help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2006-0420
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirois, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirois, J.
Endocrinology Vol. 147, No. 9 4222-4233
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Human Chorionic Gonadotropin-Dependent Up-Regulation of Genes Responsible for Estrogen Sulfoconjugation and Export in Granulosa Cells of Luteinizing Preovulatory Follicles

Kristy A. Brown, Monique Doré, Jacques G. Lussier and Jean Sirois

Centre de Recherche en Reproduction Animale and Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire (K.A.B., J.G.L., J.S.) and Département de Pathologie et Microbiologie (M.D.), Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 7C6

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jean Sirois, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 7C6. E-mail: jean.sirois{at}umontreal.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Estrogen sulfotransferase (EST) is responsible for the sulfoconjugation of estrogens, thereby changing their physical properties and preventing their action via the estrogen receptors. These sulfoconjugated steroids no longer diffuse freely across the lipid bilayer; instead, they are exported by members of the ATP-binding cassette family, such as ABCC1. The objective of this study was to investigate the regulation of EST and ABCC1 during human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-induced ovulation/luteinization. The transcripts for EST and ABCC1 were cloned by RT-PCR, and the regulation of their mRNAs was studied in preovulatory follicles obtained during estrus at 0, 12, 24, 30, 33, 36, and 39 h after hCG. Results obtained from RT-PCR/Southern blot analyses showed significant changes in steady-state levels of both EST and ABCC1 mRNA after hCG treatment (P < 0.05). In granulosa cells, a significant increase in EST transcript was observed 30–39 h after hCG. Similarly, ABCC1 transcript levels were induced in granulosa cells 12–39 h after hCG. In contrast, no significant changes in either EST or ABCC1 were detected in theca interna samples after hCG. The increase in EST and ABCC1 transcripts observed in granulosa cells was reflected in preparations of intact follicle walls, suggesting that the granulosa cell layer contributes the majority of EST and ABCC1 expression in preovulatory follicles. The present study demonstrates that follicular luteinization is accompanied not only by a decrease in 17ß-estradiol biosynthesis but also by an increase in expression of genes responsible for estrogen inactivation and elimination from granulosa cells, such as EST and ABCC1, respectively.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE BIOTRANSFORMATION OF molecules through sulfoconjugation results in striking changes in their physicochemical properties. The addition of a highly charged sulfonate group (SO3), which remains fully ionized at any pH found in biological systems, causes hydrophobic compounds to be converted to hydrophilic ones, thereby resulting in increased water solubility as well as conformational changes in both low- and high-molecular-weight molecules (1). Sulfotransferases have been classified into two different groups depending on whether they are membrane bound or soluble. More than 44 soluble or cytosolic sulfotransferases have been identified in mammals, with substrates ranging from endogenous compounds such as hormones and neurotransmitters to drugs and xenobiotics (2). The current nomenclature classifies the cytosolic sulfotransferases into five SULT families, sharing less than 40% similarity with each other. The SULT1 family members act on phenolic drugs and catecholamines (SULT1A), thyroid hormones (SULT1B), xenobiotics (SULT1C), and estrogenic steroids (SULT1E) (3).

Estrogen sulfotransferase (EST, encoded by SULT1E1) is a 30- to 36-kDa protein that catalyzes the sulfoconjugation of estrogens at the 3-hydroxyl position. It uses 3'-phospho-adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) as its sulfonate source, which is produced in a two-step ATP-dependent reaction by the enzyme PAPS synthetase (4, 5). Once sulfonated, 17ß-estradiol-sulfonate (E2-S) no longer binds to its cognate receptor (6), and its ability to diffuse freely across the lipid bilayer is greatly compromised. The first member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, P-glycoprotein, was identified in tumor cells exhibiting resistance to multiple chemotherapeutic agents (7). The ABC superfamily has since then been largely characterized, representing the largest family of transmembrane proteins, and demonstrated as being responsible for the ATP-dependent transport of many substrates, including hormones, lipids, drugs, and other toxins. Most ABC transporters are unidirectional, moving compounds from the cytoplasm to the outside of the cell (8). Member C1 of the ABC superfamily (ABCC1) translates into a 17-transmembrane-domain 190-kDa glycoprotein, called multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1), whose role as the primary transporter of many organic anions has been largely characterized (9). It was first identified in the small-cell lung carcinoma cell line NCI-H69 and has been shown to transport many glutathione-conjugated drugs as well as leukotrienes and, more recently, has been demonstrated to export estrone-3-sulfonate (E1-S) and E2-S (10, 11, 12, 13).

In mammals, follicular luteinization/ovulation is triggered by a surge in LH and is characterized by numerous physical and biochemical changes, including the decreased production of E2 (14, 15, 16). This loss in E2 biosynthetic capacity has been explained by a marked decrease in the expression of key steroidogenic enzymes involved in the follicular production of active estrogens (15, 17). However, little is known about the regulation of enzymes/proteins responsible for the inactivation and elimination of estrogens, as mediated by EST and MRP1, respectively, during this period. In the present study, the equine preovulatory follicle is used as a model to investigate the regulation of EST and ABCC1 during human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-induced ovulation/luteinization. The specific objectives were to clone equine EST and ABCC1, determine the expression of their mRNAs and proteins in preovulatory follicles after hCG treatment, and correlate their expression with the presence of sulfoconjugated steroids in the follicular fluid.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
The Prime-a-Gene labeling system, pGEM-T Easy Vector System I was purchased from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). The [{alpha}-32P]dCTP was purchased from PerkinElmer Canada, Inc. (Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada), and the QuickHyb hybridization solution was obtained from Stratagene Cloning Systems (La Jolla, CA). The TRIzol total RNA isolation reagent, SuperScript II reverse transcriptase, 1-kb DNA ladder, and synthetic oligonucleotides were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Burlington, Ontario, Canada). The QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR System was obtained from QIAGEN, Inc. (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The Expand High Fidelity DNA Polymerase was purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Laval, Québec, Canada). Biotrans nylon membranes (pore size, 0.2 mm) were obtained from ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Montréal, Québec, Canada), and all electrophoretic reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Richmond, CA). The hCG was obtained from The Buttler Co. (Columbus, OH). The equine-specific antibodies were produced by New England Peptide, Inc. (Gardner, MA). The Vectastain ABC kit was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). The diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Cloning of the equine EST and ABCC1 cDNAs
The equine EST transcript was isolated in fragments using a multistep cloning strategy (Fig. 1AGo). A 515-bp RT-PCR product (Fig. 1AaGo) was initially cloned from pooled equine ovarian RNA samples isolated from a preovulatory follicle and an ovulatory follicle (36 h after hCG treatment). Ovarian tissues were isolated and RNA was extracted as previously described (18). RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR System (QIAGEN) as directed by the manufacturer, using 500 ng RNA and oligonucleotide primers designed by sequence alignments of known EST species homologs (primers 1 and 2; Fig. 1BGo). After agarose gel electrophoresis, the RT-PCR product was excised and ligated into the pGEM-T Easy plasmid vector (Promega), and proper recombinant plasmids were identified from transformed bacterial colonies using standard techniques (19). Sequencing of the insert was performed by the Service de Séquençage de l’Université Laval (Québec, Québec, Canada) using vector-based T7 and Sp6 oligonucleotide primers. Sequences obtained from the initial RT-PCR product served to design specific oligonucleotides for a second RT-PCR (primer 4; Fig. 1BGo) and 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) reactions (primers 6 and 8; Fig. 1BGo). The second RT-PCR also required the design of a sense oligonucleotide from sequence alignments of species homologs (primer 3; Fig. 1BGo) and yielded a 290-bp fragment that partially overlapped the initial RT-PCR product and included the translation initiation codon (Fig. 1AbGo). The 3'-RACE was performed as previously described (20), except 5 µg of pooled ovarian tissue RNA (as described above) was used as a template for the initial RT reaction. Briefly, an RT reaction was performed using a poly-dT oligonucleotide with anchor sequences at its 5' end (primer 5; Fig. 1AcGo). This was followed by nested PCR using oligonucleotide primers that bound to the anchor sequence in conjunction with EST-specific forward primers. The product of the second PCR (Fig. 1AcGo) was isolated and sequenced as described above. A clone encompassing the entire coding region was isolated by RT-PCR (primers 10 and 11; Fig 1AdGo) and found to correspond with the deduced primary EST transcript reported herein (Fig. 1AGo).


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Cloning of equine EST and ABCC1. A and C, Cloned equine cDNA fragments for EST and ABCC1, respectively. Each fragment is schematically represented, with its identity indicated on the right and its position in the deduced transcript sequence indicated in parentheses. Lines indicate UTRs; open boxes designate the open reading frame (ORF). Lengths of the deduced transcript and its structural elements are indicated in base pairs. Arrows indicate the position and orientation of the oligonucleotides employed in the cloning processes, with numbers indicating their identity. B and D, Oligonucleotides used in the various cloning procedures for EST and ABCC1, respectively.

 
Because of the large size of the equine ABCC1 transcript, it was cloned using a multistep cloning strategy (Fig. 1CGo). A 981-bp RT-PCR product (Fig. 1CaGo) was initially cloned from pooled equine ovarian RNA samples isolated from a preovulatory follicle and an ovulatory follicle (36 h after hCG treatment). RT-PCR was performed using the OneStep RT-PCR System (QIAGEN) as directed by the manufacturer, using 500 ng RNA and oligonucleotide primers designed by sequence alignments of known ABCC1 species homologs (Fig. 1CGo). Subcloning and sequencing were done as described above. Sequences obtained from the initial RT-PCR product served to design a specific oligonucleotide for a second RT-PCR (primer 4; Fig. 1CbGo). The second RT-PCR also required the design of a sense oligonucleotide from sequence alignments of species homologs (primer 3; Fig. 1DGo) and yielded a 440-bp fragment that partially overlapped the initial RT-PCR product and included the translation initiation codon (Fig. 1CbGo). A third RT-PCR product was obtained, again using sense and antisense primers designed by sequence alignments of known ABCC1 homologs (primers 5 and 6; Fig. 1CcGo). The 1267-bp fragment was sequenced and used for the design of a second equine-specific primer (primer 7; Fig. 1DGo). The fourth and fifth RT-PCR products were obtained by using equine-specific sense primers (primers 7 and 9; Fig. 1DGo) and antisense primers designed from sequence alignment of known homologs (primers 8 and 10). These yielded 1359-bp (Fig. 1CdGo) and 1029-bp (Fig. 1CeGo) fragments, respectively. Finally, a sixth RT-PCR was done using equine-specific sense and antisense primers (primers 11 and 12; Fig. 1DGo) and yielded a 1228-bp fragment that was then sequenced (Fig. 1CfGo).

Equine tissues and RNA extraction
Testicular tissues were obtained from the Large Animal Hospital of the Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire (Université de Montréal) after a routine castration, whereas other nonovarian tissues were collected at a local slaughterhouse. Equine preovulatory follicles and corpora lutea were isolated at specific stages of the estrous cycle from Standardbred and Thoroughbred mares as previously described (21). Briefly, when preovulatory follicles reached 35 mm in diameter during estrus, the ovulatory process was induced by injection of hCG (2500 IU, iv) and ovariectomies were performed via colpotomy using a chain écraseur at 0, 12, 24, 30, 33, 36, or 39 h after hCG (n = 4–6 mares per time point; ovulation occurring 36–48 h after hCG) (21, 22). Follicles were dissected into preparations of follicle wall (theca interna with attached granulosa cells) or further dissected into separate isolates of granulosa cells and theca interna. Ovariectomies were also performed on d 8 of the estrous cycle (d 0, day of ovulation) to obtain corpora lutea (n = 3 mares). All animal procedures were approved by the institutional animal use and care committee. Total RNA was isolated from tissues with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Canada), according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a Kinematica PT 1200C Polytron Homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, Montréal, Canada).

Semiquantitative RT-PCR and Southern analysis
The OneStep RT-PCR System (QIAGEN) was used for semiquantitative analysis of EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a mRNA levels in equine tissues. Reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s directions, using sense (5'-CTGAAACAGATGGCATC TCC-3') and antisense (5'-GGTTTCCTTCCCAGAAATTGC-3') primers specific for equine EST, sense (5'-AGCAGGACGAGCAGGACAACG-3') and antisense (5'-GAGTCCACCGTGTCCAGCTCC-3') primers specific for equine ABCC1, and sense (5'-ACAGGACATCCAGCCCAAACG-3') and antisense (5'-GCTCCTTTGTCTTCCGAGTTG-3') primers specific for equine rpL7a. These reactions resulted in the production of EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a DNA fragments of 359, 631, and 516 bp, respectively. Each reaction was performed using 100 ng total RNA, and cycling conditions were one cycle of 50 C for 30 min and 95 C for 15 min, followed by a variable number of cycles of 94 C for 1 min, 55 C for 1 min, and 72 C for 2 min. The number of cycles used was optimized for each gene to fall within the linear range of PCR amplification and was 26 cycles for EST, 20 cycles for ABCC1, and 18 cycles for rpL7a. After PCR amplification, samples were electrophoresed on 2% Tris-acetate/EDTA-agarose gels, transferred to nylon membranes, and hybridized with corresponding radiolabeled EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a cDNA fragments using QuickHyb hybridization solution (Stratagene). Membranes were exposed to a phosphor screen, and signals were quantified on a Storm imaging system using the ImageQuant software version 1.1 (Molecular Dynamics, Amersham Biosciences, Sunnyvale, CA).

Protein extracts, anti-equine EST and MRP1 antibodies, and immunoblot analysis
Liver and preovulatory follicle extracts were prepared as previously described (23). Briefly, tissue was homogenized and sonicated on ice in TED buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 50 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM diethyldithiocarbamic acid) containing 1.0% Tween. The sonicate was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 15 min at 4 C. The recovered supernatant (whole-cell extract) was stored at –80 C until electrophoretic analyses were performed. Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (24) (Bio-Rad protein assay). Samples (50 µg proteins) were resolved by one-dimensional SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (23). The equine-specific anti-EST polyclonal antibody was generated (New England Peptide) using a peptide fragment encompassing amino acids Tyr281-Ile296, whereas the equine-specific anti-MRP1 antibody was generated (New England Peptide) using a peptide fragment encompassing amino acids Glu1262-Arg1277. Membranes were incubated with either the polyclonal anti-equine EST antibody (1:1000) or anti-MRP1 antibody (1:1000), and immunoreactive proteins were visualized on Kodak X-OMAT AR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) after incubation with the horseradish peroxidase-linked donkey antirabbit secondary antibody (1:10,000 dilution) and the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL Plus), following the manufacturer’s protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d’Urfé, Québec, Canada).

Immunohistochemical localization of EST
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories), as previously described (21). Briefly, formalin-fixed tissues were paraffin embedded, and 3-µm-thick sections were prepared and deparaffinized through a graded alcohol series. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched by incubating the slides in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min. After rinsing in PBS for 15 min, sections were incubated with diluted normal goat serum for 20 min at room temperature. The anti-EST antibody (1:100 dilution) and the anti-MRP1 (1:5000 dilution) were diluted in PBS and applied, and sections were incubated overnight at 4 C. Control sections were incubated with PBS. After rinsing in PBS for 10 min, a biotinylated goat antirabbit antibody (1:222 dilution; Vector Laboratories) was applied, and sections were incubated for 45 min at room temperature. Sections were washed in PBS for 10 min and incubated with avidin DH-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase H reagents for 45 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS for 10 min, the reaction was revealed using diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as the chromogen. Sections were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin stain and mounted.

Measurement of E1-S, E2-S, E1, and E2 concentrations in follicular fluid
The follicular fluid present in equine preovulatory follicles isolated between 0 and 39 h after hCG was analyzed for E1, E2, E1-S, and E2-S content by a gas chromatographic mass spectrometric method developed to measure steroid hormone levels in serum (25). Briefly, steroids were extracted from follicular fluid by liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction. Derivatization reactions were performed to improve chromatographic and detection response of the steroids. Unconjugated steroids were quantified by means of a sensitive gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method, using chemical ionization. The lower limit of quantification for the steroid measurements was evaluated at 0.075 ng/ml for both sulfoconjugated estrogens and 0.008 ng/ml and 0.002 ng/ml for E1 and E2, respectively.

Statistical analysis
One-way ANOVA was used to test the effect of time after hCG administration on levels of EST and ABCC1 mRNA and follicular fluid hormones. EST and ABCC1 mRNA levels were normalized with the control gene rpL7a before analysis. When ANOVAs indicated significant differences (P < 0.05), Dunnett’s test was used for multiple comparisons of individual means. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of equine EST and ABCC1 cDNAs
To clone the equine EST transcript, RT-PCR was performed on ovarian RNA using oligonucleotide primers designed by sequence alignment of known EST species homologs. The resulting cDNA fragment (Fig. 1AaGo) was sequenced and found to be highly homologous to EST transcripts identified thus far. A combination of RT-PCR and 3'-RACE reactions yielded cDNA products corresponding to all remaining coding regions as well as the partial 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) and complete 3'-UTR (Fig. 1Go, Ab and Ac). A final RT-PCR was performed that encompassed the entire coding region and upon sequencing confirmed that all RT-PCR products isolated thus far were from the same transcript. The deduced EST 1330-bp primary transcript encoded an 891-bp open reading frame (GenBank accession no. DQ418452), which predicted a protein of 296 amino acid residues. This 296-amino-acid protein is highly conserved when compared with human (P49888) and bovine (CAA39806) homologs. The equine EST has 81.0% identity at the amino acid level (Fig. 2AGo) and an 85.1% identity at the nucleic acid level when compared with human EST. All putative domains and conserved amino acids, as found in the P-loop motif, appear to be present in the equine enzyme (Fig. 2AGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Deduced primary structure of the equine EST and MRP1 proteins. A, Comparison with known human and bovine EST. The predicted amino acid sequence of the equine EST protein is aligned with human (hum; GenBank accession no. P49888) and bovine (bov; CAA39806) ESTs. Identical residues are indicated by a printed period, and numbers on the right refer to the last amino acid residue on that line. Bold underlined residues are highly conserved among sulfotransferases, residues with an asterisk are involved in estrogen sulfoconjugation, and boxed residues are part of the conserved P-loop motif (49 ). B, The predicted amino acid sequence of equine MRP1. Numbers on the right refer to the last amino acid residue on that line and percentages presented below represent homology to human (N_004987) and bovine (NP_776648) MRP1s. Bold single-underlined residues are known as Walker A sequences, whereas bold double-underlined residues are part of the Walker B sequences (35 ). Bold triple-underlined amino acids are part of the active transport family signature (35 ). Residues with an asterisk are putative N-linked glycosylation sites (53 ), whereas boxed residues represent transmembrane domains (54 ).

 
The ABCC1 transcript was also cloned using ovarian RNA and oligonucleotide primers designed by sequence alignment of known ABCC1 species homologs. Many RT-PCR were performed to obtain the entire coding region (Fig. 1CGo, a–f) and all RT-PCR products had sufficient overlap to confirm they originated from the same transcript. The deduced ABCC1 4629-bp primary transcript encoded a 4596-bp open reading frame (GenBank accession no. DQ418453), which encoded a protein of 1531 amino acid residues (Fig. 2BGo). This 1531-amino-acid protein is highly conserved when compared with human (NP_004987) and bovine (NP_776648) homologs. The equine ABCC1 has 89.7% identity at the amino acid level (Fig. 2BGo) and an 88.2% identity at the nucleic acid level when compared with human ABCC1. All putative transmembrane domains and conserved amino acids from the nucleotide-binding domain as well as the N-linked glycosylation sites appear to be present in the equine enzyme (Fig. 2BGo).

Tissue distribution of equine EST and ABCC1 mRNA
To study the tissue distribution of equine EST and ABCC1, various equine tissues were obtained and the expression of both transcripts was examined by RT-PCR/Southern blot. Results showed that the EST and ABCC1 transcripts were expressed in many of the tissues studied (Fig. 3Go). Levels of EST mRNA were highest in brain, lung, liver, uterus, and testis; moderate in adrenal, skin, and skeletal muscle; low in heart, thymus, kidney, stomach, and a preovulatory follicle isolated 36 h after hCG (i.e. ~3–6 h before ovulation); and very low in spleen (Fig. 3AGo). Levels of ABCC1 transcript were highest in the preovulatory follicle isolated 36 h after hCG; moderate in heart, testes, and skeletal muscle; low in lung, thymus, kidney, spleen, and skin; and very low or absent in brain, liver, adrenal, stomach, and uterus (Fig. 3BGo). However, levels of the control gene rpL7a remained relatively constant in all tissues studied (Fig. 3CGo).


Figure 3
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression of EST and ABCC1 mRNA in equine tissues. Total RNA was extracted from various equine tissues, and samples (100 ng) were analyzed for EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a (control gene) content by a semiquantitative RT-PCR/Southern blotting techniques, as described in Materials and Methods. A, Expression of EST mRNA in equine tissues; B, expression of ABCC1 mRNA in equine tissues; C, expression of rpL7a mRNA in equine tissues. The number of PCR cycles for each gene was within the linear range of amplification, and they represented 26, 20, and 18 cycles for EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a, respectively. Numbers on the right indicate the size of the PCR fragment.

 
Regulation of EST and ABCC1 transcripts in preovulatory follicles and corpora lutea
The regulation of EST and ABCC1 mRNAs was studied in preovulatory follicles by RT-PCR/Southern blot, using follicles isolated during estrus at 0, 12, 24, and 36 h after the administration of an ovulatory dose of hCG. Total RNA was extracted from the follicle wall (theca interna with attached granulosa cells) as well as from three corpora lutea obtained on d 8 of the estrous cycle. Levels of equine EST mRNA were low, almost absent, in equine preovulatory follicles before treatment with hCG (0 h) but were clearly induced at 36 h after hCG (Fig. 4AGo). The EST transcript expression returned to basal levels in the corpus luteum at d 8 of the cycle (Fig. 4AGo). When results from multiple follicles and corpora lutea were expressed as ratios of EST to rpL7a, a significant increase in EST transcript was detected in follicles at 36 h after hCG (P < 0.05; Fig. 4CGo). No change in rpL7a transcript was detected after gonadotropin treatment (Fig. 4BGo). When ABCC1 mRNA was examined in the same follicles, levels were low before hCG treatment with an increase observable 12–36 h after hCG (Fig. 4DGo). The ABCC1 transcript expression returned to basal levels in the corpus luteum at d 8 of the cycle (Fig. 4DGo). These results were then expressed as ratios of ABCC1 to rpL7a, and a significant increase in ABCC1 transcript was detected in follicles isolated between 12 and 36 h after hCG (P < 0.05; Fig. 4FGo). Again, no change in rpL7a transcript was observed after gonadotropin treatment (Fig. 4EGo).


Figure 4
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Regulation of EST and ABCC1 transcript by hCG in equine preovulatory follicles. Preparations of follicle wall were obtained from preovulatory follicles isolated between 0 and 36 h after hCG and of corpora lutea (CL) isolated on d 8 of the estrous cycle. Samples (100 ng) of total RNA were analyzed for EST, ABCC1, and rpL7a content by a semiquantitative RT-PCR/Southern blotting technique, as described in Materials and Methods. A, Regulation of EST mRNA in equine follicles (one follicle per time point). B, Constitutive expression of rpL7a mRNA in the same follicles used in A. Numbers on the right indicate the size of the PCR fragment. C, Relative changes in intensity of EST signal was normalized with the control gene rpL7a (five or six distinct follicles, i.e. animals per time point and three different corpora lutea). Bars marked with an asterisk are significantly different from 0 h after hCG (P < 0.05). D, Regulation of ABCC1 mRNA in equine follicles (one follicle per time point). E, Constitutive expression of rpL7a mRNA in the same follicles used in D. Numbers on the right indicate the size of the PCR fragment. F, Relative changes in intensity of ABCC1 signal was normalized with the control gene rpL7a (mean ± SEM; five or six distinct follicles, i.e. animals per time point and three different corpora lutea). Bars marked with an asterisk are significantly different from 0 h after hCG (P < 0.05).

 
To determine which cell type in the equine follicle wall was responsible for the expression of the EST and ABCC1 transcripts, granulosa and theca interna cells were isolated from follicles obtained between 0 and 39 h post hCG (Fig. 5Go). Results indicated that granulosa cells were the predominant site of both EST and ABCC1 transcript regulation. In granulosa cells, the increase in EST became significant between 30 and 39 h post hCG (P < 0.05; Fig. 5AaGo), whereas ABCC1 mRNA expression was significantly increased 12–39 h post hCG (P < 0.05; Fig. 5BaGo). Results demonstrated a slight, yet unsignificant, transient induction of both EST and ABCC1 mRNAs in theca interna cells (Fig. 5Go, Ab and Bb, respectively).


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Regulation of EST and ABCC1 mRNA in equine granulosa and theca interna cells. Preperations of granulosa cells (a) and theca interna (b) were isolated from equine preovulatory follicles between 0 and 39 h after hCG treatment, and samples (100 ng) of total RNA were analyzed for EST (A), ABCC1 (B), and rpL7a content by a semiquantitative RT-PCR/Southern blotting technique, as described in Materials and Methods. The EST and ABCC1 signal was normalized with the control gene rpL7a, and results are presented as a ratio of either EST to rpL7a or ABCC1 to rpL7a (mean ± SEM; n = 4 samples; i.e. mares per time point). Bars marked with an asterisk are significantly different from 0 h after hCG (P < 0.05). Insets show results of either EST (A) or ABCC1 (B) and rpL7a mRNA levels from one sample per time point.

 
Expression of EST and MRP1 proteins in equine preovulatory follicles
The gonadotropin-dependent induction of EST and ABCC1 was studied at the protein level by immunohistochemistry in follicles at 0 and 39 h after hCG. As shown, the antibody raised in rabbit recognized the equine EST protein from equine liver cell extracts, with a clear band appearing at approximately 35 kDa (Fig. 6AGo). Immunohistochemical results demonstrated a dramatic increase in EST production after hCG treatment (Fig. 6Go, B–E). Follicles isolated before hCG treatment (0 h) showed a very compact granulosa cell layer and very light staining (Fig. 6BGo). The administration of hCG caused the granulosa cell layer to expand, and an increase in EST accumulation (Fig. 6Go, C–E) was observed. Control sections of follicles isolated at 39 h after hCG showed no staining when anti-EST antibody was omitted (Fig 6GGo). The pattern in testes demonstrated EST expression in Leydig cells only (Fig. 6FGo).


Figure 6
View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Immunohistochemical localization of EST in equine preovulatory follicles and EST primary antibody specificity. A, Protein extracts were prepared from equine liver, and anti-EST antibody was shown to recognize a single band of predicted EST size (Mr = 35,000). Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed sections of preovulatory follicles isolated 0 and 39 h after hCG treatment and of equine testicular tissues, as described in Materials and Methods. Results show relatively weak EST staining in granulosa (GC) and theca interna (TI) cells of a preovulatory follicle obtained 0 h after hCG administration (B) but a marked increase in signal intensity in both cell types of distinct follicles isolated 39 h after hCG treatment (C–E). F, Intense EST immunoreactivity is observed in Leydig cells (L) of equine testicular sections. G, Control staining from the follicular tissue presented in D was negative when the primary antibody was omitted. Magnification, x200 (B–D and F) and x400 (E and G).

 
The anti-MRP1 antibody raised in rabbit was shown to recognize the equine MRP1 protein from an equine preovulatory follicle cell extract, with two clear bands appearing at approximately 170 and 190 kDa (Fig. 7AGo). Immunohistochemical results demonstrated an increase in MRP1 production after hCG treatment (Fig. 7Go, C and D). Follicles isolated before hCG treatment (0 h) showed a very compact granulosa cell layer and light staining (Fig. 7BGo). It is difficult to tell whether the staining observed in the antral granulosa cells was a result of the localization of the MRP1 protein or of the edge effect observed when using this technique (Fig. 7BGo). The administration of hCG caused the granulosa cell layer to expand, and an increase in MRP1 accumulation (Fig. 7Go, C and D) was observed. Control sections of follicles isolated at 39 h after hCG showed no staining when anti-MRP1 antibody was omitted (Fig. 7EGo).


Figure 7
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Immunohistochemical localization of MRP1 in equine preovulatory follicles and MRP1 primary antibody specificity. A, Protein extracts were prepared from equine preovulatory follicles, and anti-MRP1 antibody was shown to recognize two bands of predicted MRP1 size [Mr = 170,000 and 190,000 when glycosylated (55 )]. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed sections of preovulatory follicles isolated 0 and 39 h after hCG treatment, as described in Materials and Methods. Results show some MRP1 staining in granulosa (GC) of a preovulatory follicle obtained 0 h after hCG administration (B) but a marked increase in signal intensity was observed mainly in granulosa cells of follicles isolated 39 h after hCG treatment (C and D). E, Control staining from the follicular tissue presented in D was negative when the primary antibody was omitted. Magnification, x200 (B and C) and x400 (D and E).

 
Measurements of E1, E2, E1-S, and E2-S in the follicular fluid
Follicular fluid was obtained from the same follicles described above, isolated between 0 and 36 h after hCG. Sulfoconjugated E1 and E2 as well as their unconjugated counterparts were quantified. The absolute levels of sulfoconjugated estrogens and the ratio of sulfoconjugated estrogens to free ones were shown to significantly change after hCG (Fig. 8Go). Results demonstrate that levels of E1-S and E2-S had a tendency to increase 12–24 h after hCG and returned to basal levels at 39 h yet were only significantly increased at either 24 and 33 h after hCG for E1-S or 12 and 33 h after hCG for E2-S (Fig. 8Go, A and B, respectively). Concentrations of E1 had a tendency to increase after hCG and gradually decrease thereafter. However, none of these changes were significant (data not shown). Levels of E2 in follicular fluid decreased gradually after hCG, this change being significant at 39 h after hCG (data not shown). When relative levels of E1-S to E1 were analyzed, they were shown to increase significantly at 30 and 36 h after hCG (Fig. 8CGo), whereas the relative levels of E2-S to E2 were significantly increased 24–36 h after hCG (Fig. 8DGo).


Figure 8
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Absolute and relative concentrations of sulfoconjugated estrogens in follicular fluid. E1-S (A), E2-S (B), E1-S/E1 (C), and E2-S/E2 (D) were measured in follicular fluid of preovulatory follicles isolated between 0 and 36 h after hCG treatment (mean ± SEM; n = 4–6 samples per time point, i.e. mares). Bars marked with asterisks are significantly different from 0 h after hCG (P < 0.05).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study demonstrates for the first time that the process of follicular luteinization induced by hCG is accompanied by the colocalized expression and up-regulation of EST and ABCC1 in granulosa cells, proteins responsible for estrogen sulfoconjugation and export, respectively. The process of follicular luteinization has previously been associated with dramatic changes in steroid production; enzymes responsible for E2 biosynthesis are down-regulated, whereas those responsible for enhanced progesterone biosynthesis are induced (15, 17, 26, 27). Similar changes were also observed in the equine model (18, 28, 29). However, only one study examining EST expression in the ovary during the periovulatory period has been published, and it was limited to the examination of EST transcript regulation by Northern blot and in situ hybridization in immature rat preovulatory follicles (30). Also, there has been no report on the regulation of ABCC1 during the periovulatory period. Previous investigations of the expression of ABCC1 in the ovary have primarily been limited to its detection in mice by branched DNA analysis as well as its detection in human primary ovarian carcinomas by real-time RT-PCR (31, 32).

This study presents, for the first time, the cloning of equine EST and ABCC1 and identifies the luteinizing preovulatory follicle as a site of EST and ABCC1 expression. High levels of EST transcript were also identified in the brain, lung, liver, uterus, and testes. This is consistent with human studies that have demonstrated a wide pattern of EST expression by quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry (33). Very low levels of EST have also been detected in the human spleen (33). The expression of EST protein in equine Leydig cells is observed in the present study, as previously reported in other species (33, 34). Indeed, disruption of the EST gene in the male mouse leads to structural and functional lesions in the male reproductive system, suggesting a protective role for the sulfoconjugation of estrogens (13). A different pattern of expression is seen for ABCC1. Highest levels were detected in the equine preovulatory follicle 36 h after hCG, with a marked expression also occurring in the testes and skeletal muscle. Few studies depicting ABCC1 tissue distribution have been published; however, it has been shown to be highly expressed in the testes, lung, kidney, heart, and skeletal muscle of the mouse, and similarly to the present study, very low levels of ABCC1 were detected in the liver (35).

The regulation of ABCC1 in the ovary has not been addressed, and there is little information available from any tissue on the mechanisms involved in the regulation of EST and ABCC1. This study identifies hCG as a potential transcriptional modulator of both EST and ABCC1 expression in granulosa cells of the preovulatory follicle. Low, almost absent, levels of EST transcript were observed in granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles before hCG, with an up-regulation of EST mRNA occurring 30–39 h after gonadotropin treatment. The increase in EST transcript expression was reflected in immunohistochemical results obtained from follicles isolated before and 39 h after hCG. A previous study using pregnant mare serum gonadotropin-primed immature rats as a model demonstrated that treatment with hCG resulted in an up-regulation of EST transcript visible in the 6-h post-hCG samples, with a return to almost basal levels at 12 h (30). Although the samples of preovulatory follicles used in the rodent study were different (0, 6, and 12 h after hCG), they show an induction occurring approximately 6 h before ovulation, as depicted in the present study. The inflammatory cytokine IL-1ß has been shown to up-regulate EST transcript expression and activity in vascular smooth muscle cells derived from human aortas (36). Interestingly, IL-1ß has been shown to be induced after LH treatment in cultured human granulosa cells (37) and in granulosa cells obtained 6 h after gonadotropin treatment in the mare (38). The molecular regulation of ABCC1 has been studied and shown to involve many transcriptional elements and transcription factors, including Sp1, p53, and AP-1 (39, 40, 41). However, some discrepancies are discernable concerning p53 activation or repression (42).

Results from the present study suggest that the induction of EST and ABCC1 may contribute to the increase in sulfoconjugated estrogens observed during the periovulatory period. Indeed, a peak in plasma E1-S levels has been demonstrated to occur approximately 1 d before ovulation in a number of species, including the marmoset and the mare (43, 44). The present study establishes that such an increase in sulfoconjugated estrogens also occurs in the follicular fluid of mares. The results presented herein depict the presence of sulfoconjugated steroids before hCG with a significant increase in E1-S and E2-S being observed at 24 and 12 h after hCG, respectively. These findings suggest that the steroid sulfoconjugates present in the follicular fluid at these early times, before EST mRNA levels increase, may also originate from peripheral circulation. Also, a decrease in sulfoconjugated steroids is observed at 36 h after hCG, most likely because of the decreased estrogen biosynthesis, as previously described (15, 17, 18, 29). Nonetheless, the ratio of sulfoconjugated estrogens to free estrogens significantly increases after hCG treatment, supporting the argument that sulfotransferase levels are elevated to blunt the active estrogen levels at a time in the cycle when estrogen is no longer needed. Indeed, ESTs purified from numerous tissues of several species have been shown to be specific for the 3-hydroxyl group of estrogenic steroids; they do not, however, sulfonate either the 16{alpha}- or 17ß-hydroxyl group of phenolic steroids (45, 46, 47). The high homology between ESTs from different species suggests that this activity may be conserved in the mare. Indeed, the GxxGxxK structure found in the P-loop motif and involved in PAPS binding is highly conserved in all sulfotransferases (48), including the mare, as are amino acids Gly262 and Asn269, which have been shown to be required for estrogen sulfoconjugation in the guinea pig (49). As opposed to EST, MRP1 has many substrates. However, it has previously been shown to transport E1-S, in a reduced-glutathione-dependent manner, in membrane vesicles from transfected HeLa cells (50). Interestingly, the modifier subunit of glutamate cysteine ligase, the enzyme responsible for reduced glutathione synthesis, has been demonstrated to increase in preovulatory follicles after gonadotropin treatment in the rat (51). The precise role of EST and ABCC1/MRP1 during follicular luteinization/ovulation is intriguing and remains to be investigated.

In summary, this is the first study to clone the equine EST and ABCC1 cDNAs and to examine their colocalized expression and up-regulation in granulosa cells of luteinizing preovulatory follicles. By means of sulfoconjugation, EST changes a steroid’s properties, thereby dictating the biological potency of estrogens and, in concert with a transporter like ABCC1, can act as a local regulator of estrogen activity in mammals. The concept of estrogen inactivation during the process of follicular luteinization/ovulation is evolving, and results from the present study complement those previously reporting the hCG-dependent up-regulation of 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 4, an enzyme responsible for E2 oxidation (52). Future studies will be required to investigate the necessity of inactivating estrogens during the periovulatory period.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Alain Bélanger and Mr. René Bérubé from the Molecular Endocrinology and Oncology Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval (Québec, Canada) for their precious help in measuring the steroid levels in our follicular fluid samples as well as Ms. Danielle Rannou for her technical help.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Grant OPG0171135 (to J.S.). K.A.B. was supported by a NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship. J.S. was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Investigator Award.

The EST and ABCC1 nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to GenBank with accession nos. DQ418452 and DQ418453, respectively.

K.A.B., M.D., J.G.L., and J.S. have nothing to declare.

First Published Online June 8, 2006

Abbreviations: ABC, ATP-binding cassette; E1-S, estrone-3-sulfonate; E2-S, 17ß-estradiol-sulfonate; EST, estrogen sulfotransferase; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; MRP1, multidrug resistance protein 1; PAPS, 3'-phospho-adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; UTR, untranslated region.

Received April 4, 2006.

Accepted for publication May 31, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Huxtable R 1986 Biochemistry of sulfur. New York: Plenum
  2. Nagata K, Yamazoe Y 2000 Pharmacogenetics of sulfotransferase. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40:159–176[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Blanchard RL, Freimuth RR, Buck J, Weinshilboum RM, Coughtrie MW 2004 A proposed nomenclature system for the cytosolic sulfotransferase (SULT) superfamily. Pharmacogenetics 14:199–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Farooqui AA 1980 3'-Phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulphate metabolism in mammalian tissues. Int J Biochem 12:529–536[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Robbins PW, Lipmann F 1958 Enzymatic synthesis of adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate. J Biol Chem 233:686–690[Free Full Text]
  6. Hahnel R, Twaddle E, Ratajczak T 1973 The specificity of the estrogen receptor of human uterus. J Steroid Biochem 4:21–31[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Juliano RL, Ling V 1976 A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Biochim Biophys Acta 455:152–162[Medline]
  8. Sparreboom A, Danesi R, Ando Y, Chan J, Figg WD 2003 Pharmacogenomics of ABC transporters and its role in cancer chemotherapy. Drug Resist Updat 6:71–84[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Hipfner DR, Deeley RG, Cole SP 1999 Structural, mechanistic and clinical aspects of MRP1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1461:359–376[Medline]
  10. Cole SP, Bhardwaj G, Gerlach JH, Mackie JE, Grant CE, Almquist KC, Stewart AJ, Kurz EU, Duncan AM, Deeley RG 1992 Overexpression of a transporter gene in a multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line. Science 258:1650–1654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zaman GJ, Lankelma J, van Tellingen O, Beijnen J, Dekker H, Paulusma C, Oude Elferink RP, Baas F, Borst P 1995 Role of glutathione in the export of compounds from cells by the multidrug-resistance-associated protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:7690–7694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Robbiani DF, Finch RA, Jager D, Muller WA, Sartorelli AC, Randolph GJ 2000 The leukotriene C(4) transporter MRP1 regulates CCL19 (MIP-3ß, ELC)-dependent mobilization of dendritic cells to lymph nodes. Cell 103:757–768[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Qian YM, Sun XJ, Tong MH, Li XP, Richa J, Song WC 2001 Targeted disruption of the mouse estrogen sulfotransferase gene reveals a role of estrogen metabolism in intracrine and paracrine estrogen regulation. Endocrinology 142:5342–5350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Zeleznik A, Benyo D 1994 Control of follicular development, corpus luteum function and recognition of pregnancy in higher primates. In: Neils J, Knobil E, eds. Physiology of reproduction. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 751–782
  15. Fortune JE 1994 Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biol Reprod 50:225–232[Abstract]
  16. Murphy BD 2000 Models of luteinization. Biol Reprod 63:2–11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Richards JS 1994 Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr Rev 15:725–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kerban A, Boerboom D, Sirois J 1999 Human chorionic gonadotropin induces an inverse regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein messenger ribonucleic acid in theca interna and granulosa cells of equine preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 140:667–674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  20. Boerboom D, Pilon N, Behdjani R, Silversides DW, Sirois J 2000 Expression and regulation of transcripts encoding two members of the NR5A nuclear receptor subfamily of orphan nuclear receptors, steroidogenic factor-1 and NR5A2, in equine ovarian cells during the ovulatory process. Endocrinology 141:4647–4656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sirois J, Doré M 1997 The late induction of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 in equine preovulatory follicles supports its role as a determinant of the ovulatory process. Endocrinology 138:4427–4434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Duchamp G, Bour B, Combarnous Y, Palmer E 1987 Alternative solutions to hCG induction of ovulation in the mare. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 35:221–228[Medline]
  23. Filion F, Bouchard N, Goff AK, Lussier JG, Sirois J 2001 Molecular cloning and induction of bovine prostaglandin E synthase by gonadotropins in ovarian follicles prior to ovulation in vivo. J Biol Chem 276:34323–34330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bérubé R, Malenfant J, Gauvin D, Blais M, Gagnon E, Dumas R, Racine M, Bourque J, Bélanger A, Quantitation of androgenic and estrogenic steroids in rat and monkey serum using gas chromatography and negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry. ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Long Beach, CA, 2000
  26. Sandhoff TW, Hales DB, Hales KH, McLean MP 1998 Transcriptional regulation of the rat steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene by steroidogenic factor 1. Endocrinology 139:4820–4831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ronen-Fuhrmann T, Timberg R, King SR, Hales KH, Hales DB, Stocco DM, Orly J 1998 Spatio-temporal expression patterns of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) during follicular development in the rat ovary. Endocrinology 139:303–315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Boerboom D, Sirois J 2001 Equine P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{Delta}5-{Delta}4 isomerase: molecular cloning and regulation of their messenger ribonucleic acids in equine follicles during the ovulatory process. Biol Reprod 64:206–215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Boerboom D, Kerban A, Sirois J 1999 Dual regulation of promoter II- and promoter 1f-derived cytochrome P450 aromatase transcripts in equine granulosa cells during human chorionic gonadotropin-induced ovulation: a novel model for the study of aromatase promoter switching. Endocrinology 140:4133–4141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jo M, Gieske MC, Payne CE, Wheeler-Price SE, Gieske JB, Ignatius IV, Curry Jr TE, Ko C 2004 Development and application of a rat ovarian gene expression database. Endocrinology 145:5384–5396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ohishi Y, Oda Y, Uchiumi T, Kobayashi H, Hirakawa T, Miyamoto S, Kinukawa N, Nakano H, Kuwano M, Tsuneyoshi M 2002 ATP-binding cassette superfamily transporter gene expression in human primary ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 8:3767–3775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Maher JM, Slitt AL, Cherrington NJ, Cheng X, Klaassen CD 2005 Tissue distribution and hepatic and renal ontogeny of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (Mrp) family in mice. Drug Metab Dispos 33:947–955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Miki Y, Nakata T, Suzuki T, Darnel AD, Moriya T, Kaneko C, Hidaka K, Shiotsu Y, Kusaka H, Sasano H 2002 Systemic distribution of steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human adult and fetal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5760–5768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Song WC, Qian Y, Sun X, Negishi M 1997 Cellular localization and regulation of expression of testicular estrogen sulfotransferase. Endocrinology 138:5006–5012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Stride BD, Valdimarsson G, Gerlach JH, Wilson GM, Cole SP, Deeley RG 1996 Structure and expression of the messenger RNA encoding the murine multidrug resistance protein, an ATP-binding cassette transporter. Mol Pharmacol 49:962–971[Abstract]
  36. Nakamura Y, Miki Y, Suzuki T, Nakata T, Darnel AD, Moriya T, Tazawa C, Saito H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S, Yamada S, Sasano H 2003 Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in the atherosclerotic human aorta. Am J Pathol 163:1329–1339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Chen HF, Shew JY, Chao KH, Chang LJ, Ho HN, Yang YS 2000 Luteinizing hormone up-regulates the expression of interleukin-1ß mRNA in human granulosa-luteal cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 43:125–133
  38. Martoriati A, Gérard N 2003 Interleukin-1 (IL-1) system gene expression in granulosa cells: kinetics during terminal preovulatory follicle maturation in the mare. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1:42[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Zhu Q, Center MS 1996 Evidence that SP1 modulates transcriptional activity of the multidrug resistance-associated protein gene. DNA Cell Biol 15:105–111[Medline]
  40. Wang Q, Beck WT 1998 Transcriptional suppression of multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene expression by wild-type p53. Cancer Res 58:5762–5769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kurz EU, Cole SP, Deeley RG 2001 Identification of DNA-protein interactions in the 5' flanking and 5' untranslated regions of the human multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) gene: evaluation of a putative antioxidant response element/AP-1 binding site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 285:981–990[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Bahr O, Wick W, Weller M 2001 Modulation of MDR/MRP by wild-type and mutant p53. J Clin Invest 107:643–646[Medline]
  43. Harlow CR, Hearn JP, Hodges JK 1984 Ovulation in the marmoset monkey: endocrinology, prediction and detection. J Endocrinol 103:17–24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Koskinen E, Kuntsi H, Lindeberg H, Katila T 1989 Predicting ovulation in the mare on the basis of follicular growth and serum oestrone sulphate and progesterone levels. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 36:299–304[Medline]
  45. Adams JB, Poulos A 1967 Enzymic synthesis of steroid sulphates. 3. Isolation and properties of estrogen sulphotransferase of bovine adrenal glands. Biochim Biophys Acta 146:493–508
  46. Adams JB, Low J 1974 Enzymic synthesis of steroid sulphates. X. Isolation of oestrogen sulphotransferase from bovine placenta and comparison of its properties with adrenal oestrogen sulphotransferase. Biochim Biophys Acta 370:189–196
  47. Tomizuka T, Oeda T, Tamura Y, Yoshida S, Strott CA 1994 Characterization of guinea pig estrogen sulfotransferase expressed by Chinese hamster ovary cell-K1 stable transfectants. Endocrinology 135:938–943[Abstract]
  48. Komatsu K, Driscoll WJ, Koh YC, Strott CA 1994 A P-loop related motif (GxxGxxK) highly conserved in sulfotransferases is required for binding the activated sulfate donor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 204:1178–1185[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Strott CA 1996 Steroid sulfotransferases. Endocr Rev 17:670–697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Qian YM, Song WC, Cui H, Cole SP, Deeley RG 2001 Glutathione stimulates sulfated estrogen transport by multidrug resistance protein 1. J Biol Chem 276:6404–6411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Tsai-Turton M, Luderer U 2005 Gonadotropin regulation of glutamate cysteine ligase catalytic and modifier subunit expression in rat ovary is subunit and follicle stage specific. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289:E391–E402
  52. Brown KA, Boerboom D, Bouchard N, Doré M, Lussier JG, Sirois J 2004 Human chorionic gonadotropin-dependent regulation of 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 4 in preovulatory follicles and its potential role in follicular luteinization. Endocrinology 145:1906–1915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Hipfner DR, Almquist KC, Leslie EM, Gerlach JH, Grant CE, Deeley RG, Cole SP 1997 Membrane topology of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP). A study of glycosylation-site mutants reveals an extracytosolic NH2 terminus. J Biol Chem 272:23623–23630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Bakos E, Hegedus T, Hollo Z, Welker E, Tusnady GE, Zaman GJ, Flens MJ, Varadi A, Sarkadi B 1996 Membrane topology and glycosylation of the human multidrug resistance-associated protein. J Biol Chem 271:12322–12326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Yang Z, Li CS, Shen DD, Ho RJ 2002 Cloning and characterization of the rat multidrug resistance-associated protein 1. AAPS PharmSci 4:E15



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
E. Gershon, A. Hourvitz, S. Reikhav, E. Maman, and N. Dekel
Low expression of COX-2, reduced cumulus expansion, and impaired ovulation in SULT1E1-deficient mice
FASEB J, June 1, 2007; 21(8): 1893 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirois, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirois, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals