| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Is Required for Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Uptake in Adipocytes
Department of Internal Medicine and Physiology (A.R.S.) and Life Sciences Institute (L.C., S.-H.C., A.R.S.), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Alan R. Saltiel, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, 210 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2216. E-mail: saltiel{at}umich.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is rapidly activated in response to insulin in 3T3L1 adipocytes in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent manner, whereas platelet-derived growth factor was without effect. Knockdown of TC10
but not TC10ß by RNA interference inhibited insulin-stimulated glucose uptake as well as the translocation of the insulin-sensitive glucose transporter GLUT4 from intracellular sites to the plasma membrane. In contrast, loss of TC10
had no effect on the stimulation of Akt by insulin. Additionally, knockdown of TC10
inhibited insulin-stimulated translocation of its effector CIP4. These data indicate that TC10
is specifically required for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Rho family member GTPase TC10 has been shown to play a role in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4 in 3T3L1 adipocytes (5, 6). In this signaling cascade, the insulin receptor and TC10 reside constitutively in lipid raft microdomains of the plasma membrane. Upon binding to insulin, the insulin receptor catalyzes the tyrosine phosphorylation of the c-Cbl and Cbl-b protooncogenes after their recruitment via the adapter proteins APS and CAP (adapter protein containing PH and Src homology 2 domains and c-Cbl-associated protein, respectively) (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Once phosphorylated, Cbl interacts with the adapter protein CT10-related kinase (Crk)II through the Src homology 2 domain of the latter protein. Crk is constitutively associated with the nucleotide exchange factor C3G. Thus, binding of Crk to Cbl brings C3G into proximity with TC10 in lipid rafts, producing the activation of the G protein. Once activated, TC10 can interact with multiple downstream effectors including Exo70, CIP4/2, Par6B, and TCGAP (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Some of these effectors, such as CIP4, Par6, and TCGAP, interact with both Cdc42 as well as TC10, whereas Exo70 specifically interacts with TC10.
TC10 exists in two related isoforms, TC10
and TC10ß (5, 19). The two TC10 genes share identical sequences throughout the five Ras canonical boxes (G1-G5) as well as the effector domain, whereas the main differences are clustered in the amino and carboxyl termini. Both have a unique CXXCCAAX box, a presumed signal for palmityolation and prenylation, and colocalize with caveolin-enriched fractions (20, 21). Moreover, both are activated in response to insulin, but only TC10
can block glucose uptake when its dominant-negative form is expressed in adipocytes (5). Likewise, overexpression of TC10
has profound effects on remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, whereas the ß-isoform does not. Creation of chimeras between the two proteins narrowed down the amino terminal sequences as responsible for this effect (22).
To explore the role of TC10 isoforms in insulin signaling, we sought to characterize the endogenous protein and determine whether it is essential for insulin action in the insulin-responsive 3T3L1 adipocyte cell line. We show here that endogenous TC10
is activated after insulin stimulation. Moreover, knockdown of the protein in adipocytes inhibits insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake and prevents insulin-stimulated translocation of the downstream effector CIP4 without affecting other signaling events.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anti-TC10 antibody
The anti-TC10 rabbit polyclonal antibody was a generous gift from Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO) and was generated against peptide DPKTLARLNDMKEKPIC, which correspond to amino acids 136152 in human TC10, the human ortholog of TC10
. This anti-TC10 antibody detects by immunoblot analysis overexpressed hemagglutinin-TC10 and hemagglutinin-TC10
in COS-1 cells as well as endogenous mouse TC10
expressed in mouse tissues and 3T3L1 adipcoytes (data not shown). The antihuman TC10 antibody did not recognize overexpressed mouse TC10ß by either immunoprecipitation or immunoblot analysis (data not shown). Using small interfering RNA oligos specific for TC10
, protein levels of TC10
were reduced in 3T3L1 adipocytes (see Fig. 2B
). Therefore, these data demonstrate that the anti-TC10 antibody is specific for TC10
and does not cross-react with TC10ß.
|
Preparation of plasma membrane fraction
Lipid raft-enriched plasma membrane fractions were prepared as described (5, 25). Briefly, 3T3L1 adipocytes were washed twice in Dulbeccos PBS and then homogenized in a buffer of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 250 mM sucrose, and 1 mM EDTA containing protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN) with a Dounce homogenizer. Homogenized cells were centrifuged at 3,000 x g and the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 20,000 x g, producing a crude plasma membrane fraction. The resulting plasma membrane containing pellet was resuspended in 1.0 ml binding buffer [25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10 mM MgCl2, 40 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40)] for p21 activated kinase (PAK)-1 pull-down assays (see below).
Assay of GTPase activity using glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-PAK1 p21 activated kinase 1 binding domain (PBD)
To measure in vivo levels of activated GTPase, PAK1 pull-downs using GST-PBD conjugated to agarose were performed as described previously (5, 25). A lipid raft-enriched plasma membrane fraction was resuspended in 1.0 ml of binding buffer [25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2, 40 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40] in the presence of 7 µg of GST-PBD-agarose (Cytoskeleton, Inc., Denver, CO) for 1 h at 4 C. The beads were washed three times with wash buffer [25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2, 40 mM NaCl, and 1% NP-40] and once with the wash buffer without NP-40. The beads were resuspended in 20 µl sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer, subjected to 420% SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblot analysis.
2-[U-14C]deoxyglucose (2-DG) uptake assay
Glucose uptake assays were performed as described previously (25, 26). Briefly, 3T3L1 adipocytes were electroporated with either scrambled control or TC10-specific Stealth small interference RNA (siRNA) duplexes (Invitrogen) at a concentration of 1 nM siRNA double-stranded oligo/5 x 105 cells. Cells were then harvested four days after electroporation. The cells were serum-starved in DMEM containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 3 h. Then the cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated in 0.45 ml of Krebs-buffered Ringer solution of 30 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaHCO3, 120 mM NaCl, 4 mM KH2PO3, 1 mM MgSO4, and 1 mM CaCl2 in the presence or absence of 100 nM insulin for 30 min at 37 C. Glucose uptake was initiated by the addition of 50 µl of reaction mixture containing 0.1 µCi of 2-DG (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT) buffer of Krebs-buffered Ringer solution containing 20 µM cold 2-DG. The cells were incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and then the reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 µl of 200 mM cold 2-DG into each well. The cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4) and solubilized in 0.5 ml of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at room temperature for 10 min. Ten microliters of each sample were removed to measure protein concentration. Samples were then assessed for radioactivity by scintillation counting in Ready Gel (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Results were the mean ± SD of three individual determinations, and the experiment was reproduced five times.
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
To verify siRNA knockdown efficiency in adipocytes, RNA extractions were performed using RNAeasy kit according manufacturers instructions (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). RT-PCR was performed using random primers and Stratascript polymerase according to manufacturers instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). cDNA was analyzed by real-time qPCR analysis was performed using SYBR green normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Applied Biosystems 7200; Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). PCR primers used were: GAPDH forward, 5'-TGAAGCAGGCATCTGAGGG-3'; GAPDH reverse 5'-CGAAGGTGGAAGAGTGGGAG-3'; TC10
forward, 5'-TGCTTCTCCGTGGTAAATCC; TC10
reverse, 5'-CCTTGTTCCACACAGACAGG; and TC10ß forward, 5'-CGGCTGCAATGGACATGAG; TC10ß reverse, 5'-GGCACGTATTCCTCTGGGAAG. Relative expression was assessed by comparative cycle threshold method correcting for amplification efficiency of the primers and performed in triplicate.
GLUT4 translocation
A retroviral construct expressing myc-GLUT4-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) (pMX-GLUT4myc7-GFP), containing a myc tag in the first exofacial loop of GLUT4 (a generous gift of Dr. Harvey Lodish, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA) was generated as described previously (27). 3T3L1 fibroblasts infected with retroviral myc-GLUT4-eGFP containing viral particles were selected by GFP intensity using flow cytometry. Cells expressing high levels of myc-GLUT4-eGFP as determined by GFP intensity were collected and then differentiated into adipocytes as described above. The assay was performed with slight modifications as described (27, 28). Briefly, after 3T3L1 adipocytes were electroporated with scrambled control or specific siRNA, cells were seeded on 96-well plates. Four days after electroporation, cells were serum starved in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS and treated with 100 nM insulin for the times indicated. The cells were fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 10% buffered neutral formalin (VWR International, West Chester, PA). One well was permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 as a control to measure total Myc signal. After the fixation was quenched with 50 mM glycine for 5 min, cells were incubated overnight with blocking buffer [1% goat serum, 1% BSA, PBS (pH 7.4)]. Cells were incubated for 60 min with anti-Myc monoclonal antibody in blocking buffer [1% BSA, 1% ovalbumin, PBS (pH 7.4)]. Cells were incubated for 30 min with Alexa594 goat antimouse antibody in blocking buffer. After washing with PBS, fluorescence was measured with a Fluostar Optima plate reader (BMG LABTECH, Inc., Durham, NC) using the appropriate filter sets. The percentage of GLUT4 at the plasma membrane was calculated for each condition. GFP fluorescence was used to correct for variation in cell density in each well.
Immunofluorescence studies
3T3L1 adipocytes were electroporated with either scrambled control or TC10-specific RNA interference (RNAi). Four days after electroporation, cells were serum starved in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS and treated with or without 100 nM insulin for 30 min. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were incubated with 50 mM glycine in PBS (pH 7.4) to quench paraformaldehyde fixation. The cells were incubated in blocking buffer [1% BSA, 1% goat serum in PBS (pH 7.4)] for 1 h. To detect endogenous CIP4, cells were incubated with CIP4 monoclonal antibody at 1 µg/ml in blocking buffer followed by goat Alexa (594) goat antimouse IgG at 1 µg/ml in blocking buffer. When RNAi knockdown studies were conducted using adipocytes stably expressing myc-GLUT4-eGFP, the nonpermeabilized cells were incubated with anti-myc mouse monoclonal antibody (9E10) at 1 µg/ml in blocking buffer. To detect myc staining or actin, cells were incubated with Alexa594 goat antimouse IgG at 1 µg/ml and Alexa (488) Phalloidin at 1:500 in blocking buffer for 1 h. Images of the cells were captured using an FV300 scanning laser confocal microscope (Olympus America, Inc., Center Valley, PA). Efficiency knockdown by RNAi was confirmed by RT-PCR followed by real-time qPCR as described above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by insulin. 3T3L1 adipocytes were treated with insulin for 0, 2, 5, and 10 min. Plasma membrane fractions were prepared, lysed, and subjected to pull down with GST-PBD, followed by immunoblot analysis using anti-TC10
antibody. Insulin produced a dramatic increase in TC10
activity as indicated by the precipitation with immobilized PAK GTPase binding domain (Fig. 1A
(6).
|
, adipocytes were serum starved and pretreated with or without 100 nM wortmannin, a PI 3-kinase inhibitor, for 1 h before the addition of insulin (Fig. 1B
activation (Fig. 1C
in adipocytes. Thus, activation of endogenous TC10
in adipocytes is specific for insulin and is PI 3-kinase independent, consistent with previous studies (5, 6).
Previous studies revealed that overexpression of mutant forms of APS or CAP, both of which reside upstream of TC10, blocked the insulin stimulation of GLUT4 translocation or glucose uptake (9, 11). To study the role of TC10
and -ß in the regulation of glucose transport in adipocytes, their expression was reduced using specific RNAi oligos. Cells were electroporated with either scrambled control or TC10
-specific RNAi oligos. The TC10
-specific oligos knocked down expression of TC10
by approximately 75% as shown by Western blotting and qPCR (Fig. 2
, B and C). TC10
-specific oligos did not affect the expression of TC10ß as determined by qPCR (Fig. 2C
). Likewise, siRNA-mediated knockdown of TC10ß was specific and did not reduce levels of TC10
expression (Fig. 2C
). Knockdown of TC10
inhibited insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by 35%, compared with cells transfected with scrambled RNAi oligo. However, knockdown of TC10ß in adipocytes was without effect on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Fig. 2A
).
TC10
activation is independent of PI 3-kinase activation, and TC10
knockdown inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. To determine whether TC10
knockdown affected insulin receptor signaling through PI 3-kinase, adipocytes were electroporated with scrambled control or TC10
-specific or TC10ß-specific knockdown oligos and then treated with or without insulin (Fig. 3
). Efficiency of knockdown was confirmed by qPCR (data not shown). Knockdown of TC10
or TC10ß in adipocytes had no effect on the stimulation of tyrosine phosphorylation or Akt phosphorylation by insulin (Fig. 3
).
|
, we examined adipocytes stably expressing myc-GLUT4-eGFP. Adipocytes expressing myc-GLUT4-eGFP were transfected with scrambled control or TC10
-specific RNAi and treated with or without insulin. We analyzed the trafficking of the tagged GLUT4 protein by 96-well assay (Fig. 4A
knockdown blocked increased in myc staining after insulin treatment, indicating inhibition of GLUT4 vesicle trafficking and fusion. Consistent with these data, myc-positive cells and plasma membrane staining of myc-GLUT4-eGFP adipocytes was reduced in TC10
knockdown cells (Fig. 4B
|
was knocked down in adipocytes and the localization of CIP4 was examined (Fig. 5
RNAi oligo, CIP4 was translocated to the plasma membrane after insulin treatment for 510 min (Fig. 5
with siRNA in adipocytes completely blocked the translocation of CIP4 to the plasma membrane after insulin stimulation. When TC10
was knocked down in adipocytes, there was also a noticeable decrease in actin staining with phalloidin (Fig. 5
and CIP4 have been shown to be involved in regulating actin structures (22, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36). Thus, whether this decrease in actin staining was an effect of TC10
knockdown or due to disruption of CIP4 function was not clear.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this report, we show for the first time that insulin activates endogenous TC10 in adipocytes, consistent with previous studies on exogenously expressed TC10 (5, 6). This activation occurs over a time course identical with that reported for the exogenously expressed protein. We also show that activation of the G protein is specific for insulin and is not seen with PDGF. Additionally, insulin activation of TC10 is unaffected by wortmannin, demonstrating that TC10 activation by insulin is PI 3-kinase independent.
There are two gene products encoding TC10 proteins, TC10
and TC10ß (5, 19). To evaluate the importance of the TC10 pathway insulin action and determine which gene product might be relevant to insulin action, we knocked down both TC10
and -ß, followed by assay of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and GLUT4 translocation. Interestingly, reduction of TC10
and not TC10ß protein levels in adipocytes attenuated insulin-stimulated glucose transport. This inhibition was due to a defect in GLUT4 translocation. As a control, neither insulin-stimulated general tyrosine phosphorylation nor Akt phosphorylation was affected on knockdown of either TC10 isoform in adipocytes.
There have been conflicting reports about the role of the TC10/CAP/C3G pathway in the stimulation of glucose transport by insulin in adipocytes (41, 42, 43). Whereas Czechs (43) laboratory found that reduction of CAP protein with siRNA had no effect on glucose uptake in 3T3L1 adipocytes, Ahn et al. (41) used siRNA to knock down CAP and APS in human and mouse adipocytes and found that both gene products were essential for insulin action. Whereas the reason for the discrepancy between these findings is not clear, our recent studies (Chiang, S.-H. and A. R. Saltiel, unpublished observations) suggest that these differences might be explained by different levels of GLUT1 protein in cells (44), which is unaffected by CAP knockdown. Moreover, the effect of TC10 knockdown in experiments described here are consistent with a role for the CAP/Cbl pathway in the regulation of glucose transport by insulin.
The extent of inhibition of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake seen with TC10
knockdown is similar to the level of inhibition observed with knockdown of either Akt1 or Akt2 alone, essential components of PI 3-kinase signaling (45). Moreover, similar effects of siRNA knockdown have been observed for the components of the exocyst complex, which assembles in response to activation of TC10 by insulin (26). Together, these data indicate that activation of both TC10 and PI 3-kinase are essential for insulin-stimulated glucose transport.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure statement: L.C. and S.-H.C. have nothing to disclose. A.R.S. was previously a member of the editorial board of Endocrinology.
First Published Online September 28, 2006
Abbreviations: APS, adapter protein containing PH and Src homology 2 domains; CAP, c-Cbl-associated protein; Crk, CT10-related kinase; 2-DG, 2-[U-14C]deoxyglucose; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DTT, dithiothreitol; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; NP-40, Nonidet P-40; PAK, p21 activated kinase; PBD, p21 activated kinase 1 binding domain; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase; qPCR, quantitative PCR; RNAi, RNA interference; siRNA, small interference RNA.
Received August 25, 2006.
Accepted for publication September 20, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/
) is a convergent downstream target of the insulin-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and TC10 signaling pathways. J Cell Biol 164:279290This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Bertrand, S. Horman, C. Beauloye, and J.-L. Vanoverschelde Insulin signalling in the heart Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2008; 79(2): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Lodhi, D. Bridges, S.-H. Chiang, Y. Zhang, A. Cheng, L. M. Geletka, L. S. Weisman, and A. R. Saltiel Insulin Stimulates Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate Production via the Activation of Rab5 Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2008; 19(7): 2718 - 2728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Petersen, L. Madsen, L. M. Pedersen, P. Hallenborg, H. Hagland, K. Viste, S. O. Doskeland, and K. Kristiansen Cyclic AMP (cAMP)-Mediated Stimulation of Adipocyte Differentiation Requires the Synergistic Action of Epac- and cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase-Dependent Processes Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(11): 3804 - 3816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Falasca, W. E. Hughes, V. Dominguez, G. Sala, F. Fostira, M. Q. Fang, R. Cazzolli, P. R. Shepherd, D. E. James, and T. Maffucci The Role of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase C2{alpha} in Insulin Signaling J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 28226 - 28236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |