help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2005-1117
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/6/s25    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henley, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henley, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.
Endocrinology Vol. 147, No. 6 s25-s32
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society


Supplement

Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Use Distinct Mechanisms of Action to Modulate Endocrine System Function

Derek V. Henley and Kenneth S. Korach

Receptor Biology Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Kenneth S. Korach, Receptor Biology Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, MD B3-02, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709. E-mail: korach{at}niehs.nih.gov.

Abstract

The term endocrine-disrupting chemicals is used to define a structurally diverse class of synthetic and natural compounds that possess the ability to alter various components of the endocrine system and potentially induce adverse health effects in exposed individuals and populations. Research on these compounds has revealed that they use a variety of both nuclear receptor-mediated and non-receptor-mediated mechanisms to modulate different components of the endocrine system. This review will describe in vitro and in vivo studies that highlight the spectrum of unique mechanisms of action and biological effects of four endocrine-disrupting chemicals–diethylstilbestrol, genistein, di(n-butyl)phthalate, and methoxyacetic acid–to illustrate the diverse and complex nature of this class of compounds.

A VARIETY OF structurally diverse natural and synthetic chemicals, classified as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), have been reported to interfere with the endocrine system and ultimately disturb the normal function of tissues and organs, particularly those of the reproductive tract. Given their physicochemical differences and distinct biological effects, it is not surprising that a variety of mechanisms are used by EDCs to influence the endocrine system. Advances in our understanding of these mechanisms have been aided by increased public interest in the health effects of EDCs and the development of new tools and models for studying these compounds. Diethylstilbestrol (DES), genistein (Gen), di(n-butyl) phthalate (DBP), and methoxyacetic acid (MAA) are four compounds (Fig. 1Go) that are discussed here in an effort to illustrate some of the unique mechanisms of action used by EDCs to modulate endocrine system function.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The chemical structures of selected EDCs. The structure of 17ß-estradiol is also shown for comparison.

 
DES

DES is a nonsteroidal synthetic estrogen that was developed by Sir Charles Dodds and colleagues in 1938 (1). Physicians began prescribing DES in the late 1940s to maintain normal placental steroid synthesis and prevent miscarriages and premature births (2). The results of the first randomized controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of DES in preventing miscarriage and premature birth, published in 1953, showed no protective effect of DES (3). Despite these findings, DES continued to be prescribed to pregnant women until 1971, and it has been estimated that approximately 5–10 million Americans were treated with DES during pregnancy or exposed in utero from the 1940s to 1971 (4). Its use was discontinued in 1971 after a report that associated in utero DES exposure with vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma, a rare form of reproductive tract cancer, in a small number (~0.1%) of daughters of women who had taken the drug (5, 6). Subsequent studies have reported multiple teratogenic effects attributable to prenatal DES exposure that occur more frequently than clear cell adenocarcinomas. In females exposed to DES in utero, nonneoplastic abnormalities such as anatomical malformations of the cervix, vagina, and uterus have been reported, as well as decreased fertility and less successful pregnancies (7, 8, 9, 10). Although no increased risk of cancer has been observed in DES-exposed males, several teratogenic effects have been reported in the reproductive tract, including testicular hypoplasia, cryptorchidism, and epididymal cysts (7, 8, 11).

Adverse effects resulting from DES exposure continue to be uncovered as those exposed in utero advance in age. In an effort to better predict, prevent, and understand the effects of in utero DES exposure, several rodent models have been created to elucidate the mechanisms by which DES may impart its carcinogenic and teratogenic effects on humans. One well characterized DES exposure model is the neonatal mouse, in which female and male pups are treated with DES (2 µg/d) for the first 5 d of life and aged up to 18 months. Neonatal exposure of female mice to DES results in few reproductive tract abnormalities but a high incidence of benign reproductive tract tumors (12, 13). Although rodent models have effectively reproduced several elements of human DES exposure in utero, the complex developmental and carcinogenic effects of DES have made it difficult to study the mechanisms underlying DES-mediated action (13).

A variety of receptor-mediated and non-receptor-mediated mechanisms for DES-induced toxicity have been put forward. The generation of mice lacking either estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) (14) or ERß (15), i.e. ER knockout (ERKO) mice, provided effective tools to incorporate into the neonatal mouse model as a means to determine the role of the estrogen receptor (ER) in mediating DES-induced effects in vivo. Additionally, because there are two ER proteins, ER{alpha} and ERß, the different animal models can be used to identify the role of each receptor, if any, in DES-mediated toxicity in specific tissues.

Actions on females
Studies in our laboratory have used the neonatal mouse model to study DES effects in female wild-type (WT), {alpha}ERKO, and ßERKO mice. WT females treated neonatally with DES displayed characteristic DES-induced reproductive tract lesions in the uterus, vagina, and oviduct (16) (Table 1Go). In the uterus, DES treatment produced atrophy, smooth muscle disorganization, hyalinization, squamous metaplasia of the luminal and glandular epithelium, and endometrial hyperplasia. In the vagina, DES treatment produced persistent epithelial cornification and vaginal adenosis in a small percentage of animals. Finally, in the oviduct, DES induced progressive proliferative lesions of the epithelium (16, 17). Similarly treated {alpha}ERKO females displayed none of these characteristic DES-induced lesions, indicating that DES elicits its effects in the female reproductive tract through an ER{alpha}-dependent signaling pathway.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Incidence of pathology observed in WT and {alpha}ERKO female mice after neonatal DES exposure

 
Actions on males
Similar experiments were performed in males to determine whether DES-mediated effects in the male reproductive tract, namely within the seminal vesicles and prostate, were ER mediated. DES treatment of WT males resulted in a significant decrease in seminal vesicle size at all ages, whereas no differences in the seminal vesicle sizes of DES- and oil-treated {alpha}ERKO males were observed regardless of age (18) (Fig. 2Go). With respect to the prostate gland, histological analyses revealed that neonatal DES exposure in WT and ßERKO mice resulted in changes in the aged ventral and dorsolateral prostates, including increased stromal mass, epithelial hyperplasia and dysplasia, and interstitial lymphocyte infiltration, all of which are characteristic of the phenotype of an estrogenized prostate gland (19). In addition, DES-induced epithelial cell differentiation defects indicative of estrogen imprinting were observed in the dorsolateral prostate of WT and ßERKO mice, including the presence of a continuous layer of basal cells lining the epithelial ducts and acini, luminal cell hyperplasia, and loss of expression of dorsolateral prostate-2 protein, a marker of functional differentiation in the dorsolateral prostate (18). None of these effects were observed in the prostates of {alpha}ERKO males treated with DES, indicating that ER{alpha} is required for DES-mediated effects in the prostate. Collectively, these data suggest that DES acts through an ER{alpha}-mediated mechanism in the male reproductive tract.


Figure 2
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of neonatal DES exposure on seminal vesicle weight in adult WT and {alpha}ERKO male mice. Top, Whole mounts of seminal vesicles from WT and {alpha}ERKO males at 6 months of age, after neonatal exposure to either vehicle (corn oil, CO) or DES (scale is in centimeters). Bottom, Quantitative analysis of seminal vesicle weights (percent body weight) from WT and {alpha}ERKO males at 4 and 12 months of age after neonatal exposure to corn oil or DES. *, P < 0.05. [Originally published in Ref. 18 .]

 
Mechanisms of action
Additional studies used these animal models to determine whether DES acts through an ER-mediated mechanism to disrupt the expression of genes that are required for normal differentiation and organization of the reproductive tract. The Hox and Wnt families of genes represent potential targets for DES-mediated effects because their expression in the paramesonephric duct is critical for the development and organization of the female reproductive tract, and the reproductive tract phenotypes of null mouse models of the Hox and Wnt gene families are similar to those found in DES-exposed mice (20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Furthermore, neonatal DES exposure reduces the expression of Hoxa9, Hoxa10, Hoxa11, and Wnt7a in the murine female reproductive tract (23, 25, 26), further suggesting a role of altered Hox and Wnt gene expression in the observed reproductive tract phenotypes of DES-exposed mice. Based on these observations, experiments were performed in neonatal {alpha}ERKO female mice to determine the role of ER{alpha} in mediating DES-induced down-regulation of Hox and Wnt gene expression. Expression of uterine Hoxa10 and Hoxa11 was reduced approximately 50%, and Wnt7a expression was reduced over 80% in the uteri of 5-d-old WT mice neonatally exposed to DES (16). In contrast to WT mice, DES had no effect on Hoxa10, Hoxa11, or Wnt7a expression in similarly treated {alpha}ERKO mice, indicating that the DES- mediated reduction of the expression of these genes is regulated through ER{alpha} (Fig. 3Go). These results implicate an early developmental role for ER{alpha} in DES-induced teratogenic effects and suggest that disruption of Hox and Wnt gene expression may be ultimately responsible for the anatomical abnormalities in DES-exposed mice.


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of neonatal DES exposure on Hoxa10, Hoxa11, and Wnt7a expression in the uteri of WT and {alpha}ERKO female mice. Top and middle, Quantitative analysis of ribonuclease protection assays (Hoxa10 and Hoxa11), showing the average percentage of cyclophilin (normalization mRNA) (±SEM) for each experimental group. Bottom, Quantitative analysis of the semiquantitative RT-PCR showing the average Wnt7a levels for each genotype and treatment as a percentage of ActbSEM). *, P < 0.01. [Originally published in Ref. 16 .]

 
Subsequent studies have attempted to characterize the molecular mechanism underlying DES-mediated decreases in Hox and Wnt gene expression. One potential mechanism involves epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation. For example, neonatal DES exposure increases lactoferrin and c-fos gene expression in the mouse uterus through demethylation of the lactoferrin promoter (27) and hypomethylation of exon 4 of the c-fos gene (28). However, DES treatment had no effect on the methylation state of the Hoxa10 and Hoxa11 proximal promoters in the mouse uterus, indicating that DES uses a different mechanism to modulate the expression of these genes (29). Additional studies have since identified a nonconsensus estrogen response element (ERE) in the Hoxa10 promoter that is differentially regulated by estradiol and DES (30). In these studies, the maximal estradiol-induced luciferase expression of a Hoxa10-ERE-containing reporter plasmid was four times greater than the maximum induced by DES, indicating that the Hoxa10 ERE is induced in a ligand-specific manner, presumably because of the distinct conformational changes in the ER induced by ligand differences and by the Hoxa10 ERE. This molecular mechanism may account for the decreased Hoxa10 gene expression in the female reproductive tract after DES exposure and ultimately the distinct reproductive tract phenotypes observed in DES-exposed females. Whether a similar mechanism is responsible for the DES-mediated decreases in Hoxa11 and Wnt7a gene expression remains to be determined.

Gen

Several nonsteroidal plant-derived compounds known as phytoestrogens signal through the ER and therefore may act as endocrine disruptors. The potential benefits of phytoestrogens in preventing hormone-dependent cancers and lowering cholesterol have raised interest in studying the biological effects of these compounds. One such compound is Gen, an isoflavone present at high concentrations in soy-based products, which exhibits in vitro and in vivo estrogenic activity (31, 32, 33) as well as tyrosine kinase inhibitory properties (34). Although convincing evidence for both the beneficial and detrimental effects of Gen exposure is limited, it has been reported to reduce mammary cancer in rats (35, 36) and to lower cholesterol levels in humans (37, 38). However, it has also been associated with diminished reproductive capacity in animals (39, 40) and has been shown to induce uterine adenocarcinomas in a neonatal mouse model (41) and to increase the incidence of mammary tumors in rats (42). Further interest in studying Gen has resulted from the observation that humans, particularly infants, are exposed to it through their diet. It has been estimated that adults consuming modest amounts of soy-containing foods have a total isoflavone intake of approximately 1 mg/kg·d, whereas infants fed soy formula ingest significantly higher amounts, consuming 6–9 mg/kg·d of isoflavones, approximately 65% of which is Gen (43). This dose of isoflavones in infants is six to 11 times higher than the amount reported to have hormonal effects that alter the menstrual cycle in adult women (44).

Actions on the uterus
Given the ubiquitous nature of isoflavones in the human diet and the potential for both beneficial and adverse health consequences after exposure to Gen, efforts have been made to characterize the mechanism of action of Gen and to more clearly define the health effects of Gen exposure. In an immature mouse model, Gen elicits classical estrogenic uterotropic responses including increases in uterine wet weight, epithelial cell height, gland number, and lactoferrin expression (45). Receptor-binding assays indicate that Gen preferentially binds to ERß in comparison with ER{alpha}, with relative binding affinities reported from 20- to 30-fold higher for ERß (46, 47). Despite these differences in ligand binding affinity, Gen has only a slight preference for transactivation of gene expression in vitro through ERß compared with ER{alpha}, suggesting that Gen may elicit effects in vivo through both ER{alpha}- and ERß-mediated pathways (47). Evidence for ER{alpha}-mediated actions of Gen in vivo is derived from studies showing Gen-induced effects in the mouse uterus, which predominantly expresses ER{alpha} (45). In addition, Gen activates the IGF-I signaling pathway in the mouse uterus via an ER{alpha}-dependent mechanism (48). Taken together, these data suggest Gen acts through an ER{alpha}-mediated mechanism in the uterus.

Evidence suggesting an ER{alpha}-mediated mechanism for Gen action in the uterus has prompted studies in our laboratory to definitively establish the role of ER{alpha} in the uterine response to Gen. In these studies, ovariectomized WT and {alpha}ERKO mice were treated with corn oil, estradiol (10 µg/kg·d), or Gen (50 µg/kg·d) for 3 d, and uterine weights were determined. Both the estradiol and Gen treatments significantly increased uterine wet weights in WT mice, whereas neither ligand increased uterine wet weights in the {alpha}ERKO mice, providing direct evidence that ER{alpha} is necessary for Gen-induced uterotropic effects (unpublished data).

Actions on the ovary
To further determine the contributions of ER{alpha} and ERß to Gen-induced effects in tissues other than the uterus, studies using ER null mice were incorporated into the neonatal mouse model described earlier, and the effects of Gen on the ovary were determined. Initial studies in WT CD-1 mice treated with Gen for 5 d showed a dose-dependent increase in multioocyte follicles by 19 d (49) (Table 2Go). To prove that the mechanism was due to the estrogenic properties of Gen and not to tyrosine kinase inhibitory properties, the nonestrogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor lavendustin was incorporated into these experiments. No multioocyte follicles were observed after treatment with lavendustin regardless of dose, indicating that the increased incidence of multioocyte follicles was due to the estrogenic properties of Gen. Similar experiments were performed in C57BL/6 mice and in both {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO mice to determine whether Gen was signaling in the ovary through ER{alpha}, ERß, or a non-receptor-mediated mechanism. Neonatal treatment with Gen increased the incidence of multioocyte follicles in WT C57BL/6 and {alpha}ERKO mice in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, ßERKO mice treated with Gen had a significant decrease in the incidence of multioocyte follicles, suggesting that the induction of multioocyte follicles after neonatal Gen exposure requires ERß (49) (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Incidence of multioocyte follicles after treatment with Gen or lavendustin A

 
Taken together, studies focused on the mouse uterus and ovary show that Gen is capable of signaling in a tissue-specific manner through both ER{alpha}- and ERß-mediated mechanisms. Although a variety of physiological and toxicological effects of Gen exposure have been illustrated in animal studies, conflicting data reported in epidemiological studies make it difficult to correlate animal models with human exposure (50). Additional studies characterizing other possible mechanisms of Gen action, such as non-receptor mediated, epigenetic, and transgenerational effects, are needed to broaden our understanding of the potential beneficial and detrimental effects of human exposure and to clarify inconsistencies between epidemiological studies.

DBP

Phthalate esters are used extensively as plasticizers and stabilizers in a variety of plastics and consumer goods. Exposure to phthalates through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption occurs throughout life (51). Select phthalate esters, including DBP, adversely affect the male rat reproductive tract after either prenatal or postnatal exposure. These adverse reproductive tract effects, which include disrupted epididymal development, hypospadias, cryptorchidism, multinucleated gonocytes, and reduced fertility, are a result of the antiandrogenic effects of some phthalate esters (52). Interestingly, the reproductive tract abnormalities present in DBP-exposed rats are similar to those that occur in humans with testicular dysgenesis syndrome, which is believed to result from altered fetal development as a result of genetic mutations and/or pharmacological or environmental disruptions (53). Given the widespread use of phthalate esters, a potential role for DBP in testicular dysgenesis is plausible (51, 55). Humans are exposed to more DBP than any other phthalate ester, with maximal DBP exposure reaching 113 µg/kg·d (56, 57). Interestingly, these same studies showed that women of childbearing age have the highest estimated DBP exposures. However, these levels are considerably lower than the minimal reported dose of DBP necessary to alter male reproductive tract development of more than 50 mg/kg·d (52).

Mechanisms of action
Animal models in which rats are exposed gestationally to various phthalate esters have been used to characterize the endocrine-disrupting effects elicited by the phthalate esters. In these studies, DBP elicits its antiandrogenic effects by reducing testosterone production in the Leydig cells of the testis through several mechanisms. However, the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist flutamide, in contrast to DBP, has little effect on the developing epididymis, suggesting a complex mechanism underlying DBP-mediated reproductive tract effects that involves more than its antiandrogenic properties (52). Furthermore, neither DBP nor its major metabolite, monobutyl phthalate, physically interacts with the AR, indicating that the antiandrogenic effects of DBP occur through AR-independent mechanisms (52).

One such established mechanism is the transcriptional down-regulation of genes associated with cholesterol transport (Scarb1 and Star) and testosterone biosynthesis (Cyp11a1, Hsd3b1, and Cyp17a1) that results in decreased testosterone production by the Leydig cells of the testis (58, 59, 60). Recent studies using microarray analyses to characterize the effects of DBP treatment on global gene expression profiles in the fetal rat testis show that DBP affects the expression of nearly 400 genes in Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, and gonocytes (61). With respect to the fetal Leydig cell, DBP increased the expression of genes such as Nalp6, which is known to inhibit Leydig cell testosterone synthesis, and decreased the expression of genes such as Npc and Lhcgr that up-regulate testosterone production. Within Sertoli cells, DBP increased the expression of testin and decreased Gja1 expression, both of which are associated with gap junction signaling, suggesting altered communication between Sertoli cells and gonocytes.

The dynamic nature of DBP-mediated effects is further illustrated by time course experiments in which DBP reduces testosterone production within 1 h of treatment, before detectable decreases in gene expression associated with cholesterol transport and steroid synthesis (62). DBP rapidly increased the expression of several genes, including members of the immediate-early gene family, which may play a role in the early decrease in testosterone production.

Although the mechanisms by which phthalate esters such as DBP alter the expression of genes required for normal male reproductive tract development have not been fully characterized, DBP serves as an example of an endocrine disruptor that elicits multiple effects on the male fetal reproductive tract, including antiandrogenic effects, without physically associating with the AR or altering AR-mediated signaling. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that DBP can activate the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), the pregnane X receptor (PXR) (63), and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor subtypes (PPAR{alpha}, -ß, and -{gamma}) (64), all of which are nuclear receptors (NRs) concentrated in the liver that regulate several metabolic enzymes, including those involved in steroid metabolism. These findings suggest that phthalate-induced effects on the male reproductive tract may be mediated by one or more of these NRs; however, additional research, perhaps using the CAR, PXR, and PPAR knockout mice, is needed to address this possibility.

MAA

MAA is the major metabolite of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME), an industrial solvent commonly used in varnishes, paints, dyes, and fuel additives (65). Exposure to EGME and MAA results in toxic reproductive effects in both animals and humans (66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71). Occupational exposure to both EGME and MAA has been associated with subfertility, spontaneous abortion, and reduced sperm counts (70, 72, 73, 74). The toxic effects of MAA have prompted investigations into the cellular and molecular actions of MAA that have uncovered unique actions for an EDC.

In vitro actions
In vitro studies show that MAA exerts its effects by potentiating the ligand-induced transcriptional activity of ER{alpha}, ERß, thyroid hormone receptor (TRß), progesterone receptor (PR), and AR, indicating that MAA may influence the activity of a shared component of NR signaling (75, 76). However, MAA has negligible effects on NR-mediated transcriptional activity in the absence of hormone, indicating it is not functioning simply as a NR agonist. This was confirmed by receptor-binding assays, which showed that MAA does not compete with estradiol for binding to the ER (76). The potentiation effects of MAA are also not a result of the derepression of gene transcription, because microarray data show that MAA alone altered the expression of only three transcripts after a 24-h exposure. In the same experiment, addition of the PR agonist R5020 potentiated the PR-mediated expression of 16 genes and resulted in the induction of four new genes, indicating that MAA can alter NR target gene specificity.

In vivo actions
Additional experiments were performed to determine whether MAA had similar effects on NR function and gene expression in vivo. Immature CD-1 female mice were treated with the synthetic progestin R5020 in the absence and presence of MAA, and uterine levels of calcitonin mRNA expression were determined. Results showed that neither R5020 nor MAA alone had any effect on calcitonin expression, but a combination of the two produced an approximate 4-fold increase in expression, indicating MAA was capable of potentiating ligand-dependent NR-mediated transcriptional activation in vivo.

Mechanisms of action
The observation that MAA increases the transcriptional activity of multiple NRs suggests it may target a common component of NR action. One such potential target is the MAPK signaling pathway, which upon activation has been shown to potentiate the agonist-induced activity of both ER{alpha} and PR (54, 77 MAA increased the levels of activated Ras and ERK1/2 in HeLa cells, and a MAPK kinase inhibitor reduced the MAA-induced potentiation of agonist-bound PR by 60% in a reporter gene assay, indicating MAA is potentiating NR signaling through a MAPK-dependent signaling pathway (76). In addition to activating MAPK, MAA may regulate NR activity by modifying chromatin structure because MAA inhibits histone deacetylase activity in vitro and in vivo, resulting in increased levels of acetylated histone H4 (76).

The results of these studies reveal a novel mechanism of action for an EDC, in which MAA potentiates the ligand-dependent transcriptional activity of multiple NRs by targeting a common pathway(s) in NR-mediated signaling. This suggests that MAA exposure may potentiate the effects of weak nuclear receptor agonists found in the environment, producing a response indicative of a full agonist. Considering this possibility and the potential health impact associated with it, additional research evaluating the effects of MAA on NR activation by weak agonists, including environmental compounds, is needed.

Conclusions

DES, Gen, DBP, and MAA are four compounds described herein that illustrate the diverse biological effects and mechanisms of action used by EDCs to modulate endocrine system function. Studies on these compounds show that EDCs can act via receptor-mediated and/or non-receptor-mediated mechanisms to influence endocrine system function. The observation that EDCs can modulate the endocrine system in a receptor-independent manner has required investigators to reassess the criteria for classifying a compound as an EDC. The varied and sometimes complex mechanisms of action of EDCs, coupled with the physical and chemical diversity among members of the EDC family, suggest there may be numerous additional mechanisms used by EDCs that have yet to be uncovered. Future progress in identifying and characterizing EDCs will require an appreciation for their diverse mechanisms of action and will likely depend on the development of new screening methods and experimental models that account for this diversity.

Footnotes

This research was supported by the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

D.V.H. and K.S.K. have nothing to declare.

First Published Online May 11, 2006

Abbreviations: AR, Androgen receptor; DBP, di(n-butyl) phthalate; DES, diethylstilbestrol; EDC, endocrine-disrupting chemical; EGME, ethylene glycol monomethyl ether; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; ERKO, ER knockout; Gen, genistein; MAA, methoxyacetic acid; NR, nuclear receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; WT, wild-type.

Received August 31, 2005.

Accepted for publication November 24, 2005.

References

  1. Dodds EC GL, Lawsaon W, Robinson R 1938 Estrogenic activity of certain synthetic compounds. Nature 141:247–248
  2. Smith OW, Smith, GBS, Hurwitz D 1946 Increased excretion of pregnanediol in pregnancy from diethylstilbestrol with special reference to the prevention of late pregnancy accidents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 51:411–415
  3. Dieckmann WJ, Davis ME, Rynkiewicz LM, Pottinger RE 1953 Does the administration of diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy have therapeutic value? Am J Obstet Gynecol 66:1062–1081[Medline]
  4. Noller KL, Fish CR 1974 Diethylstilbestrol usage: its interesting past, important present, and questionable future. Med Clin North Am 58:739–810
  5. Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC 1971 Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. N Engl J Med 284:878–881[Medline]
  6. Melnick S, Cole P, Anderson D, Herbst A 1987 Rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. An update. N Engl J Med 316:514–516[Abstract]
  7. Herbst AL 2000 Behavior of estrogen-associated female genital tract cancer and its relation to neoplasia following intrauterine exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Gynecol Oncol 76:147–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Mittendorf R 1995 Teratogen update: carcinogenesis and teratogenesis associated with exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) in utero. Teratology 51:435–445[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kaufman RH, Adam E, Hatch EE, Noller K, Herbst AL, Palmer JR, Hoover RN 2000 Continued follow-up of pregnancy outcomes in diethylstilbestrol-exposed offspring. Obstet Gynecol 96:483–489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Giusti RM, Iwamoto K, Hatch EE 1995 Diethylstilbestrol revisited: a review of the long-term health effects. Ann Intern Med 122:778–788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Marselos M, Tomatis L 1992 Diethylstilboestrol. I. Pharmacology, toxicology and carcinogenicity in humans. Eur J Cancer 28A:1182–1189
  12. Newbold RR, McLachlan JA 1982 Vaginal adenosis and adenocarcinoma in mice exposed prenatally or neonatally to diethylstilbestrol. Cancer Res 42:2003–2011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Marselos M, Tomatis L 1992 Diethylstilboestrol. II. Pharmacology, toxicology and carcinogenicity in experimental animals. Eur J Cancer 29A:149–155
  14. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O 1993 Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11162–11166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, Enmark E, Warner M, Mahler JF, Sar M, Korach KS, Gustafsson JA, Smithies O 1998 Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor ß. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15677–15682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Couse JF, Dixon D, Yates M, Moore AB, Ma L, Maas R, Korach KS 2001 Estrogen receptor-{alpha} knockout mice exhibit resistance to the developmental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure on the female reproductive tract. Dev Biol 238:224–238[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Couse JF, Korach KS 2004 Estrogen receptor-{alpha} mediates the detrimental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure in the murine reproductive tract. Toxicology 205:55–63[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Prins GS, Birch L, Couse JF, Choi I, Katzenellenbogen B, Korach KS 2001 Estrogen imprinting of the developing prostate gland is mediated through stromal estrogen receptor {alpha}: studies with {alpha}ERKO and ßERKO mice. Cancer Res 61:6089–6097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Singh J, Handelsman DJ 1999 Morphometric studies of neonatal estrogen imprinting in the mature mouse prostate. J Endocrinol 162:39–48[Abstract]
  20. Dolle P, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Brown JM, Tickle C, Duboule D 1991 HOX-4 genes and the morphogenesis of mammalian genitalia. Genes Dev 5:1767–1776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Weinstein M, Branford W, Li H, Small K, Potter SS 1995 Hoxa 11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility. Development 121:1373–1385[Abstract]
  22. Satokata I, Benson G, Maas R 1995 Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10-deficient mice. Nature 374:460–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Miller C, Degenhardt K, Sassoon DA 1998 Fetal exposure to DES results in de-regulation of Wnt7a during uterine morphogenesis. Nat Genet 20:228–230[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Parr BA, McMahon AP 1998 Sexually dimorphic development of the mammalian reproductive tract requires Wnt-7a. Nature 395:707–710[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Block K, Kardana A, Igarashi P, Taylor HS 2000 In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure alters Hox gene expression in the developing mullerian system. FASEB J 14:1101–1108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ma L, Benson GV, Lim H, Dey SK, Maas RL 1998 Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev Biol 197:141–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Li S, Washburn KA, Moore R, Uno T, Teng C, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA, Negishi M 1997 Developmental exposure to diethylstilbestrol elicits demethylation of estrogen-responsive lactoferrin gene in mouse uterus. Cancer Res 57:4356–4359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Li S, Hansman R, Newbold R, Davis B, McLachlan JA, Barrett JC 2003 Neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure induces persistent elevation of c-fos expression and hypomethylation in its exon-4 in mouse uterus. Mol Carcinog 38:78–84[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Li S, Ma L, Chiang T, Burow M, Newbold RR, Negishi M, Barrett JC, McLachlan JA 2001 Promoter CpG methylation of Hox-a10 and Hox-a11 in mouse uterus not altered upon neonatal diethylstilbestrol exposure. Mol Carcinog 32:213–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Akbas GE, Song J, Taylor HS 2004 A HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) is differentially regulated by 17ß-estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES). J Mol Biol 340:1013–1023[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Santell RC, Chang YC, Nair MG, Helferich WG 1997 Dietary genistein exerts estrogenic effects upon the uterus, mammary gland and the hypothalamic/pituitary axis in rats. J Nutr 127:263–269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hsieh CY, Santell RC, Haslam SZ, Helferich WG 1998 Estrogenic effects of genistein on the growth of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 58:3833–3838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Collins BM, McLachlan JA, Arnold SF 1997 The estrogenic and antiestrogenic activities of phytochemicals with the human estrogen receptor expressed in yeast. Steroids 62:365–372[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Akiyama T, Ishida J, Nakagawa S, Ogawara H, Watanabe S, Itoh N, Shibuya M, Fukami Y 1987 Genistein, a specific inhibitor of tyrosine-specific protein kinases. J Biol Chem 262:5592–5595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hilakivi-Clarke L, Onojafe I, Raygada M, Cho E, Skaar T, Russo I, Clarke R 1999 Prepubertal exposure to zearalenone or genistein reduces mammary tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 80:1682–1688[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Lamartiniere CA, Zhang JX, Cotroneo MS 1998 Genistein studies in rats: potential for breast cancer prevention and reproductive and developmental toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 68:1400S–1405S
  37. Potter SM, Baum JA, Teng H, Stillman RJ, Shay NF, Erdman Jr JW 1998 Soy protein and isoflavones: their effects on blood lipids and bone density in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 68:1375S–1379S
  38. Cruz ML, Wong WW, Mimouni F, Hachey DL, Setchell KD, Klein PD, Tsang RC 1994 Effects of infant nutrition on cholesterol synthesis rates. Pediatr Res 35:135–140[Medline]
  39. Bradbury RB, White DE 1954 Estrogens and related substances in plants. Vitam Horm 12:207–233[Medline]
  40. Setchell KD, Gosselin SJ, Welsh MB, Johnston JO, Balistreri WF, Kramer LW, Dresser BL, Tarr MJ 1987 Dietary estrogens: a probable cause of infertility and liver disease in captive cheetahs. Gastroenterology 93:225–233[Medline]
  41. Newbold RR, Banks EP, Bullock B, Jefferson WN 2001 Uterine adenocarcinoma in mice treated neonatally with genistein. Cancer Res 61:4325–4328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hilakivi-Clarke L, Cho E, Onojafe I, Raygada M, Clarke R 1999 Maternal exposure to genistein during pregnancy increases carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis in female rat offspring. Oncol Rep 6:1089–1095[Medline]
  43. Setchell KD, Zimmer-Nechemias L, Cai J, Heubi JE 1997 Exposure of infants to phyto-oestrogens from soy-based infant formula. Lancet 350:23–27[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Cassidy A, Bingham S, Setchell KD 1994 Biological effects of a diet of soy protein rich in isoflavones on the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 60:333–340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Jefferson WN, Padilla-Banks E, Clark G, Newbold RR 2002 Assessing estrogenic activity of phytochemicals using transcriptional activation and immature mouse uterotrophic responses. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 777:179–189[Medline]
  46. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson JA 1998 Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor ß. Endocrinology 139:4252–4263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Mueller SO, Simon S, Chae K, Metzler M, Korach KS 2004 Phytoestrogens and their human metabolites show distinct agonistic and antagonistic properties on estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and ERß in human cells. Toxicol Sci 80:14–25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Klotz DM, Hewitt SC, Korach KS, Diaugustine RP 2000 Activation of a uterine insulin-like growth factor I signaling pathway by clinical and environmental estrogens: requirement of estrogen receptor-{alpha}. Endocrinology 141:3430–3439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Jefferson WN, Couse JF, Padilla-Banks E, Korach KS, Newbold RR 2002 Neonatal exposure to genistein induces estrogen receptor (ER){alpha} expression and multioocyte follicles in the maturing mouse ovary: evidence for ERß-mediated and nonestrogenic actions. Biol Reprod 67:1285–1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Bouker KB, Hilakivi-Clarke L 2000 Genistein: does it prevent or promote breast cancer? Environ Health Perspect 108:701–708[Medline]
  51. Latini G 2005 Monitoring phthalate exposure in humans. Clin Chim Acta 361:20–29[Medline]
  52. Foster PM, Mylchreest E, Gaido KW, Sar M 2001 Effects of phthalate esters on the developing reproductive tract of male rats. Hum Reprod Update 7:231–235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Virtanen HE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J 2005 Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the development and occurrence of male reproductive disorders. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207(Suppl 2):501–505
  54. Shen T, Horwitz KB, Lange CA 2001 Transcriptional hyperactivity of human progesterone receptors is coupled to their ligand-dependent down-regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of serine 294. Mol Cell Biol 21:6122–6131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Thomas JA, Thomas MJ 1984 Biological effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and other phthalic acid esters. Crit Rev Toxicol 13:283–317[Medline]
  56. Kohn MC, Parham F, Masten SA, Portier CJ, Shelby MD, Brock JW, Needham LL 2000 Human exposure estimates for phthalates. Environ Health Perspect 108:A440–A442
  57. Blount BC, Silva MJ, Caudill SP, Needham LL, Pirkle JL, Sampson EJ, Lucier GW, Jackson RJ, Brock JW 2000 Levels of seven urinary phthalate metabolites in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect 108:979–982
  58. Lehmann KP, Phillips S, Sar M, Foster PM, Gaido KW 2004 Dose-dependent alterations in gene expression and testosterone synthesis in the fetal testes of male rats exposed to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Toxicol Sci 81:60–68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Shultz VD, Phillips S, Sar M, Foster PM, Gaido KW 2001 Altered gene profiles in fetal rat testes after in utero exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Toxicol Sci 64:233–242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Barlow NJ, Phillips SL, Wallace DG, Sar M, Gaido KW, Foster PM 2003 Quantitative changes in gene expression in fetal rat testes following exposure to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Toxicol Sci 73:431–441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Liu K, Lehmann KP, Sar M, Young SS, Gaido KW 2005 Gene expression profiling following in utero exposure to phthalate esters reveals new gene targets in the etiology of testicular dysgenesis. Biol Reprod 73:180–192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Thompson CJ, Ross SM, Hensley J, Liu K, Heinze SC, Young SS, Gaido KW 2005 Differential steroidogenic gene expression in the fetal adrenal gland versus the testis and rapid and dynamic response of the fetal testis to di(n-butyl) phthalate. Biol Reprod 73:908–917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Wyde ME, Kirwan SE, Zhang F, Laughter A, Hoffman HB, Bartolucci-Page E, Gaido KW, Yan B, You L 2005 Di-n-butyl phthalate activates constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor and enhances the expression of steroid-metabolizing enzymes in the liver of rat fetuses. Toxicol Sci 86:281–290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Lapinskas PJ, Brown S, Leesnitzer LM, Blanchard S, Swanson C, Cattley RC, Corton JC 2005 Role of PPAR{alpha} in mediating the effects of phthalates and metabolites in the liver. Toxicology 207:149–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Johanson G 2000 Toxicity review of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and its acetate ester. Crit Rev Toxicol 30:307–345[Medline]
  66. Chapin RE, Dutton SL, Ross MD, Lamb 4th JC 1985 Effects of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME) on mating performance and epididymal sperm parameters in F344 rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 5:182–189[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Brinkworth MH, Weinbauer GF, Schlatt S, Nieschlag E 1995 Identification of male germ cells undergoing apoptosis in adult rats. J Reprod Fertil 105:25–33[Abstract]
  68. Foster PM, Creasy DM, Foster JR, Gray TJ 1984 Testicular toxicity produced by ethylene glycol monomethyl and monoethyl ethers in the rat. Environ Health Perspect 57:207–217[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Nagano K, Nakayama E, Oobayashi H, Yamada T, Adachi H, Nishizawa T, Ozawa H, Nakaichi M, Okuda H, Minami K, Yamazaki K 1981 Embryotoxic effects of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether in mice. Toxicology 20:335–343[Medline]
  70. Correa A, Gray RH, Cohen R, Rothman N, Shah F, Seacat H, Corn M 1996 Ethylene glycol ethers and risks of spontaneous abortion and subfertility. Am J Epidemiol 143:707–717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. El-Zein RA, Abdel-Rahman SZ, Morris DL, Legator MS 2002 Exposure to ethylene glycol monomethyl ether: clinical and cytogenetic findings. Arch Environ Health 57:371–376[Medline]
  72. Welch LS, Schrader SM, Turner TW, Cullen MR 1988 Effects of exposure to ethylene glycol ethers on shipyard painters. II. Male reproduction. Am J Ind Med 14:509–526[Medline]
  73. Ratcliffe JM, Schrader SM, Clapp DE, Halperin WE, Turner TW, Hornung RW 1989 Semen quality in workers exposed to 2-ethoxyethanol. Br J Ind Med 46:399–406[Medline]
  74. Schenker MB, Gold EB, Beaumont JJ, Eskenazi B, Hammond SK, Lasley BL, McCurdy SA, Samuels SJ, Saiki CL, Swan SH 1995 Association of spontaneous abortion and other reproductive effects with work in the semiconductor industry. Am J Ind Med 28:639–659[Medline]
  75. Tirado OM, Martinez ED, Rodriguez OC, Danielsen M, Selva DM, Reventos J, Munell F, Suarez-Quian CA 2003 Methoxyacetic acid disregulation of androgen receptor and androgen-binding protein expression in adult rat testis. Biol Reprod 68:1437–1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Jansen MS, Nagel SC, Miranda PJ, Lobenhofer EK, Afshari CA, McDonnell DP 2004 Short-chain fatty acids enhance nuclear receptor activity through mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and histone deacetylase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7199–7204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Lee H, Jiang F, Wang Q, Nicosia SV, Yang J, Su B, Bai W 2000 MEKK1 activation of human estrogen receptor {alpha} and stimulation of the agonistic activity of 4-hydroxytamoxifen in endometrial and ovarian cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 14:1882–1896[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/6/s25    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henley, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henley, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Korach, K. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals