Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2006-0305
Endocrinology Vol. 147, No. 8 3769-3776
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society
Diurnal Rhythmicity of the Clock Genes Per1 and Per2 in the Rat Ovary
Jan Fahrenkrug,
Birgitte Georg,
Jens Hannibal,
Peter Hindersson and
Søren Gräs
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jan Fahrenkrug, Professor, M.D., D.Med.Sci., Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Bispebjerg Hospital, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark. E-mail: bbhjanf{at}inet.uni2.dk.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Circadian rhythms are generated by endogenous clocks in the central brain oscillator, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and peripheral tissues. The molecular basis for the circadian clock consists of a number of genes and proteins that form transcriptional/translational feedback loops. In the mammalian gonads, clock genes have been reported in the testes, but the expression pattern is developmental rather than circadian. Here we investigated the daily expression of the two core clock genes, Per1 and Per2, in the rat ovary using real-time RT-PCR, in situ hybridization histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry. Both Per1 and Per2 mRNA displayed a statistically significant rhythmic oscillation in the ovary with a period of 24 h in: 1) a group of rats during proestrus and estrus under 12-h light,12-h dark cycles; 2) a second group of rats representing a mixture of all 4 d of the estrous cycle under 12-h light,12-h dark conditions; and 3) a third group of rats representing a mixture of all 4 d of estrous cycle during continuous darkness. Per1 mRNA was low at Zeitgeber time 02 and peaked at Zeitgeber time 1214, whereas Per2 mRNA was delayed by approximately 4 h relative to Per1. By in situ hybridization histochemistry, Per mRNAs were localized to steroidogenic cells in preantral, antral, and preovulatory follicles; corpora lutea; and interstitial glandular tissue. With newly developed antisera, we substantiated the expression of Per1 and Per2 in these cells by single/double immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, we visualized the temporal intracellular movements of PER1 and PER2 proteins. These findings suggest the existence of an ovarian circadian clock, which may play a role both locally and in the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
MANY PHYSIOLOGICAL AND behavioral processes exhibit circadian rhythmicity, which is controlled by endogenous clocks present in neurons of the brains suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and cells of peripheral tissues (1, 2). These cellular clocks are driven by a self-sustained molecular oscillator, which generates rhythmic gene expression with a periodicity of about 24 h (3). The molecular oscillator is composed of interacting positive and negative transcriptional/translational feedback loops in which the heterodimeric transcription activator CLOCK/brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1 (BMAL1) promotes the transcription of E-box containing cryptochrome (Cry1 and Cry2) and period (Per1 and Per2) genes as well as clock-controlled output genes (3, 4, 5). After being synthesized in the cytoplasm, CRY and PER proteins are imported into the nucleus to inhibit transactivation mediated by positive regulators. The oscillator in the SCN, which has been considered the master clock in a hierarchic model of the circadian timing system, seems not to be essential for driving the peripheral clocks (6). The SCN clock rather acts as a synchronizer of peripheral oscillators, opening the possibility that physiological rhythmicity in peripheral tissues can be controlled directly by their own clock genes. The neurons of the SCN receive daily information about environmental light and darkness via a monosynaptic neuronal pathway originating in a subset of light-sensitive retinal ganglion cells (7, 8). The SCN then synchronizes the physiology of the organism to daily changes by coordinating the activity of tissue-specific oscillators via neuronal and humoral outputs.
Circadian output from the SCN plays a major role in the regulation of female reproductive rhythms (9), and in the rat neuronal projections from the SCN to the GnRH neurons have been demonstrated (10). Furthermore, estradiol acts permissive to prime GnRH and LH release (9, 11). Female rats are spontaneous ovulators, and under standard laboratory conditions with a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle, the estrous cycle lasts for 4 d. One of the hallmarks of the cycle is the midcyclic gonadotropin peak, which occurs on the afternoon of proestrus with subsequent ovulation approximately 12 h later. Changes in the duration of the light/dark periods cause altered timing of the gonadotropin peak and estrous cycle (12), and destruction of the SCN as well as constant light lead to a state of constant estrus and a change from spontaneous to induced ovulation (13, 14, 15). Furthermore, female clock mutant mice, which carry a 51-amino acid deletion in the transcriptional activation domain of the CLOCK protein gene, display disrupted estrous cycles and inability to produce a gonadotropin peak (16).
Information on the expression of clock genes in mammalian gonads is limited to the testes (17, 18, 19, 20, 21), and both arrhythmic and oscillating expressions have been reported. Most studies, however, have shown that the pattern of expression is developmental rather than circadian, confined to specific stages of spermatogenesis (17, 18, 19). Occurrence of clock genes in the mammalian ovary has not yet been reported, but noncyclic expression of Per and cytoplasmic localization of PER have been reported in the Drosophila ovary (22, 23, 24).
In the present study, we examined the spatiotemporal expression of the two core clock genes, Per1 and Per2, in the rat ovary and report that they oscillate with a period of approximately 24 h under 12-h light, 12-h dark conditions and in continuous darkness. Cyclic changes in Per mRNAs were followed by a rise and fall in PER proteins with a lag of several hours. In situ hybridization histochemistry showed that Per mRNAs were localized to the steroid-producing cells in the ovaries, and by double immunocytochemistry the dynamic intracellular movements of PER1 and PER2 proteins were visualized.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Animals
Adult female albino Wistar rats (Taconic Breeding Centre, Ll. Skensved, Denmark) weighing 150200 g were housed under standard laboratory conditions with free access to food and water. Experiments were performed in accordance with the law on animal experiments in Denmark (publication no. 382, 10 June 1987).
Experimental design
To examine the temporal expression of the Per genes in the rat ovaries during the 4-d estrous cycle, we first examined the mRNA expression during the 2 d of proestrus and estrus. Marked changes in morphology and hormonal output occur during these 2 d in which the primary estradiol-producing preovulatory follicles mature and rupture to release the oocyte. Subsequently the cells luteinize and become progesterone-producing corpora lutea. Thirty-three rats were entrained to 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle [Zeitgeber time (ZT; time-point of exogenous scheduled entraining cycle) 0 = lights on and ZT 12 = lights off] and followed with daily cellular profile analysis of vaginal smears for at least three consecutive 4-d cycles. Three animals were killed by decapitation every fourth hour corresponding to the following ZTs during the 2 d of proestrus and estrus: ZT 22, ZT 2, ZT 6, ZT 10, ZT 14, ZT 18, ZT 22, ZT 2, ZT 6, ZT 10, and ZT 14. The ovaries were rapidly removed and frozen on dry ice. One ovary from each animal was used for quantification of Per1 and Per2 mRNA by real-time RT-PCR.
The expression of the Per genes in the ovaries during proestrus and estrus was obviously found to be diurnal, and subsequently we examined the daily expression of the two genes in a population of rats representing a mixture of all 4 d of the cycle. Forty-five rats were kept in a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. The estrous cycle of each animal was determined by cellular profile analysis in vaginal smears. Five animals were killed at each of the following time points: ZT 0, ZT 2, ZT 6, ZT 10, ZT 12, ZT 14, ZT 16, ZT 18, and ZT 20. It was ensured that each time point represented a mixture of stages in the estrous cycle. The ovaries were rapidly removed, and one ovary from each animal was used for quantification of Per1 and Per2 mRNA by real-time RT-PCR, whereas the other ovary was used for in situ hybridization histochemistry or immunocytochemistry (n = 3 and n = 2, respectively, at each time point). Ovaries for real-time RT-PCR and in situ hybridization histochemistry were rapidly frozen on dry ice, whereas ovaries for immunocytochemistry were immersion fixed in Stefaninis fixative overnight, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose, and frozen.
Finally we examined the expression of the Per genes during constant environmental conditions. Forty-five rats were entrained to a 12-h light,12-h dark cycle for at least 14 d after which the light was turned off. On the second cycle after the transfer into continuous darkness, five animals were killed at each of the following time points: ZT 0, ZT 2, ZT 6, ZT 10, ZT 12, ZT 14, ZT 16, ZT 18, and ZT 20. The ovaries were rapidly removed and treated as described above.
RNA preparation, cDNA synthesis, and real-time PCR analysis
Total ovary RNA was prepared by the guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method (25). cDNA from 1 µg RNA was synthesized using TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a total volume of 20 µl. After the cDNA synthesis, the samples were diluted 5-fold yielding cDNA synthesized from 10 ng total RNA per microliter. For the standard curves; a pool of ovary RNA was used to make two large batches of cDNA used for the Per1 and ß2-microglobulin (B2m) and Per2 and B2m standard curves, respectively. Five serial 5-fold dilutions were made and frozen in aliquots. The most concentrated sample held cDNA from 50 ng total RNA per microliter and the least concentrated cDNA from 80 pg total RNA per microliter. Doublets of 2.5 µl of each standard were assayed in each run; the highest standard was arbitrarily set to 12,500 and the lowest to 20.
Real-time PCR was performed using an ABI7000 instrument and Taqman chemistry (Applied Biosystems). The primers and TaqMan probes were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems). The probes for the Per1, Per2, and B2m assays all had a 3'-TAMRA-quencher, the Per1 (6-FAM-CAG CAA GAG TAC AAA CTC ACA GAG CCC ATC C-TAMRA) and Per2 (6-FAM-AGC CCC AGC AAG TGA TCG AGG ACT AAG-TAMRA) probes had a 5'-6-FAM-reporter, whereas the B2m-probe (VIC-TCC CCA AAT TCA AGT GTA CTC TCG CCA TC-TAMRA) used as internal control had a VIC reporter. It was verified that the amount of B2m mRNA used as internal control did not vary as function of time (data not shown). The probes used in all three assays were spanning exon boundaries, thus excluding detection of genomic DNA. Verification for this was done by running samples of 25 ng rat genomic DNA. The amount of DNA was chosen to equal the amount of RNA input in each of the experimental cDNA samples analyzed. No amplification of genomic DNA was seen using any of the assays. All samples, standards, and the nontemplate-negative controls were made in duplicate in a final volume of 25 µl. The PCRs were done using TaqMan universal PCR master mix containing AmpErase7UNG (Applied Biosystems). In the Per1 assay, 150 nM probe, 300 nM forward primer (AGC TCT GCT GGA GAC CAC TGA), and 400 nM reverse primer (CAC TCA GGA GAC TAT AGG CAA TGG A) were used. In the Per2 assay, 200 nM of probe, forward (GCA GGC TCA CTG CCA GAA CT) and reverse primer (CAA GAT GAT TCT ATT CCA GAA GCA TT) were used, and in the B2m assay, 150 nM probe and 300 nM forward (CGT GCT TGC CAT TCA GAA AA) and reverse primer (GAA GTT GGG CTT CCC ATT CTC) were used.
The ABI prism 7000 SDS software program (Applied Biosystems) was used to calculate the concentrations (in arbitrary units) of Per1 or Per2 and B2m mRNA. The amount of Per1 or Per2 mRNA in each sample was normalized with the amount of B2m mRNA from the sample obtained on the same plate.
In situ hybridization histochemistry
Frozen ovaries taken at time points at which Per mRNAs as revealed by real-time RT-PCR were low (Per1: ZT 2; Per2: ZT 6) and high (Per1: ZT 14; Per2: ZT 18) were cut in 12-µm-thick sections. In situ hybridization histochemistry was performed as previously described using 33P-labeled Per1 and Per2 cRNA probes (26). After hybridization, washing, RNase treatment, and a final wash, the radioactively labeled ovary sections were dried, emulsion dipped (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK), and exposed for 714 d before being developed. Sections were counterstained with cresyl violet acetate. For control purposes hybridizations were performed in parallel using antisense and sense probes on consecutive sections. Images were obtained via a DC 200 camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using Leica DC 200 software.
Immunohistochemistry
Two cDNA fragments, one encoding the N-terminal part of mouse Per1 (404 amino acids) and another encoding a long C-terminal part of rat PER2 (836 amino acids) were generated by RT-PCR and subcloned in the vector pCRT7/NT-TOPO (Invitrogen, Taastrup, Denmark). The two recombinant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS and extracted, solubilized, and purified according to our previously described procedure (27).
Five rabbits were immunized with 50 µg of the PER1 protein and another five rabbits were immunized with 50 µg of the PER2 protein with intervals of 10 d. Serum from each bleeding was tested by immunoblotting for reaction with the purified recombinant proteins. In addition, Western blot analysis and immunostaining were performed on rat suprachiasmatic nucleus and ovary. Serum from rabbit no. 298 (PER1) and 015S (PER2) was selected. In Western blots these antisera showed distinct bands of the expected molecular size (
150 kDa), and the reactivity was removed by absorption of the anti-PER1 and anti-PER2 antisera with immunization material.
Double immunohistochemistry for visualization of PER1 and PER2 was performed as described in detail previously using the protocol on two primary antibodies from the same species (28, 29). In brief, 12-µm sections were incubated overnight with the PER2 antiserum (diluted 1:80,000) followed on the second day by biotinylated donkey antirabbit antiserum (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) and visualized by biotinylated tyramide (tyramide system amplification, DuPont NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) and streptavidin conjugated Texas Red (Amersham Bioscience). After washing and blocking in 1% H2O2 for 10 min, the sections were incubated overnight with anti-PER1 antiserum (diluted 1:5000). On the third day, the anti-PER1 antibody was visualized using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit antiserum (from kit no. 12, code no. T20922, diluted 1:800; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) followed by incubation with Alexa-Tyramide 488 (diluted 1:200; Molecular Probes). Some slides were counterstained with 4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole for visualization of cell nuclei. Preabsorption with the respective antigens and/or elimination of the primary antiserum abolished specific staining of the respective antigen (see Fig. 6
, I and J).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6. Confocal images of immunofluorescent staining for PER1 (A, C, E, and G) and PER2 (B, D, F, and H) of rat corpus luteum cells in sections taken at representative time points (ZT 6, 12, 16, and 0) during a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. Note the changes in staining intensity and intracellular localization of PER1 and PER2 immunoreactivity over time. Preabsorption controls for PER1 and PER2 are shown in I and J, respectively. Scale bars, 100 µm.
|
|
Photomicrographs were obtained with an Olympus IX70 confocal microscope equipped with Fluoview (version 2.1.39; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and appropriate filter settings for detecting Alexa 488 and Texas Red. All images were digital and had a depth of field of about 1.38, 0.69, 0.35, and 0.23 µm for the x10, x20, x40, and x60 objectives, respectively. Images were edited for contrast and brightness by Adobe Photoshop (San Jose, CA) and combined into plates using Adobe Illustrator.
Statistical analysis
Levels of Per mRNAs were presented as means ± SEM. Diurnal and circadian changes in Per1 and Per2 mRNAs were analyzed using the methods for cosinor-rhythmometry as described by Nelson et al. (30). The data were thus fitted to a combined cosine and sine function: Per = M + k1COS(2
t/24) + k2SIN(2
t/24). Substituting COS(2
t/24) = X and SIN(2
t/24) = Z gives the expression: Per = M + k1X + k2Z. The model fit was then tested using the GLM procedure in the SAS statistical software package (31). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Rhythmic changes in Per mRNAs in rat ovary
Both Per1 and Per2 were expressed in the rat ovary and quantification of the Per mRNAs during the days of proestrus and estrus under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle disclosed rhythmic oscillations with a period of approximately 24 h (Fig. 1
). Statistical analysis showed that both Per1 mRNA (P = 0.0003) and Per2 mRNA (P < 0.0001) changed significantly as a function of a 24-h-cycle. To substantiate that the oscillations in Per mRNAs were diurnal throughout the ovarian cycle, we performed a 24-h experiment in another group of female rats in which each time point was represented by ovaries from mixed stages of the 4-d estrous cycle. In this experiment, ovarian Per mRNAs also displayed a significant (Per1: P = 0.02; Per2: P = 0.0001) diurnal rhythm of expression (Fig. 2
) similar to that observed during proestrus and estrus. Thus, the Per1 mRNA level was low at ZT 02 and peaked at ZT 1214, whereas the Per2 mRNA level from a trough at ZT 56 gradually increased, reaching a peak at ZT 1718, after which it declined again.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1. Rhythmic changes in Per1 (upper panel) and Per2 (lower panel) mRNAs in rat ovaries during proestrus and estrus. mRNA levels were measured using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Values are given as mean ± SEM, n = 3 at each time point. mRNA levels for both Per1 and Per2 were rhythmic and changed significantly as a function of a 24-h cycle. The fitted curves have been drawn. The white bars at the bottom of the graph represent the period of light (ZT 0 to ZT 12), whereas the black bars represent period of darkness (ZT 12 to ZT 24). Estrous cycle is indicated above.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2. Rhythmic changes in Per1 (upper panel) and Per2 (lower panel) mRNAs in rat ovaries during a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. Each time point (n = 5) was represented by ovaries taken at the various stages of the estrous cycle. mRNA levels were measured using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Values are given as mean ± SEM. mRNA levels for both Per1 and Per2 were rhythmic and changed significantly as a function of the 24-h light/dark cycle. The fitted curves have been drawn. The white bar at the bottom of the graph represents period of light (ZT 0 to ZT 12), whereas the black bar represents period of darkness (ZT 12 to ZT 24).
|
|
We then performed in situ hybridization histochemistry to localize Per1 and Per2 mRNA to particular cells and tissue compartments in the ovary. As expected, signals for Per1 (Fig. 3
, A and C) and Per2 mRNA (Fig. 3
, E and G) were weak at ZT 2 and ZT 6, respectively. At ZT 14 (Per1) and ZT 18 (Per2), the corpora lutea were strongly labeled, and labeling was also observed in the granulosa cell compartments and the theca cell compartments of growing follicles at preantral, antral, and preovulatory stages as well as in cells of the interstitial glandular tissue (Figs. 3
, B, D, F, and H, and 4
). All these cell types are steroid producing. No signal was detected in the oocytes. Sense probes for Per1 and Per2 mRNA produced no signal at the times of peak expression (Figs. 3
, D and H, insets, and 4
).

View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3. In situ hybridization histochemistry using 33P-labeled antisense and sense RNA probes showing Per1 (AD) and Per2 mRNA (EH) at times of nadir (A, C, E, and G) and peak expression (B, D, F, and H). Strong labeling was observed in growing antral (gf), early antral (eaf), antral follicles (af), corpus luteum (cl), and interstitial glandular tissue (ic) at ZT 14 for Per1 (B and D) and ZT 18 for Per2 mRNA (F and H), respectively. No signals were obtained at these time points with the sense probes (insets). Scale bars (A, B, E, and F), 200 µm; (C, D, G, and H), 50 µm.
|
|

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4. In situ hybridization of Per1 and Per2 mRNA in sections of ovaries taken at times of peak expression. Autoradiograms of sections hybridized with 33P-labeled rPer1 and rPer2 antisense RNA probes (A and B) and sense probes (C and D).
|
|
To examine whether the rhythmic oscillations in Per gene expression also occurred under constant conditions, we quantified Per1 and Per2 mRNA in ovaries from a group of rats kept under continuous darkness. The expression of the Per mRNAs showed a significant (Per1 and Per2: P < 0.0001) rhythmic pattern with a period of 24 h similar to the mixed estrous cycle experiment under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. High levels of Per1 mRNA was observed at ZT 14 relative to the low levels of ZT 2, whereas Per2 mRNA peaked at ZT 18 and had nadir at ZT 6 (Fig. 5
).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5. Circadian changes in Per1 (upper panel) and Per2 (lower panel) mRNAs in rat ovaries during continuous darkness. Each time point (n = 5) was represented by ovaries taken at the various stages of the estrous cycle. mRNA levels were measured using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Values are given as mean ± SEM. mRNA levels for both Per1 and Per2 were rhythmic and changed significantly as a function of the 24-h dark period. The fitted curves have been drawn. The black bar at the bottom of the graph represents period of darkness (ZT 0 to ZT 24).
|
|
Time course and localization of PER proteins
Expression of the PER proteins in the ovaries was examined by immunohistochemistry, and in accordance with the mRNAs localization, immunoreactive PER1 and PER2 were visualized in steroidogenic cells in the preantral, antral, and preovulatory follicles in the corpora lutea and interstitial glandular tissue. Both the levels and intracellular localization of the PER proteins were found to vary dramatically across the daily cycle (Fig. 6
). At ZT 6 weak PER1 immunostaining was detected in the cytoplasm of a few cells (Fig. 6A
). The cytoplasmic PER1 immunostaining increased during the following hours, and at ZT 12 most cells showed PER1 immunostaining in their cytoplasm (Fig. 6C
). Subsequently PER1 was transferred to the nuclei of the cells, and at ZT 16 cytoplasmic staining was less intense, whereas nuclear PER1 immunoreactivity became apparent. From ZT 16 to ZT 0, PER1 was hardly visible in the cytoplasm, whereas intense nuclear immunostaining was observed (Fig. 6
, E and G).
The pattern for PER2 immunostaining was similar to that of PER1. The changes in PER2 protein levels and localization were as the mRNA, however, delayed by approximately 4 h in relation to PER1. Thus, at ZT 12 PER2 protein level was low and hardly detectable in the cytoplasm (Fig. 6D
). Until ZT 16 the cytoplasmic staining increased (Fig. 6F
), and from ZT 18 to ZT 2, a nuclear localization of Per2 was evident (Fig. 6H
). At ZT 6 the nuclear Per2 immunostaining was faint (Fig. 6B
), and it disappeared completely at ZT 10.
The displaced time course of the changes in intracellular localization of the two PER proteins is clearly illustrated in the high-power merged images (Fig. 7
), e.g. at ZT 16 at which Per2 is still in the cytoplasm and Per1 has a nuclear localization.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7. High-power confocal images of double-immunofluorescent staining for PER1 (green) and PER2 (red) of rat corpus luteum cells in sections taken at ZT 16 and ZT 0 during a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. The two proteins occur in the same cells, but the time course of intracellular distribution is displaced. At ZT 16 (A, C, and D), PER2 is still present in the cytoplasm, whereas PER1 has been transferred to the cell nuclei. At ZT 0 (B), both proteins are located in the nucleus. 4', 6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining (blue) of nuclei is shown in E. C, D, and E are merged in F. Scale bars (A and B), 20 µm; (CF), 10 µm.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Per1 and Per2 play a pivotal role in circadian rhythmicity, and mutations in the genes cause altered circadian phenotype (32, 33, 34, 35). Conceivably it is the activation of Per gene expression that phase shifts clocks in vivo (36). In the present study, we demonstrated for the first time that the two clock genes, Per1 and Per2, and their gene products were expressed in steroidogenic cells of the rat ovary and that the levels displayed a rhythmicity with a period of 24 h. The diurnal rhythmicity was observed in ovaries collected at 2 specific days of the estrous cycle, in a mixture of cyclic ovaries collected from all the stages of the 4-d estrous cycle as well as in randomly collected cyclic ovaries from rats kept under constant dark conditions. These findings indicate that the rat ovary like a number of other peripheral tissues is equipped with an intrinsic molecular circadian clock mechanism. Daily clock gene oscillations inside the steroidogenic cells thus may underlay the characteristic steroid hormonal profiles and morphological changes of the 4-d ovarian estrous cycle, a notion that adds a new dimension to the already complex concept of ovarian physiology. We observed that in the ovary, Per1 mRNA level was low during the early day and peaked at early night (ZT 14), whereas Per2 mRNA had nadir at midday (ZT 6) and reached its maximum expression at midnight (ZT 18).
Previously we (26) reported that Per1 mRNA in the rat SCN showed maximum expression at midday (ZT 6) and minimum expression at night. Per2 mRNA in the SCN was low during early day and late night but peaked at the transition time between day and night (ZT 12). Thus, the rhythms of Per1 and Per2 gene expression in the ovary were phase delayed by approximately 6 h relative to the SCN. In accordance, a delay of 39 h has been reported for most peripheral circadian clocks (4). It has been demonstrated that humoral or neural outputs act as functional connections between central and peripheral clocks (37). It remains to be clarified whether the ovarian clock is under the influence of the brains biological clock located in the SCN. The Per genes and their gene products were shown to be expressed in steroidogenic cells, which are all endowed with one or both of the gonadotropin receptors. Consequently a putative regulator of ovarian clock gene rhythms could be the gonadotropins and in particular the midcyclic gonadotropin peak. Preliminary experiments in our laboratory using immature prepubertal rats injected with equine chorionic gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin support this notion (Gräs, S., B. Georg, and J. Fahrenkrug, unpublished data).
The contemporary understanding of how rhythmicity is generated is that CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers initiate transcription of per and cry genes (38). PER1 and PER2 associate with CRY1 and CRY2 to form heterodimer complexes, also including Casein kinase. Casein kinase I
and I
phosphorylate the PERs and thereby affect both nuclear translocation and destabilization of the PER proteins by ubiquitination (39, 40). After nuclear translocation the PERs inhibit CLOCK/BMAL induction of the per and cry genes. In the mouse it has been shown that PER2 also promotes Bmal1 transcription through mechanism not yet fully understood to provide a positive drive to the system (41). Rev-Erb-
, itself a target for positive induction by CLOCK/BMAL1, inhibits induction of Bmal1 (42).
In the present study, we were able to examine the temporal intracellular movements of PER protein expression by immunohistochemistry using newly developed antisera. From a just detectable level, the PER proteins accumulated within the cytoplasm of the ovarian steroidogenic cells for several hours after which the proteins were transferred to the nuclei. The rise and fall in PER protein followed the cycle of mRNA expression with a lag of several hours. The nuclear accumulation of PER1 and PER2 protein coincided with declining levels for Per1 and Per2 mRNAs, which is consistent with the delayed feedback model of the oscillator, and the simultaneous PER2 mediated increase in the transcription of Bmal1. Our protein findings are somewhat different from those previously reported in the SCN (43). Thus, in the SCN both PER proteins accumulate in the nuclei of the cells at the same time and peak at ZT12, despite that Per1 mRNA and Per2 mRNA reach maximal values at different time points. Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies on the SCN have been unable to show specific cytoplasmic localization of PER immunoreactivity. In the ovary we found that the phase for the cyclic PER2 protein expression was delayed by approximately 4 h relative to PER1, which accords with the rise and falls of their respective mRNAs. Furthermore, we found that the nuclear accumulation of the PER proteins occurred later in the cycle than reported for SCN cells. The discrepancies could be tissue specific or could reflect differences in methodology. Our immunocytochemical data, however, clearly demonstrate the changes in intracellular localization and staining intensities of the two PER proteins and that the protein cycles of PER1 and PER2 were asynchronous.
Clock genes are also expressed in the male gonadal tissue of rodents, but the reported findings are unusual and somewhat conflicting. It appears that Per2 is not expressed in the testis (17, 18, 19, 20). Zylka et al. (20) initially demonstrated that Per1 expression oscillates in mouse testis, but later studies (17, 18, 19) found the levels in the testis to be constant over a 24-h period. It was shown that the expression of both Per1 and clock mRNA and protein is restricted to specific developmental stages of spermatogenesis (17, 19). Species differences may exist because rhythmic expression of Per1 has been reported in hamster testis (21).
Information on the circadian regulation of the female hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis is accumulating (9, 44), but at present the role of an ovarian circadian clock is purely speculative. In addition to the ovarian sex hormones, a large number of other hormones and local regulatory substances are produced to ensure optimal coordination between the different aspects of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis. The concept of daily rhythms in ovarian gene expression is new, and consequently the temporal aspect has only occasionally been examined. However, diurnal rhythms have been reported for some of the genes involved in ovarian steroid production during puberty and the menstrual cycle in humans (12, 45, 46). Diurnal rhythms have also been reported for the FSH-regulatory peptides, inhibin-A, inhibin-B, and follistatin (47).
Knockout mice for many of the clock genes, including Per1 and Per2, exist (4, 37). In female clock-mutant mice, estrous cyclicity and maintenance of pregnancy are disrupted, but the changes are subtle and ovulation takes place despite absence of the LH peak (16, 48). No major abnormalities in fertility have been reported for the other clock gene mutants, but systematic studies remain to be conducted. Furthermore, it is generally believed that the roles of the central and peripheral clocks are to adjust the organism in the best possible way to different environmental changes, and photic and feeding inputs are known to be important for entrainment of the systems (12, 37). Normally, experimental animals are kept under very well-defined environmental conditions. It is possible that almost normal fertility may exist under such conditions, but it is likely that fertility (and other systems) could be more severely disrupted if the animals were subjected to irregular environmental changes.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Henrik L. Jørgensen is acknowledged for his help with the statistical analysis. The skillful technical assistance of Anita Hansen, Juliano Olsen, Yvonne Søndergaard, and Lea Charlotte Larsen is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the Danish Biotechnology Center for Cellular Communication.
Disclosure statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online May 4, 2006
Abbreviations: B2m, ß2-Microglobulin; BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus; ZT, Zeitgeber time (time-point of exogenous scheduled entraining cycle).
Received March 8, 2006.
Accepted for publication April 24, 2006.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2002 Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418:935941[CrossRef][Medline]
- Schibler U, Sassone-Corsi P 2002 A web of circadian pacemakers. Cell 111:919922[CrossRef][Medline]
- Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2001 Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Ann Rev Physiol 63:647676[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lowrey PL, Takahashi JS 2004 Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 5:407441[CrossRef][Medline]
- Okamura H 2004 Clock genes in cell clocks: roles, actions, and mysteries. J Biol Rhythms 19:388399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yoo SH, Yamazaki S, Lowrey PL, Shimomura K, Ko CH, Buhr ED, Siepka SM, Hong HK, Oh WJ, Yoo OJ, Menaker M, Takahashi JS 2004 PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:53395346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Berson DM 2003 Strange vision: ganglion cells as circadian photoreceptors. Trends Neurosci 26:314320[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hannibal J, Fahrenkrug J 2002 Melanopsin: a novel photopigment involved in the photoentrainment of the brains biological clock? Ann Med 34:401407[CrossRef][Medline]
- de la Iglesia HO, Schwartz WJ 2005 Timely ovulation: circadian regulation of the female hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Endocrinology 147:11481153[Medline]
- Kalsbeek A, Buijs RM 2002 Output pathways of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus: coding circadian time by transmitter selection and specific targeting. Cell Tissue Res 309:109118[CrossRef][Medline]
- Goldman BD 1999 The circadian timing system and reproduction in mammals. Steroids 64:679685[CrossRef][Medline]
- Turek FW, van Cauter E 1994 Rhythms in reproduction. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The physiology of reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 487540
- Hoffman JC 1988 The influence of photoperiod on reproductive functions in female mammals. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, ed. Physiology of reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 5777
- Brown-Grant K, Raisman G 1977 Abnormalities in reproductive function associated with the destruction of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in female rats. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 198:279296[Medline]
- Weigand SJ, Terasawa E, Bridson WE, Goy RW 1980 Effects of discrete lesions of preoptic and suprachiasmatic structures in the female rat. Alterations in the feedback regulation of gonadotropin secretion. Neuroendocrinology 31:147157[Medline]
- Miller BH, Olson SL, Turek FW, Levine JE, Horton TH, Takahashi JS 2004 Circadian clock mutation disrupts estrous cyclicity and maintenance of pregnancy. Curr Biol 14:13671373[CrossRef][Medline]
- Alvarez JD, Chen D, Storer E, Sehgal A 2003 Non-cyclic and developmental stage-specific expression of circadian clock proteins during murine spermatogenesis. Biol Reprod 69:8191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bittman EL, Doherty L, Huang L, Paroskie A 2003 Period gene expression in mouse endocrine tissues. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285:R561R569
- Morse D, Cermakian N, Brancorsini S, Parvinen M, Sassone-Corsi P 2003 No circadian rhythms in testis: Period1 expression is clock independent and developmentally regulated in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol 17:141151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zylka MJ, Shearman LP, Weaver DR, Reppert SM 1998 Three period homologs in mammals: differential light responses in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock and oscillating transcripts outside of brain. Neuron 20:11031110[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tong Y, Guo H, Brewer JM, Lee H, Lehman MN, Bittman EL 2004 Expression of haPer1 and haBmal1 in Syrian hamsters: heterogeneity of transcripts and oscillations in the periphery. J Biol Rhythms 19:113125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liu X, Lorenz L, Yu QN, Hall JC, Rosbash M 1988 Spatial and temporal expression of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 2:228238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Saez L, Young MW 1988 In situ localization of the per clock protein during development of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 8:53785385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hardin PE 1994 Analysis of period mRNA cycling in Drosophila head and body tissues indicates that body oscillators behave differently from head oscillators. Mol Cell Biol 14:72117218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step methods of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156159[Medline]
- Nielsen HS, Hannibal J, Knudsen SM, Fahrenkrug J 2001 Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide induces period 1 and period 2 gene expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) during late night. Neuroscience 103:433441[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hannibal J, Hindersson P, Knudsen SM, Georg B, Fahrenkrug J 2002 The photopigment melanopsin is exclusively present in PACAP containing retinal ganglion cells of the retinohypothalamic tract. J Neurosci 22:RC 191:17
- Fahrenkrug J, Hannibal J 1998 Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide immunoreactivity in capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibres supplying the rat urinary tract. Neuroscience 83:12611272[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hannibal J, Fahrenkrug J 2004 Melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells are light responsive from birth. Neuroreport 15:23172320[CrossRef][Medline]
- Nelson W, Tong YL, Lee JK, Halberg F 1979 Methods for cosinor-rhythmometry. Chronobiologia 6:305323[Medline]
- SAS Institute 1994 SAS/STAT users guide. 4th ed, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute
- Bae K, Jin X, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2001 Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock. Neuron 30:525536[CrossRef][Medline]
- Cermakian N, Monaco L, Pando MP, Dierich A, Sassone-Corsi P 2001 Altered behavioral rhythms and clock gene expression in mice with a targeted mutation in the Period1 gene. EMBO J 20:39673974[CrossRef][Medline]
- Zheng B, Larkin D, Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Sage M, Eichele G, Lee CC, Bradley A 1999 The mPer2 gene encodes a functional component of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature 400:169173[CrossRef][Medline]
- Zheng B, Albrecht U, Kaasik K, Sage M, Lu W, Vaishnav S, Li Q, Sun ZS, Eichele G, Bradley A, Lee CC 2001 Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 105:683694[CrossRef][Medline]
- Albrecht U, Zheng B, Larkin D, Sun ZS, Lee CC 2001 mPer1 and mPer2 are essential for normal resetting of the circadian clock. J Biol Rhythms 16:100104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kennaway DJ 2005 The role of circadian rhythmicity in reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 11:91101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shearman LP, Sriram S, Weaver DR, Maywood ES, Chaves I, Zheng B, Kume K, Lee CC, van der Horst GTJ, Hastings MH, Reppert SM 2000 Interacting molecular loops in the mammalian circadian clock. Science 288:10131019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vielhaber E, Eide E, Rivers A, Gao Z-H, Virshup DM 2000 Nuclear entry of the circadian regulator mPER1 is controlled by mammalian casein kinase I
. Mol Cell Biol 20:48884899[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Akashi M, Tsuchiyaka Y, Yoshino T, Nishida E 2002 Control of intracellular dynamics of mammalian period proteins by casein kinase I
(CKI
) and CKI
in cultured cells. Mol Cell Biol 22:16931703[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Yu W, Nomura M, Ikeda M 2002 Interactivating feedback loops within the mammalian clock: BMAL1 is negatively autoregulated and upregulated by CRY1, CRY2, and PER2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290:933941[CrossRef][Medline]
- Preitner N, Damiola F, Molina L-L, Albrecht U, Schibler U 2002 The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERB
controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 110:251260[CrossRef][Medline] - Field MD, Maywood ES, OBrien JA, Weaver DR, Reppert SM, Hastings MH 2000 Analysis of clock proteins in mouse SCN demonstrates phylogenetic divergence of the circadian clockwork and resetting mechanisms. Neuron 25:437447[CrossRef][Medline]
- Chappell PE 2005 Clocks and the black box: circadian influences on gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion. J Neuroendocrinol 17:119130[CrossRef][Medline]
- Ankaberg C, Norjavaara E 1999 Diurnal rhythm of testosterone secretion before and throughout puberty in healthy girls: correlation with 17ß-estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:975984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bao A-M, Liu R-Y, van Someren EJW, Hofman MA, Cao Y-X, Zhou J-N 2003 Diurnal rhythm of free estradiol during the menstrual cycle. Eur J Endocrinol 148:227232[Abstract]
- Foster CM, Olton PR, Padmanabhan V 2005 Diurnal changes in FSH-regulatory peptides and their relationship to gonadotrophins in pubertal girls. Hum Reprod 20:543548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dolatshad H, Campell EA, OHara L, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Johnson MH 2006 Developmental and reproductive performance in circadian mutant mice. Hum Reprod 21:6879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. P. Williams III, E. M. Gibson, C. Wang, S. Tjho, N. Khattar, G. E. Bentley, K. Tsutsui, and L. J. Kriegsfeld
Proximate mechanisms driving circadian control of neuroendocrine function: lessons from the young and old
Integr. Comp. Biol.,
June 14, 2009;
(2009)
icp041v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bebas, C. P. Goodall, M. Majewska, A. Neumann, J. M. Giebultowicz, and P. E. Chappell
Circadian clock and output genes are rhythmically expressed in extratesticular ducts and accessory organs of mice
FASEB J,
February 1, 2009;
23(2):
523 - 533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Pilorz and S. Steinlechner
Low reproductive success in Per1 and Per2 mutant mouse females due to accelerated ageing?
Reproduction,
April 1, 2008;
135(4):
559 - 568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Nakao, S. Yasuo, A. Nishimura, T. Yamamura, T. Watanabe, T. Anraku, T. Okano, Y. Fukada, P. J. Sharp, S. Ebihara, et al.
Circadian Clock Gene Regulation of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene Expression in Preovulatory Ovarian Follicles
Endocrinology,
July 1, 2007;
148(7):
3031 - 3038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-J. He, M. Hirata, N. Yamauchi, S. Hashimoto, and M.-a. Hattori
The disruption of circadian clockwork in differentiating cells from rat reproductive tissues as identified by in vitro real-time monitoring system
J. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2007;
193(3):
413 - 420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E Menkhorst, N Ezard, and L Selwood
Induction of ovulation and natural oestrous cycling in the Stripe-faced Dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura
Reproduction,
February 1, 2007;
133(2):
495 - 502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|