help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2005-1625
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Cadepond, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Cadepond, F.
Endocrinology Vol. 147, No. 9 4339-4350
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Expression and Functional State of the Corticosteroid Receptors and 11ß-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in Schwann Cells

Ghislaine Groyer, Bernard Eychenne, Christelle Girard, Krzysztof Rajkowski, Michael Schumacher and Françoise Cadepond

Unité Mixte de Recherche 788, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale and University Paris-Sud 11, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. F. Cadepond, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 788, 80, rue du Général Leclerc, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. E-mail: cadepond{at}kb.inserm.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To investigate the role of steroid receptors in mediating the reported effects of steroids on Schwann cell (SC) myelination and growth, we determined mRNA contents and transcriptional activities of the corticosteroid (glucocorticosteroid and mineralocorticosteroid) receptors (GR and MR) and sex steroid (progesterone, androgen, and estrogen {alpha} and ß) receptors in rat SC cultured under proliferative (in the presence of insulin and forskolin, which induces a high intracellular cAMP content) and quiescent conditions. We found no or very low expression and activity of the sex steroid receptors, as shown by mRNA concentrations determined with real-time PCR and transcriptional activities using transient expression of reporter plasmids in SC. These data and binding studies in SC lines demonstrated that the levels of the sex steroid receptors were the limiting factors. GR was clearly expressed (~8000 sequences/ng total RNA) and functional. No significant modification in GR mRNA levels was observed, but an increase in transcriptional efficiency was recorded in proliferating cells compared with quiescent cells. MR was also significantly expressed at the mRNA level (~450 sequences/ng total RNA) under the two culture conditions. No MR transcriptional activity was observed in SC, but a low specific binding of aldosterone was detected in SC lines. 11ß-Hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD2), an enzyme that inactivates glucocorticoids, was strongly expressed and active in quiescent SC, although in proliferating cells, HSD2 exhibited a strong decrease in activity and mRNA concentration. These data support a physiological role for HSD2 regulation of glucocorticosteroid concentrations in nerve SC.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
FORMATION OF MYELIN sheaths around axons by specialized glial cells allows efficient conduction of the nervous impulse. In the peripheral nervous system (PNS), myelin is formed by Schwann cells (SC), which acquire and maintain the myelinating phenotype upon contact with large axons (>1 µm) (1, 2). According to culture conditions, SC are in a proliferative state (in the presence of insulin and forskolin) or remain quiescent (in their absence). The increase in intracellular cAMP content induced by forskolin is not mitogenic by itself but allows growth factors such as IGF-I or insulin to stimulate proliferation (3). cAMP can also promote partial differentiation in cultured SC if they are cultured at high density, when cell division is absent (4, 5). Steroids such as dexamethasone and progesterone have been shown to stimulate the myelination process in cocultures of SC and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons (6, 7). In cultured SC, they can moderately increase the transcription driven by promoters of myelin proteins such as P0 and PMP22 (8, 9). Moreover, glucocorticosteroids have been shown to enhance potency of SC mitogens (10). To define whether nuclear steroid receptors mediate these effects, we undertook a careful study of their expression in SC in the two culture conditions.

The ubiquitous glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is expected to exert its pleiotropic control on a large set of genes depending on the cell context. In SC, the role of GR is poorly documented. For the mineralocorticosteroid receptor (MR), which also binds glucocorticosteroids, it is not known whether it is expressed and mediates specific effects in SC. Progesterone (P) and its metabolites may be synthesized and are biologically active in the nervous system (11, 12), thus belonging to the class of neurosteroids (13, 14). The presence of progesterone receptor (PR) in cultured SC has been detected by steroid binding and immunocytology (11, 15). On the contrary, Chan et al. (16), who detected PR mRNA and PR protein in DRG neurons cocultured with SC by RT-PCR and immunocytology, did not detect clear PR message and protein in SC. Other sex steroids may exert important functions in the nervous system. In SC, previous reports have described trophic effects of estrogens in the presence of cAMP (17), acting via the estrogen receptor (ER) and the stimulation of the expression of myelin protein P0 by androgens in the absence of the androgen receptor (AR) (11). In cultured segments of rat sciatic nerve, estradiol (E2) stimulated SC proliferation in males and P did so in females, but in this report cAMP acted as an inhibitor (18). Although these studies show that SC contain steroid receptor message and protein, they do not provide information on the amounts of receptors and their functional state.

Steroids can regulate target gene expression using different mechanisms. They can activate a nuclear steroid receptor leading to stimulation or inhibition of the expression of a target gene by direct genomic action on specific regulatory elements located in its promoter. In some cases, their cross-binding to another steroid receptor type may occur, leading to agonistic (19) or antagonistic effects (20). In addition, activated steroid receptors can also modulate the activity of other transcription factors on responsive promoters and even interfere with upstream signaling pathways, thus mediating nongenomic effects (21, 22, 23). Such effects can also result from the action of membrane receptors: classical steroid receptors with membrane location (23, 24), novel membrane steroid-binding proteins or G protein-coupled receptors, and neuromediator receptors (25, 26, 27, 28). Therefore, it appears very important to know the pattern of expression and the functional state of the various classical steroid receptors in SC to determine whether they can be involved in the mechanisms of steroid action.

After a brief report dealing with steroid receptors in several glial cell lines of the central nervous system (CNS) and PNS (29), the present work investigates the expression of various steroid receptors in primary cultures of purified SC under proliferative and quiescent conditions by real-time PCR. The functional state of the receptor proteins was checked by transcriptional measurements from exogenous synthetic promoters controlling reporter proteins, introduced by transfection. Complementary steroid binding studies were performed in SC lines (rat CR3a1 and CR1b4 cells and mouse MSC80 cells) (30, 31). These SC lines display some characteristics of primary cultured SC, i.e. partial differentiation and myelin protein expression in the presence of neurons. Moreover, to investigate a possible regulation of GR and MR activity in purified SC, the expression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD2), an enzyme able to inactivate glucocorticosteroids by converting corticosterone (CS) into 11ß-dehydrocorticosterone, was examined. The possibility of coordinated regulation between steroid receptors and steroid metabolic enzymes, leading to invalidation of the GR pathway, is discussed with respect to nerve regeneration.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents
DMEM 7777 was from Sigma-Aldrich (Lyon, France). Radiolabeled steroids were from PerkinElmer (Courtaboeuf, France) [CS, NET 399; E2, NET 317; promegestone (R5020), NET 555; methyltrienolone (R1881), NET 590; triamcinolone acetonide (TA), NET 470; aldosterone (Aldo), NET 105]. Cold steroids were from Sigma [E2, CS, 5{alpha}-dehydrotestosterone (DHT), and Aldo) or NEN Life Science Products (R1881 and R5020). The GR agonist 17{alpha}-1-propynyl-11ß,17ß-dihydroxy-6-methyl-androsta-1,4,6-triene-3-one (RU28362) were gifts from HMR (Romainville, France; now Aventis). Mouse antirat GR antibody (BuGR) was purchased from Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO). Measurements of cAMP were performed using the [3H]cAMP Biotrak assay system (TRK432) from GE Healthcare.

Cell culture
SC from the sciatic nerves of 3- to 4-d-old Sprague Dawley rats were purified and propagated as previously described (4). They were 3 wk old at the end of the purification steps and were cultured at most another 4 wk. They were used after a 48-h incubation with DMEM containing 10% charcoal/dextran-treated serum (32) (to eliminate the steroids present in the serum), 4 mM glutamine, and a 1/200 mixture of penicillin, streptomycin, and fungizone (1000 U/ml, 10 mg/ml, and 1 mg/ml, respectively).

MSC80 (mouse) and CR3a1 and CR1b4 (rat) cell lines were cultured as previously described (30, 31). They were maintained in 10% charcoal/dextran-treated serum for 48–72 h.

To investigate ER binding and ER mRNA content, cells were cultured for at least 5 d in medium containing phenol-red-depleted DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum before the 48-h terminal incubation with steroid-depleted serum.

Total RNA preparation and RT
Total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy kit from QIAGEN (Courtaboeuf, France) including an additional DNase step (RNase-free DNase set kit). A mean yield of 1 µg RNA was obtained from approximately 4 x 105 quiescent SC or from 3.6 x 105 SC cultured in proliferative medium or approximately 2 x 105 cells from the different cell lines. This correspondence allowed conversion of mRNA concentrations per nanogram RNA into mRNA concentrations per cell. RT was carried out with Superscript II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) with 1 µg total RNA in 20 µl, using hexanucleotide primers (250 ng) in the presence of the ribonuclease inhibitor RNAsin (0.5 µl; Promega, Charbonnières, France). A mean of 14% incorporation of [32P]dCTP into cDNA was determined by trichloroacetic acid precipitation, a value used to estimate sequence number per nanogram original RNA (i.e. retrotranscribed with a 100% efficiency).

PCR experiments
PCR experiments were carried out using a real-time PCR apparatus, ABI PRISM 7000 (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France). Assays were performed in 20 µl according to Applied Biosystems’ recommendations with the cDNA from 20 ng total RNA. We used TaqMan methodology for rat GR, MR, PR, AR, and ER{alpha} and -ß (gene expression assays nos. Rn01405583, Rn00565562, Rn00575662, Rn00560747, Rn00562166, and Rn00562610, respectively) and SYBR Green technology for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and HSD (type 1 and 2). For MSC80 mRNAs, except for ER{alpha}, we performed estimations using the above-mentioned rat gene expression assays. GAPDH primers were TGC ACC ACC AAC TGC TTA GC (sense) and GGC ATG GAC TGT GGT CAT GAG (antisense). Primers for HSD2 sequences were chosen in exons 2 and 3 (sense, TTG GCA AGG AGA CAG CTA AG, and antisense, CCA GAA CAC GGC TGA TAT CCT), whereas for HSD1 they were GGA GCC CAT GTG GTA TTG A (sense) and AGT GCC GGC AAT GTA GTG A (antisense). For mouse ER{alpha} mRNA, an adaptation of the classical method was performed using a robocycler (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and common mouse/rat primers: sense, CCCCTACTACCTGGAGAAC; antisense, GGTTTGTAGCTGGACACATG. Accurate presentation of gene expression data required normalization and quantification steps that are described in detail below.

PCR data normalization with GAPDH
Amplification of an endogenous control was necessary to standardize the amount of cDNA in a PCR, and we followed the expression of the housekeeping gene GAPDH in each sample using a standard GAPDH curve obtained with a bulk preparation of kidney retro-transcribed RNA. This curve was very close to that obtained with SC preparations.

Validation of GAPDH as a reference gene for RNA samples of SC and related cell lines was performed by analyzing several housekeeping genes with geNorm software (33). We found that GAPDH was one of the most stably expressed control genes. Furthermore, by exploiting the cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from several SC preparations, cultured in parallel either with or without insulin and forskolin, the low mean Ct variation ({Delta}Ct = 0.16) observed between the two culture conditions was taken into account for the expression of the results in Fig. 1AGo.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Steroid receptor mRNAs in Schwann cells (SC) cultured in the absence (quiescent SC) or the presence of insulin and forskolin (proliferating SC) (A) and in three SC lines (B). GR, MR, PR, and ER{alpha} mRNA concentrations, expressed as sequence number per nanogram total RNA ± SEM, were determined by real-time PCR using standard curves obtained by serial dilutions of the corresponding linearized plasmid and normalized with respect to the GAPDH content. Cell lines were cultured and proliferating in the absence of insulin and forskolin. White bars, GR; black bars, MR; striped bars, PR. ER{alpha} is shown in B for MSC80 cells but merged into the x-axis for other cells. ERß and AR were below detection level.

 
PCR quantification of mRNA concentrations
For the estimation of receptor mRNA copy numbers, the number of cycles (Ct) required to reach a fixed fluorescence level was converted into a sequence number by using a standard curve method (User Bulletin no. 2, Abi Prism 7700 sequence detection system). Serial dilutions of the corresponding linearized expression plasmid (two separate plasmid digestions and several dilution series) were made with 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8) in siliconized tubes. Comparison of the slopes of standard curves with plasmid DNA and cDNA from kidney (GR and MR), ovary (AR or ER{alpha} and -ß) and SC (when possible), showing no differences in amplification efficiencies between cDNA and DNA in most experiments, allowed this quantification of mRNA sequences.

For mouse ER{alpha}, we quantified the amount of 294-bp amplicon after gel electrophoresis in the presence of ethidium bromide. Absorbance of ethidium bromide-stained bands was measured at several successive cycles with a Bio-Rad (Marne-la-Coquette, France) image analysis system using molecular analysis software. After subtracting background and plotting the logarithm of intensities as a function of cycle numbers, an absorbance value at a given cycle was read in the linear part of the curve. The same experiment was carried out with the GAPDH gene for normalization and with increased quantities of plasmid DNA for the estimation of sequence numbers.

Relative quantitation of HSD1 and HSD2 mRNA concentrations was performed by real-time PCR using SYBR Green and GAPDH as reference gene.

Cell cytosol preparation and steroid binding measurements
The binding activities for various steroids were determined in cytosol extracts from cell lines. Cells were cultured with charcoal/dextran-treated serum 48–72 h before harvesting and then collected by scraping and centrifugation. Cell pellets were suspended in the GTED-Mo homogenization buffer [13% glycerol (vol/vol), 20 mM Tris-Cl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (pH 7.4) at 4 C, containing 5 µg/ml antipain, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 15 mM Na2MO4; 2 ml/g cell pellet] and homogenized with a motor-driven glass/glass homogenizer. Low-salt cytosol extract was obtained after 1 h centrifugation at 105,000 x g. Aliquots were removed for protein concentration measurements. The 10% glycerol and 1 mg/ml ovalbumin were then added to prevent inactivation during incubation and freezing/thawing steps. For each steroid receptor tested, standard incubations (50 µl) contained 20 nM tritiated steroid (TA, Aldo, R5020, R1881, and E2) with and without a 1000-fold molar excess of corresponding cold competitor steroid (RU28362, Aldo, R5020, R1881, and E2, respectively). To eliminate possible cross-reactivity of a given steroid with another steroid receptor, parallel incubations were also performed with additional steroids (20 µM RU28362 for MR, 10 µM CS and 15 nM DHT for PR, 50 µM TA for AR and 15 nM DHT for ER). When performing titration experiments, various radioactive steroid concentrations (from 0.5–20 nM) were used with and without a 1000-fold molar excess of the corresponding cold steroid and in the presence of complementary steroid when necessary (RU28362 for Aldo binding to MR).

Separation of bound and free steroid was performed according to the hydroxyapatite method (34). Briefly, 500 µl of hydroxyapatite slurry (10%) was pelleted by centrifugation in a 5-ml glass scintillation vial. After supernatant removal, aliquots of 20 µl cytosol were layered on it (two vials per sample). Ten minutes later, four rapid washings of the pellet were performed with 1.5 ml buffer, before the addition of 5 ml picofluor 15 and counting. Total radioactivity was also measured from two 2-µl aliquot supernatants. Titration data were analyzed by the nonlinear regression analysis included in PRISM 2 software.

Detection of GR by Western blotting
Cytosol samples (30 µg protein) were mixed with concentrated Laemmli’s sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before loading on 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for electrophoretic separation. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using Towbin transfer buffer (35). Membranes were blocked and incubated overnight at 4 C with BuGR antibody (0.025 µg/ml). After rinsing, they were incubated 1 h at room temperature with 3.125 ng/ml horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (goat antimouse antibody from Pierce Biotechnology, Brebières, France) and processed for chemiluminescence detection (Supersignal West Femto; Pierce).

Cell transfection and transcriptional activity measurements
SC were collected by trypsination (2 x 106 to 5 x 106 cells) and transfected according to Nucleofector Technology (Amaxa GmbH, Köln, Germany) using the astrocyte kit and the V20 program with 3 µg MMTV-luciferase (36) or overERE-{Delta}MTV-CAT (37) reporter plasmid. These promoters displayed a stronger response to steroids than promoters containing simple glucocorticoid-responsive elements or estrogen-responsive elements (ERE). After transfection, the bulk of cells were quickly distributed in six-well polylysine-coated dishes and, 3 h later, treated with different steroids (10 nM or 1 µM for RU28362, R5020, RU1881, and E2 and 0.1 or 10 nM for Aldo). Cell lysis was performed after 18–24 h incubation with steroids. Measurements of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) activity using [3H]chloramphenicol in a liquid-phase method and luciferase activity by luminescence with a luciferin substrate were performed as previously described (38, 39).

Batch transfection allowed a stock of cells with a unique transfection efficiency to be made available for a series of steroid incubation conditions. The efficiency of transfection was determined by including a small proportion of green fluorescent protein-expressing plasmid (0.5 µg) and by counting green fluorescent cells.

For exogenous steroid receptor expression, 1 µg of each plasmid containing rat GR, MR, PR, AR, and ER{alpha} sequences (pC7GR, MR-cDNA3, PR6B-pcDNA3.1/Zeo, pSG5-rAR or pCMVratAR, and ER-pEGFP, respectively; see Acknowledgments) were cotransfected with the appropriate reporter plasmid.

Measurements of HSD2 activity
For measurements of 11ß-dehydrogenase activity, cells maintained 48 h with steroid-depleted serum in 35-mm-diameter dishes were used at subconfluence with or without insulin and forskolin. After 2 h in medium containing 2% steroid-depleted serum, 10 nM [3H]CS was added (the Km of HSD2 is in the nanomolar range) (40). At different times, the supernatant of each well (1 ml) was removed and extracted with 9 ml methanol containing 1 mg 3-ter-butyl-4-hydroxy-anisol, 5 nmol CS and 5 nmol 11-dehydrocorticosterone, vortexed and left overnight at room temperature. After centrifugation at 4500 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant and 0.5-ml pellet were concentrated to 50–150 µl and layered on thin-layer chromatography plates. Two discrimination systems were used: chloroform/methanol/water (100:5:0.1) or chloroform/ethyl acetate (4:1). Cold steroids (markers and carriers) were detected with UV light and the radioactivity profile obtained with a Tracemaster 20 apparatus (Berthold, Thoiry, France) using Chroma software. The radioactivity comigrating with the cold dehydrocorticosterone peak was expressed as a percentage of total slot radioactivity and the amount normalized to the initial CS concentration. Spontaneous CS conversion was very low and subtracted from the experimental values. After careful rinsing, cell layers were lysed and used for total protein determination according to the Pierce BCA kit.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Presence of GR mRNA, low concentrations of MR and PR mRNA, and absence of AR and ER mRNA in SC
The number of GR, MR, and PR mRNA sequences per nanogram of total RNA was determined in rat SC by TaqMan real-time technology (Fig. 1Go, A and B). GR mRNA (8500 ± 2460 and 7500 ± 2070 sequences/ng total RNA, mean ± SEM; n = 10) and MR mRNA (398 ± 98 and 511 ± 85 sequences/ng; mean ± SEM; n = 8 and 10) were found in cells cultured in proliferative and quiescent medium, respectively. GR and MR expression did not significantly differ in SC cultured in the absence and in the presence of insulin and forskolin, which allow cell proliferation. These values corresponded approximately to 20 GR and one MR mRNA molecule/SC. In cell lines, the GR mRNA sequence number per nanogram was of the same order of magnitude as in SC, except Msc80, which exhibited a lower content. On the contrary, the MR mRNA level was higher in CR1b4 and MSC80 lines (Fig. 1BGo).

A lower content of PR mRNA was detected in SC: 125 ± 46 (mean ± SEM; n = 10) and 112 ± 33 (mean ± SEM; n = 10) sequences/ng in the absence or in the presence of insulin and forskolin, respectively (Fig. 1AGo). These values corresponded to approximately 0.3 sequences per SC. PR mRNA content was very low in the three SC lines (Fig. 1BGo).

In all cells, no significant AR mRNA was detected either by TaqMan or by classical methodology (not shown). Extremely low concentrations of ER{alpha} mRNA were measured (around 25 sequences/ng in the absence of insulin and forskolin and 15 sequences/ng in their presence). ERß mRNA levels were still lower (<10 sequences/ng; not shown). The same results were obtained with cell lines.

Although some differences in PR and MR mRNA contents were observed between SC and cell lines, we performed complementary steroid binding studies using cytosols from SC lines. In addition, to check for the synthesis of efficient receptors, we investigated the transcriptional responses of SC exposed to different steroid treatments.

Significant high-affinity glucocorticosteroid and low mineralocorticoid binding activities but no significant sex steroid binding in SC lines
Binding studies were performed on cytosol extracts and thus concerned the intracellular content of nuclear steroid receptors. Cytosol preparation requires the availability of sufficient cell material; therefore, steroid binding activities were studied in cell lines instead of SC. Determination of the GR binding in CR3a1, CR1b4, and MSC80 cells was performed after cytosol incubation with 20 nM [3H]TA with or without an excess of cold RU28362. This last glucocorticosteroid agonist was used rather than TA because it displayed no cross-reactivity with other steroid receptors. The mean concentration of steroid binding sites ranged from 630–890 fmol/mg cytosol protein for the three cell lines. The number of GR binding sites per cell was calculated from the cell numbers taken for each cytosol preparation. They were 11,000 ± 3,280 (mean ± SEM; n = 4) for MSC80, 5370 ± 1345 (mean ± SEM; n = 3) for CR3a1, and 4340 ± 1263 (mean ± SEM; n = 3) for CR1b4. Titration curves (as shown for CR3a1 in Fig. 2AGo, curve with filled circles) gave a KD value in the nanomolar range with a very low nonspecific background (slope = 0.0027, curve with open circles).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Binding of TA and R5020 in CR3a1 cell cytosol (A) and of Aldo in MSC80 cytosol (B). Aliquots of cytosol (0.72 mg protein/ml) of CR3a1 were incubated with increasing concentrations of [3H]TA or [3H]R5020 without (bullet and {blacksquare}, total binding) or with a 1000-fold molar excess of the cold competitor steroid (RU28362 for GR and R5020 for PR; {circ} and {square}, respectively) corresponding to nonspecific binding. Binding parameters for GR receptor (TA binding) were Bmax of 0.82 pmol/ml of cytosol and Kd = 0.4 nM. The slope of nonspecific binding was 0.0027. For PR (R5020 binding), the binding parameters obtained were Bmax of 0.130 pmol/ml of cytosol and Kd =7 nM with a nonspecific binding slope of 0.0086. For MR (Aldo binding), aliquots of cytosol (3.4 mg protein/ml) of MSC80 were incubated with increasing concentrations of [3H]Aldo ({blacksquare}) in the presence of 20 µM RU28362 with or without a 1000-fold excess of cold Aldo ({square}). Binding parameters were Bmax of 45.56 fmol/ml of cytosol and Kd = 1.57 nM. The nonspecific binding slope was 0.00125.

 
Specific PR binding capacities were difficult to assess in CR3a1 cells (and other cell lines) because total progestin (R5020) binding levels detected were low with proportionally high nonspecific backgrounds with a steroid bound/total steroid ratio of 0.0086, which increased as a function of cytosol protein content: (Fig. 2AGo, curves with filled and empty squares, respectively). Both these facts led to increased variability of the measurements. In addition, a pseudo binding was observed with buffer alone (not shown). For these reasons, no clear-cut conclusion whether PR protein was present in any significant amount could be drawn directly from these binding measurements.

The specific binding of Aldo was measured in the presence of the glucocorticoid RU28362. This steroid, which does not bind to MR, was introduced to saturate GR binding sites, thus eliminating any Aldo binding to GR. MR binding activity was very low but significant in the three cell lines studied (10–15 fmol/mg cytosol protein) as shown for MSC80 cytosols (Fig. 2BGo). These values were precise because the nonspecific slope was very low (0.00125) and [3H]Aldo did not generate a mock titration curve as observed for the progestin R5020.

No specific binding to ER was observed with CR3a1 and CR1b4 cell cytosols (Fig. 3AGo). Exploitation of estradiol binding experiments with MSC80 extracts (Fig. 3BGo) led to detection of a binding component with a low capacity (40 fmol/mg cytosol protein and moderate affinity Kd of ~7 nM) above an important nonspecific binding (slope 0.0125). No mock titration was detected with estradiol, but an increased variability of the measurements was observed at high steroid concentrations that impeded correct estimation of the plateau level. No specific binding to AR was observed in the three cell lines studied (not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. E2 binding to CR3a1and CR1b4 (A) and MSC80 (B) cytosols. Total binding (black symbols), nonspecific binding (white symbols). A, Squares represent CR1b4, circles CR3a1; B, black squares represent MSC80 total binding; white squares nonspecific binding, and white circles binding by buffer containing 1 mg/ml ovalbumin. The protein concentration of the MSC80 cytosol was 3.2 mg/ml. Binding parameters for ER in MSC80 cells were Bmax of 128 fmol/ml and Kd = 7 nM. Nonspecific binding slope was 0.0126.

 
From the binding experiments of the different steroid receptors, we can conclude that the GR protein was expressed as a binding entity, in agreement with GR immunodetection by Western blots performed with SC and cell lines (not shown) and consistent with the significant levels of mRNA. MR was expressed at a lower level than expected from its mRNA concentration. The lack of significant specific binding for the other receptors is consistent with the absence or the very low concentrations of the corresponding mRNAs measured in the previous section.

Glucocorticosteroids, but not the other steroids, activate the transcription of reporter genes driven by synthetic promoters containing their corresponding responsive elements
Transient transfection experiments using reporter plasmids containing steroid-responsive promoters were performed to test the functional state of the various steroid receptors in cultured SC isolated from sciatic nerves. Cells were transfected using Amaxa technology with the reporter plasmid MMTV-luciferase, which can be activated by GR, MR, PR, and AR. As shown in Fig. 4Go, only glucocorticosteroids increased the transcriptional activity of reporter plasmid. All the other steroids, mineralocorticosteroids (Aldo), progestagens (R5020), and androgens (R1881) did not activate transcription. Moreover, the transcriptional activity of glucocorticosteroid-stimulated GR and the basal activity were significantly higher when cells were cultured in proliferation medium (Fig. 4Go, filled bars).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Transcriptional activity of endogenous steroid receptors in Schwann cells (SC) cultured in the absence or the presence of insulin and forskolin. Cells were transfected with reporter plasmid MMTV-luc (3 µg) and treated or not with various steroids, 10–6 M RU 28362 (GR), 10–9 M Aldo (MR), 10–6 M R5020 (PR), and 10–6 M R1881 (AR), in quiescent (white bars) or proliferative conditions (presence of insulin and forskolin) (black bars). Transcriptional activity was expressed in arbitrary luciferase units per 1000 cells. Fisher test concluded equality of the variances in both culture conditions and unpaired t test a significant increase of transcriptional activity in SC cultured in the presence of insulin and forskolin (P < 0.05).

 
The lack of transactivation by the other steroid receptors could be due to a lack of expression or inactivity of receptors or to a downstream defect in the transcriptional machinery. To eliminate this last hypothesis, we transiently expressed each of these receptors together with the corresponding reporter gene in SC and treated the cells with the corresponding steroid. A stimulation of the transcription was observed after treatment with Aldo (10–9 M), R5020, or R1881 (10–6 M) (Fig. 5Go). Similar results were obtained with lower steroid concentrations (10–10 M Aldo, 10–8 M R5020, and 10–8 M R1881; not shown). Exogenous GR expression was accompanied by increased transcriptional response to RU28362 (10–6 and 10–8 M). These results indicate that exogenous receptors were active and that the transcriptional machinery necessary for the steroid response was functional but that the endogenous contents of PR, MR, and AR were too low to sustain the transcription from exogenous promoters in SC. All transcriptional responses in the presence of exogenous receptor were significantly higher when cells were proliferating (compare Fig. 5Go, A and B), and this was unrelated to a difference in transfection efficiency.


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Transcriptional activity driven by exogenous steroid receptors in the absence (A) or in the presence (B) of insulin and forskolin. Schwann cells were transfected with MMTV-luc reporter plasmid (3 µg) with or without steroid receptor expression plasmids (1 µg) and treated (black bars) or not (white bars) with various steroids: 10–6 M RU 28362 (GR), 10–9 M Aldo (MR), 10–6 M R5020 (PR), and 10–6 M R1881 (AR). Transcriptional activity is expressed in luciferase arbitrary units per 1000 cells. Data were treated by ANOVA (two factors and repeated experiments). The effects of both factors were significant (culture conditions in the absence or presence of insulin and forskolin (P = 0.0055, F value = 12.41, and degrees of freedom = 1) and absence or expression of exogenous steroid receptors (P = 0.03, F value = 4.20, and degrees of freedom = 4).

 
Similar experiments were conducted with overERE-{Delta}MTV-CAT to analyze the estrogen (10–7 M E2) response in SC. As above, no endogenous activity was recorded, but clear transcriptional activity was measured in the presence of E2 after cotransfection of the ER{alpha} expression plasmid (Fig. 6Go). Insulin and forskolin moderately increased transcription mediated by exogenous ER. Surprisingly, even after 9 d of phenol red depletion, exogenous ER exhibited E2-independent activity (30–50% in SC and 80% in cell lines).


Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Transcriptional activity of endogenous and exogenous ER{alpha} in the absence (left) or in the presence of insulin and forskolin (right). Schwann cells were transfected with reporter plasmid overERE-DMTV-CAT (3 µg) and RSV-luc (1 µg) for monitoring transfection efficiency with and without 1 µg of ER-expressing plasmid and treated (black bars) or not (white bars) with 10–7 M E2. Transcriptional activity is expressed as the CAT/luc ratio.

 
In this study, we provided the demonstration of a lack of classical transcriptional activity for endogenous PR, AR, and ER{alpha}, investigated by transient transfection of reporter plasmids, consistent with very low expression of these receptors. That Aldo failed to activate the transcription of the reporter gene is in contradiction with the observation that SC contain significant amounts of MR mRNA and that low binding was observed in cell lines. Therefore, to investigate a potential MR function that requires Aldo to access MR in the presence of glucocorticosteroid excess, we analyzed the activity of HSD2, an enzyme that inactivates glucocorticosteroids and has been found in tissues expressing both corticoid receptors and able to respond to mineralocorticosteroid via the MR (41).

High levels of HSD2 activity in quiescent SC but a strong decrease in SC cultured in proliferation medium
We checked for the expression and activity of the HSD2 protein by determining the rates of transformation of [3H]CS into [3H]11ß-dehydrocorticosterone. Figure 7AGo shows that quiescent SC displayed the higher conversion efficiency (28 pmol/h·mg protein) compared with proliferating SC. This activity fell to no more than 1 pmol/h·mg protein in the presence of insulin and forskolin. After 48 h withdrawal of insulin and forskolin, the concentration of cAMP was 1.9 pmol/106 SC, whereas it increased to 23 and 9.9 pmol/106 cells 30 min and 4 h after 10 µM forskolin introduction, respectively. CR3a1 exhibited lower rates of conversion (0.14 pmol/h·mg protein) than proliferative SC (0.4 pmol/h·mg in the same experiment), whereas CR1b4 and MSC80 activities were extremely low (0.028 and 0.012 pmol/h·mg protein) (Fig. 7BGo). The importance of the changes in HSD2 activity in SC prompted us to investigate the levels of HSD2 RNAs under both culture conditions and in SC lines to check for the occurrence of this regulation at the mRNA level.


Figure 7
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. A, Kinetic analysis of HSD2 activity in SC cultured (A) in the absence (squares) or in the presence (triangles) of insulin and forskolin; B, comparison of the HSD2 velocities in proliferating SC and in derived SC lines. The conversion of 10 nM [3H]corticosterone into [3H]dehydrocorticosterone was estimated by thin-layer chromatography analysis and expressed as picomoles per milligram protein (and per hour for velocities).

 
Regulation of HSD2 by forskolin in SC occurs at the mRNA level
We analyzed the relative expression of the HSD2 and HSD1 mRNA in primary SC and cell lines by real-time RT-PCR. HSD2 mRNA concentrations were considerably higher than HSD1 mRNA (Fig. 8AGo), corresponding to a HSD2/HSD1 ratio close to 250. The accumulation of HSD2 in SC (normalized with GAPDH) was maximal in the absence of insulin and forskolin and decreased by a factor of approximately 9 in their presence (Fig. 8BGo). In additional experiments, if both insulin and forskolin were removed from cell cultures for 24 h and then only forskolin reintroduced, it was found that HSD2 mRNA decreased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 8CGo). In cell lines, HSD2 levels were always low. HSD1 mRNA exhibited variable levels according to cell line and SC culture conditions, but its concentration was always 10- to 100-fold lower than that of HSD2 mRNA. These data demonstrate that HSD2 is the main HSD isoform expressed in SC, that the intracellular cAMP level is involved in HSD2 regulation, and that this regulation occurs at the mRNA level (synthesis and/or stability).


Figure 8
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Concentration of HSD1 and HSD2 mRNAs in SC cultured in the absence or in the presence of insulin and forskolin and in derived SC lines. A, Semilogarithmic transformation of amplification curves obtained with the ABI Prism 7000 apparatus using SYBR Green dye for quantification. Curves obtained with GAPDH (squares), HSD2 (circles), and HSD1 (triangles) primers are shown. White symbols, SC cultured in the absence of insulin and forskolin; black symbols, SC cultured in their presence. B, mRNA concentrations in quiescent and proliferating SC and derived SC lines, expressed as a percentage of GAPDH sequences in the same RT samples HSD1 (black bars) and HSD2 (white bars). C, Time-dependent down-regulation of HSD2 mRNA in SC cells cultured 24 h without insulin and forskolin and then exposed to forskolin at zero time: white bars, untreated cells; black bars, forskolin-treated cells.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This work is the first to provide an integrated view of the expression of the steroid receptors from mRNAs to proteins (binding or transcriptional activities) in SC and SC lines. Our results for SC are concordant with data obtained in Schwan-nomas where GR was found in all tumors, PR in a subset of tumors, AR rarely in male tumors, and ER undetected (42).

No sex steroid receptor activity in SC
In our experimental conditions, purified SC did not express significant levels of functional sex steroid receptors, as shown by mRNA concentrations, transcriptional activities, and binding studies in SC lines. Demonstration that the receptors were limiting factors was provided by the positive transcriptional responses obtained when exogenous receptors were transiently expressed.

Our results showing that AR mRNA was barely detectable and that protein functions were lacking in SC agree with two previous studies concluding that AR expression is absent from SC (11, 43). The hypothesis of a PR-mediated androgen effect (11) is not in agreement with the absence of functional PR.

For ER{alpha} and ERß, our data with SC indicate the absence of expression in our culture conditions. No binding was found in CR3a1 and CR1b4 in concordance with the very low level of mRNA and lack of transcriptional activity, whereas in the MSC80 cell line, a binding component, which differed from ER, was found (lack of mRNA and of transcriptional activity and affinity lower than usually reported for ER). Furthermore, in SC, exogenous ER{alpha} displayed ligand-independent activity (44, 45).

Our present results indicating that the low level of PR protein, if any, is not sufficient to trigger biological activity agree with the study by Chan et al. (16), who did not detect significant PR expression in SC cultured alone or cocultured with DRG neurons and who proposed the hypothesis of P action via the PR expressed in the neighboring neurons. The discrepancy with previous observations in SC may result from the difficulty to precisely determine very low concentrations using methods with restricted sensitivity and with small-sized biological samples. Even with the availability of more sensitive methods, i.e. RT-PCR, we cannot clearly conclude that there is PR gene expression in purified Schwann cells.

Moreover, several reports indicate that P may act via nonsteroid receptor pathways. The reported P effect on the myelin protein P0 promoter and on one of the two PMP22 promoters devoid of a known glucocorticoid-responsive element/P-responsive element and the agonistic effect of RU486 in SC suggest the intervention of nonclassical effects (8). In addition, the effect of P derivative tetrahydroprogesterone on PMP22 expression, unable to bind PR, may involve membrane receptors such as the GABAA receptor (11). More recently, data on rapid and transient induction in SC of several transcription factors were reported, which required further investigation (46, 47). Recently described nonclassical progestin receptors (48, 49, 50), some of which have a membrane location and are detected in the nervous system (51), may also be involved in P responsiveness.

Finally, it can be hypothesized that stimuli such as diffusible factors (steroids, neurotrophins, cytokines, and neuromediators) or direct contacts with axons that occur in the in vivo environment may influence the expression of sex steroid receptors in SC. Nevertheless, studies performed with cocultured SC and DRG neurons by Chan et al. (16) did not provide evidence for such an effect with respect to PR. Current work is in progress to analyze receptor mRNA contents of the nerve.

Glucocorticosteroid receptor expression and activity in purified SC cultures
The presence of functional GR in SC and SC lines agrees with the large distribution of GR in all cells of higher organisms. Its level of expression in SC is similar to that reported in specialized cells such as hepatocytes or lymphocytes (52, 53). Lower binding capacities have been reported in total brain (52) or brain subregions (54) and even in astrocyte cultures (55).

A better transcriptional efficiency was observed for endogenous GR in the presence of insulin and forskolin. The stimulatory effect of cAMP on GR-mediated transcription has previously been reported (56). Because the same observation was made with other transiently expressed steroid receptors, this increased efficiency could result from cell physiological context such as modulation of signaling pathways (25, 56) or expression of a given set of transcriptional cofactors (57, 58, 59).

Glucocorticosteroids display complex activities on the nervous system either deleterious or favorable, depending on the type of cell (neuron or glia), their state of development, the physiological process studied, and the dose of steroid present. In cultured SC, glucocorticosteroids may enhance the potency of mitogens, probably via a GR-mediated effect (10). GR was also present in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and diverse neuronal populations of the CNS (60, 61, 62), where glucocorticosteroids generally exert antiproliferative and differentiating effects as shown on neonatal external granule cells of the cerebellum and on oligodendrocytes (63, 64).

The effects of glucocorticosteroids on myelination also differ according to the cell type. Chari et al. (64) stressed, in their model of experimental demyelination of the spinal cord, that remyelination via the resident oligodendrocytes was delayed by glucocorticosteroids, although SC-mediated repair was almost unaffected. Accordingly, in SC, glucocorticosteroids were shown to mediate an increase in the rate of myelin formation (7) and in the activity of P0 and PMP22 promoters (9). Few data are available on other glucocorticosteroid target genes. In the CNS, the effects of glucocorticosteroids have been demonstrated on glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase (65), glutamine synthetase (66), and some growth factors (67, 68). In the PNS, glutamine synthetase also appears to be positively regulated (our unpublished results in cultured SC).

Finally, the influence of glucocorticosteroids on neurodegeneration, neuroprotective, and regenerative processes seems to be largely dependent on their concentration (69, 70, 71), indicating the importance of both the GR/MR equilibrium (69) and enzymatic regulation of glucocorticosteroid levels (via HSD2) in cells expressing both corticosteroid receptors.

Low levels of mineralocorticosteroid receptor
This report is the first to deal with the expression of MR in SC and related cell lines. We found that MR mRNA was present in SC primary cultures and CR3a1 cells at levels representing 5–10% of the GR content but higher levels for other cell lines (30% in CR1b4 and 60% in Msc80 cells). The proportion of MR relative to GR mRNAs is similar to that reported in CNS astrocytes (72) and most brain subregions (57, 73). Binding studies in cell lines showed that the concentration of MR was low (240–450 sites per cell), corresponding to approximately 1/25 the observed GR site number. Such a concentration of MR binding sites in SC was lower than reported for astrocyte cultures (55) and most specialized brain subregions (54). In addition, no transcriptional activity could be detected in cultured SC. However, low levels of binding sites and low biological activity of endogenous MR have also been reported for well-known Aldo target cells such as renal cortical collecting ducts (CCD) (cell lines and primary cultures) (74, 75, 76, 77), and thus they do not necessarily imply the in vivo absence of a functional receptor.

In the myelinating SC, the expression, localization, and clustering of various types of ion channels near the node of Ranvier and in specialized junctions of paranodal loops show analogies with polarized Aldo target cells such as renal CCD or distal colon (78, 79). In these cells, MR-mediated genomic and nongenomic effects have been characterized. Na+/K+ ATPase activity, which is regulated by mineralocorticosteroids in both kidney cells and in the hippocampus (80, 81), is expressed in the nerve and undergoes regulation of subunit expression upon lesion (82, 83). Therefore, a possible switch in MR transcriptional activity in SC, resulting from extracellular signals and axonal contact and acting on MR mRNA content, translational efficiency, or protein stability should be investigated.

In the CNS, the posttranscriptional mechanisms have been shown to differentially regulate the levels of GR and MR in different brain subregions and during development and in response to stress (54, 73, 84, 85). Furthermore, a recent report indicates that MR expression is increased after injury in rat hippocampus neurons both in primary cultures and in vivo and that an increased MR expression is correlated with neuronal survival (86). Such a role of MR and identification of its target genes remain to be explored in SC.

Regulation of HSD2 expression and activity in primary SC cells indicates a local inactivation of glucocorticoids when intracellular cAMP levels are low
Regulation of GR activity and GR/MR equilibrium could occur at a prereceptor level by local inactivation of glucocorticosteroids by HSD2 (80, 87). HSD2 activity in quiescent SC was similar to that measured in CCD and osteoblastic cell lines, only six times lower than the activity recorded in rat primary CCD cells (76, 88) and remarkably down-regulated by cAMP. It should be noticed that after a peripheral nerve injury, intracellular cAMP levels are strongly decreased (to approximately one tenth of the level observed in the intact nerve) as a consequence of a simultaneous decrease in adenylyl cyclase and an increase in phosphodiesterase activity (89, 90). Such a cAMP starvation should induce strong HSD2 activity, leading to a decrease in active glucocorticosteroid concentration and reduction in GR transcriptional activity. Indeed, our results for the regenerating nerve after cryolesion show that HSD2 expression is increased (unpublished results).

Therefore, the following scenario can be advanced. After a peripheral nerve injury, the levels of glucocorticosteroids should increase in the circulation. A high HSD2 activity would limit their intracellular accumulation in the lesioned nerve and their potential deleterious effect on cellular processes such as dedifferentiation and proliferation (63, 64) during the first period of regeneration. Because glucocorticosteroids have been shown to enhance myelin protein synthesis by Schwann cells (7, 9), they would have a beneficial effect during the following remyelination period at the time of axonal contact establishment, when HSD2 expression returned to basal levels.

Interestingly, in the adult brain, the major reaction is the reactivation of inactive 11-ketoglucocorticoids driven by HSD1 (91). Thus, our data demonstrating the extent of HSD2 activity and its regulation by cAMP in SC may constitute a very important new aspect of nerve physiology. Further investigation of MR involvement and a possible functional balance between GR and MR, already described in the CNS (69, 70, 71), is required in the PNS, where data on steroid receptor expression during development, in the mature state, and during regeneration still have to be collected.

In summary, this work is the first to present a comprehensive study of corticosteroid and sex steroid receptors in SC at the level of expression (mRNA and protein) and activity. We clearly show the expression and function of GR on synthetic responsive genes, an observation that can be extended to several endogenous genes (work in progress) and the regulation of its intracellular activity by HSD2. A possible role of low levels of MR remains to be elucidated. Other steroid nuclear receptors (PR, ER{alpha} and -ß, and AR) are poorly expressed in SC and are not expected to mediate the sex steroid effects. Because steroids such as P and CS and their metabolites may regulate GR, MR, and HSD2 activity (92, 93, 94), we are now investigating how steroid biosynthetic and metabolic enzymes as well as the steroids produced locally or accumulated from the periphery could influence the function of corticosteroid receptors after peripheral nerve injury and during the regeneration process.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Marie-Edith Rafestin-Oblin for helpful discussion, Ron Evans for MMTV-luc, Robert Barouki and Charbel Massaad for overERE-{Delta}MTV-CAT, Didier Picard for rat GR-PC7, Stanley Watson for MR cDNA sequence, Marie-Edith Rafestin-Oblin for introduction of MR sequences in pcDNA3, Benita Katzenellenbogen for pratPR6B and Stephane Savary for introduction of PR sequence in pcDNA3.1/Zeo, Jorma Palvimo for pSG5-rAR, Elisabeth Wilson for pCMVratAR and pGEMrAR1, Catherine Pasqualini for rat ERpEGFP plasmid, and HMR (now Aventis) for providing us with RU28486 and RU28362. CR3a1 and CR1b4 cells were kindly given by Julien Ghislain and Patrick Charnay and MSC80 cells by Jean-Jacques Hauw.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Association Française contre les Myopathies Grant R04053LL/RAE04008LLA.

Disclosure statement: all authors have nothing to declare.

First Published Online June 8, 2006

Abbreviations: AR, Androgen receptor; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyl transferase; CCD, cortical collecting ducts; CNS, central nervous system; CS, corticosterone; Ct, cycle threshold; DHT, 5{alpha}-dehydrotestosterone; DRG, dorsal root ganglia; E2, estradiol; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen-responsive elements; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GR, glucocorticosteroid receptor; HSD2, 11ß-hydroxysteroid-dehydrogenase type 2; MR, mineralocorticosteroid receptor; P, progesterone; PR, progesterone receptor; PNS, peripheral nervous system; SC, Schwann cells; TA, triamcinolone acetonide.

Received December 20, 2005.

Accepted for publication May 31, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Garbay B, Heape AM, Sargueil F, Cassagne C 2000 Myelin synthesis in the peripheral nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 61:267–304[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Michailov GV, Sereda MW, Brinkman BJ, Fisher TM, Haug B, Birchmeier C, Role L, Lai C, Schwab MH, Nave KA 2004 Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science 304:700–703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schumacher M, Jung-Testas I, Robel P, Baulieu EE 1993 Insulin-like growth factor I: a mitogen for rat Schwann cells in the presence of elevated levels of cyclic AMP. Glia 8:232–240[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Morgan L, Jessen KR, Mirsky R 1991 The effects of cAMP on differentiation of cultured Schwann cells: progression from an early phenotype (04+ to a myelin phenotype (P0+, GFAP+, N-CAM-, NGF-receptor-) depends on growth inhibition. J Cell Biol 112:457–467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Benmessahel Y, Troadec JD, Cadepond F, Guennoun R, Hales DB, Schumacher M, Groyer G 2004 Downregulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) gene expression by cyclic AMP in cultured Schwann cells. Glia 45:213–228[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Koenig HL, Schumacher M, Ferzaz B, Thi AN, Ressouches A, Guennoun R, Jung-Testas I, Robel P, Akwa Y, Baulieu EE 1995 Progesterone synthesis and myelin formation by Schwann cells. Science 268:1500–1503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chan JR, Phillips 2nd LJ, Glaser M 1998 Glucocorticoids and progestins signal the initiation and enhance the rate of myelin formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10459–10464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Desarnaud F, Do Thi AN, Brown AM, Lemke G, Suter U, Baulieu EE, Schumacher M 1998 Progesterone stimulates the activity of the promoters of peripheral myelin protein-22 and protein zero genes in Schwann cells. J Neurochem 71:1765–1778[Medline]
  9. Desarnaud F, Bidichandani S, Patel PI, Baulieu EE, Schumacher M 2000 Glucocorticosteroids stimulate the activity of the promoters of peripheral myelin protein-22 and protein zero genes in Schwann cells. Brain Res 865:12–16[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Neuberger TJ, Kalimi O, Regelson W, Kalimi M, De Vries GH 1994 Glucocorticoids enhance the potency of Schwann cell mitogens. J Neurosci Res 38:300–313[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Magnaghi V, Cavarretta I, Galbiati M, Martini L, Melcangi RC 2001 Neuroactive steroids and peripheral myelin proteins. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 37:360–371[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Schumacher M, Guennoun R, Mercier G, Desarnaud F, Lacor P, Benavides J, Ferzaz B, Robert F, Baulieu EE 2001 Progesterone synthesis and myelin formation in peripheral nerves. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 37:343–359[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Baulieu EE, Robel P, Schumacher M 2001 Neurosteroids: beginning of the story. Int Rev Neurobiol 46:1–32[Medline]
  14. Mellon SH, Griffin LD, Compagnone NA 2001 Biosynthesis and action of neurosteroids. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 37:3–12[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Jung-Testas I, Schumacher M, Robel P, Baulieu EE 1996 Demonstration of progesterone receptors in rat Schwann cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 58:77–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Chan JR, Rodriguez-Waitkus PM, Ng BK, Liang P, Glaser M 2000 Progesterone synthesized by Schwann cells during myelin formation regulates neuronal gene expression. Mol Biol Cell 11:2283–2895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jung-Testas I, Schumacher M, Bugnard H, Baulieu EE 1993 Stimulation of rat Schwann cell proliferation by estradiol: synergism between the estrogen and cAMP. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 72:282–290[Medline]
  18. Svenningsen AF, Kanje M 1999 Estrogen and progesterone stimulate Schwann cell proliferation in a sex- and age-dependent manner. J Neurosci Res 57:124–130[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Myles K, Funder JW 1996 Progesterone binding to mineralocorticoid receptors: in vitro and in vivo studies. Am J Physiol 270:E601–E607
  20. Schmidt M, Renner C, Loffler G 1998 Progesterone inhibits glucocorticoid-dependent aromatase induction in human adipose fibroblasts. J Endocrinol 158:401–447[Abstract]
  21. Kousteni S, Bellido T, Plotkin LI, O’Brien CA, Bodenner DL, Han L, Han K, Digregorio GB, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS, Roberson PK, Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC 2001 Nongenotropic, sex-nonspecific signaling through the estrogen or androgen receptors: dissociation from transcriptional activity. Cell 104:719–730[Medline]
  22. Leonhardt SA, Boonyaratanakornkit V, Edwards DP 2003 Progesterone receptor transcription and non-transcription signaling mechanisms. Steroids 68:761–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Funder JW 2005 The nongenomic actions of aldosterone. Endocr Rev 26:313–321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Johnson LR, Farb C, Morrison JH, McEwen BS, Ledoux JE 2005 Localization of glucocorticoid receptors at postsynaptic membranes in the lateral amygdala. Neuroscience 136:289–299[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hammes SR 2003 The further redefining of steroid-mediated signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2168–2170[Free Full Text]
  26. Belelli D, Lambert JJ 2005 Neurosteroids: endogenous regulators of the GABAA receptor. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:565–575[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. El-Etr M, Akwa Y, Fiddes RJ, Robel P, Baulieu EE 1995 A progesterone metabolite stimulates the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone from GT1–1 hypothalamic neurons via the {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type A receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3769–3773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gago N, El-Etr M, Sananes N, Cadepond F, Samuel D, Avellana-Adalid V, Baron-Van Evercooren A, Schumacher M 2004 3{alpha},5{alpha}-Tetrahydroprogesterone (allopregnanolone) and {gamma}-aminobutyric acid: autocrine/paracrine interactions in the control of neonatal PSA-NCAM+ progenitor proliferation. J Neurosci Res 78:770–783[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Cadepond F, Massaad C, Trousson A, Grenier J, Groyer G, Baulieu E, Schumacher M 2002 Steroid receptors in various glial cell lines expression and functional studies. Ann NY Acad Sci 973:484–487[Medline]
  30. Thi AD, Evrard C, Rouget P 1998 Proliferation and differentiation properties of permanent Schwann cell lines immortalized with a temperature-sensitive oncogene. J Exp Biol 201:851–860[Abstract]
  31. Boutry JM, Hauw JJ, Gansmuller A, Di-Bert N, Pouchelet M, Baron-Van Evercooren A 1992 Establishment and characterization of a mouse Schwann cell line which produces myelin in vivo. J Neurosci Res 32:15–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Cadepond F, Gasc JM, Delahaye F, Jibard N, Schweizer-Groyer G, Segard-Maurel I, Evans R, Baulieu EE 1992 Hormonal regulation of the nuclear localization signals of the human glucocorticosteroid receptor. Exp Cell Res 201:99–108[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F 18 June 2002 Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034
  34. Hechter O, Mechaber D, Zwick A, Campfield LA, Eychenne B, Baulieu EE, Robel P 1983 Optimal radioligand exchange conditions for measurement of occupied androgen receptor sites in rat ventral prostate. Arch Biochem Biophys 224:49–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J 1979 Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:4350–4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hollenberg SM, Giguere V, Evans RM 1989 Identification of two regions of the human glucocorticoid receptor hormone binding domain that block activation. Cancer Res 49:2292s–2294s
  37. Massaad C, Coumoul X, Sabbah M, Garlatti M, Redeuilh G, Barouki R 1998 Properties of overlapping EREs: synergistic activation of transcription and cooperative binding of ER. Biochemistry 37:6023–6032[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Sleigh MJ 1986 A nonchromatographic assay for expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in eucaryotic cells. Anal Biochem 156:251–256[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. de Wet JR, Wood KV, Deluca M, Helinski DR, Subramani S 1987 Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 7:725–737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Draper N, Stewart PM 2005 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the pre-receptor regulation of corticosteroid hormone action. J Endocrinol 186:251–271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Farman N, Rafestin-Oblin ME 2001 Multiple aspects of mineralocorticoid selectivity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280:F181–F192
  42. Carroll RS, Zhang JP, Black PM 1997 Hormone receptors in vestibular schwannomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:188–192[Medline]
  43. Jordan CL, Price Jr RH, Handa RJ 2002 Androgen receptor messenger RNA and protein in adult rat sciatic nerve: implications for site of androgen action. J Neurosci Res 69:509–518[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Shupnik MA 2004 Crosstalk between steroid receptors and the c-Src-receptor tyrosine kinase pathways: implications for cell proliferation. Oncogene 23:7979–7989[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Flint AP, Sheldrick EL, Fisher PA 2002 Ligand-independent activation of steroid receptors. Domest Anim Endocrinol 23:13–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Mercier G, Turque N, Schumacher M 2001 Early activation of transcription factor expression in Schwann cells by progesterone. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 30:137–148
  47. Guennoun R, Benmessahel Y, Delespierre B, Gouezou M, Rajkowski KM, Baulieu EE, Schumacher M 2001 Progesterone stimulates Krox-20 gene expression in Schwann cells. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 20:75–82
  48. El-Hefnawy T, Manna PR, Luconi M, Baldi E, Slotte JP, Huhtaniemi I 2000 Progesterone action in a murine Leydig tumor cell line (mLTC-1), possibly through a nonclassical receptor type. Endocrinology 141:247–255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Falkenstein E, Tillmann HC, Christ M, Feuring M, Wehling M 2000 Multiple actions of steroid hormones—a focus on rapid, nongenomic effects. Pharmacol Rev 52:513–556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Sutter-Dub MT 2002 Rapid non-genomic and genomic responses to progestogens, estrogens, and glucocorticoids in the endocrine pancreatic B cell, the adipocyte and other cell types. Steroids 67:77–93[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Zhu Y, Bond J, Thomas P 2003 Identification, classification, and partial characterization of genes in humans and other vertebrates homologous to a fish membrane progestin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2237–2242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Yoneda Y, Han D, Ogita K, Watanabe A 1995 Distinction between binding of [3H]triamcinolone acetonide to a ligand binding domain on the glucocorticoid receptor complex in cytosol fractions of brain and liver from the rat with intact adrenals. Brain Res 685:105–116[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Miller AH, Spencer RL, Pearce BD, Pisell TL, Azrieli Y, Tanapat P, Moday H, Rhee R, McEwen BS 1998 Glucocorticoid receptors are differentially expressed in the cells and tissues of the immune system. Cell Immunol 186:45–54[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Marlier LN, Patacchioli FR, Porzio O, Chiusaroli R, Borboni P, Lauro R, Angelucci L 1997 Distribution of adrenocorticoid receptors in the rat CNS measured by competitive PCR and cytosolic binding. J Mol Neurosci 9:1–12[Medline]
  55. Chou YC, Luttge WG, Sumners C 1991 Expression of mineralocorticoid type I and glucocorticoid type II receptors in astrocyte glia as a function of time in culture. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 61:55–61[Medline]
  56. Fuller PJ, Lim-Tio SS, Brennan FE 2000 Specificity in mineralocorticoid versus glucocorticoid action. Kidney Int 57:1256–1264[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Jenkins BD, Pullen CB, Darimont BD 2001 Novel glucocorticoid receptor coactivator effector mechanisms. Trends Endocrinol Metab 12:122–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Zhang Q, Piston DW, Goodman RH 2000 Regulation of corepressor function by nuclear NADH. Science 295:1895–1897
  59. Grenier J, Trousson A, Chauchereau A, Cartaud J, Schumacher M, Massaad C 2006 Differential recruitment of p160 coactivators by glucocorticoid receptor between Schwann cells and astrocytes. Mol Endocrinol 20:254–267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Vielkind U, Walencewicz A, Levine JM, Bohn MC 1990 Type II glucocorticoid receptors are expressed in oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. J Neurosci Res 27:360–373[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Bohn MC, Howard E, Vielkind U, Krozowski Z 1991 Glial cells express both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 40:105–111[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Cintra A, Bhatnagar M, Chadi G, Tinner B, Lindberg J, Gustafsson JA, Agnati LF, Fuxe K 1994 Glial and neuronal glucocorticoid receptor immunoreactive cell populations in developing, adult, and aging brain. Ann NY Acad Sci 746:42–61[Medline]
  63. Holmes MC, Sangra M, French KL, Whittle IR, Paterson J, Mullins JJ, Seckl JR 2006 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 protects the neonatal cerebellum from deleterious effects of glucocorticoids. Neuroscience 137:865–873[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Chari DM, Zhao C, Kotter MR, Blakemore WF, Franklin RJ 2006 Corticosteroids delay remyelination of experimental demyelination in the rodent central nervous system. J Neurosci Res 83:594–605[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Cheng JD, de Vellis J 2000 Oligodendrocytes as glucocorticoids target cells: functional analysis of the glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase gene. J Neurosci Res 59:436–445[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Baas D, Fressinaud C, Vitkovic L, Sarlieve LL 1998 Glutamine synthetase expression and activity are regulated by 3,5,3'-triodo-L-thyronine and hydrocortisone in rat oligodendrocyte cultures. Int J Dev Neurosci 16:333–340[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Chao HM, McEwen BS 1994 Glucocorticoids and the expression of mRNAs for neurotrophins, their receptors and GAP-43 in the rat hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 26:271–276[Medline]
  68. Hansson AC, Cintra A, Belluardo N, Sommer W, Bhatnagar M, Bader M, Ganten D, Fuxe K 2000 Gluco- and mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated regulation of neurotrophic factor gene expression in the dorsal hippocampus and the neocortex of the rat. Eur J Neurosci 12:2918–2934[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. De Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl MS, Joels M 1998 Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease. Endocr Rev 19:269–301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. De Kloet ER, Van Acker SA, Sibug RM, Oitzl MS, Meijer OC, Rahmouni K, de Jong W 2000 Brain mineralocorticoid receptors and centrally regulated functions. Kidney Int 57:1329–1336[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Abraham I, Harkany T, Horvath K, Luiten P 2001 Action of glucocorticoids on survival of nerve cells: promoting neuroregeneration or neuroprotection? J Neuroendocrinol 13:749–760[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Bohn MC, O’Banion MK, Young DA, Giuliano R, Hussain S, Dean DO, Cunningham LA 1994 In vitro studies of glucocorticoid effects on neurons and astrocytes. Ann NY Acad Sci 746:243–258[Medline]
  73. Bohn MC, Dean D, Hussain S, Giuliano R 1994 Development of mRNAs for glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors in rat hippocampus. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 77:157–162[Medline]
  74. Rafestin-Oblin ME, Farman N, Cassingena R, Ronco P, Vandewalle A 1993 Mineralocorticoid receptors in SV40-transformed tubule cell lines derived from rabbit kidney. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 44:45–52[CrossRef][Medline]
  75. Chen SY, Wang J, Liu W, Pearce D 1998 Aldosterone responsiveness of A6 cells is restored by cloned rat mineralocorticoid receptor. Am J Physiol 274:C39–C46
  76. Bens M, Vallet V, Cluzeaud F, Pascual-Letallec L, Kahn A, Rafestin-Oblin ME, Rossier BC, Vandewalle A 1999 Corticosteroid-dependent sodium transport in a novel immortalized mouse collecting duct principal cell line. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:923–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Bocchi B, Fagart J, Cluzeaud F, Fay M, Rafestin-Oblin ME, Farman N 2003 Glucocorticoid metabolism by 11-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 modulates human mineralocorticoid receptor transactivation activity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 84:239–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  78. Salzer JL 2003 Polarized domains of myelinated axons. Neuron 40:297–318[CrossRef][Medline]
  79. Baker MD 2002 Electrophysiology of mammalian Schwann cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 78:83–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. Rogerson FM, Brennan FE, Fuller PJ 2003 Dissecting mineralocorticoid receptor structure and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 85:389–396[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Farman N, Bonvalet JP, Seckl JR 1994 Aldosterone selectively increases Na+-K+-ATPase {alpha}3-subunit mRNA expression in rat hippocampus. Am J Physiol 266:C423–C428
  82. Arteaga MF, Gutierrez R, Avila J, Mobasheri A, Diaz-Flores L, Martin-Vasallo P 2004 Regeneration influences expression of the Na+, K+-ATPase subunit isoforms in the rat peripheral nervous system. Neuroscience 129:691–702[CrossRef][Medline]
  83. Garty H, Karlish SJ 2005 FXYD proteins: tissue-specific regulators of the Na,K-ATPase. Semin Nephrol 25:304–311[CrossRef][Medline]
  84. Paskitti ME, McCreary BJ, Herman JP 2000 Stress regulation of adrenocorticosteroid receptor gene transcription and mRNA expression in rat hippocampus: time-course analysis. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 80:142–152[Medline]
  85. Marlier LN, Patacchioli FR, Porzio O, Bottone A, Di Grezia R, Borboni P, Lauro R, Angelucci L 1996 Differential regulation of adrenocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus and spinal cord of adrenalectomized rats. J Neurosci Res 43:526–534[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. Macleod MR, Johansson IM, Soderstrom I, Lai M, Gido G, Wieloch T, Seckl JR, Olsson T 2003 Mineralocorticoid receptor expression and increased survival following neuronal injury. Eur J Neurosci 17:1549–1555[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Rashid S, Lewis GF 2005 The mechanisms of differential glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid action in the brain and peripheral tissues. Clin Biochem 38:401–409[CrossRef][Medline]
  88. Eyre LJ, Rabbitt EH, Bland R, Hughes SV, Cooper MS, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM, Hewison M 2001 Expression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in rat osteoblastic cells: pre-receptor regulation of glucocorticoid responses in bone. J Cell Biochem 81:453–462[CrossRef][Medline]
  89. Poduslo JF, Walikonis RS, Domec MC, Berg C, Holz-Heppelmann CJ 1995 The second messenger, cyclic AMP, is not sufficient for myelin gene induction in the peripheral nervous system. J Neurochem 65:149–159[Medline]
  90. Walikonis RS, Poduslo JF 1998 Activity of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases and adenylyl cyclase in peripheral nerve after crush and permanent transection injuries. J Biol Chem 273:9070–9077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Holmes MC, Yau JL, Kotelevtsev Y, Mullins JJ, Seckl JR 2003 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the brain: two enzymes two roles. Ann NY Acad Sci 1007:357–366[CrossRef][Medline]
  92. Rafestin-Oblin ME, Fagart J, Souque A, Seguin C, Bens M, Vandewalle A 2002 11ß-Hydroxyprogesterone acts as a mineralocorticoid agonist in stimulating Na+ absorption in mammalian principal cortical collecting duct cells. Mol Pharmacol 62:1306–1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Quinkler M, Meyer B, Oelkers W, Diederich S 2003 Renal inactivation, mineralocorticoid generation, and 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibition ameliorate the antimineralocorticoid effect of progesterone in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3767–3772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  94. Ge RS, Dong Q, Sottas CM, Latif SA, Morris DJ, Hardy MP 2005 Stimulation of testosterone production in rat Leydig cells is mineralocorticoid receptor mediated. Mol Cell Endocrinol 243:35–42[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Girard, S. Liu, F. Cadepond, D. Adams, C. Lacroix, M. Verleye, J.-M. Gillardin, E.-E. Baulieu, M. Schumacher, and G. Schweizer-Groyer
Etifoxine improves peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery
PNAS, December 23, 2008; 105(51): 20505 - 20510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Schumacher, R. Guennoun, A. Ghoumari, C. Massaad, F. Robert, M. El-Etr, Y. Akwa, K. Rajkowski, and E.-E. Baulieu
Novel Perspectives for Progesterone in Hormone Replacement Therapy, with Special Reference to the Nervous System
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(4): 387 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Cadepond, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Cadepond, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals