| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pharmacology (A.J.M.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195; and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (R.A.S., D.M.D.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
Address all correspondence to: Dr. Andrew J. Mhyre, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, D1-100, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024. E-mail: amhyre{at}fhcrc.org. Address reprint requests to: Dr. Daniel Dorsa, Research Development and Administration, Oregon Health & Science University, L335, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97239.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(C6ER
) or rat ERß (C6ERß). Introduction of a cAMP response element-luciferase reporter gene into C6, C6ER
, and C6ERß cells leads to the observation that E2 treatment reduced isoproterenol-stimulated luciferase activity by 35% in C6ER
but had no effect on reporter gene expression in C6ERß or untransfected C6 cells. A similar effect was seen with a membrane-impermeable estrogen (E2-BSA), suggesting the modulation of nonclassical transcription by estradiol treatment is mediated by the activation of a membrane-initiated signaling pathway. Furthermore, pretreatment with wortmannin (phosphatidylinsositol 3-kinase) or U73122 (phospholipase C) attenuated the E2-induced reduction in nonclassical transcription. We conclude that E2 treatment reduces cAMP response element-mediated transcription in glioma cells expressing ER
and that this reduction is dependent on the activation of membrane-initiated signaling. These findings suggest a novel model of estrogen rapid signaling in astrocytes that leads to modulation of nonclassical transcription. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the classical model of steroid receptor function, the ligand-bound estrogen receptors (ERs) form homo- and/or heterodimers and modulate transcription of genes containing estrogen response elements (EREs). However, this single pathway model does not account for the complexity of effects seen in response to changes in estradiol levels. In the presence of ligand, the ER monomer can complex with fos and jun and regulate transcription at activator protein-1 sites (6, 7). In addition to directly stimulating numerous genomic targets, estradiol activates membrane-initiated signaling pathways, resulting in changes in intracellular calcium (8), increases in cAMP (9), and activation of signaling pathway kinases such as Akt (10), p42/44 MAPK (11), phospholipase C (PLC) (12), and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) (13). Activation of these membrane-initiated signaling pathways after estradiol treatment can alter gene expression independent of ER-DNA interactions (14). For example, the promoter region of the neurotensin/neuromedin gene lacks sequences that mimic an ERE-like element, but estradiol can activate the protein kinase A/CREB pathway, leading to transcription at cAMP response elements (CREs), which drives the expression of the neurotensin/neuromedin gene (15). The diversity in the various membrane-initiated signaling pathways and the resulting transcriptional events adds to the complexity of the functional changes in response to estradiol levels.
Although considerable efforts have been devoted to understanding how estradiol directly effects neurons in both in vitro (5, 16) and in vivo models (2, 17), the effects of estradiol on nonneuronal cells of the CNS remain largely unclear. ERs have been detected in astrocytes, the predominant glial cell type, in both in vitro (18, 19, 20) and in vivo (21, 22, 23) studies, suggesting that estradiol may modulate the role glial cells play in maintaining normal homeostasis and/or modulating inflammatory signals in the brain. It has recently been shown that 17ß-estradiol (E2) treatment of cortical astrocytes increases the secretion of TGF-ß, a neurotrophic growth factor (24, 25), suggesting that estradiol treatment may enhance neuronal viability via a noncell autonomous mechanism. In neurons, it has been demonstrated that E2 treatment activates the p42/44 MAPK signaling pathway, which partially mediates protection against glutamate excitotoxicity (26). It remains unclear whether estradiol stimulates similar rapid signaling events in astrocytes to indirectly modulate neuronal function and survival. To test the hypothesis that estradiol treatment activates membrane-initiated signaling pathways leading to modulation of nonclassical transcription in astrocytes, we developed an astrocyte cell model by stably transfecting the C6 rat glioblastoma with either ER
or ERß. In this study, we examined whether E2 modulates transcription at CREs in ER
- and/or ERß-expressing glioma cells and if so, what membrane-initiated signaling pathways are responsible for these alterations in gene expression.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture
The C6 rat glioblastoma cell line was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and grown on tissue culture-treated dishes in media (10%FM) consisting of phenol red-free DMEM (Mediatech, Inc., Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA). When the cultures reached 95% confluency, cells were subcultured with TrypLE (Invitrogen Corp.). The cells were maintained at 37 C and 5% CO2 atmosphere and were used for experiments between passage 5 and 20.
Generation of transfected cell lines
For transfection, C6 cells were grown in transfection media (10%CSM) consisting of phenol red-free DMEM supplemented only with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 2 mM L-glutamine. Once the cells reached 85% confluency, a 100-mm tissue culture dish was transfected with a mixture of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Corp.) and pcDNA3.1 hygromycin (15 µg) containing cDNA encoding the appropriate gene. The ERs expressed included full-length human ER
(hER
) (27) (a kind gift from Dr. Pierre Chambon, Strasbourg, France), full-length rat ERß (rERß) (28) (a kind gift from Dr. George Kuiper, Karolinska Institute, Sweden) and the hER
gene with two point mutations in the DNA binding domain (C202H and C205H), making it transcriptionally inactive at ERE sites (29, 30). Lipofectamine 2000 was premixed with the various plasmids at a ratio of 1 µg DNA to 2.5 µl transfectant for 30 min before the mixture was added to the cells. After 48 h, the media were replaced and the cells were treated with Hygromycin B (Invitrogen Corp.; 400 µg/ml) to select for incorporation of the plasmid. Single colonies were isolated after 10 d of growth in selection media and tested for receptor expression by Western blot and functional assays. The monoclonal ER-expressing cell lines were maintained in 10%FM containing Hygromycin B (100 µg/ml) to suppress the loss of plasmid expression.
Immunoblotting
Each monoclonal cell line was tested for ER expression by Western blot techniques. Cells, grown to 80% confluency, were rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and lysed with immunoprecipitation buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 100 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 100 µM NaVO4, and 150 mM NaCl] containing 1% Triton X-100 and Proteinase Inhibitor Cocktail (EMD Biosciences). The lysates were sonicated for 2 min and cleared by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 10 min. Protein concentrations were quantified using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL) and equal amounts of protein (50 µg) from each lysate were diluted in Laemmli sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer, resolved by electrophoresis on 412% Bis-Tris precast NuPage gels (Invitrogen Corp.) in running buffer [50 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethane sulfonic acid, 50 mM Tris base, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 1 mM EDTA] as described by the manufacturer, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride. Recombinant hER
(10 pg) and hERß (100 pg) proteins (Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO) were loaded as positive controls. The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk diluted in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4 C in 5% nonfat dry milk/TBS-T containing either a mouse anti-ER
antibody (1:500; 6F11 from Novocostra Laboratories, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) or a rabbit anti-ERß antibody (1:200; 517700 from Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA). Secondary goat antimouse or antirabbit antibodies (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were used for enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc.) and photographed in an Epi Chemi II Darkroom (UVP Inc., Upland, CA).
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was used to determine the subcellular localization of the ERs in the stably transfected cell lines. C6ER
, C6ERß, or untransfected C6 cells were plated on 0.001% poly-D-ornithine-coated glass coverslips and allowed to attach overnight. The cultured cells were fixed with acetone:methanol (50:50; 10 min), blocked with 10% BSA/1% Cold Water Fish Skin Gelatin in PBS (1 h) at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4 C in 1% BSA/0.1% Gelatin (PBG) containing the appropriate antibody (1:200): rabbit anti-ER
antibody (AB-16; Lab Vision Corp., Fremont, CA) or rabbit anti-ERß antibody (06-629; Upstate, Charlottesville, VA). After four washes in PBG, fluorescently tagged secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) were used to visualize the primary antibodies bound to the ER in each cell line (1 h at room temperature). The coverslips were washed with PBG four times, mounted with Vectasheild containing 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector, Burlingame, CA), and sealed. Images were acquired using a fluorescent microscope.
Activation of luciferase (luc) reporter genes
The ability of E2 to modulate gene expression at either CRE or ERE sites was assessed using reporter gene assays. Cell lines were plated in 12-well tissue culture-treated plates at a density of 8 x 104 cells/well in 10%CSM and grown overnight. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Corp.) was premixed for 30 min with the various reporter gene constructs at a ratio of 1 µg DNA to 2 µl transfection reagent before the mixture was added to the cells. Each well was transfected with a luc reporter gene (750 ng), tkERE-luc (a kind gift from Dr. Peter Burbach, Rudolf Magnus Institute, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands) or CRE-luc (a kind gift from Dr. Daniel Storm, University of Washington, Seattle, WA). In addition, each well was cotransfected with pCH110 (500 ng), a ß-galactosidase (ß-gal) reporter (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), to normalize for transfection efficiency. E2-BSA was dissolved in Tris-HCl and filtered with a 3-kDa cut-off filter as previously described (31). After 6 h of transfection, the media were replaced with 10%CSM containing either E2 or conjugated E2-BSA. For CRE experiments, the cells were treated with E2 or vehicle (0.095% ethanol) for 30 min before isoproterenol (10 µM final) was added. The cells were incubated for 24 h and then lysed in Glo Lysis Buffer (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Each lysate was assayed for both luc and ß-gal activity using the Steady Glo Assay and Beta Glo Assay, respectively, as described by the manufacturer (Promega Corp.). The luminescence was measured on a Fushion plate reader (PerkinElmer, Inc., Boston, MA).
Cell treatments with pharmacological inhibitors
The effect of E2 on CRE-luc reporter gene expression was quantified in the presence of specific pharmacological inhibitors. C6ER
cells were plated in 12-well plates and transfected with the CRE-luc and pCH110 constructs as described above. To test the involvement of Gi/o proteins, the cells were pretreated with pertussis toxin (300 ng/ml) for 18 h before and during the transfection with the reporter constructs. The endotoxin catalyzes ADP-ribosylation of Gi and Go inactivating the G proteins. After 6 h of transfection with the reporter constructs, the media were replaced with fresh 10%CSM containing the appropriate pharmacological inhibitor: Akt Inhibitor IV, calphostin C (PKC inhibitor), ICI 182,780 (ER antagonist), pertussis toxin (inactivates Gi/o), U0126 (MEK1/2 inhibitor), U73122 (PLC inhibitor), and wortmannin (PI3K inhibitor). Thirty minutes after changing the media, the cells were preexposed to E2 (10 nM) or vehicle (0.095% ethanol) for 30 min before the addition of isoproterenol (10 µM final). The cells were exposed to all three treatments (inhibitor, E2, and isoproterenol) for 24 h and then lysed and assayed as described above.
Statistical analysis
For each experiment, the significance of differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukeys multiple comparison test (Prism 4.0; GraphPad, San Diego, CA). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Each treatment was performed in quadruplicate, and the experiments were repeated at least three times. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or ERß in modulating glioma cell function. After transfection with cDNAs encoding either hER
or rERß, monoclonal cell lines were screened for receptor expression by Western blot analysis, and a single clone was selected for each receptor transfected (C6ER
and C6ERß). We detected immunoreactive bands in whole cell lysates from these cell lines that were the same size as those detected in the positive controls, recombinant hER
and hERß proteins (Fig. 1A
and ERß were not detected in untransfected C6 cells. To characterize the localization of the receptors in the transfected cell lines, immunocytochemistry was performed on C6ER
, C6ERß, and untransfected C6 cells. Using immunofluorescence, we observed that ER
and ERß localized predominantly to the DAPI-stained nucleus, although we also observed cytoplasmic and plasma membrane immunoreactivity (Fig. 1B
|
and ERß in the transfected glioma cell lines, we introduced a tkERE-luc reporter gene into C6, C6ER
, and C6ERß cells along with a control plasmid (pCH110) that expresses ß-gal to control for transfection efficiency. We then exposed the cells to increasing concentrations of E2 (100 fM to 10 nM) and found that in C6ER
and C6ERß cells, E2 increased luc activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2
cells E2 treatment resulted in a maximal 8-fold increase in luc activity with an EC50 of 32.8 pM, whereas in C6ERß cells treatment increased luc activity by 6-fold with an EC50 of 143.3 pM. No change in activity was detected in untransfected cells confirming the lack of ER expression in untransfected C6 cells. Pretreatment with the ER antagonist, ICI 182,780 (1 µM), abolished the ERE-mediated response to 1 nM E2 in C6ER
and C6ERß cells (data not shown). Together, these data demonstrate that ER
and ERß expressed in the stable glioma cell lines are functionally active in modulating classical ERE-mediated transcription.
|
, C6ERß, and untransfected C6 cells were transiently transfected with the CRE-luc and pCH110 constructs, exposed to various treatments for 24 h and assayed for luc and ß-gal activity. In contrast to its effect in the neuronal cell model, E2 treatment alone failed to increase luc activity in transfected glioma cells (Fig. 3A
cells with E2 reduced isoproterenol-stimulated CRE-mediated luc activity by 35% with an EC50 of 285.1 pM (Fig. 3B
cells were pretreated with ICI 182,780 (1 µM). Although the antagonist had no effect on its own, it blocked the effect of E2 on isoproterenol-stimulated luc activity (Fig. 4
, a nuclear ER.
|
|
cells with E2-BSA, we found that isoproterenol-stimulated luc activity was reduced by 24%, similar to the results with unconjugated estradiol, whereas C6ERß cells were unresponsive to E2-BSA (Fig. 5A
(Fig. 5B
at or near the plasma membrane, which in glioma cells leads to activation of a signal transduction cascade that results in a reduction in isoproterenol-stimulated transcription at CRE sites.
|
and activates the PI3K and PLC signal transduction pathway leading to inhibition of CRE-mediated transcription.
|
|
mutated in the DNA binding domain (C202H;C205H: HE27) (29) was stably expressed in C6 cells (C6ER
HE27). Using the tkERE-luc reporter gene, we found that this mutated receptor was transcriptionally inactive at ERE sites when expressed in the C6ER
HE27 cell line (Fig. 8A
HE27 cells and assessed the modulation of luc activity in response to E2 treatment. When C6ER
HE27 cells were pretreated with E2 (10 nM), we detected a 35% reduction in isoproterenol-stimulated CRE-mediated luc reporter gene activity comparable with the estradiol-induced reduction in C6ER
cells expressing wild-type receptor (Fig. 8B
HE27 cells with the membrane-impermeable E2-BSA also reduced isoproterenol stimulated CRE-luc reporter gene expression by 29% similar to free E2 (Fig. 8C
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, but not ERß. This estradiol-induced reduction in CRE-mediated gene expression is sensitive to the pharmacological inhibitors, wortmannin and U73122, strongly suggesting the activation of the PI3K/PLC signaling pathway.
Three observations provide evidence that estradiol modulates nonclassical CRE-mediated transcription in glioma cells by activating ER
. First, E2 treatment of transfected C6 cells inhibited isoproterenol-stimulated CRE-luc reporter gene expression. This reduction in CRE-mediated transcription required the expression of ER
, whereas untransfected and ERß-expressing C6 cells were unresponsive to E2 treatment. Second, pretreatment with the ER antagonist, ICI 182,780, blocked the reduction in reporter gene activity. This sensitivity to the ER antagonist demonstrated that the estradiol-induced reduction in transcription at CRE sites is mediated by the activation of the ER and not another putative receptor (35) or GPR30 (36). Third, the mutated receptor, ER
HE27, which is transcriptionally inactive at ERE sites, was also able to mediate the effect of E2 on transcription at CRE sites similar to wild-type ER
. Together, these results demonstrate that E2, through activation of ER
, inhibits transcription at CRE sites in glioma cells independent of classical ERE-mediated transcription.
A possible mechanism for the E2-induced reduction in nonclassical transcription is the interaction between the ER and CREB-binding protein (CBP), a cofactor involved in transcription at various response elements including CRE sites (37). E2 treatment has been shown to increase the interaction between ER
and CBP (38). Furthermore, in 293A cells, expression of ER
negatively modulates transcription at nonclassical response elements, which is augmented with E2 treatment (39). Kamei et al. (40) have suggested that the activation of ERE-mediated transcription by estradiol may sequester CBP at ERE sites, and therefore, decrease activity of CBP at other transcriptional sites such as CREs. This study presents evidence that, in glioma cells, E2 is not modulating the transcriptional machinery, but instead activating a rapid signaling event. This is indicated by the observations that treatment with either E2 or ICI 182,780 alone had no effect on the basal level of CRE-mediated transcription, but rather CRE-luc reporter gene expression was only modulated by E2 when the CREB signaling pathway was activated, such as when the cells were stimulated with isoproterenol. Furthermore, mutation in the DNA binding domain (ER
HE27), making it transcriptionally inactive at ERE sites, had no effect on the receptors ability to mediate the reduction in transcription at CRE sites in response to E2 treatment. These data suggest that estradiol modulates CRE-mediated transcription in glioma cells independent of CBP and its classical genomic effects at ERE sites.
In addition to our finding that E2 treatment leads to modulation of nonclassical transcription at CRE sites in glioma cells, two independent approaches provide evidence that the reduction in transcription is mediated by the activation of membrane-initiated signaling pathways. First, treating C6ER
or C6ER
HE27 cells with E2-BSA, a membrane-impermeable estrogen, showed that the estradiol-induced reduction in CRE-mediated transcription is initiated by the receptor at or near the plasma membrane. Similar to the results with free E2, C6ERß and untransfected C6 cells were unresponsive to E2-BSA, further suggesting that the estradiol-induced reduction in transcription at CRE sites requires the expression and activation of ER
at the plasma membrane. Pawlak et al. (41) have recently demonstrated that, in primary cultures of midbrain astrocytes, ER
localized to the plasma membrane and along the astrocyte processes. Localization of ER
has been shown to be dependent on palmitoylation of the receptor (42) in addition to an interaction with Caveolin-1 (43) that transiently anchors the receptor to the membrane. In the transfected glioma cells, we detected ER
immunoreactivity outside of the DAPI-stained nucleus, suggesting that at least some of the ER
expressed in these cells localizes to the plasma membrane where it can bind to free or BSA-conjugated estradiol and activate rapid signaling pathways. A second approach, blocking signaling molecules with specific pharmacological inhibitors, suggests that the modulation of CRE-mediated transcription in glioma cells requires the activation of a rapid signaling pathway. The estradiol-induced reduction in CRE-mediated transcription was sensitive to wortmannin (PI3K) and U73122 (PLC), suggesting that E2 treatment of glioma cells activates the PI3K/PLC pathway leading to modulation of transcription at CRE sites. This sensitivity to wortmannin and U73122 was unexpected as previous findings from our laboratory demonstrated that E2 treatment of transfected hippocampal-derived neuronal cell lines (HTER
or HTERß) activates p42/44 MAPK and CREB, resulting in an increase in CRE-mediated transcription (16, 32). However, treatment of C6ER
and C6ERß cells with physiological concentrations of E2 failed to affect the phosphorylation state of either CREB or p42/44 MAPK (44). Together, these data demonstrate that E2 treatment activates a membrane-initiated signaling pathway in glioma cells leading to a reduction in CRE-mediated transcription, which is dissimilar to its effects in neuronal cells.
Although treating C6ER
cells with E2 caused a reduction in CRE-luc reporter gene expression, the ligand failed to affect CRE-mediated transcription in either C6ERß or untransfected C6 cells. C6 cells have been used in the past to model the antioxidant properties of estradiol in glial cells, but this effect required supraphysiological doses of E2 (45, 46), consistent with reports that C6 cells do not express either of the ERs (47). Although recent reports have shown detectable levels of mRNA for ER
in C6 cells by RT-PCR (44, 48), under the culture conditions used in this study, we were unable to detect ER
protein in untransfected C6 cells by immunoblotting or immunocytochemistry. Moreover, the ERE-luc reporter gene assay confirmed the lack of functional receptors in untransfected C6 cells because E2 had no effect on luc expression in these cells. Transfection with either hER
or rERß resulted in a significant increase in ERE-mediated transcription in response to physiological concentrations of E2. This observation further demonstrates that the estradiol-induced reduction in transcription at CRE sites is dependent on the activation of ER
, and not another endogenously expressed receptor.
The functional evidence that E2 treatment reduces CRE-mediated transcription in ER
-expressing glioma cells suggests a novel estrogen-activated rapid signaling pathway in astrocytes. This new model is based on the results that E2 induces a membrane-initiated signaling pathway that is sensitive to wortmannin and U73122. In other cell lines, estradiol treatment has been shown to activate the p42/44 MAPK pathway and CREB (9, 11) and increase CRE-mediated transcription (32). CREB, a transcription factor that modulates gene expression at CRE sites, is a coincidence detector that is responsive to several different signaling pathways including cAMP/protein kinase A, p42/44 MAPK, and PI3K pathways. This study suggests that E2 binds ER
and activates PI3K/PLC at or near the plasma membrane of glioma cells, which results in attenuation of the transcriptional activity at CRE sites, independent of the classical effects of estradiol on ERE-mediated gene expression.
An important prediction of this rapid signaling model is that estradiol levels may reduce neuroinflammation by attenuating the increase in CRE-mediated transcription in response to proinflammatory signals. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that estradiol can modulate the functional activity of astrocytes and modify their ability to protect neurons from different insults (24). After brain injury, both ER
and ERß are up-regulated in reactive astrocytes suggesting that these cells are a direct target of estradiol stimulation (49, 50). Furthermore, astrocytes release growth factors such as TGF-ß in response to E2 (24, 25), and also respond to and modulate the immune response by releasing both pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines. Inhibition of CRE-mediated transcription may provide a mechanism for estradiol to shift the response in astrocytes to antiinflammation. Lipopolysaccharides increase cyclooxygenase-2 expression through p42/44 MAPK and PKC signaling cascades leading to an increase in prostaglandins and inflammation (51). Treatment of primary astrocyte cultures with pigment epithelium-derived factor increases proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-
(52). Both of these inflammatory signals activate CREB and nuclear factor-
B, which drive the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and proinflammatory cytokines. In this study, we provide functional evidence that E2 treatment reduces CRE-mediated transcription and therefore, may suppress proinflammatory signals from reactive astrocytes leading to neuroprotection from degenerative insults that stimulate inflammation.
In summary, we have found that E2 treatment of ER
-expressing glioma cells reduces nonclassical transcription at CRE sites. The inhibitory effect on nonclassical transcription appears to be mediated by a signal transduction cascade initiated with the activation of PI3K and PLC at or near the plasma membrane. These results suggest a novel nonclassical signaling model for estrogen rapid signaling in astrocytes. If true, this model has important implications in how estradiol can modulate the responses to inflammation in astrocytes and other nonneuronal cells of the CNS. A deeper understanding of estrogen rapid signaling in the various cell-types of the brain may prove important in treating neuroinflammation and preventing neurodegenerative disorders.
| Footnotes |
|---|
A.J.M., R.A.S., and D.M.D. have nothing to declare.
First Published Online January 26, 2006
Abbreviations: ß-gal, ß-Galactosidase; CBP, CREB-binding protein; CNS, central nervous system; CRE, cAMP response element; CREB, CRE binding protein; 10%CSM, transfection media consisting of phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and L-glutamine; DAPI, 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; E2, 17ß-estradiol; E2-BSA, 17ß-estradiol-6-CMO:BSA, a membrane-impermeable estrogen; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; 10%FM, growth media consisting of phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin and L-glutamine; hER
, human ER
; hERß, human ERß; luc, luciferase; MEK, MAPK kinase; PBG, 1% BSA/0.1% fish skin gelatin in PBS; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PLC, phospholipase C; rERß, rat ERß; TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20.
Received October 17, 2005.
Accepted for publication January 13, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or ß and activation of the MAPK pathway. J Neurochem 82:674682[CrossRef][Medline]
estrogen receptors are located at extranuclear sites. J Comp Neurol 429:355371[CrossRef][Medline]
and ß in the spinal cord during postnatal development: localization in glial cells. Neuroendocrinology 77:334340[CrossRef][Medline]
is associated with the plasma membrane of astrocytes and coupled to the MAP/Src-kinase pathway. Glia 50:270275[CrossRef][Medline]
membrane localization: regulation by 17ß-estradiol. Mol Biol Cell 16:231237
at the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol 23:16331646
and ERß in neurons and glia. Neuroscience 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.019
B and CREB. Glia 50:223234[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. K. Marriott, K. R. McGann-Gramling, B. Hauss-Wegrzyniak, L. C. Sheldahl, R. A. Shapiro, D. M. Dorsa, and G. L. Wenk Brain Infusion of Lipopolysaccharide Increases Uterine Growth as a Function of Estrogen Replacement Regimen: Suppression of Uterine Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} by Constant, But Not Pulsed, Estrogen Replacement Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 232 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mastronardi, G. G. Smiley, J. Raber, T. Kusakabe, A. Kawaguchi, V. Matagne, A. Dietzel, S. Heger, A. E. Mungenast, R. Cabrera, et al. Deletion of the Ttf1 Gene in Differentiated Neurons Disrupts Female Reproduction without Impairing Basal Ganglia Function J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13167 - 13179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||