help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2005-1565
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/5/2273    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vuilleumier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Falcón, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vuilleumier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Falcón, J.
Endocrinology Vol. 147, No. 5 2273-2279
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Starting the Zebrafish Pineal Circadian Clock with a Single Photic Transition

Robin Vuilleumier, Laurence Besseau, Gilles Boeuf, Aurélien Piparelli, Yoav Gothilf, Walter G. Gehring, David C. Klein and Jack Falcón

Laboratoire Aragó (R.V., L.B., G.B., A.P., J.F.), Observatoire Océanologique de Banyuls, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7628, Université de Paris VI, 66651 Banyuls/Mer-Cédex, France; Biozentrum (R.V., W.G.G.), University of Basel, Cell and Developmental Biology, Basel 4056, Switzerland; Section on Neuroendocrinology (D.C.K.), Office of the Scientific Director, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4480; and Department of Zoology (Y.G.), The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jack Falcón, Laboratoire Arago, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7628, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and University Pierre and Marie Curie, BP 44, F-66651 Banyuls sur Mer, France. E-mail: falcon{at}obs-banyuls.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The issue of what starts the circadian clock ticking was addressed by studying the developmental appearance of the daily rhythm in the expression of two genes in the zebrafish pineal gland that are part of the circadian clock system. One encodes the photopigment exorhodopsin and the other the melatonin synthesizing enzyme arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT2). Significant daily rhythms in AANAT2 mRNA abundance were detectable for several days after fertilization in animals maintained in a normal or reversed lighting cycle providing 12 h of light and 12 h of dark. In contrast, these rhythms do not develop if animals are maintained in constant lighting or constant darkness from fertilization. In contrast to exorhodopsin, rhythmicity of AANAT2 can be initiated by a pulse of light against a background of constant darkness, by a pulse of darkness against a background of constant lighting, or by single light-to-dark or dark-to-light transitions. Accordingly, these studies indicate that circadian clock function in the zebrafish pineal gland can be initiated by minimal photic cues, and that single photic transitions can be used as an experimental tool to dissect the mechanism that starts the circadian clock in the pineal gland.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LIFE ON EARTH is characterized by a 24-h pattern of activity, reflecting the solar day. In essentially all forms, these rhythms are not directly controlled by the light/dark cycle, but reflect the action of an endogenous timing mechanism—the circadian clock—which exhibits an approximately 24-h period. In addition, mechanisms exist through which the environmental lighting cycle synchronizes circadian rhythms with light-to-dark and dark-to-light transitions.

In contrast to the significant progress made in understanding the molecular basis of circadian clocks and how light acts on the clock (1, 2), scant progress has been made in understanding the fundamental question of what initially starts the clock—ticking—as defined by producing a coordinated output signal—and whether a photic perturbation is required. This issue is of interest and importance in view of the fundamental role that circadian rhythms play in biology.

The question of whether the vertebrate circadian clock function develops autonomously or requires an external trigger has been investigated in zebrafish, at the molecular, physiological, and behavioral levels. This has generated conflicting results. For example, studies on the transcription factor zPer3, a component of the circadian clock machinery, are at odds: expression was reported to oscillate under constant darkness (DD) by one group (3) but not by another using transgenic embryos expressing luciferase under control of the zPer3 promoter (4). It is clear that conclusions regarding clock function cannot be based on observations of zPer3 expression alone because zPer3 is just one among other components of the clock machinery; accordingly, it may not be a reliable indicator of the functional state of the clock. Other approaches in which physiological and behavioral endpoints have been used are also problematical because the endpoints are a reflection of factors other than clock development, including downstream processes and the mechanisms linking the two (5, 6). Accordingly, studies using these systems may not provide an entirely reliable indication of clock function.

An experimental approach that circumvents these limitations is the measurement of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT2) mRNA in the fish pineal organ. The pineal organ is generally considered a master circadian clock in fish and is of special experimental value because each pinealocyte contains all elements of a circadian system—a photoreceptor, a clock, and an output (7), i.e. mRNA encoded by the zebrafish (zf)AANAT2 gene. Aanat encodes the next-to-last enzyme in vertebrate melatonin synthesis and zfAANAT2 expression in the adult is controlled by integral elements of the molecular circadian clock, thereby providing a reliable marker of clock function (8, 9, 10, 11). In addition, measurement of zfAANAT2 mRNA, is superior to the measurement of melatonin release from intact embryonic zebrafish, which has been used to study clock function (5), because melatonin synthesis is regulated not only by the clock, but also by a down-stream gating mechanism through which light acts to rapidly switch off melatonin production, without necessarily having immediate effects on clock function. As a result, it is not possible to study clock function in constant light, because light masks the output. However, measurement of zfAANAT2 mRNA eliminates this limitation because light does not have an immediate effect on this parameter.

In the current study, we have examined the relationship between lighting and the rhythmic expression of zfAANAT2 and of another clock-related gene, exorhodopsin (ExR), which encodes the photopigment thought to mediate photic control of the pineal clock (12). Our experiments addressed the issue of whether minimal photic perturbations can initiate circadian expression of each of these genes in the embryonic zebrafish pineal gland. Previous studies raised this possibility, because zfAANAT2 mRNA transiently increased after exposure to a single 1-h light pulse against a background of constant darkness (12). The nature of the controlling mechanism was investigated here, to determine whether this increase was a transient one-time response to the light pulse (13) or represented the initiation of a circadian rhythm. The results establish that circadian rhythmicity is initiated by a single light pulse and extend this finding by revealing that rhythmicity can also be initiated by a single dark pulse or by single photic transitions (light-to-dark: L->D, or dark-to-light: D->L). Moreover, our findings indicate that clock function is initiated before the retina can detect light and at a time when the pinealocyte is anatomically immature.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Adult zebrafish were kept at 28.5 C on a light/dark (LD) cycle (12 h light, 12 h dark). Light was provided by fluorescent lamps ({lambda} = 400–700 nm; Nominal TX Universal aquarium lamps (IRC70-Lumen/W70), Actizoo, Beaufort La Vallée, France); the intensity at tank level was 5000 lux. Fertilized eggs were usually obtained in the morning shortly after lights on. They were incubated at the same temperature and under the indicated photoperiodic conditions (see Results and figure legends). Embryos were collected at different developmental stages. Dark samples were maintained in the dark until time of collection; dim red light used for night collections was provided by 230V/15W red bulbs (PF712E; Philips, Suresnes, France), with an intensity not exceeding 6 lux at the level of the embryos.

For the whole-mount in situ hybridization, pigmentation of the embryos was prevented by addition of 0.2 mM phenylthiourea to the egg water at 24 h post fertilization (hpf).

Animal experimentation was conducted in accord with accepted standards of humane animal care (principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki).

Whole-mount in situ hybridization
At the end of the incubation time, embryos were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 C, transferred to 100% methanol, and stored at –20 C.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using commercially available kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche, Meylan, France) (11, 14). Sense and antisense digoxygenin-labeled zfAANAT2 riboprobes corresponding to a 900-bp cDNA of zfAANAT2 (GenBank accession no. AF124756) were generated as described (11). The digoxygenin-labeled zfExR probes were generated from a fragment corresponding to bp 28–602 from zfExR (GenBank accession no. AB025312) inserted in the Topo vector (Invitrogen, Meylan, France). All probes (1 µg/ml) were hybridized at a temperature of 68 C, and detection was performed using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin antibodies, and using alkaline phosphatase substrate (Roche, Meylan, France). For each embryo, intensity of the staining was submitted to triple evaluation by three independent observers, within a scale of 0 (no staining at all) to 4 (highest signal intensity) (3). Preliminary studies indicated that densitometry measurements on black and white photomicrographs gave similar results as also shown elsewhere (11).

Statistics and data plotting were performed using the Instat-3 and PRISM-4 softwares (GraphPad). Each time point included five to 10 individuals, and all embryos from a given experiment were treated simultaneously. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM; they were analyzed by one-way or two-way ANOVA. One-way-ANOVA was followed, when significant, by Tukey’s post hoccomparison of means (for convenience, only a comparison of the higher and lower means are reported in the legend of the figures). Experiments were repeated at least twice, each on different days. Pictures were obtained using a C-35AD-2 Olympus camera on a BH-2 Olympus microscope (Rungis, France).

Electron microscopy
Embryos and larvae were sampled at 22, 48, and 72 hpf and 11 d post fertilization (dpf), and fixed for 2 h in 4% glutaraldehyde/2% paraformadehyde, in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) pH 7.4. After a brief rinsing in PB, they were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at room temperature. After rinsing in PB, all specimens were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in araldite. Ultra-thin (50–70 nm thick) sections made on the pineal area were stained with 7% uranyl acetate in methanol, and contrasted with lead citrate (15). Sections were viewed and photographed on a Hitachi 7500 transmission electron microscope (Elescience, Verrières, France).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Appearance of photoreceptor characteristics in developing pinealocytes
The embryonic pineal organ expresses ZfExR starting at 18 hpf (Fig. 1AGo). The area of ExR expression becomes larger at 24 hpf (Fig. 1BGo). Expression is limited to the pineal organ until 72 hpf (Fig. 1Go, C–E); at 96 hpf weak expression occurs in the ventral retina (Fig. 1FGo) at the level of the photoreceptor layer (Fig. 1Go, G and H).


Figure 1
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Localization of ExR expression in the developing zebrafish embryo. ExR mRNA was visualized using in situ hybridization as indicated in Materials and Methods. A–E, With the antisense probe, a specific expression is evidenced in the pineal organ, which appears as a spot located dorsally of the embryo’s head as early as 18 hpf (arrow in A). At higher stages, i.e. from 24 (B) to 72 (C) hpf, the spot appears located dorsally (D) in the midline of the head, between the eyes. E, Dorsal view of an embryo’s pineal spot at 52 hpf; a few individual labeled cells are seen. F–H, At later stages, some expression also appears in the ventral retina as shown by the arrow in F. G and H, Higher magnifications of the labeled retina in F. The yolk in C and F shows weak nonspecific staining.

 
Electron microscopic examination revealed that the initial zfExR expression (18 hpf) is accompanied by the appearance of two defining structural characteristics of photoreceptors, centrosomes and [2 x 9 + 0] ciliary structures (Fig. 2AGo); a third feature of photoreceptors, the extensive infoldings of plasma membranes, first becomes obvious at 48 hpf (Fig. 2BGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Ultrastructure of zebrafish pineal photoreceptor cells at early stages of development. A, At 22 hpf, the pineal cells show little signs of differentiation, except the cilia of the 9 x 2 + 0 type and the associated centrosome (arrows and inset). B, At 48 hpf, photoreceptors are fully differentiated, and the well developed outer segment (OS) arises from the cilia (arrows). Bars, 1 µm.

 
Rhythmic expression of zfExR and zfAANAT2 develops in LD but not in constant light (LL) and DD
zfExR and zfAANAT2 mRNAs were studied in parallel as a function of environmental lighting. Daily rhythms in both were detected in LD, but were only statistically significant for zfAANAT2; rhythmic changes in these mRNAs were not apparent in LL or DD (Fig. 3Go).


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. zfExR and zfAANAT2 mRNA abundance under LD, DD, and LL conditions. Embryos were kept at 28.5 C under either a 12:12 LD cycle (A), DD (B) or LL (C). The gray boxes correspond to the dark phases (which are the same as those of the embryos genitors in A). The black bars at the bottom (in B and C) indicate the subjective dark phases (dark phases of the genitors). Embryos were collected at the times indicated and processed for the in situ hybridization; mRNA abundance was estimated as indicated in Materials and Methods. Mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). Zero in the abscissa corresponds to 0800 h (time of fertilization). One-way ANOVA indicated that AANAT2 mRNA abundance did not vary significantly under DD or LL. However, significant changes occurred under LD (P < 0.0003); a, significantly different from b (Tukey’s post hoc comparison of means, P < 0.05). Differences in ExR mRNA abundance were not statistically significant under any of the conditions tested. Similar results were obtained in two other experiments.

 
Circadian rhythmicity of zfAANAT2 is maintained following LD cycles or a single dark pulse
zfAANAT2 was expressed rhythmically for at least 24 h in LL, if animals were first exposed to either two 12:12 LD (not shown) or two DL (Fig. 4Go) cycles. It was also found that rhythmicity was induced in LL after a single dark pulse applied at 24 hpf, and that the phase of the circadian rhythm was a function of pulse duration (Fig. 5Go). The finding that the zfAANAT2 mRNA rhythm persists for two cycles, and with similar amplitude, strengthens the idea that this represents a true circadian rhythm, rather than a one-time transient response.


Figure 4
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. zfAANAT2 mRNA abundance under a reversed DL cycle (A) followed by constant light (B). A, Embryos were placed under a LD cycle (controls; solid line) or a reversed DL cycle (DL; dashed line) from fertilization. B, An initial DL cycle was followed by LL at 60 hpf (solid line); the controls (dashed line) were maintained under DL (same as DL cycle in A). The gray panels correspond to the dark phases. Embryos were collected at the times indicated and processed as in Fig. 3Go. Mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). The data fitted a sinusoidal; in each curve the variations in mRNA abundance were statistically significant (one-way ANOVA: P < 0.005 or below). a, Significantly different from b; a, significantly different from b (Tukey’s post hoc comparison of means, P < 0.05). Similar results were obtained in two other experiments.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effects of dark stimuli of different durations on zfAANAT2 mRNA abundance in embryos maintained under LL. Embryos were maintained under LL from fertilization; a dark stimulus of 2 (light gray, solid line) or 8 h (dark gray, dashed line) duration was applied at 24 hpf, as indicated. Embryos were then processed as indicated in Fig. 3Go. The black bars at the top of each column indicate the subjective dark phases (dark phases of the genitors). Mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). In each curve, the observed variations in mRNA abundance were statistically significant as indicated by the one-way ANOVA analysis (P < 0.005); Tukey’s post hoc comparison of individual means indicated that peak and nadir values differed from each other (P < 0.05). Pulse duration affected significantly the shape of the oscillations, as indicated by a two-way ANOVA comparison of the data (P < 0.0008). The 0 in the abscissa indicates time of fertilization (0800 h). Similar results were obtained in a second experiment.

 
Photic pulses initiate circadian rhythmicity of zfAANAT2
The above experiment used a dark pulse against an LL background. Similarly, a light pulse (1–8 h) against a DD background induced circadian expression of zfAANAT2 (Fig. 6Go): the phases of the subsequent oscillations were similar, independent of the pulse duration. However, variations induced by the 1-h pulse were not significant and of lower amplitude than those obtained with the 2- or 8-h pulses.


Figure 6
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effects of light pulses of different duration on AANAT2 mRNA abundance in embryos maintained under constant darkness (DD). Embryos were maintained under DD (A) from fertilization and a light pulse of 1 (B), 2 (C) or 8 (D) h was applied at 24 hpf, as indicated. They were then processed as indicated in Fig. 3Go. The black bars at the top indicate the subjective dark phases (dark phases of the genitors). The gray panels indicate darkness for the embryos. Mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). The 0 in the abscissa indicates time of fertilization (0800 h). One-way ANOVA indicated that the variations in mRNA abundance were statistically significant only in C (2-h light pulse) and D (8-h light pulse) (P < 0.0001). a, Significantly different from b (Tukey’s post hoc comparison of means, P < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that the 2- h and 8-h light pulses curves were significantly different from the DD curves (P < 0.01), but the duration of the pulse (2 h vs. 8 h) had no significant effect (P < 0.7). Similar results were obtained in another experiment.

 
Conversely, the appearance of the peak in AANAT mRNA abundance depended on the time at which the pulse was applied. Thus, 4-h pulses of light applied at successive points during the 20- to 46-hpf period induced corresponding delays in peak appearance (Fig. 7Go).


Figure 7
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effects of light pulses applied at different post-fertilization times on the circadian expression of AANAT2 mRNA abundance in embryos maintained under DD. A, Embryos were maintained under DD from fertilization. A 4-h light pulse was applied at 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, or 46 hpf as indicated; embryos were collected shortly after at different time intervals and processed as indicated in Fig. 3Go. Mean ± SEM (n = 5–10); error bars are not shown for clarity of the graph. ANOVA indicated that the variations in mRNA abundance differ significantly in all curves (P < 0.0001); in each curve, Tukey’s post hoc comparison of means indicated that the peak values were different from the nadir values (P < 0.001). B, Data are replotted from those presented in A. There is strict correlation between the times at which the light pulses are applied (abscissa) and the corresponding phase delays in peak appearance reported in the ordinates (time of peak appearance minus time of peak obtained with the first pulse of light).

 
Single photic transitions (D->L or L->D) initiate circadian rhythmicity of zfAANAT2
The above photic perturbations involve two photic transitions, L->D at the start and D->L at the end of the dark pulse. It was also found that a single cue initiated clock function when the D->L transition occurred at 21 hpf or later (Fig. 8Go, A–E). In a reversed experiment, embryos were raised under LL and then switched to DD; this initiated circadian oscillations when the L->D transition occurred at 21 hpf or later (Fig. 8AGo'–E').


Figure 8
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Effects of dark-to-light and light-to-dark transitions on AANAT2 mRNA abundance. A–E, Embryos were maintained under constant light from fertilization (A: LL), or first exposed to darkness for 15 (B), 18 (C), 21 (D), or 24 (E) hours, before being released under LL. A'–E', Embryos were first placed under constant darkness (A', DD) from fertilization or exposed to light for 15 (B'), 18 (C'), 21 (D'), or 24 (E') hours before being released under DD. They were then processed as indicated in Fig. 3Go. The black bars at the top of graph indicate the dark phases of the genitors, and the gray boxes indicate darkness for the embryos. Mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). Two-way ANOVA indicated that the curves in D and E were not different from each other, but differed from the others (A–C) (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the curves in D' and E' were not different from each other, but differed from the A'–C' curves (P < 0.0001). a, Significantly different from b (Tukey’s post hoc comparison of means, P < 0.05). The 0 in the abscissa indicates time of fertilization (0800 h). Similar results were obtained in an independent experiment.

 
zfExR expression is not circadian
The expression of zfExR was examined in all the experiments described above. However, statistically significant rhythmic expression of zfExR did not occur.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
One of the advances of this study is finding that elements of the three functional components of circadian clock system in the zebrafish pineal organ—photodetection, clock function and output—appear to be in place at the end of 1 dpf. This is coincident with the appearance of the first pinealofugal nerve fibers (19 hpf) (16). It is of interest to note that at this point in development, pinealocytes appear to be anatomically immature compared with those observed d 2 (this study) or 6 dpf (17). At 24 hpf they lack the defining feature that characterizes the adult pinealocyte—distinct photoreceptor outer segments—while containing the characteristic 2 x 9 + 0 cilia from which the outer segments develop (17, 18, 19). The expression of ZfExR at 1 dpf is likely to explain pinealocyte photosensitivity at this stage. Accordingly, it appears that at 1 dpf, when the pinealocyte is not anatomically mature, it is fully capable of functioning as a complete circadian system, capable of responding to light. The interpretation that at this stage of development light acts indirectly on the pineal gland through another structure is less attractive because it assumes a developmental extrinsic->intrinsic switch in how light regulates the pineal circadian clock.

Our results also provide additional support to the view that fish pineal photoreceptors develop before retinal photoreceptors (20). Specifically, at 24 and 48 hpf, photodetector features were not evident in the zebrafish retina (data not shown). The first rudiments of retinal photoreceptor outer segments are not observable before 54 hpf (21), whereas the initial retinal expression of an opsin gene is not seen before 40 hpf (22). It is, however, not impossible that other pigments function during this period of time in the retina. We also detected ZfExR expression at 4 dpf in the ventral retina, as has been described for Aanat2 (detectable at 3 dpf) (11), indicating that retinal zfExR expression is developmentally transient (11). In contrast to the 4 dpf retinal expression of zfExR, pineal expression was detectable at 24 hpf, when structural features of photoreceptors were also apparent. Earlier development of pineal photoreceptors relative to that of retinal photoreceptors is intriguing, because similar transcription factors control expression of the same or closely related genes in each tissue. It will be of interest to determine the molecular basis of this temporal difference.

Previous observations have been interpreted to indicate that the nocturnal increase in zfAANAT2 mRNA abundance is itself triggered by light-induced expression of zfPer2 (13). If this were the only condition, however, one would expect an increase in zfAANAT2 expression to occur under LL once the pineal becomes activated, i.e. between 18 and 24 hpf. This was not observed, i.e. neither a surge, nor endogenous oscillations in Aanat2 expression, was observed in embryos raised under LL from birth. Accordingly, it would appear more accurate to conclude that the embryos also needed to experience both dark and a photic transition. This is supported by the finding that circadian oscillations in zfAANAT2 expression occurred under LL provided the embryos were previously exposed to an LD or DL cycle. Moreover, a single transition from DD to LL, or LL to DD, initiated circadian oscillations in zfAANAT2, providing that this transition occurred at 21 hpf or later. This is consistent with the proposal that exposure to both light and darkness is necessary to initiate pineal clock function. However, it is not yet clear whether this initiation of pineal clock function reflects the start of the circadian clocks in individual pinealocytes or the synchronization of active clocks in these cells, or both.

Synchronization of the clocks in individual pinealocytes may involve light-dependent induction of zfPer2 (13), and dark-dependent induction of a yet-unidentified factor, both of which could interact with components of the transcriptional/translational feedback loop that constitutes the circadian clock (23, 24). From the effects of dark pulses under LL and light pulses under DD, it appears that the timing of light onset, not duration, determines the phase of the resulting circadian rhythm.

The results of these studies provide clear indication that zfAANAT2 is under circadian control. This is likely to reflect the presence of E-Box elements (8), which mediate circadian control of many genes through interactions with protein components of the clock (25, 26, 27). The mechanism underlying the noncircadian photic control of zfExR expression in LD lighting cycles remains unknown.

In summary, the present study provides evidence that the circadian system in the zebrafish pineal organ is potentially functional as early as 18–21 hpf, i.e. 2 d before the retina. Anatomically immature pinealocytes are capable of transducing light signals and generating circadian oscillations in zfAANAT2 expression. Accordingly, it appears that light sensitivity, circadian clock function, and output are present early in embryonic development and that the pineal gland—not the retina—mediates photic responses at this stage. Our results also provide further support to the interpretation that minimal photic cues are sufficient to initiate pineal circadian clock function during development. Finally, it appears that light perception per se, as provided by LL, is not sufficient to initiate the circadian oscillations; rather, a photic transition is required, with the time of light onset determining the subsequent phase of the oscillations. This and previous studies (13) suggest that the onset and entrainment of the pineal circadian clocks need both light and darkness, i.e. light acting through induction of zfPer2 expression, and darkness acting through a yet unknown mechanism. It remains to be determined whether the photic transitions (L->D or D->L) start the clock ticking in each cell or synchronizes circadian activity of individual cells, or does both. These questions may be asked, using the paradigm established here, in which single photic transitions are sufficient to generate a circadian output, i.e. zfAANAT2 mRNA.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank M. Fuentès, B. Rivière, and D. Saint-Hilaire for their technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Grant PICS 2556) and the Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure statement: R.V., L.B., G.B., A.P., Y.G., W.G.G., D.C.K., and J.F. have nothing to declare.

First Published Online February 23, 2006

Abbreviations: AANAT2, Arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase; DD, constant darkness; dpf, days post fertilization; ExR, exorhodopsin; LD, light/dark; LL, constant light; zf, zebrafish.

Received December 8, 2005.

Accepted for publication February 9, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vallone D, Gondi SB, Whitmore D, Foulkes NS 2004 E-box function in a period gene repressed by light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4106–4111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sato TK, Panda S, Miraglia LJ, Reyes TM, Rudic RD, McNamara P, Naik KA, FitzGerald GA, Kay SA, Hogenesch JB 2004 A functional genomics strategy reveals Rora as a component of the mammalian circadian clock. Neuron 43:527–537[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Delaunay F, Thisse C, Marchand O, Laudet V, Thisse B 2000 An inherited functional circadian clock in zebrafish embryos. Science 289:297–300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kaneko M, Cahill GM 2005 Light-dependent development of circadian gene expression in transgenic zebrafish. PLoS Biol 3:e34
  5. Kazimi N, Cahill GM 1999 Development of a circadian melatonin rhythm in embryonic zebrafish. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 117:47–52[Medline]
  6. Hurd MW, Cahill GM 2002 Entraining signals initiate behavioral circadian rhythmicity in larval zebrafish. J Biol Rhythms 17:307–314[Abstract]
  7. Falcón J, Besseau L, Boeuf G, Molecular and cellular regulation of pineal organ responses. In: Hara T, Zielinski B, eds. Fish physiology: sensory systems neuroscience. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, in press
  8. Appelbaum L, Anzulovich A, Baler R, Gothilf Y 2005 Homeobox-clock protein interaction in zebrafish. A shared mechanism for pineal-specific and circadian gene expression. J Biol Chem 280:11544–11551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chen W, Baler R 2000 The rat arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase E-box: differential use in a master vs. a slave oscillator. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 81:43–50[Medline]
  10. Chong NW, Bernard M, Klein DC 2000 Characterization of the chicken serotonin N-acetyltransferase gene. Activation via clock gene heterodimer/E box interaction. J Biol Chem 275:32991–32998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gothilf Y, Coon SL, Toyama R, Chitnis A, Namboodiri MA, Klein DC 1999 Zebrafish serotonin N-acetyltransferase-2: marker for development of pineal photoreceptors and circadian clock function. Endocrinology 140:4895–4903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mano H, Kojima D, Fukada Y 1999 Exo-rhodopsin: a novel rhodopsin expressed in the zebrafish pineal gland. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 73:110–118[Medline]
  13. Ziv L, Levkovitz S, Toyama R, Falcón J, Gothilf Y 2005 Functional development of the zebrafish pineal gland: light-induced expression of period2 is required for onset of the circadian clock. J Neuroendocrinol 17:314–320[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Thisse B, Heyer V, Lux A, Alunni V, Degrave A, Seiliez I, Kirchner J, Parkhill, JP, Thisse C 2004 Spatial and temporal expression of the zebrafish genome by large-scale in situ hybridization screening. Methods Cell Biol 77:505–519[Medline]
  15. Reynolds ES 1963 The use of the lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 17:208–212
  16. Wilson SW, Easter SSJ 1991 A pioneering growth cone in the embryonic zebrafish brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2293–2296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Allwardt BA, Dowling JE 2001 The pineal gland in wild-type and two zebrafish mutants with retinal defects. J Neurocytol 30:493–501[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Falcón J 1999 Cellular circadian clocks in the pineal. Prog Neurobiol 58:121–162[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Tsujikawa M, Malicki J 2004 Genetics of photoreceptor development and function in zebrafish. Int J Dev Biol 48:925–934[Medline]
  20. Forsell J, Holmqvist B, Ekstrom P 2002 Molecular identification and developmental expression of UV and green opsin mRNAs in the pineal organ of the Atlantic halibut. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 136:51–62[Medline]
  21. Schmitt EA, Dowling JE 1999 Early retinal development in the zebrafish, Danio rerio: light and electron microscopic analyses. J Comp Neurol 404:515–536[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Takechi M, Kawamura S 2005 Temporal and spatial changes in the expression pattern of multiple red and green subtype opsin genes during zebrafish development. J Exp Biol 208:1337–1345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Iuvone PM, Tosini G, Pozdeyev N, Haque R, Klein DC, Chaurasia SS 2005 Circadian clocks, clock networks, arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase, and melatonin in the retina. Prog Retinal Eye Res 24:433–456[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2002 Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418:935–941[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kyriacou CP, Rosato E 2000 Squaring up the E-box. J Biol Rhythms 15:483–490[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hardin PE 2004 Transcription regulation within the circadian clock: the E-box and beyond. J Biol Rhythms 19:348–360[Abstract]
  27. Munoz E, Baler R 2003 The circadian E-box: when perfect is not good enough. Chronobiol Int 20:371–388[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
P. A. Salome, Q. Xie, and C. R. McClung
Circadian Timekeeping during Early Arabidopsis Development
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2008; 147(3): 1110 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/5/2273    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vuilleumier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Falcón, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vuilleumier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Falcón, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals