help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-0254
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonack, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tonack, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, A. N.
Endocrinology Vol. 148, No. 12 5902-5912
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Dioxin Affects Glucose Transport via the Arylhydrocarbon Receptor Signal Cascade in Pluripotent Embryonic Carcinoma Cells

Sarah Tonack, Karen Kind, Jeremy G. Thompson, Anna M. Wobus, Bernd Fischer and Anne Navarrete Santos

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology (S.T., B.F., A.N.S.), Martin Luther University Faculty of Medicine, D-06097 Halle (Saale), Germany; Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology (K.K., J.G.T.), Research Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia; and Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (A.M.W.), 06466 Gatersleben, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Anne Navarrete Santos, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Faculty of Medicine, Grosse Steinstrasse 52, D-06097 Halle (Saale), Germany. E-mail: a.navarrete-santos{at}medizin.uni-halle.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Intoxication by dioxins such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) leads, among other damages, to early embryo loss, fetal malformations, and cardiovascular toxicity. Apart from binding to the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR), the mechanism of TCDD-mediated embryo toxicity is still unclear. We investigated possible modes of a TCDD-mediated toxicity, particularly in glucose metabolism, in pluripotent P19 mouse embryonic carcinoma cells. Undifferentiated P19 cells were exposed to 1–100 nM TCDD and characterized for AhR signaling. For studying cell differentiation, P19 cells were exposed to 10 nM TCDD at stage of embryoid body formation, and analyzed on glucose metabolism and cardiac differentiation during the next 3 wk. TCDD treatment activated the AhR-signaling cascade within 1 h, confirmed by AhR translocation, induction of cytochrome P450 1A1 expression, and activation of the xenobiotic response element. Although cell viability and transcription of the cardiac marker protein {alpha}-myosin heavy chain were affected, TCDD did not inhibit the differentiation of P19 cells to pulsating cardiomyocytes. TCDD significantly down-regulated the expression levels of the glucose transporter (GLUT) isoforms 1 and 3. After 24-h TCDD treatment, GLUT1 was no longer localized in the plasma membrane of P19 cells. The impaired GLUT expression correlated with a lower glucose uptake in 5-d-old embryoid bodies. The TCDD effects were mediated by AhR, as shown by preculture with the AhR antagonist {alpha}-naphthoflavone. Our data demonstrate that an AhR-mediated disturbance in GLUT expression and insufficient glucose uptake may be major mechanisms in TCDD embryo toxicity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (TCDD) (dioxin) belongs to a family of lipophilic halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons and is one of the most toxic environmental contaminants. TCDD is a well-known teratogen, and causes a wide variety of toxicities, including reproductive and developmental toxicity, immunotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity at low exposure levels (1, 2). TCDD is accumulated in adipose and liver tissues, and in reproductive organs and the fetus (3). One known mechanism of TCDD action is binding and activation of the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) (4). The AhR is a cytosolic transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix family. The activated receptor heterodimerizes with the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) in the nucleus and binds the xenobiotic response elements (XREs). Although AhR-driven transcriptional regulation has been extensively studied, the mechanism by which TCDD causes its toxic effects is not fully understood.

One of the possible mechanisms is the disturbance of glucose transport. A well-described effect of TCDD intoxication in vivo is a loss of body weight, hyperlipidemia, and other metabolic perturbations (5). TCDD is known to alter glucose transport in intestinal epithelium (6) and preadipocyte cell lines (7). It significantly reduces the level of glucose transporter (GLUT) 4 in vivo in adipose and muscle tissue (8). Because of the hydrophilic character of glucose, specific transport proteins are required for glucose to cross the cell membrane. They are present in all cell types and provide pores for the transmembrane glucose passage.

The number of mammalian GLUTs has expanded over the past several years, and two different families have been identified: sodium glucose cotransporters, and facilitative GLUTs. The latter belongs to a family of 13 structurally related, membrane-spanning glycoproteins (9). They exhibit different kinetic properties and tissue expression patterns depending on the cellular demand and regulation. Glucose enters the preimplantation embryo preferentially by GLUTs. In mouse blastocysts, at least six GLUT isoforms have been described (10, 11, 12). Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells express GLUT1, 3, and 8. GLUT2 and GLUT4 are detectable only in differentiated ES-derived cells (13). In adult cardiac cells, GLUT1 is localized in the plasma membrane (PM), whereas GLUT4 translocates from cytoplasmic storage vesicles to the PM in response to an insulin stimulus.

TCDD affects heart development in zebra fish (2), chicken (14), and mouse (15). In piscine and avian embryos exposed to TCDD, changes in cardiac structure and function have been described. In the piscine embryo, TCDD reduces heart size and cardiomyocyte proliferation (2). Similarly, in the chick embryo, TCDD induces ventricular cavity dilation associated with thinner ventricle walls and reduced cardiomyocyte proliferation (14). The importance of the timing of TCDD exposure to cardiac teratogenic endpoints has not been studied in detail; however, chick embryos exposed to TCDD after organogenesis exhibit less severe cardiac structural or functional deficits compared with ones exposed shortly after fertilization (16). TCDD-treated fetal mice exhibit a dose-related decrease in heart-to-body weight ratio and a decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation (15).

To investigate the mechanism of TCDD embryo toxicity, we have used P19 mouse embryonic carcinoma cells (ECCs). P19 cells have differentiated into cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle cells (17). The cardiac cell differentiation recapitulates in vivo differentiation of embryonic myocardium, as shown by several authors (18, 19). The ability of P19 cells to reflect early differentiation processes was the basis to analyze the developmental toxicity of TCDD in this study. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that the AhR signaling cascade is fully active in pluripotent ECCs. A temporary TCDD exposure of undifferentiated P19 cells showed a long-lasting effect on gene expression and glucose transport. TCDD reduced cell viability and glucose uptake, whereas the mRNA expression of the skeletal muscle-specific transcription factor MyoD and the capacity to form contractile clusters were not affected. The TCDD-induced reduction of cellular glucose uptake is most likely caused by an impaired trafficking and a significant decrease in GLUT1 and 3 protein amounts. We show that in TCDD-treated P19 cells, the GLUT1 protein is no more localized in the PM. Disturbance of glucose uptake and GLUT expression in embryonic cells emerge as a potential mechanism of TCDD developmental toxicity.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
P19 cell culture
The ECC line P19 (17) was cultured on gelatin (0.1%)-coated tissue culture dishes in DMEM (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented by 15% heat inactivated fetal calf serum (selected batches of Biochrom KG, Berlin, Germany), L-glutamine (2 mM; Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), ß-mercaptoethanol (final concentration 50 mM; Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), nonessential amino acids (stock solution diluted 1:100; Invitrogen), and streptomycin/ampicillin (5000 U/ml ampicillin, 5000 µg/ml streptomycin; Invitrogen) as described in Ref. 19 .

Cardiac differentiation of P19 cells
P19 cells were differentiated into spontaneously beating cardiac clusters as previously described (19). Cells were cultured in differentiation medium supplemented with 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, München, Germany) as inducer of cardiac differentiation. Drops of differentiation medium (20 µl) with 400 cells were placed onto the lids of Petri dishes filled with PBS and cultured for 2 d. Cell aggregates formed in the hanging drops were transferred into nonadhesive bacteriologic grade Petri dishes (6 cm) containing 5 ml culture medium to develop embryoid bodies (EBs) for a further 3 d. The 5-d-old EBs were placed onto gelatin (0.1%)-coated Petri dishes and grown for another 5–10 d (5 + 5 d, 5 + 10 d). The first spontaneously beating clusters appeared 1 d after plating. Analysis was performed for up to 10 d.

TCDD treatment
TCDD (Amchro, Hattersheim, Germany) was dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 1.55 mM. It was added to the cultures at concentrations of 0.1–100 nM. Control variants (solvent control) were cultured with the appropriate DMSO concentration without TCDD. For cardiac differentiation, undifferentiated P19 cells were cultured for 2 d (hanging drop period) in the presence of 1% DMSO and 10 nM TCDD. Furthermore, the experiment was repeated with a lower DMSO concentration of 6.45 x 10–6% and 10 nM TCDD to bring out more clearly the differentiation effects of TCDD.

The AhR antagonist {alpha}-naphthoflavone ({alpha}-NF) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added in a concentration range of 0.1–100 µM to the medium 4 h before TCDD treatment. {alpha}-NF is a well-known AhR antagonist, which also inhibits cytochrome P450 activity.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR
The Superscript II RT-kit, dNTPs, and Taq polymerase were purchased from Invitrogen, and random primer, Rnase inhibitor, and Dnase I from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). Total RNA from P19 cells was extracted as described in Ref. 11 . For RNA extraction from EBs, 15 EBs were pooled. Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed in a final volume of 100 µl and amplified by PCR in a separate reaction as performed: 1 µl cDNA for GLUT1, 3, and 8; 5 µl for GLUT2; and 3 µl for GLUT4, AhR, ARNT, cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) in a 50 µl volume containing 5 µM dNTP, 2.5 U Taq polymerase, using the primer combinations listed in Table 1Go. Resulting PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.8% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Agarose gels were scanned by Bio-Capt MW software (LTF, Wasserburg, Germany), and three independent experiments were performed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Primers used for RT-PCR and real-time PCR (Real) in this study

 
Real-time PCR
Samples were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR using an ABI-PRISM 5700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for 18S, GLUT1, GLUT3, GLUT4, GLUT8, CYP1A1, MyoD, and {alpha}-myosin heavy chain ({alpha}-MHC) transcription levels. Reactions were performed using SYBR green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), as a double-stranded DNA-specific fluorescent dye, with the appropriate primer set (Table 1Go). PCR was initiated with 2 min at 50 C, then 10 min at 95 C. The program continued with 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95 C and 60 sec at 60 C. Each assay, for each respective gene of interest, included duplicates of each cDNA sample and a no-template control. The parameter cycle threshold (CT) is defined as the cycle number at which fluorescence intensity exceeds a fixed threshold. Relative mRNA expression for the genes of interest was expressed relative to undifferentiated P19 cells (untreated control) using the {Delta}{Delta}CT method. The expression of 18S rRNA was used to normalize samples for the amount of cDNA used per reaction. Experiments were repeated three times. Control of real-time RT-PCR specificity was performed by gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR products. For each reaction, dissociation curve analysis was performed to confirm the amplification of single products.

Mitochondrial activity assessment
The viability of P19 cells was determined by MTT assay (EZ4U nonradioactive cell proliferation and cytotoxicity assay, Fa.; Biomedica, Wien, Austria) following the manufacturer’s protocol. This assay is based on the reduction of the nontoxic, yellow tetrazolium salt (450 nm) to an intensively colored, red formazan derivate (620 nm). Reduction requires functional mitochondria as an indicator of cell viability and cell proliferation. Cells (n = 4000) were plated onto gelatin-coated 96-well plates in 100 µl DMEM medium. TCDD at final concentration of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 nM, and DMSO used as solvent control, respectively, were added. After 24 h, 10 µl substrate was added to each well and incubated for 1 h in 5% CO2 at 37 C. The absorbance was measured at 450 and 620 nm in an ELISA reader (SLT Labinstruments, Crailsheim, Germany). P19 cells cultured in standard DMEM without TCDD were estimated as 100%.

Construction of vectors and transfection
For the vector construction, restriction enzymes were purchased from Fermentas GmbH (St. Leon-Roth, Germany). The full-size coding regions of mouse GLUT1 was amplified from undifferentiated P19 cells using high fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche Diagnostics). Specific primers were derived from mouse GLUT1 and AhR mRNA gene sequences published in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory database. GLUT1 was amplified directly, whereas the AhR full-size coding sequence was amplified in three steps using the primer set combinations, AhR full-sizes primer 1, primer 2, and primer 3 (Table 1Go). All PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel and purified using Quia Quick Spin columns (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). GLUT1 was cloned directly into the eGFP-C3 Vector (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) by directed restriction with EcoRI and XhoI. The AhR full-size sequence was cloned in a first step into the pGEMT vector (Promega Corp., Mannheim, Germany), and then reassembled by directed restriction and cloning in the eGFP-C3. Therefore, first the AhRP1 PCR product was cloned into eGFP-C3 plasmid linearized by XhoI and EcoRI. The second AhRP2 PCR fragment was added after restriction with EcoRI and SalI. Finally, the third fragment (AhRP3) was included after NotI and SacII restriction. All vector inserts were verified by sequencing (Seqlab, Göttingen, Germany) and basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) alignment. Recombinant vectors (50 µg) were cloned transient into ECCs by electroporation (Gene Pulser, 500 µF, 250 mV; Bio-Rad Laboratories, München, Germany) in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). The evaluation was performed by confocal scanning microscopy (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

Western blot analyses
Protein preparations and Western blot analysis were performed as described in Ref. 13 . Protein (30 µg) from undifferentiated ECCs or pooled EBs was added to the blots.

For Western blotting, the primary antibodies monoclonal mouse anti-GLUT4 antibody (1:6000; DPC Biermann, Bad Nauenheim, Germany), rabbit anti-GLUT1 antibody (1:5000; Alpha Diagnostics International Inc., San Antonio, TX), rabbit anti-GLUT3 antibody (1:2000; Alpha Diagnostics), and mouse anti-ß-actin antibody (1:40,000; Sigma-Aldrich), respectively, were used by incubation overnight at 4 C. The secondary antibodies, goat antimouse-IgG (1:25,000), goat antirabbit-IgG (1:10,000) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) were applied for 1 h at room temperature.

The resulting blots were scanned using a CanoScan D660U flat screen scanner (Canon, Krefeld, Germany), and the images were quantified using the Bio-Capt MW software (LTF).

Subcellular fractionation
The fractionation was performed as described in Ref. 20 . P19 ECCs were cultured with 10 nM TCDD and DMSO as solvent control for 25 h. Cells from 10, 80-cm2 flasks were harvested and lysed by syringe pressure in solution I [250 mM sucrose, 5 mM NaN3, and 10 mM NaHCO3 (pH 7.8)]. Cellular lysis was verified by trypan blue staining of intact cells. Nuclei and remaining intact cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 30 min at 4 C in a Biofuge 28S (Heraeus, Berlin, Germany). The supernatant was centrifuged at 32,000 x gmax for 1 h at 4 C. The pellet included the unpurified PM, the supernatant, and microsomal and cytosolic fractions. The PM pellet was dissolved in solution I and cleaned by ultracentrifugation (Beckman-Coulter GmbH Biomedical Research, Krefeld, Germany) on a sucrose gradient consisting of a 30 and 40% sucrose solution, followed by a centrifugation with 150,000 x gmax, 1 h and 4 C in a SW40 TI rotor. The PM laying on the 30% sucrose solution was diluted in solution II (10 nM NaHCO3), pelleted by centrifugation at 190,000 x gmax for 1 h at 4 C, and diluted in 0.1 N NaOH. The supernatant, including the microsomal and cytosolic fraction, was centrifuged at 190,000 x gav for 1 h at 4 C. The pellet containing the microsomes was dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH. Twenty micrograms of internal membrane proteins and 4.5 µg PM proteins were applied in Western blotting analyses for GLUT1, 3, and 4, as described before.

Immunofluorescence
For immunofluorescence analysis of TCDD-treated cells, GLUT1 (rabbit anti-GLUT1 antibody, 1:1500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and desmin (mouse anti-desmin antibody, 1:20, Abcam; and rabbit antidesmin antibody, 1:50, Chemicon, Hampshire, UK) were used as previously described (13).

XRE luciferase reporter gene assay
The XRE reporter gene was constructed by heat annealing of two oligonucleotides [XRE 3xfw: 5'-CTAGCC(CTTCTCACGCAACGCCTGGC)x3-3'; and XRE 3xrw: 5'-TCGAG (CCAGGCGTTGCGTGAGAAGG)x3-C3'; Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany] containing three XRE elements. The oligonucleotide was cloned into the pTAL-Luc-Vector (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) by directed restriction. The vector was verified by sequencing. A combination of 50 µg XRE reporter and 1.25 µg pRL-SV40 Vector (Promega) were transfected by electroporation in P19 cells. There were 1 x 106 cells plated in six-well plates and allowed to recover for 8 h. TCDD treatment was performed for 24 h. The luminescence of firefly and Renilla luciferase was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega) in the Sirius Luminometer (Berthold Detection Systems, Pforzheim, Germany). The firefly luciferase was set in relation to the Renilla luciferase activity. The raw data were expressed as a percentage relative to P19 cells cultured in normal media. For this study the specificity of the XRE construct and AhR binding was proved by addition of {alpha}-NF before TCDD stimulation in MCF7 cells (data not shown). After {alpha}-NF there was no further induction of XRE promoter activity detectable by TCDD.

Glucose uptake studies
Glucose uptake was measured as described in Ref. 21 . In brief, 2 and 5-d EBs were washed twice in glucose-free DMEM and transferred into 100 µl pulse droplets, kept strictly at 37 C, for 3 min. The glucose-free pulse medium contained 0.3 mM 3-O-methyl-D-[1-3H] glucose (3H-OMG) (37 GBq/liter; Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) and 25 mM 3-OMG (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Uptake was stopped after 3 min by transferring the EBs through four washes of ice-cold glucose-free DMEM. The diameter of the EBs was recorded using a calibrated ocular micrometer. Radioactivity of individual EBs was determined in a Wallac LSC 1408 liquid scintillation analyzer (Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland). In three experimental replicates, 2-d EBs (n = 30) and 5-d EBs (n = 50) were studied. Uptake of 3-OMG was expressed in nmol/3 min x vol (cm3). The volume of the spherical EB (4/3{pi}r3) was calculated as previously described (22) and used to standardize the differences in size between EBs.

For plated 5 + 5-d EBs, five 5-d EBs were plated on a six-well plate. One hour before the experiment, the cells were washed three times with a glucose-free DMEM and left for 1 h in 1 ml media. One milliliter of DMEM with 2 µCi of 3H-OMG in 50 mM 3-OMG was added and then incubated for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by washing three times with glucose-free DMEM, and the cells were lysed for 1 h in 500 µl 0.1 M NaOH at 60 C. Two hundred microliters were analyzed in the liquid scintillation analyzer. For standardization the protein amount of each well was calculated using a Bio-Rad assay. The uptake was expressed as picomoles per milligram.

Statistics
The results were compared with the Student’s t test. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The differences were considered statistically significant at P values less than 0.05, less than 0.01 to untreated controls, and at P values less than 0.05, less than 0.01 to solvent controls.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TCDD activates AhR signaling in P19 cells
P19 cells have shown an active AhR signaling cascade, as demonstrated by: 1) AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A1 expression; 2) AhR translocation; 3) activation of a XRE promoter element; and 4) stimulation of CYP1A1 mRNA expression by TCDD. The following data were obtained.

RT-PCR analyses of AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A1.
Undifferentiated mouse P19 cells, differentiated EBs (2 and 5 d old), and EB outgrowths were analyzed by RT-PCR. AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A1 mRNA levels were expressed in all studied stages (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Analysis of AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A1-RNA expression by reverse transcriptase PCR during P19 cell differentiation. RT-PCR with specific oligonucleotide primers (Table 1Go) for AhR, ARNT, and CYP1A1 was performed on undifferentiated P19 ECCs, on 2–5 d cultured EBs and on plated EBs (5 + 5 d; 5 d as EB 5-d plated). Resulting PCR fragments were resolved in 1.8% agarose gel. For each primer combination, a PCR control without cDNA template (–) was performed. ß-actin was used as a standard for the quality of RT-PCR reaction.

 
Translocation of AhR by TCDD.
AhR translocation was investigated using an AhR-eGFP reporter protein and confocal imaging (Fig. 2AGo). In nontreated undifferentiated control P19 cells, the AhR-eGFP fluorescence was found in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2AGo, a–c), indicating that the AhR is present in P19 cells in an inactive state. Stimulation with 10 nM TCDD causes a change in the subcellular distribution of the AhR-eGFP fluorescence from cytoplasm into the nuclei within 40 min (Fig. 2AGo, g–i).


Figure 2
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Functionality of AhR signaling cascade in undifferentiated P19 cells with AhR translocation (A) and quantitation of XRE induction (B). A, The AhR was localized by an eGFP construct in the cytoplasm of control cells in green (a, c, d, and f). After 40-min TCDD treatment, the AhR was localized in the nucleus (g and i). The nuclei are shown in red by 7-aminoactinomycin D staining (b, c, e, f, h, and i), overlay yellow, respectively. B, The P19 cells were transfected with an XRE-reporter gene, and induction of luciferase activity by 10 nM TCDD was quantified in a luminometer after 24 h. The experiment was performed two times with three replicates each. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 significance to untreated control; and {dagger}, P < 0.05 to the solvent control.

 
Activation of XREs.
In transfected undifferentiated P19 cells, the luciferase activity increased up to 230% compared with nontreated control cells (100%) upon stimulation with 10 nM TCDD. There was a 20% increase in luciferase activity in the solvent control (Fig. 2BGo).

Stimulation of CYP1A1 gene expression by AhR.
The AhR target gene CYP1A1 showed a significant and concentration-dependent increase in mRNA level after stimulation with 0.1–100 nM TCDD (Fig. 3AGo). CYP1A1 was significantly up-regulated for 3 h after addition of 10 nM TCDD, with a maximum at 2 h. A second increase followed 24 h after treatment (Fig. 3BGo). The TCDD-stimulated increase in CYP1A1 gene expression was inhibited by {alpha}-NF in a concentration-dependent manner, ranging from 0.1–100 µM (Fig. 3CGo), indicating that AhR inhibition abolished the CYP1A1 expression. TCDD exerted an immediate and a long-lasting effect on CYP1A1 expression during differentiation. In 2-d EBs, the CYP1A1 mRNA level was 2-fold increased vs. nontreated controls. A 5- to 6-fold increase was noted at stages 5 and 5 + 5 d, whereas at stage 5 + 10 d, no differences in CYP1A1 expression between TCDD-treated and solvent controls were detected anymore (Fig. 3DGo).


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Quantification of CYP1A1-RNA amounts by real-time PCR (A–D) in P19 cells. Real-time PCR with specific oligonucleotide primers (Table 1Go) for CYP1A1 was performed on undifferentiated P19 ECCs, on 2–5 d cultured EBs (2–5 d), and on plated EBs (5 + 5 d; 5 d as EB 5-d plated). The real-time PCR for each gene was analyzed using the {Delta}{Delta}CT method with 18S rRNA as standard. A, P19 cells were incubated with TCDD (1–100 nM) for 120 min. The measured CYP1A1 mRNA amount was set in relation to nontreated P19 cells (ECC). B, The CYP1A1 expression was quantified from 1–24 h after incubation with 10 nM TCDD and controls (DMSO, final concentration 6.25 x 10–4%), respectively. C, The AhR was blocked with {alpha}-NF in a concentration range from 0.1–100 µM 2 h before the treatment with 10 nM TCDD. D, During the differentiation, the EBs were incubated with 10 nM TCDD during the hanging drop period (0–2 d). The CYP1A1-mRNA amount was quantified by real-time PCR in relation to undifferentiated P19 cells. All experiments (A–D) were performed three times with at least two PCR repetitions. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01 significance to the untreated control; and {dagger}, P < 0.05, {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 to the solvent control.

 
TCDD exerts cytotoxic effects in P19 cells
The viability of TCDD-exposed undifferentiated P19 cells was assessed by the MTT assay. TCDD, at a concentration range of 10–100 nM, impaired mitochondrial activity by 10% compared with nontreated cells. Lower TCDD concentrations did not affect mitochondrial activity. It is noteworthy, but so far not explainable, that in the solvent controls with the addition of the corresponding amount of DMSO (6.45 x 10–6 to 6.45 x 10–5%), the cell viability increased up to 135% of nontreated cells (Fig. 4Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Mitochondrial activity measurement by a MTT assay in undifferentiated P19 cells. P19 cells were treated with 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 nM TCDD for 24 h before measurement. As control the cells were incubated with appropriate DMSO amounts. The mitochondrial activity was measured with the EZ4U assay after 2-h substrate incubation. Untreated P19 cells (ECC) were set as 100% control. The experiment was performed three times with at least five replicates. *, P < 0.05 significance to the untreated control, and {dagger}, P < 0.05, {dagger}{dagger}, P < 0.01 to the solvent control.

 
TCDD does not affect cardiac differentiation of P19 cells
The developmental impact of a temporary (48 h) TCDD exposure during the hanging drop phase of the differentiating P19 cells was estimated by quantification of: 1) {alpha}-MHC and MyoD transcript levels (Fig. 5Go, A and B); and 2) the formation of spontaneously beating cardiac clusters (Fig. 5CGo).


Figure 5
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Analysis of the cardiac differentiation by evaluation of EBs with spontaneously beating cardiac clusters (A) and real-time PCR of {alpha}-MHC (B) and MyoD (C) during differentiation with 1% DMSO and 1% DMSO/10 nM TCDD. A, Differentiation was induced by 1% DMSO (positive control) 10 nM TCDD and as a control with 6.25 x 10–4% DMSO. After 5-d differentiation, each EB was set into an extra well of a 24-well plate and analyzed from d 5 + 1 to 5 + 5 afterwards for spontaneously beating clusters by light microscopy. A total of 144 EBs for the 1% DMSO and 72 EBs for 10 nM TCDD and the control group was analyzed, respectively. B, Using real-time PCR with specific oligonucleotide primers for {alpha}-MHC and MyoD (Table 1Go), the expression profiles of P19 ECCs, EBs from 2–5 d, and plated EB 5 + 5 d, 5 + 10 d were characterized. Incubation with 10 nM TCDD/1% DMSO (TCDD) or 1% DMSO (control) was performed during the hanging drop period (0–2 d). The real-time PCR for each gene was analyzed by the {Delta}{Delta}CT method with 18S rRNA as standard. Asterisks indicate statistical significance to the untreated control (*) or the solvent control ({dagger}).

 
The mRNA level of the cardiac marker {alpha}-MHC strongly increased during differentiation until d 5 + 5 d, followed by a reduction at 5 + 10 d (Fig. 5AGo). In TCDD-treated cells, the {alpha}-MHC mRNA level differed from controls with a significant higher amount at 5 d and 5 + 5 d, and reduced amounts at 5 + 10 d. In contrast, the myogenic marker MyoD exponentially increased until d 5 + 10 d (Fig. 5BGo). The MyoD mRNA level was not influenced by TCDD.

The changes of {alpha}-MHC transcription by TCDD implicated consequences for cardiac differentiation and functionality. Therefore, the number of EBs with beating cardiac clusters was estimated 1–5 d after EB plating (Fig. 5CGo). DMSO (1%) as an efficient inducer of cardiac differentiation was used as positive control. Clusters of pulsating cardiomyocytes were observed in more than 95% of EBs at d 8–9 differentiation. When the DMSO concentration was reduced to 6.25 x 10–6% (concentration of the solvent control for TCDD), only 80% or less of EBs showed beating foci at d 8–10 (Fig. 5CGo). No significant differences in the number of EBs with beating clusters were found between TCDD-treated and solvent control EBs. TCDD did not inhibit or induce the differentiation of P19 cell to pulsating cardiomyocytes (Fig. 5CGo).

TCDD affects glucose uptake and GLUT expression
The glucose uptake of 2, 5, and 5 + 5-d EB was measured by incorporation of 3H-OMG and related to EB size, with an average uptake of approximately 1200 nmol 3H-OMG/ cm3 x 3 min for nontreated EBs or protein amount, respectively. Early stage exposure to 10 nM TCDD significantly decreased the glucose uptake later in development, i.e. in 2, 5, and 5 + 5-d EBs (Fig. 6AGo).


Figure 6
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Glucose uptake in 2, 5, and 5 + 5-d EBs (A) and mRNA expression of GLUT1–4 and 8 during cardiomyogenic differentiation (B), and Western blot analysis of GLUT1, 3, and 4 (C). A, The single EB uptake of H3-O methyl glucose for 3 min was measured by tritium counting. In total, 30 2-d EBs and 50 5-d EBs for the DMSO and TCDD groups, respectively, were investigated. B, Using RT-PCR with specific oligonucleotide primers for GLUT1–4 and 8 (Table 1Go), the expression profiles of P19 ECCs, EBs from 2–5 d, and plated EB (5 + 5 d; 5 d as EB 5-d plated) were characterized. Resulting PCR fragments were resolved in 1.8% agarose gel. In addition, for each primer combination, a PCR control without cDNA template (–) was performed. C, Myogenic differentiated EBs with 1% DMSO as control and 1% DMSO/10 nM TCDD as TCDD treatment were collected at 2, 5, 5 + 5, and 5 + 10 d in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and the whole protein lysate was analyzed by Western blot for GLUT1, 3, and 4 protein amounts. ß-Actin was used as a control of homogenous protein amount on the gels. *, P < 0.05 significance to the appropriate control.

 
The reduction in glucose uptake was correlated with changes in GLUT expression. Four isoforms (GLUT1, 3, 4, and 8) were expressed; GLUT2 expression was not detectable (Fig. 6BGo). RNA levels of GLUTs, determined by real-time PCR at various stages of EB differentiation, showed only minor changes. TCDD exposure led to a slight increase of GLUT1, 3, and 4 at d 2, whereas the GLUT1 mRNA level was decreased by 30–60% at 5, 5 + 5, and 5 + 10 d (Table 2Go). For GLUT3 and 8, a significant decrease was observed only at stage 5 + 10 d. If EB differentiation was not effected by TCDD, GLUT1 and 3 protein levels increased notably. A strong reduction of GLUT1 and 3 protein by TCDD was found from 5-d EB onwards. GLUT4 remained unchanged (Fig. 6CGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Relative GLUT-mRNA amounts in 2 and 5 d, and plated 5 + 5 and 5 + 10-d EBs

 
TCDD disturbed the subcellular localization of GLUT1 in P19 cells
The localization of GLUT1 was investigated by an eGFP-GLUT1 reporter in undifferentiated P19 cells exposed for 5, 15, and 25 h with 10 nM TCDD (Fig. 7AGo). In untreated P19 cells and solvent controls, the GLUT1 construct was mainly localized in the PM and particularly in the cytoplasm, whereas at 25 h, the TCDD-treated cells showed a spotted cytoplasmic GLUT1 fluorescence signal, with no or significantly lower GLUT1 fluorescence in the PM. Analyses of GLUT1 and 3 amounts in the membrane fractions of treated and nontreated P19 cells showed that GLUT1 and 3 amounts decreased remarkably in the PM fraction. The fraction of the inner membrane (IM) consisting mainly of low-density microsomal compartments remained unchanged for GLUT1, 3, and 4 (Fig. 7CGo).


Figure 7
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Localization of the GLUT1 in TCDD-treated P19 cells. GLUT1 localization was detected by a GLUT1-eGFP fusion protein (A) and immunofluorescence (B) in nondifferentiated and differentiated P19 cells, respectively. A, Cells were transfected transiently with GLUT1-eGFP (green fluorescence) and treated with TCDD or DMSO (solvent control). a, Transfected cells without any treatment. b and c, DMSO-treated solvent controls for 5 and 25 h. d–f, TCDD treatments for 5, 15, and 25 h. g, AhR antagonist {alpha}-NF was given before TCDD treatment. Cells were fixed after 5, 15, and 25 h, and the nuclei were counterstained with 7-aminoactinomycin D in red. For AhR inhibition, cells were treated with 10 µM {alpha}-NF 2 h before the TCDD treatment. The arrows are marking a membrane staining of GLUT1, the asterisk a cytoplasmic staining. B, GLUT1 (a and b) was localized in 5 + 5-d differentiated EB cells. P19 cells were differentiated without (a) or with TCDD (b). The differentiated cells were localized by double-immunofluorescence staining with an antidesmin antibody (red fluorescence). The arrows indicate GLUT staining. The nuclei are stained blue with Hoechst 33258. Negative controls are shown in the right corner. Bars, 20 µm. C, Analysis of the membrane fractions by Western blot for GLUT1, 3, and 4. Cells were separated as described into IM and PM fractions. Twenty and 4.5 µg protein lysates for IM and PM, respectively, were loaded to the blot.

 
Furthermore, the GLUT1 localization was investigated in 5 + 5-d EB outgrowths exposed during early EB formation to TCDD (Fig. 7BGo). In control cells, GLUT1 was localized in the whole cell and the PM. In TCDD-treated P19 cells, we found a strong perinuclear localization of GLUT1. The structural protein desmin was used as a marker of differentiated cells.

TCDD effect on subcellular localization of GLUT1 depends on AhR
For further analysis of TCDD-induced dysregulation of GLUT, P19 cells were treated with {alpha}-NF before TCDD exposure. In this experimental setup, no differences in GLUT1 localization were found in exposed cells compared with controls (Fig. 7AGo).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The toxic effects of the xenobiotic compound TCDD have been shown in several in vitro and in vivo studies (reviewed in Ref. 23). These data led to a complex synopsis of TCDD action in mammalian cells and organisms, including wasting syndrome, metabolic dysfunctions, liver tumor promotion, endocrine disruption, and developmental defects. From the risk assessment point of view, the developmental defects of the reproductive system are among the most critical because they have been observed at very low dose levels. TCDD is the most potent exogenous ligand of the AhR initiating its signaling cascade. The AhR is already expressed in preimplantation embryos of several mammalian species, including Mus musculus (24), Oryctolagus cuniculus (25), and Bos taurus (26).

AhR signaling in P19 cells
In the present study, we have shown that the AhR and its dimerization partner ARNT are constitutively expressed in undifferentiated and differentiating ECCs. The translocation of the AhR into the nucleus was detected as soon as 40 min after TCDD treatment. This is contrary to findings in fibroblast and Hepa-1c1c7 cells (27, 28), in which the nuclear signal of AhR was found later, i.e. after 2 and 6 h, respectively. In P19 cells, the AhR translocation correlated well with the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA within 1 h after TCDD treatment. Remarkably, CYP1A1 mRNA induction peaked at 2 h and decreased to control levels within 4 h. This fast and time-limited induction contrasts to CYP1A1 expression in TCDD-exposed mouse blastocysts (24) and HepG2 cells (29), in which a maximum increase was observed at 12 h and later than 25 h, respectively. The CYP1A1 RNA level was induced by 1 nM TCDD, whereas inhibition of AhR blocked the increase of CYP1A1 level, as demonstrated by the decrease in TCDD-induced CYP1A1 level by {alpha}-NF. {alpha}-NF also blocked AhR translocation into the nucleus in P19 cells. The functionality of the AhR/ARNT transcription factor complex in P19 cells was further demonstrated by XRE promoter activation. In contrast to rat hepatocarcinoma cells (MH1C1), XRE induction was less strong, with a 2.2-fold induction in P19 cells compared with a 6.8-fold increase in MH1C1 (data not shown).

TCDD mediated toxicity in undifferentiated and cardiac differentiated P19 cells
Measured by the MTT assay, the viability of TCDD-exposed undifferentiated P19 cells was reduced by 10% compared with nontreated cells. This assay is based on functional mitochondria as an indicator for cell viability and cell proliferation. It is known that TCDD leads to a cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase in different cell types (30, 31). It is noteworthy that an induction of cell arrest may be a possible mechanism of TCDD toxicity in embryonic cells. However, in the present study using P19 ECCs, the differentiation efficiency was not affected by TCDD. The measured reduction of the mitochondrial activity can also be caused by lowered cytosolic glucose concentration (32).

Mouse ECCs have a high capacity to form cardiomyocytes in vitro. After induction with DMSO, P19 cells form EBs that contain a high percentage of cardiomyocytes (19). Spontaneously beating clusters can be seen from the developmental stage 5 + 1 d onwards. Within the range of TCDD concentrations used in this study, a significant influence on cardiac differentiation could not be shown. Several in vivo studies had reported on abnormalities in heart development after TCDD (15, 33, 34). TCDD treatment of chicken embryos led to pericardial edema (35), an increased heart wet/dry weight, and heart myosin content (34). Interestingly, mice lacking the AhR have developed cardiac hypertrophy and hypertension, suggesting that the AhR is required for cardiovascular homeostasis in the adult mouse (36). The cardiac-specific actin {alpha}-MHC has been used as a marker for cardiomyocyte differentiation in murine ES cells (37). The differentiation of P19 cells into cardiac muscle cells in the presence of DMSO was accompanied by a significant increase in {alpha}-MHC expression. TCDD exposure led to decreased {alpha}-MHC-mRNA levels at d 5 + 5 and 5 + 10 of cardiomyogenic differentiation, whereas the skeletal muscle-specific MyoD transcription factor was not affected. Despite the changes in {alpha}-MHC transcript levels, we found no effect on the number of beating cardiac clusters. Together, TCDD induced changes in the transcription of cardiac marker genes, whereas the skeletal myogenic-specific MyoD was not affected. However, changes in the mRNA amount by TCDD did not significantly affect the cardiomyocyte differentiation and formation of spontaneously beating cardiac clusters. TCDD acts neither as an inducer nor an inhibitor of cardiac differentiation.

Toxic effects of TCDD on glucose transport and GLUT expression
Glucose is the most important energy substrate for embryonic cells during development. Lack of glucose blocks the differentiation from the morula to the blastocyst stage during preimplantation embryo development (38). Glucose enters embryonic cells by facilitative transport mechanisms via membrane-spanning GLUT molecules (10). Pluripotent P19 cells expressed four GLUT isoforms. In contrast to adult cardiac and skeletal myocytes, which express only GLUT1 and 4, P19 cells also express GLUT isoforms 3 and 8, closely resembling the expression pattern of blastocysts with GLUT1, 3, 4, 8, and 9, and ES cells with GLUT1, 3, and 8 (13).

GLUT mRNA and protein levels as well as the glucose uptake decreased by TCDD in P19 cells. One reason for the metabolic changes seen in individuals exposed to TCDD was the reduction of GLUTs in various tissues (39, 40). In adipocytes, TCDD decreased GLUT1 and 4 mRNA and protein by 40–80% (39). The TCDD effect on GLUT expression in P19 cells differed from that observed in adult adipocytes. Whereas the GLUT4 mRNA and protein level was substantially decreased by TCDD treatment in adipocytes, it was not altered in P19 cells. Whereas GLUT1 and 4 are the functional transporters for glucose uptake in adipocytes, GLUT4 is not altered in pluripotent P19 cells. In contrast, GLUT1 and GLUT3 mRNA and protein level decreased during differentiation. These decreases were significant from 5 d of the differentiation onwards, i.e. 3 d after termination of TCDD treatment. Concomitantly, glucose uptake was reduced in 5-d EBs.

In addition, the GLUT localization is clearly dependent on AhR signaling. TCDD-induced changes did not occur after AhR inhibition by {alpha}-NF. In nontreated P19 cells, the GLUT1 isoform was located in the PM, indicating that this isoform is responsible for the import of glucose into the cell. The effect of TCDD on GLUT1 localization became visible after 24 h, indicating that not only the transcriptional and primary translation processes were affected, but also protein processing and shuttling. Furthermore, we could show that a 48-h exposure at the beginning of the differentiation process disturbed the subcellular GLUT localization later in differentiation. After TCDD treatment, GLUT1 was localized around the nucleus.

The import of glucose, the rate-limiting step for most metabolic processes, is highly sensitively regulated. This study reveals that TCDD down-regulates GLUTs and disturbs the cellular assembling of glucose transport channels in dioxin-exposed ECCs. The impaired GLUT expression correlates with reduced glucose uptake and mitochondrial activity. The dysregulation of GLUTs by TCDD can be restored by an inhibition of the AhR. In conclusion, one possible mechanism of embryo toxicity of dioxins could be a specific disturbance of glucose transport and subsequent cellular glucose metabolism, followed by developmental retardation and contributing to early embryo loss.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Michaela Kirstein for her experienced technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from the German Academic Exchange Service Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) within the German-Australia Exchange Program, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Fi306/13-1, the Graduate Program 416 of the DFG German Research Council, and the Wilhelm Roux Program of the Martin Luther University Faculty of Medicine, Halle, Germany.

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online September 13, 2007

Abbreviations: AhR, Arylhydrocarbon receptor; ARNT, arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; CT, cycle threshold; CYP1A1, cytochrome P450 1A1; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EB, embryoid body; ECC, embryonic carcinoma cell; ES, embryonic stem; GLUT, glucose transporter; 3H-OMG, 3-O-methyl-D-[1-3H] glucose; IM, inner membrane; {alpha}-MHC, {alpha}-myosin heavy chain; {alpha}-NF, {alpha}-naphthoflavone; PM, plasma membrane; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; XRE, xenobiotic response element.

Received February 27, 2007.

Accepted for publication September 6, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Birnbaum LS 1995 Developmental effects of dioxins and related endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicol Lett 82- 83:743–750[CrossRef]
  2. Antkiewicz DS, Burns CG, Carney SA, Peterson RE, Heideman W 2005 Heart malformation is an early response to TCDD in embryonic zebrafish. Toxicol Sci 84:368–377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Seiler A, Visan A, Buesen R, Genschow E, Spielmann H 2004 Improvement of an in vitro stem cell assay for developmental toxicity: the use of molecular endpoints in the embryonic stem cell test. Reprod Toxicol 231–240
  4. Poland A, Knutson JC 1982 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 22:517–554[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tuomisto JT, Pohjanvirta R, Unkila M, Tuomisto J 1995 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced anorexia and wasting syndrome in rats: aggravation after ventromedial hypothalamic lesion. Eur J Pharmacol 293:309–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ishida T, Kan-o S, Mutoh J, Takeda S, Ishii Y, Hashiguchi I, Akamine A, Yamada H 2005 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced change in intestinal function and pathology: evidence for the involvement of arylhydrocarbon receptor-mediated alteration of glucose transportation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 205:89–97[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Olsen H, Enan E, Matsumura F 1994 Regulation of glucose transport in the NIH 3T3 L1 preadipocyte cell line by TCDD. Environ Health Perspect 102:454–458[Medline]
  8. Liu PC, Matsumura F 2006 TCDD suppresses insulin-responsive glucose transporter (GLUT-4) gene expression through C/EBP nuclear transcription factors in 3T3–L1 adipocytes. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 20:79–87[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Uldry M, Thorens B 2004 The SLC2 family of facilitated hexose and polyol transporters. Pflugers Arch [Erratum (2004) 448:259–260] 447:480–489[CrossRef]
  10. Pantaleon M, Kaye PL 1998 Glucose transporters in preimplantation development. Rev Reprod 3:77–81[Abstract]
  11. Tonack S, Fischer B, Navarrete Santos A 2004 Expression of the insulin-responsive glucose transporter isoform 4 in blastocysts of C57/BL6 mice. Anat Embryol (Berl) 208:225–230[Medline]
  12. Carayannopoulos MO, Chi MM, Cui Y, Pingsterhaus JM, McKnight RA, Mueckler M, Devaskar SU, Moley KH 2000 GLUT8 is a glucose transporter responsible for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the blastocyst. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7313–7318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tonack S, Rolletschek A, Wobus AM, Fischer B, Santos AN 2006 Differential expression of glucose transporter isoforms during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Differentiation 74:499–509[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ivnitski-Steele ID, Friggens M, Chavez M, Walker MK 2005 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) inhibition of coronary vasculogenesis is mediated, in part, by reduced responsiveness to endogenous angiogenic stimuli, including vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 73:440–446[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Thackaberry EA, Nunez BA, Ivnitski-Steele ID, Friggins M, Walker MK Effect of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on murine heart development: alteration in fetal and postnatal cardiac growth, and postnatal cardiac chronotropy. Toxicol Sci 88:242–249
  16. Sommer RJ, Hume AJ, Ciak JM, Vannostrand JJ, Friggens M, Walker MK 2005 Early developmental 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure decreases chick embryo heart chronotropic response to isoproterenol but not to agents affecting signals downstream of the beta-adrenergic receptor. Toxicol Sci 83:363–371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. McBurney MW, Jones-Villeneuve EM, Edwards MK, Anderson PJ eds. 1982 Control of muscle and neuronal differentiation in a cultured embryonal carcinoma cell line. Nature 299:165–167[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Skerjanc IS 1999 Cardiac and skeletal muscle development in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Trends Cardiovasc Med 9:139–143[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wobus AM, Kleppisch T, Maltsev V, Hescheler J 1994 Cardiomyocyte-like cells differentiated in vitro from embryonic carcinoma cells P19 are characterized by functional expression of adrenoceptors and Ca2+ channels. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 30A:425–434
  20. McKeel DW, Jarett L 1970 Preparation and characterization of a plasma membrane fraction from isolated fat cells. J Cell Biol 44:417–432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Navarrete Santos A, Tonack S, Kirstein M, Pantaleon M, Kaye P, Fischer B 2004 Insulin acts via mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation in rabbit blastocysts. Reproduction 517–526
  22. Robinson DH, Smith PR, Benos DJ 1990 Hexose transport in preimplantation rabbit blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil 89:1–11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mandal PK 2005 Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. J Comp Physiol [B] 175:221–230[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Wu Q, Ohsako S, Baba T, Miyamoto K, Tohyama C 2002 Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on preimplantation mouse embryos. Toxicology 174:119–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Tscheudschilsuren G, Kuchenhoff A, Klonisch T, Tetens F, Fischer B 1999 Induction of arylhydrocarbon receptor expression in embryoblast cells of rabbit preimplantation blastocysts upon degeneration of Rauber’s polar trophoblast. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 157:125–133[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Pocar P, Augustin R, Fischer B 2004 Constitutive expression of CYP1A1 in bovine cumulus oocyte-complexes in vitro: mechanisms and biological implications. Endocrinology 145:1594–1601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bunger MK, Moran SM, Glover E, Thomae TL, Lahvis GP, Lin BC, Bradfield CA 2003 Resistance to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicity and abnormal liver development in mice carrying a mutation in the nuclear localization sequence of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J Biol Chem 278:17767–17774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Song Z, Pollenz RS 2003 Functional analysis of murine aryl hydrocarbon (AH) receptors defective in nuclear import: impact on AH receptor degradation and gene regulation. Mol Pharmacol 63:597–606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Adachi J, Mori Y, Matsui S, Matsuda T 2004 Comparison of gene expression patterns between 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a natural arylhydrocarbon receptor ligand, indirubin. Toxicol Sci 80:161–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Knockaert M, Blondel M, Bach S, Leost M, Elbi C, Hager GL, Nagy SR, Han D, Denison M, Ffrench M, Ryan XP, Magiatis P, Polychronopoulos P, Greengard P, Skaltsounis L, Meijer L 2004 Independent actions on cyclin-dependent kinases and aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediate the antiproliferative effects of indirubins. Oncogene 23:4400–4412[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Jin DQ, Jung JW, Lee YS, Kim JA 2004 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin inhibits cell proliferation through arylhydrocarbon receptor-mediated G1 arrest in SK-N-SH human neuronal cells. Neurosci Lett 363:69–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Liu Y, Song XD, Liu W, Zhang TY, Zuo J 2003 Glucose deprivation induces mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in PC12 cell line. J Cell Mol Med 7:49–56[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Powell DC, Aulerich RJ, Meadows JC, Tillitt DE, Giesy JP, Stromberg KL, Bursian SJ 1996 Effects of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) injected into the yolks of chicken (Gallus domesticus) eggs prior to incubation. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31:404–409[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Walker MK, Pollenz RS, Smith SM 1997 Expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and AhR nuclear translocator during chick cardiogenesis is consistent with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced heart defects. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 143:407–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Rifkind AB, Sassa S, Reyes J, Muschick H 1985 Polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbon lethality, mixed-function oxidase induction, and uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase inhibition in the chick embryo: dissociation of dose-response relationships. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 78:268–279[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Lund AK, Goens MB, Kanagy NL, Walker MK 2003 Cardiac hypertrophy in aryl hydrocarbon receptor null mice is correlated with elevated angiotensin II, endothelin-1, and mean arterial blood pressure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 193:177–187[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Fijnvandraat AC, van Ginneken AC, de Boer PA, Ruijter JM, Christoffels VM, Moorman AF, Lekanne Deprez RH 2003 Cardiomyocytes derived from embryonic stem cells resemble cardiomyocytes of the embryonic heart tube. Cardiovasc Res 58:399–409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Chatot CL, Lewis-Williams J, Torres I, Ziomek CA 1994 One-minute exposure of 4-cell mouse embryos to glucose overcomes morula block in CZB medium. Mol Reprod Dev 37:407–412[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Liu PC, Matsumura F 1995 Differential effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on the "adipose- type" and "brain-type" glucose transporters in mice. Mol Pharmacol 47:65–73[Abstract]
  40. Enan E, Liu PC, Matsumura F 1992 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin causes reduction of glucose transporting activities in the plasma membranes of adipose tissue and pancreas from the guinea pig. J Biol Chem 267:19785–19791[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonack, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tonack, S.
Right arrow Articles by Santos, A. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals