help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2006-0686
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viardot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viardot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, D.
Endocrinology Vol. 148, No. 1 346-353
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Potential Antiinflammatory Role of Insulin via the Preferential Polarization of Effector T Cells toward a T Helper 2 Phenotype

Alexander Viardot, Shane T. Grey, Fabienne Mackay and Donald Chisholm

Diabetes and Obesity Research Program (A.V., D.C.), and Arthritis and Inflammation Research Program (S.T.G., F.M.), Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney-Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Alexander Viardot, M.D., Diabetes and Obesity Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Sydney-Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia. E-mail: a.viardot{at}garvan.org.au.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hyperglycemia in critical illness is a common complication and a strong independent risk factor for morbidity and death. Intensive insulin therapy decreases this risk by up to 50%. It is unclear to what extent this benefit is due to reversal of glucotoxicity or to a direct effect of insulin, because antiinflammatory effects of insulin have already been described, but the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. The insulin receptor is expressed on resting neutrophils, monocytes, and B cells, but is not detectable on T cells. However, significant up-regulation of insulin receptor expression is observed on activated T cells, which suggests an important role during T cell activation. Exogenous insulin in vitro induced a shift in T cell differentiation toward a T helper type 2 (Th2)-type response, decreasing the T helper type 1 to Th2 ratio by 36%. This result correlated with a corresponding change in cytokine secretion, with the interferon-{gamma} to IL-4 ratio being decreased by 33%. These changes were associated with increased Th2-promoting ERK phosphorylation in the presence of insulin. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that insulin treatment influences T cell differentiation promoting a shift toward a Th2-type response. This effect of insulin in changing T cell polarization may contribute to its antiinflammatory role not only in sepsis, but also in chronic inflammation associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HYPERGLYCEMIA IN CRITICAL illness is commonly observed and is a strong independent risk factor for morbidity and death (1, 2). Intensive insulin therapy in critical illness aiming to achieve normoglycemia has recently been shown to decrease this risk by up to 50% (3). This might be due in large part to the reversal of glucotoxicity, but a direct beneficial effect of insulin is also possible, e.g. via antiinflammatory or antiapoptotic pathways.

Some complex antiinflammatory effects of insulin have been described, mediated via down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species through inhibition of NF-{kappa}B (4), down-regulation of acute phase proteins (5, 6), and conversely, via increasing endothelial nitric oxide synthase (7) and antiinflammatory cytokine secretion (8). In experimental models, intensive insulin treatment during sepsis was able to decrease proinflammatory (IL-1ß, IL-6, macrophage inflammatory factor, TNF{alpha}) and increase antiinflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) (9), indicating an immunomodulating effect. Furthermore, antiapoptotic effects of insulin and other growth factors have also been described, and inhibiting sepsis-induced apoptosis of T and B cells is thought to be beneficial. It is still not clear which immune cells are most affected by insulin, nor the mechanisms by which insulin might alter the immune response.

T helper type 1 (Th1) or type 2 (Th2) cells are effector T cells important for the modulation of the inflammation process. Th1 cells are important for cell-mediated immune responses, especially for intracellular pathogens, secreting IL-2, interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}), and TNF, whereas Th2 cells are important for antibody-mediated responses, especially against intestinal pathogens and parasites, secreting IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13. A Th1-dominant response characterizes several autoimmune diseases, whereas a predominantly Th2 response is a feature of allergic diseases and asthma (10). IL-4 is an important activator of B cells, and a shift from Th1 to Th2 cytokines could lead to a diminution of cellular immune responses and a stimulation of antibody-mediated responses. Thus, Th2 cells have inhibitory effects on Th1 differentiation and vice versa (11), illustrating that an appropriate balance between Th1 and Th2 cells is important to provide optimal host protection by the immune system.

The influence of insulin on T cell development into Th1 or Th2 cells has not been determined so far. It is well accepted that the MAPK pathways play an important role in T cell activation and differentiation. It is known that increased ERK phosphorylation leads to polarization of T cells toward Th2 and, in contrast, phosphorylation of p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) favors a T cell differentiation toward Th1 (12, 13). The effect of continued activation of the insulin signaling pathway on the MAPK is well established, causing activation of ERK and inhibition of p38 and JNK (14), suggesting it could favor Th2 T cell differentiation. In the present study, we assessed the regulation of insulin receptor (IR) expression on various immune cells and determined whether insulin influences T cell differentiation into Th1/Th2 subtypes by changing the balance of the aforementioned MAPK.

Here, we report that insulin is able to promote Th2 T cell differentiation as shown by a decrease in Th1 to Th2 ratio as well as the IFN-{gamma} to IL-4 ratio in vitro. This newly discovered effect of insulin may contribute to a modulation of inflammation and clinical outcome benefit in critical illness, and a reduced response to this effect might contribute to the proinflammatory state found with insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental subjects
All the following experiments were performed with approval of St. Vincent’s Hospital Research Ethics Committee (Sydney-Darlinghurst, Australia). To obtain human peripheral lymphocytes we collected EDTA blood samples (40 ml) from 15 healthy male donors (aged 25–30 yr) and four septic patients from the intensive care unit at St. Vincent’s Hospital after having obtained written informed consent.

Reagents and flow cytometry
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) prepared as below were washed with PBS containing 0.25% BSA and stained with FITC-, PE-, PerCP-, or allophycocyanin-conjugated antibodies to various cell surface markers purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA), with the exception of a biotin-labeled antihuman-IR mouse antibody (NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA). Immunofluorescent staining was performed using standard procedures with appropriate secondary staining reagents (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), and cells were analyzed using BD FACSCalibur (San Diego, CA). Biotin-labeled antihuman IgG2 was used as isotype control for IR assessment. For comparative quantification of IR expression, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the IR was divided by the MFI of the isotype control, which gives the relative MFI which can be compared among different cell subsets.

For quantification of Th1/Th2 cells we used intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 (BD Bioscience PharMingen, San Diego, CA). After surface staining for CD4+ and CD8+, cells were permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit with GolgiPlug (BD Bioscience PharMingen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After the intracellular staining, cells were immediately analyzed by flow cytometry. Apoptosis was measured by FACS counting for Annexin V-positive but propidium iodide-negative (BD Biosciences) stained CD4+ T cells after 72 h activation as stated below.

PBMC isolation and culture
PBMCs were isolated from EDTA blood samples by Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) density gradient centrifugation. Human CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMC preparations by magnetic separation using CD14+ magnetic beads for monocyte depletion, followed by positive selection by CD4+ magnetic beads (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec, Sydney, Australia) reaching a purity of more than 95%.

For stimulation and culture up to 72 h, cells were resuspended in standardized cell culture medium RPMI 1640 containing 11.1 mmol/liter glucose (GIBCO, Invitrogen Corp., Auckland, New Zealand) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) and 10% bovine calf serum (HyClone, Logan, UT), resulting in basal insulin levels of 1.6 µU/ml. Cells in a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml were added to tissue culture plates (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY) and kept in a CO2 incubator at 37 C. Human recombinant neutral insulin (Actrapid; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) or bovine insulin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) was added at a concentration of 1000 µU/ml = 7 nM = 40 ng/ml, with no difference in the results between the two species.

T cells were stimulated with plate-bound antihuman CD3 mAb [clone TR66, BD Bioscience PharMingen, coated onto culture plates overnight in PBS (10 µg/ml) at 4 C] in combination with 2 µg/ml soluble antiCD28 (BD Bioscience PharMingen). Cells were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h and used for FACS or Western blot. Culture medium was used for cytokine protein measurement by ELISA. For proliferation assays, cultures were pulsed with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) 18 h before harvesting and quantified using a ß-scintillation counter.

To generate Th1 cells, we added IL-12 (PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ) and neutralizing antibodies against IL-4 (BD Bioscience PharMingen) to the culture medium. For Th2 cells, we added IL-4 (PeproTech Inc.) and neutralizing antibodies against IFN-{gamma} (BD Bioscience PharMingen). Cells were harvested after 72 h and reincubated in the same conditions for another 72 h.

B cells were stimulated with 10 µg/ml goat F(ab')2 antihuman µ-chain Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and 50 ng/ml IL-4 (PeproTech Inc.) for 72 h. Neutrophils and monocytes were stimulated with 10 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) for 24 h.

Measurement of cytokine protein levels in culture medium
The cytokines IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 were measured in the supernatant of stimulated CD4+ T cells using BD OptEIA Sets (BD Bioscience PharMingen). Samples were added in triplicate to 384-well MaxiSorp plates (Nalge Nunc International) and the instructions of the manufacturer’s protocol were followed. As substrate for horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody we used the reagent set A+B from BD Biosciences. The reaction was stopped with 20 µl H2SO4 (2 N), and absorbance was measured at 450 nm wavelength using an automated spectrometer by TECAN (Mannedorf/Zurich, Switzerland). A standard curve for each plate allowed us to calculate the corresponding cytokine concentration.

Western blot
Stimulated and cultured CD4+ T cells were harvested at different time points and homogenized in lysing buffer. Proteins were separated on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the Novex XCELL II Mini Cell Transblot apparatus (San Diego, CA) at 100 V for 1 h. The membranes were blocked for 1 h in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% skim milk powder at room temperature, briefly rinsed, and incubated overnight at 4 C with rabbit primary antisera raised against pERK, phospho-p38, pJNK, pAKT, total AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), pIRS-1 (pY612; Biosource International, Camarillo, CA), and total ERK-1, total p38, total JNK-1, and total IR substrate (IRS) 1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), all diluted 1:1000.

After washing the membranes with TBS-Tween, an antirabbit or antimouse secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (diluted 1:1000; Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) was applied for 1 h at room temperature. Western Lightning chemiluminescence reagents (PerkinElmer Life Science, Boston, MA) and Hyperfilm ECL High Performance chemiluminescence films (Amersham Biosciences) were used to detect labeled antigen. We used the software IPLab Gel (version 1.5 g; Signal Analytics Corp., Vienna, VA) for quantification and divided the quantity of phosphorylated proteins by the quantity of the corresponding total protein.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IR is absent on resting T cells, but strongly up-regulated after activation
To identify the immune cell candidates for insulin action, we measured the cell surface expression of the IR on all major blood leukocyte subsets using flow cytometry. Blood samples from at least six healthy subjects were processed as described in Materials and Methods to isolate PBMC or neutrophils, and stained with antibody against characteristic cell surface immune markers (CD4+, CD3+, CD8+, CD3+, CD16+, CD56+, CD3+, CD19+, CD14+). In the resting state, IR was mainly found on the surface of neutrophils, monocytes, and B cells, but was undetectable on the resting T lymphocytes (Fig. 1Go, A and D).


Figure 1
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Resting (A), activated (B), or septic (C) human CD4+ T cells stained for IR (white) and corresponding isotype control (gray). A shift of the MFI to the right in B and C corresponds to positive staining of IR. The relative MFI, used in D, is the result of the MFI of IR divided by the MFI of isotype control. D, The relative MFI allows comparing the staining intensity for IR between the major leukocyte subsets in the resting or activated state. Results are given as means ± SEM of at least five subjects. *, Significance by P < 0.005 with respect to resting cells, as determined by Mann-Whitney U test. E, Human CD4+ T cells, resting or activated for 72 h with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 subjected to incubation with insulin 1000 µU/ml for 10 and 20 min. Results are given as means ± SEM. *, Significance by P < 0.05 with respect to time 0, as determined by Mann-Whitney U test. n = 3 different subjects and experiments.

 
For each cell type, we chose an appropriate agent for maximal activation, as described in Materials and Methods. The optimal stimulation time was established from time course experiments (data not shown). IR expression on neutrophils, monocytes, and B cells was not significantly changed after stimulation, whereas a strong and statistically significant up-regulation of IR expression was observed on CD4+ T cells (6-fold up-regulation, P < 0.0002) and CD8+ T cells (4-fold up-regulation, P < 0.003) (Fig. 1Go, B and D).

This in vitro observation was confirmed by a trend in vivo because increased IR expression was observed on a subset of peripheral blood T cells from septic patients from our intensive care unit compared with healthy controls (Fig. 1Go, A–C). Thus, IR expression is regulated on activated T cells and may play a key role during T cell activation and differentiation.

Newly expressed IR on T cells are functional
To confirm the up-regulation of IR on activated T cells, and to confirm that these receptors are functional, we analyzed activation of the insulin signaling pathway by measuring IRS-1 and AKT phosphorylation, in both activated and resting CD4+ T cells. Fig. 1EGo shows that both IRS-1 and AKT are significantly phosphorylated 10 and 20 min after the addition of insulin to activated T cells, whereas no significant change in IRS-1 and AKT phosphorylation was observed when insulin was added to resting CD4+ T cells. These results not only correlate with the absence of IR on resting cells and its up-regulation on activated CD4+ T cells, but also prove that these receptors are functional and able to stimulate the insulin signaling pathway in activated T lymphocytes.

Insulin does not change activation status or proliferation, but inhibits apoptosis of CD4+ T cells
To investigate the effects that could be mediated by activation of the insulin signaling pathway, we measured as a first step the up-regulation of classical activation markers such as CD25 and CD69 upon cell activation. Fig. 2Go, A and B, show the FACS analysis of activated CD4+ T cells cultured with or without insulin and stained for these two activation markers, and it clearly shows that there is no difference in activation status caused by insulin. Furthermore, we measured proliferation of sorted CD4+ T cells after 72 h activation using [3H]thymidine incorporation assays, but there was no difference found when cells were incubated with insulin (Fig. 2CGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Sorted CD4+ T cells resting (gray) and stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 for 72 h in the presence (dotted line) or absence of insulin (solid line), stained for activation marker CD25 (A) and CD69 (B), showing no difference in activation status. C, Sorted and stimulated CD4+ T cells as above in the presence (1000 µU/ml, black bars) or absence of insulin (white bars). Proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation, and apoptosis was measured by staining for Annexin V and propidium iodide. Values are compared with cell cultures without insulin (=100%), error bars represent SEM. *, Significance by P < 0.05 with respect to control as determined by Mann-Whitney U test. n = 3 different subjects and experiments.

 
However, when we counted for apoptotic CD4+ T cells after a 72-h activation period using flow cytometry and gating for Annexin V-positive and propidium iodide-negative stained cells, we observed a decrease in apoptotic cells by 14% when compared with baseline (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2CGo).

Insulin promotes T cell differentiation toward a Th2 phenotype
We aimed to investigate whether stimulation of these newly expressed IR during T cell activation can lead to a change in T cell differentiation, especially into Th1 and Th2 T cell effector subsets. Therefore, sorted CD4+ T cells from five healthy subjects were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and cultured for 72 h in the presence or absence of insulin. This time frame allowed the cells to maximally express IR on the cell surface and initiate T cell proliferation and differentiation (Fig. 1Go, A–E).

After 72 h, cells were harvested and stained for intracellular cytokines IFN-{gamma} and IL-4, the key signature cytokines distinguishing Th1 from Th2 cells (11). Cell counts of Th1 and Th2 polarized T cells using flow cytometry demonstrated a decrease of the Th1 to Th2 ratio by 36% (P < 0.021) in the presence of 1000 µU/ml insulin, suggesting a skewing of T cell differentiation toward a Th2 cell type (Fig. 3Go, A–C, and Table 1Go). This effect on T cell differentiation was clearly dose dependent, with the Th1 to Th2 ratio decreasing from 1.42 without insulin to 1.29 at 50 µU/ml insulin (–9.5%, not significant), to 1.08 at 250 µU/ml insulin (–24%, P < 0.05) and to 0.94 at 1000 µU/ml (–36%, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3CGo). In conclusion, insulin plays an unexpected differentiation role during effector T cell polarization.


Figure 3
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Sorted CD4+ T cells stimulated for 72 h with immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in the presence (B) or absence (A) of 1000 µU/ml insulin. Th1/Th2 populations were defined by intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-{gamma} and IL-4. C, Insulin dose-dependent change in the Th1 to Th2 ratio. D, Sorted CD4+ T cells were stimulated as above, but cultured in Th1-condition (IL-12, anti-IL-4) or Th2-condition (IL-4, anti-IFN-{gamma}) for two periods of 72 h. Th1/Th2 populations were defined as above using intracellular cytokine staining. See Table 1Go for cell numbers in C and D. E, IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 were measured using ELISA in the culture media of sorted CD4+ T cells stimulated as above, with or without insulin. *, Significance by P < 0.05 with respect to control (cells cultured without insulin), as determined by Mann-Whitney U test. n ≥ 3 different subjects and experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Th1/Th2 cell numbers after stimulation

 
To clarify whether the observed effect of insulin in T cell polarization is caused by an inhibited Th1 or enhanced Th2 differentiation, we generated Th1 and Th2 cells in vitro using Th1- or Th2-promoting culture conditions as previously described (15). These Th1- and Th2-promoting cultures were incubated with or without insulin, and Th1 and Th2 cells were analyzed after 7 d by flow cytometry using intracellular cytokine staining. We demonstrated that addition of insulin did not change the number of Th1 cells obtained from Th1-promoting cultures. In contrast, a significant increase (22%; P < 0.05) in the number of Th2 cells in the Th2-promoting cultures was seen in the presence of insulin (Fig. 3DGo and Table 1Go). This indicates that insulin is acting mainly by enhancing Th2 differentiation, rather than inhibiting Th1 differentiation. In summary, an increase in Th2 cell number is mainly responsible for the described decrease in Th1 to Th2 ratio caused by the addition of insulin.

Insulin can induce a shift toward a Th2-type cytokine secretion profile
To confirm changes in effector T cell polarization upon insulin stimulation, cytokines secreted by activated T cells were analyzed. Sorted CD4+ T cells were stimulated and cultured as described above, in the presence or absence of insulin. After 24, 48, and 72 h, the culture supernatants were collected and IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 levels were measured by ELISA. After 48 and 72 h of treatment with insulin, IFN-{gamma} levels were decreased by –32 and –21%, respectively (P < 0.05), and IL-4 levels increased by 32, 16, and 14% at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively (P < 0.05). This resulted in a marked and significant insulin-driven reduction of the IFN-{gamma} to IL-4 ratio at 48 and 72 h by –39 and –33%, respectively (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3EGo).

Therefore, changes in the phenotype of effector T cells seen in Fig. 3Go, A–D, were further supported by the preferential secretion of Th2 cytokines.

Altered T cell polarization is associated with increased ERK phosphorylation
Although there are no reports of a role for insulin in the regulation of T cell differentiation, it is well established that insulin can activate some MAPK such as ERK (14). Independently, it is also known that MAPK, especially ERK (in Th2) and JNK/p38 (in Th1) are important regulators of T cell differentiation (12, 13). Therefore, we tested whether the change in T cell polarization caused by insulin treatment is associated with characteristic changes in MAPK phosphorylation, which could lead to activation of transcriptional programs driving T cell polarization (11).

Similar CD4+ T cell cultures as described above were used to collect intranuclear and cytoplasmic cell proteins for Western blot analysis at three time points (24, 48, and 72 h), with or without insulin. Fig. 4AGo shows increasing phosphorylation of ERK, p38, and JNK over time in activated T cells. After 72 h, ERK phosphorylation was clearly enhanced by the presence of insulin, whereas no change in phosphorylation of p38 or JNK was observed at this time point.


Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Sorted CD4+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies for 72 h in the presence or absence of 1000 µU/ml insulin. A, Western blot analysis was performed at 24, 48, and 72 h. B, Quantification of ERK, p38, and JNK phosphorylation at the 72-h time point. Phosphorylated proteins were divided by total proteins. *, Significance by P < 0.05 with respect to control (cells cultured without insulin), as determined by Mann-Whitney U test. n = 8 different subjects.

 
Quantification of Western blots from at least eight different normal subjects after 72 h activation ex vivo confirmed a significant rise in ERK phosphorylation by 28% (P < 0.05) after insulin treatment, whereas no significant changes in p38 and JNK phosphorylation were observed in control cultures at the same time (Fig. 4BGo). Changes in pERK levels paralleled the observed changes in cytokine production (IL-4) as shown in Fig. 3EGo, both becoming significant after 48 h. Confirmation of an increase in ERK phosphorylation in CD4+ T cells after insulin treatment provides a possible mechanism explaining the role of insulin in driving Th2 T cell differentiation.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we show for the first time that insulin influences T cell differentiation promoting a shift toward a Th2-type response, mainly due to an increase the number of Th2 T cells generated, with corresponding changes in the cytokine secretion profile. The reduction of the Th1 to Th2 cell number ratio and the IFN-{gamma} to IL-4 secretion ratio caused by insulin can be regarded as an important immunomodulatory effect, in accordance with other documented antiinflammatory effects of insulin, including inhibition of NF-{kappa}B, reducing proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins as well as increasing production of antiinflammatory cytokines (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 18).

Th1 and Th2 are important in the modulation of the immune response. Each subtype is potentially able to counter regulate the other, leading to a dynamic balance that adapts the host immune response according to the specific pathogen. Each subset has specific roles and properties, such as cell-mediated immune responses, especially those targeting intracellular pathogens, which are characteristic of Th1 cell function, and antibody-mediated responses, e.g. against intestinal pathogens and parasites, which are more typical of Th2 cell function. Furthermore, a Th1-dominant response is seen in several autoimmune diseases, whereas a predominantly Th2 response is often the feature of allergic diseases and asthma (19, 20, 21, 22). Imbalances between Th1 and Th2 cells are often found in these chronic diseases. IL-4 is an important activator of B cells, and a shift from Th1 to Th2 cytokines could lead to a diminution of cellular immune responses and stimulation of antibody-mediated responses. The relative abundance of Th1 and Th2 cells in sepsis depends largely on the nature of microbes driving the infection and its duration (23). Although still controversial, some studies suggest that a Th1/Th2 imbalance favoring a predominance of Th2 cells could be responsible for the immunosuppression observed in sepsis (24). However, these studies used in vitro stimulation of T cells, and as such are limited because they do not integrate parameters such as the type of pathogen involved or the time course of sepsis. A shift toward a Th2-response has recently been described as a protective mechanism against an overwhelming proinflammatory immune response, associated with recovery and survival of septic patients (25, 26). In this study, we report that insulin is able to change the balance of Th1 and Th2 in favor of a Th2-type response in vitro.

Critical illness and sepsis are often associated with hyperglycemia, a proinflammatory state, and marked insulin resistance. High-dose insulin administration is often necessary to achieve normoglycemia. Furthermore, the excess of proinflammatory cytokines found in severe sepsis is associated with the risk of multiorgan failure and subsequent death. The proinflammatory effect of hyperglycemia has been well demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, causing an increase in reactive oxygen species generation (27), up-regulation of adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and IL-6 (16), the proinflammatory transcription factors activator protein-1 and early growth response-1, and their regulated gene transcription of metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and MMP-9 (28).

In contrast, it has been shown that insulin administration and its antiinflammatory properties can counteract the proinflammatory state caused by hyperglycemia. A Belgian study (1) reported a reduction in the level of certain acute phase proteins (C-reactive protein, mannose-binding lectin) and cytokines (IL-6) in patients randomly assigned to intensive insulin treatment. How insulin is involved in directly modulating immune function is not well understood. Previous work has shown that insulin can decrease NF-{kappa}B activation and certain proinflammatory cytokines in PBMC (4). In addition, insulin reduces intranuclear early growth response-1, the expression of tissue factor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (17), and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and MMP-9 (18).

De novo emergence of IR on T cells upon activation is not a novel finding (29, 30, 31), and the presence of IR on other leukocyte subsets has been described already (32). However, this is the first report comparing the expression of IR on all major subsets of human peripheral blood leukocytes in the resting and activated state, and thus demonstrating that de novo expression of IR upon activation is a unique property of T cells, and might indicate an important role in modulating T cell response (Fig. 1DGo). A slight but not significant increase of AKT phosphorylation after short time incubation of resting CD4+ T cells might indicate a weak expression of IR that otherwise is not detectable by flow cytometry or quantitative PCR (Fig. 1EGo). However, the up-regulation of IR after activation was strong (6-fold) and highly significant. A similar trend of up-regulated IR was seen on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells collected from four septic patients from our intensive care unit. In contrast to our in vitro activation, it was only a defined subset of T cells showing IR expression (Fig. 1CGo), and this subset was also characterized by high expression of CD25 and CD69. Considering that in vivo activation of T cell is antigen-specific, and a consequence of direct contact with antigen presenting cells, the observation that not all T cells show a similar degree of activation seems physiological.

Because IR is also expressed on other immune cells such as innate immune cells, we cannot exclude other insulin-mediated protective roles from these cells as an explanation for the reduced inflammation seen in septic patients receiving insulin. However, we postulate that the ability of insulin to modify the polarization of Th cells may be an important contributor to the protective effect of insulin during severe illness. Whether insulin can also prevent observed apoptosis of CD4+ T cells (as shown in our in vitro experiments; Fig. 2CGo) and B cells (33) or modulate T cell differentiation and cytokine secretion in sepsis is currently being investigated by our group in association with an Australian multicenter study conducting a clinical trial on the use of insulin infusion in intensive care.

The insulin concentration used in our experiments (1000 µU/ml = 7 nM) is supraphysiological, but still much lower than in most other in vitro experiments, where concentrations up to 100 nM frequently are used. Pharmacological insulin concentrations reached under intensive insulin treatment (e.g. 8 U/h) are reported to be up to 125 µU/ml (34), but insulin administration of up to 20 U/h at the start of insulin treatment can increase levels up to 500 µU/ml. Several studies using euglycaemic hyperinsulinemic clamps in septic patients reached levels up to 1250 µU/ml (35). These high levels of insulin have shown to partially overcome the marked insulin resistance encountered in sepsis in regard to glucose metabolism, especially glucose oxidation. In our study, the effect of insulin on T cell differentiation was clearly dose dependant, starting at levels of 50 µU/ml and becoming significant at levels of 250 and 1000 µU/ml (Fig. 3CGo). In summary, the concentration used in our experiments was chosen to ensure a maximal effect despite possibly developing insulin resistance within T cells.

We also investigated whether insulin affects basic T cell biology such as proliferation, apoptosis, and activation status. As shown in Fig. 2CGo, there was no change in T cell proliferation in the presence of insulin, but a slight but significant decrease in CD4+ T cell apoptosis. Antiapoptotic effects of insulin have already been described (36), and could be beneficial in the setting of sepsis-induced apoptosis of T and B cells (33). To investigate the possibility that insulin might alter the activation status of stimulated T cells, we stained CD4+ T cells for the classical activation markers CD25 and CD69. As demonstrated in Fig. 2Go, A and B, there was no change in both activation markers after 72 h of activation in the presence of insulin, which could have explained the observed differences in MAPK phosphorylation. It is known that CD25 and CD69 up-regulation is a slow process, peaking after 24 h of cell activation, and therefore, it is not to be expected to be changed in our short time insulin incubation for 10 and 20 min (Fig. 1EGo). Nevertheless, we confirmed an identical expression of these activation markers by flow cytometry in this experiment (data not shown).

The important role of MAPK in T cell development and differentiation has been well described, especially the role of ERK activation for Th2 development, and p38 and JNK for Th1 development (12, 13). Insulin stimulates cell proliferation through ERK activation, and it has been shown to negatively act on p38 and JNK after prolonged incubation. It is noteworthy that the incubation time of insulin is important to choose to answer specific research questions, as the observed effects on MAPK phosphorylation can be directly the opposite when comparing short- and long-term incubation (14).

In our experiments, we showed that, in activated CD4+ T cells, insulin increases the phosphorylation of ERK without changing phosphorylation of p38 or JNK after 72 h activation, which is paralleled by a shift toward a Th2-cytokine secretion profile (Figs. 2EGo and 3Go, A and B). Selective activation of ERK in T cells in response to insulin is likely to be the reason for increased Th2 T cells generated by insulin treatment as ERK activation is critical for Th2 T cell generation (12, 13).

There is also evidence that IL-4 signaling recruits IRS family proteins downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, which are important for growth, survival, and regulation of gene expression in response to IL-4 and IL-13 (37). Furthermore, although Stat6 and JAK-3 are present in equivalent amounts in both Th1 and Th2 cells, IRS-2 protein levels are much lower in Th1 than in Th2 cells (38). Thus, altered sensitivity of Th2 committed cells to insulin, by way of relatively higher levels of IRS proteins may explain the preferential expansion of Th2 cells reported. Thus, we cannot exclude that the observed Th2 profile induction by insulin observed in this study may be due to a preferential expansion of already committed Th2 cells rather than true differentiation of naive T cells into Th2 cells.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first time that insulin influences T cell differentiation, promoting a shift toward a Th2-type response. The association of increased ERK phosphorylation with T cell polarization toward a Th2 phenotype in response to insulin treatment suggests that MAPK phosphorylation is key to the role of insulin as a modulator of effector T cell differentiation. This modulatory effect of insulin is in accordance with other documented antiinflammatory effects of insulin. Whether similar changes in T cell differentiation are observed in response to intensive insulin treatment during sepsis in humans is currently being investigated. In summary, this study uncovers a novel and so far unappreciated role for insulin and IR in the immune system. A better understanding of the role of insulin on immune cell function is important for improving therapeutic strategies for patients in intensive care and other situations of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance.


    Acknowledgments
 
We offer special thanks to Dr. Frederic Sierro, Dr. Tatyana Chtanova, and Kate Jeffrey for their excellent technical support.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation (PBBSB-102602) and the Margarete und Walter Lichtenstein-Stiftung (Basel, Switzerland). Research expenses were partially compensated by Diabetes Australia Research Trust, Novo Nordisk, and Aventis Pharmaceuticals.

First Published Online September 28, 2006

Abbreviations: IFN-{gamma}, Interferon-{gamma}; IR, insulin receptor; IRS, IR substrate; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MMP, metalloproteinase; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; Th1, T helper type 1; Th2, T helper type 2.

Received May 22, 2006.

Accepted for publication September 15, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Gerstein HC 2000 Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview. Lancet 355:773–778[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE 2002 Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:978–982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R 2001 Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 345:1359–1367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dandona P, Aljada A, Mohanty P, Ghanim H, Hamouda W, Assian E, Ahmad S 2001 Insulin inhibits intranuclear nuclear factor {kappa}B and stimulates I{kappa}B in mononuclear cells in obese subjects: evidence for an anti-inflammatory effect? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3257–3265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hansen TK, Thiel S, Wouters PJ, Christiansen JS, Van den Berghe G 2003 Intensive insulin therapy exerts antiinflammatory effects in critically ill patients and counteracts the adverse effect of low mannose-binding lectin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1082–1088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Takebayashi K, Aso Y, Inukai T 2004 Initiation of insulin therapy reduces serum concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 53:693–699[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hartell NA, Archer HE, Bailey CJ 2005 Insulin-stimulated endothelial nitric oxide release is calcium independent and mediated via protein kinase B. Biochem Pharmacol 69:781–790[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Jeschke MG, Klein D, Herndon DN 2004 Insulin treatment improves the systemic inflammatory reaction to severe trauma. Ann Surg 239:553–560[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Jeschke MG, Klein D, Bolder U, Einspanier R 2004 Insulin attenuates the systemic inflammatory response in endotoxemic rats. Endocrinology 145:4084–4093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chtanova T, Mackay CR 2001 T cell effector subsets: extending the Th1/Th2 paradigm. Adv Immunol 78:233–266[Medline]
  11. Ho IC, Glimcher LH 2002 Transcription: tantalizing times for T cells. Cell 109(Suppl):S109–S120
  12. Singh RA, Zhang JZ 2004 Differential activation of ERK, p38, and JNK required for Th1 and Th2 deviation in myelin-reactive T cells induced by altered peptide ligand. J Immunol 173:7299–7307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dong C, Davis RJ, Flavell RA 2002 MAP kinases in the immune response. Annu Rev Immunol 20:55–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Desbois-Mouthon C, Blivet-Van Eggelpoel MJ, Auclair M, Cherqui G, Capeau J, Caron M 1998 Insulin differentially regulates SAPKs/JNKs and ERKs in CHO cells overexpressing human insulin receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 243:765–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Chtanova T, Tangye SG, Newton R, Frank N, Hodge MR, Rolph MS, Mackay CR 2004 T follicular helper cells express a distinctive transcriptional profile, reflecting their role as non-Th1/Th2 effector cells that provide help for B cells. J Immunol 173:68–78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Piconi L, Quagliaro L, Da Ros R, Assaloni R, Giugliano D, Esposito K, Szabo C, Ceriello A 2004 Intermittent high glucose enhances ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin and interleukin-6 expression in human umbilical endothelial cells in culture: the role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. J Thromb Haemost 2:1453–1459[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Aljada A, Ghanim H, Mohanty P, Kapur N, Dandona P 2002 Insulin inhibits the pro-inflammatory transcription factor early growth response gene-1 (Egr)-1 expression in mononuclear cells (MNC) and reduces plasma tissue factor (TF) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1419–1422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dandona P, Aljada A, Mohanty P, Ghanim H, Bandyopadhyay A, Chaudhuri A 2003 Insulin suppresses plasma concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9. Diabetes Care 26:3310–3314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A 1996 Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787–793[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Mosmann TR, Sad S 1996 The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunol Today 17:138–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. O’Garra A 1998 Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity 8:275–283[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. O’Garra A, Arai N 2000 The molecular basis of T helper 1 and T helper 2 cell differentiation. Trends Cell Biol 10:542–550[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Pulendran B 2004 Modulating TH1/TH2 responses with microbes, dendritic cells, and pathogen recognition receptors. Immunol Res 29:187–196[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Iwasaka H, Noguchi T 2004 [Th1/Th2 balance in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)]. Nippon Rinsho 62:2237–2243[Medline]
  25. Pachot A, Monneret G, Voirin N, Leissner P, Venet F, Bohe J, Payen D, Bienvenu J, Mougin B, Lepape A 2005 Longitudinal study of cytokine and immune transcription factor mRNA expression in septic shock. Clin Immunol 114:61–69[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Venet F, Lepape A, Debard AL, Bienvenu J, Bohe J, Monneret G 2004 The Th2 response as monitored by CRTH2 or CCR3 expression is severely decreased during septic shock. Clin Immunol 113:278–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Mohanty P, Hamouda W, Garg R, Aljada A, Ghanim H, Dandona P 2000 Glucose challenge stimulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by leucocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2970–2973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Aljada A, Ghanim H, Mohanty P, Syed T, Bandyopadhyay A, Dandona P 2004 Glucose intake induces an increase in activator protein 1 and early growth response 1 binding activities, in the expression of tissue factor and matrix metalloproteinase in mononuclear cells, and in plasma tissue factor and matrix metalloproteinase concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 80:51–57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stentz FB, Kitabchi AE 2004 De novo emergence of growth factor receptors in activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Metabolism 53:117–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Stentz FB, Kitabchi AE 2004 Transcriptome and proteome expression in activated human CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324:692–696[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Koffler M, Raskin P, Womble D, Helderman JH 1991 Immunobiological consequence of regulation of insulin receptor on alloactivated lymphocytes in normal and obese subjects. Diabetes 40:364–370[Abstract]
  32. Stuart CA, Meehan RT, Neale LS, Cintron NM, Furlanetto RW 1991 Insulin-like growth factor-I binds selectively to human peripheral blood monocytes and B-lymphocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1117–1122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hotchkiss RS, Tinsley KW, Swanson PE, Schmieg Jr RE, Hui JJ, Chang KC, Osborne DF, Freeman BD, Cobb JP, Buchman TG, Karl IE 2001 Sepsis-induced apoptosis causes progressive profound depletion of B and CD4+ T lymphocytes in humans. J Immunol 166:6952–6963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Chambrier C, Laville M, Rhzioual Berrada K, Odeon M, Bouletreau P, Beylot M 2000 Insulin sensitivity of glucose and fat metabolism in severe sepsis. Clin Sci (Lond) 99:321–328[Medline]
  35. Rusavy Z, Sramek V, Lacigova S, Novak I, Tesinsky P, Macdonald IA 2004 Influence of insulin on glucose metabolism and energy expenditure in septic patients. Crit Care 8:R213–R220
  36. Allen RT, Krueger KD, Dhume A, Agrawal DK 2005 Sustained Akt/PKB activation and transient attenuation of c-jun N-terminal kinase in the inhibition of apoptosis by IGF-1 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Apoptosis 10:525–535[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Kelly-Welch AE, Hanson EM, Boothby MR, Keegan AD 2003 Interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling connections maps. Science 300:1527–1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Huang H, Paul WE 1998 Impaired interleukin 4 signaling in T helper type 1 cells. J Exp Med 187:1305–1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. Badiou, J.-P. Cristol, I. Jaussent, N. Terrier, M. Morena, F. Maurice, H. Leray-Moragues, J.-P. Rivory, L. Chalabi, C. Delcourt, et al.
Fine-Tuning of the Prediction of Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients by Use of Cytokine Proteomic Determination
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 423 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Silano, R. Di Benedetto, F. Maialetti, A. De Vincenzi, R. Calcaterra, A. Trecca, and M. De Vincenzi
A 10-residue peptide from durum wheat promotes a shift from a Th1-type response toward a Th2-type response in celiac disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2008; 87(2): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viardot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viardot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals