRAP220 and CBP are indispensable for the differentiation of preadipocytes to mature adipocytes in vivo (37, 38). Although the specific roles of TRAP220 or CBP in macrophage differentiation have not yet been established, PDIP1 might also be involved in the differentiation processes of adipocytes and macrophages. Further studies using a PDIP1 knockout mouse are underway to elucidate the physiological functions of PDIP1 in multiple tissues.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online October 20, 2005
Abbreviations: aa, Amino acids; AF, activation function; aP2, fatty acid-binding protein; AR, androgen receptor; CBP, cAMP response element-binding protein-binding protein; CD36, scavenger receptor; DBD, DNA-binding domain; DBD-H, DBD and part of the hinge region; ER, estrogen receptor; EST, expression sequence tag; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; h, human; LBD, ligand-binding domain; Luc, luciferase; N-CoR, nuclear receptor corepressor; NR, nuclear hormone receptor; P/CAF, p300/CBP-associated factor; PDIP1, PPAR
-DBD-interacting protein 1; PGC, PPAR
-interacting coactivator; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PPRE, PPAR response element; PRIC, PPAR
-interacting cofactor; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA end; RNase, ribonuclease; RNB, RNase B; RXR, retinoid X receptor; si, short interfering; SRC, steroid receptor coactivator; TR, thyroid hormone receptor; TRAP, thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein; Tro, troglitazone; UAS-TK, upstream activating sequence-thymidine kinase.
Received April 18, 2005.
Accepted for publication October 10, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: a nuclear regulator of metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth. J Biol Chem 276:3773137734
in diabetes and metabolism. Trends. Pharmacol Sci 25:331336
. Nature 395:137143[CrossRef][Medline]
and CBP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 240:6164[CrossRef][Medline]
coactivator-1. Mol Cell 5:971982
drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibers. Nature 418:797801[CrossRef][Medline]
. EMBO J 18:36763687[CrossRef][Medline]
coactivator 1
(PGC-1
): transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr Rev 24:7890
-interacting cofactor complex in rat liver and characterization of PRIC285 as a coactivator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1183611841
stimulates the growth arrest and DNA-damage inducible 153 gene in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Oncogene 21:21712180[CrossRef][Medline]
in macrophage differentiation and cholesterol uptake. Nat Med 7:4147[CrossRef][Medline]
transactivation. J Biol Chem 277:15861592
coactivator-1 through transcription factor docking. Science 286:13681371
in transcriptional control of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation enzymes. Mol Cell Biol 20:18681876
transcriptional activity by the coactivator PGC-1. J Biol Chem 275:1630216308
2-stimulated adipogenesis. Nature 417:563567[CrossRef][Medline]
. J Biol Chem 277:1690616912This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Ehrenborg and A. Krook Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Physiology and Metabolism by Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {delta} Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2009; 61(3): 373 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Satoh, T. Ishizuka, T. Tomaru, S. Yoshino, Y. Nakajima, K. Hashimoto, N. Shibusawa, T. Monden, M. Yamada, and M. Mori Tat-Binding Protein-1 (TBP-1), an ATPase of 19S Regulatory Particles of the 26S Proteasome, Enhances Androgen Receptor Function in Cooperation with TBP-1-Interacting Protein/Hop2 Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3283 - 3290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Heemers and D. J. Tindall Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: A Diversity of Functions Converging on and Regulating the AR Transcriptional Complex Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2007; 28(7): 778 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Michalik, J. Auwerx, J. P. Berger, V. K. Chatterjee, C. K. Glass, F. J. Gonzalez, P. A. Grimaldi, T. Kadowaki, M. A. Lazar, S. O'Rahilly, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 726 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |