| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The Bunnie Joan Sachs Laboratory (D.L.K., W.R.), Neuroendocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016; Department of Medicine (D.Y.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; Department of Pathology (K.T.K.), St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 1W8; and University of Santiago de Compostela (S.V.), Campus Universitario de Lugo, Department of Anatomy, Lugo 2700-2, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: David L. Kleinberg, The Bunnie Joan Sachs Laboratory, Neuroendocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016. E-mail: david.kleinberg{at}med.nyu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-reductase inhibition in BPH and why testosterone inhibition might theoretically reduce gland volume but increase fibromuscular tissue. The work also provides a rationale for considering IGF-I inhibition as therapy for BPH to reduce the size of both prostate compartments. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To understand better why testosterone inhibition is not fully effective in treating BPH, we investigated the relative roles of IGF-I and testosterone in the development of both prostate compartments, and also tested the effects of an inhibitor of IGF-I action on prostate compartment size and activity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hormones and hormone inhibitors
Hormone therapy was begun and continued for 7 d. Testosterone was administered in SILASTIC capsules (inside diameter 0.16 cm, outside diameter 0.32 cm, length 1 cm; Dow Corning, Corp., Midland, MI) embedded sc on the backs of animals as previously described (3). Des (1, 2, 3) IGF-I [40 µg per Alzet pump (No. 1007D; Alzet Corp., Palo Alto, CA)] was a gift from Genentech Inc. In this paper it is referred to as IGF-I. The pumps were also implanted sc. Animals were treated with IGF-I plus testosterone, IGF-I alone, testosterone alone or saline in controls. The Alzet pump was used to administer bovine GH (bGH) (100 µg) for 7 d to castrated Ames dwarf male mice with or without IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 (2 mg/pump) or saline (controls). Intact CD mice were treated with either IGFBP-1 (4 mg/pump) or saline for controls for 7 d. The higher dose in these mice was given because they were heavier than the dwarfed animals.
Cloning, expression, and purification of IGFBP-1
The IGFBP-1 gene was isolated by PCR from pcBP25 (16) and ligated into pPICZ
A. This plasmid was then transformed into Pichia pastoris strain X-33 per manufacturers instructions (Invitrogen Easy Select Pichia Expression Kit; Invitrogen, Corp., Carlsbad, CA). Transformed yeast cells were initially grown overnight in sterile buffered glycerol-complex medium plus 1 mg/ml Zeocin (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0; 1.34% YNB; 440 ng/liter biotin; and 1% glycerol) at 28 C. Cells were aseptically diluted 10-fold in sterile buffered methanol-complex medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0, 1.34% YNB, 440 ng/l biotin, and 0.5% methanol) and incubated for an additional 24 h at 28 C to induce expression. Cell suspensions were centrifuged (5000 x g; 10 min); the protein in the culture supernatant was then precipitated in 60% ammonium sulfate for 1 h. Precipitated protein was harvested by centrifugation (7500 x g; 30 min) and resuspended in Tris buffer (0.5 M NaCl; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9; 20 µg/ml leupeptin; 20 µg /ml aprotinin; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Protein was further purified by fast protein liquid chromatography using Ni-NTA Superflow Agarose (QIAGEN, Inc., Valencia, CA). The fractions containing protein determined by the Bradford assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) were dialyzed (Spectrum, Spectra/Por MWCO 6-8000) in 100 mM HEPES pH 6.0 (100 mM HEPES salt, 44 mM NaH2PO4·H2O) for at least 1 h. The Bradford assay determined the final concentration of the protein. Western blotting with antihuman IGFBP-1 (Upstate Biotechnology, Waltham, MA) confirmed identification of IGFBP-1.
Surgical procedures
Orchiectomy was performed under anesthesia with tribromoethanol/amylene hydrate 0.2 ml/10 g body weight given intraperitoneally in a 1.25% solution by standard methodology.
Implantation of SILASTIC capsules and Alzet miniosmotic pumps.
SILASTIC capsules (inside diameter 0.16 cm, outside diameter 0.32 cm, length 1 cm) containing testosterone (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and Alzet pumps containing IGF-I or bGH, or IGFBP-1 alone or in combination, or saline were implanted sc on the backs of animals under anesthesia as previously described (3).
Histology
At the end of each experiment, the entire urogenital complex was removed. The vas deferens, coagulating glands, seminal vesicles, ampullary gland, urinary bladder, and most of the ureter were removed, and the remaining prostate gland with attached ureter was examined. Whole prostate glands were fixed in 10% phosphate formalin solution. After 24 h the prostate tissues were transversely embedded in paraffin along the same orientation so that the sections were perpendicular to the urethra. The paraffin block was cut into 4-µm serial sections. Three adjacent sections from three different levels of each gland were taken to make a single observation. In the case of probasin, only one section from each animal was assessed because the results were so obvious. Anatomical analysis was performed on sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin or smooth muscle
-actin. Adjacent sections from each level were stained by immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated insulin receptor substrate 1 (pY-IRS1), Ki67, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin end labeling of fragmented DNA (TUNEL). The histology sections, which included both ventral and dorsolateral prostate lobes, were examined using a Nikon E400 microscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Photographs were taken at x200 and x400 by an attached Nikon digital camera using DXM1200 software Nikon ACT-1 on a personal computer system. All prostate tissue on each slide was assessed for the area occupied by each of the components of the prostate. Fibromuscular development was assessed by outlining the periglandular sheath of fibromuscular tissue and then calculating the area. The area between the inner aspects of the fibromuscular layer and the outer limit of the lumen was measured to assess size of the glandular compartment. The lumen was measured separately. A semiautomatic computer system (Image-Pro plus, version 4.5; Media Cybernetics, Baltimore, MD) assisted morphological analysis. The method of Doehring et al. (10) was used to calculate the stromal epithelial ratio.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical identification of phosphorylated IRS1, Ki67, TUNEL, probasin and smooth muscle actin in prostate tissue was made.
Histological sections were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated through descending alcohols to water, and rinsed in PBS (pH 7.4). For nonenzymatic antigen retrieval, sections were heated in sodium citrate buffer (0.01 M; pH 6.0) in a microwave oven (700 W) for 15 min and then allowed to cool for 20 min at room temperature. To inactivate endogenous peroxidase activity, slides were rinsed with PBS and incubated in 3% H2O2 for 10 min, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. They were then incubated overnight at 4 C or 1 h at room temperature with primary antibodies. The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-IRS1 pY896 (overnight 1:100 dilution; Biosource International, Inc., Camarillo, CA) and smooth muscle
-actin antibody (overnight, 1:200; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), Ki67 antibody (1 h at room temperature, 1:1000; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), and rabbit antimouse probasin antibody (PB1, overnight 1:1000), a gift from Norman M. Greenberg, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, WA). Slides were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with goat antirabbit or goat antimouse Igs, HRP (1:100 dilution; Dako). Detection was achieved by incubation for 5 min with a DAB solution containing 5 mg DAB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 1 ml 1% H2O2 in 100 ml Tris buffer (pH 7.6). The slides were then counterstained with hematoxylin or 0.5% methyl green (pH 4) and mounted with Permount (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ). The primary pY-IRS1 antibody was incubated with 200-fold molar excess of IRS1 (pY896) phosphopeptide as a negative control. Omission of the primary antibody and replacement with nonimmune IgG was used as a negative control for smooth muscle
-actin antibody, Ki67 antibody, and probasin antibody.
The sections from three different levels of each gland were examined by taking photographs. Morphometry was performed by identifying positive brown staining cells in the sections using a semiautomatic computer system (Image-Pro plus, version 4.5; Media Cybernetics) (17). Smooth muscle
-actin staining was expressed as the brown-colored area. To assess phosphorylation of IRS1, the total number of epithelial cells and stromal cells stained for pY-IRS1 was counted. Ki67 was expressed as the percentage of epithelial and stromal cells labeled. Probasin was expressed as the percentage of epithelial cells stained. At least 2000 cells in three sections were counted except in the case of probasin, where at least 1000 cells were counted.
Apoptosis
The TUNEL assay with the ApopTag peroxidase in situ apoptosis detection kit, according to the manufacturers instruction. (Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA), was used to detect apoptotic cells. The results were expressed as the percentage of labeled cells in both epithelial and stromal compartments. At least 2000 cells per three sections were counted.
Western blot
Specificity of the antibody to pY-IRS1 was determined by measuring pY-IRS1 by Western blotting. MCF-7 cells were treated with IGF-I. Protein samples from control and IGF-I treated cells were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on a 1015% gradient gel. We found that there was an increase in signal of phosphorylated IRS1 in protein extracted for IGF-I treated cells.
Statistical analysis
Statistics were performed using groups of three animals each for each hormone or hormone combination in each of the three animal models. The two-tailed unpaired Students t test was used between groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
-actin antibody. Although testosterone alone had a slight, but significant, stimulatory effect over control on fibromuscular development, this effect was significantly less than the effect of IGF-I alone.
Glandular development.
In contrast, in the glandular compartment both IGF-I alone and testosterone alone stimulated epithelial mass and lumen size, and when administered together, there was an additive effect on the epithelial cell area and a synergistic one on lumen size.
When the relative effects of these hormones were expressed as a ratio between stromal and epithelial elements (SER), testosterone alone and testosterone together with IGF-I caused a small but significant reduction in the SER compared with control and a much greater reduction compared with the effect of IGF-I alone (Fig. 1C
). The stimulatory effect of IGF-I alone was greater on stromal development than any other treatment. The SER is calculated from the area of stromal tissue to epithelial tissue and does not consider the lumen area (10).
Relative effects of IGF-I and testosterone on cell division. Apoptosis and phosphorylation of IRS1
Mechanisms by which the various hormone combinations acted on the fibromuscular compartment were explored. Endpoints were cell division, apoptosis, and phosphorylation of IRS1 (Fig. 2
). IGF-I alone increased cell division (P < 0.001; Fig. 2
, A and C) and IRS1 phosphorylation (P < 0.001; Fig. 2
, A and B), and inhibited apoptosis (P < 0.05; Fig. 2
, A and D) in the fibromuscular compartment. Addition of testosterone to IGF-I significantly reversed each of these effects. Testosterone alone had a slight stimulatory effect on phosphorylation of IRS1, but when given together with IGF-I, it inhibited IRS1 phosphorylation.
|
Effects of IGF-I and testosterone on probasin
Probasin, an androgen sensitive protein (Fig. 3
), was not found in the glandular epithelium in control prostates. Testosterone alone led to an increase in the percent of epithelial cells that were positive for probasin. IGF-I alone very slightly increased the number of epithelial cell that produced probasin, but when testosterone and IGF-I were given together, the increase in the percent of cells positive for probasin was synergistic. There were no obvious qualitative differences in probasin staining in ventral and dorsolateral prostate lobes.
|
Ames dwarf mice.
Ames dwarf mice have impaired prostate development because they are deficient in GH. They are also deficient in prolactin, TSH, and gonadotrophins (18). To determine if IGFBP-1 could prevent bGH-induced IGF-I action, we treated 10-wk-old castrated Ames animals with bGH with or without infusion of IGFBP-1 for 7 d. IGFBP-1 inhibited GH-induced fibromuscular and glandular development (Fig. 4
and Table 2
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IGF-I induced prostate development begins with GH. Animals with low GH have impaired prostate development. Thus, mice overexpressing a GH antagonist that prevents the action of GH (3, 22) and Ames dwarf mice that have low GH also have impaired prostate development (unpublished results). GH has previously increased transcripts coding for androgen receptor, type I and II 5
reductases, and several androgen dependent proteins (23). In contrast, GH excess stimulates seminal vesicle growth in mice overexpressing bGH, and patients with acromegaly have enlarged prostates (6, 24).
Previous studies from our laboratory showed that IGF-I is essential for normal glandular development of the prostate glandular compartment (3), as is testosterone. In those, glandular development was studied by treating otherwise intact IGF-I(/) male mice with various combinations of IGF-I and testosterone. The stromal tissue was removed by collagenase digestion so that the effects of the hormones on the glands free of fibromuscular elements could be analyzed. We found that IGF-I was necessary for full glandular development. IGF-I was found to substitute for the IGF-I deficiency in IGF-I(/) mice. That bGH was incapable of doing the same suggested that the entire effect of GH in prostate glandular development is mediated via IGF-I. In that study we did not assess effects on the fibromuscular compartment. We were also not able to assess the relative effects of testosterone vs. IGF-I because the animals were not castrated. In the present study the mice were castrated to remove endogenous testosterone, and the prostates were studied in serially sectioned whole glands so that both compartments could be studied simultaneously.
Our results revealed novel discordance between the hormonal control of the development of fibromuscular and glandular compartments. In keeping with previous observations that IGF-I can cause DNA synthesis in smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts (25), that prostatic stromal cells express IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), that IGFs can increase stromal cell proliferation (26), and that des (1, 2, 3) IGF-I stimulates cell division and inhibits apoptosis in BPH stromal cells (27), we found that the development and hyperplasia of the fibromuscular compartment were under the control of IGF-I. When added to IGF-I, testosterone had an inhibitory effect on this IGF-I induced process, raising the possibility that testosterone might prevent fibromuscular hyperplasia. Interestingly, when IGF-I was absent, testosterone had a slight but significant effect on fibromuscular development. However, testosterone alone also significantly inhibited SER in comparison to controls. Because androgen has been shown to stimulate IGF-I production in the stromal compartment of the prostate (28), it is possible that testosterone alone might have had a greater effect on fibromuscular development had the animal model been capable of expressing IGF-I.
Why testosterone would inhibit the action of IGF-I in the fibromuscular compartment is unclear. This unanticipated finding suggests a far more complicated interaction between the two hormones in which the mechanisms of development are different. One unsupported suggestion is that testosterone might induce an intermediary substance that could inhibit IGF-I action in the fibromuscular compartment, as it is known to stimulate substances that stimulate gland development (2).
The events in the glandular compartment are in sharp contrast to those observed in the fibromuscular compartment. For glandular development both IGF-I and testosterone are required (3). Both had significant independent effects on the development of epithelial mass and lumen size, although the effect of testosterone alone was greater than that of IGF-I alone. The effect of testosterone on phosphorylation of IRS1 and cell division was also greater than that of IGF-I alone in epithelial cells. Testosterone was also more effective than IGF-I in inhibiting apoptosis. When administered in combination, IGF-I and testosterone had greater effects on each of these parameters of IGF-I action than either hormone alone. The high rate of apoptosis in the castrated IGF-I(/) animals compared with that in wild-type mice could be caused by complete deficiency of IGF-I, or castration or both (29).
The combination of IGF-I and testosterone also had a synergistic effect on probasin production in the epithelial cells of the prostate. Staining was more intense in response to the two hormones than with either alone That IGF-I and testosterone acted in synergy compared with testosterone alone suggests that IGF-I potentiates the effect of testosterone on probasin production. Although probasin production is known to be more or less sensitive to testosterone depending upon the specific prostate lobes (30, 31, 32), we did not note qualitative differences between the ventral and dorsolateral lobes of the prostate.
Another way of understanding the relative effects of the hormones on the two compartments of the prostate is by expressing the effects on prostate development as the ratio of stromal to epithelial development (10). The stimulatory effect of IGF-I on fibromuscular development is underscored by a marked increase in SER when given alone and by the reduction in SER by testosterone alone or testosterone combined with IGF-I. One caveat is that the doses of IGF-I used may have been supraphysiological, and, therefore, we may be seeing an exaggerated response regarding fibromuscular hyperplasia.
Our results demonstrate that IGFBP-1 can prevent GH-induced fibromuscular and glandular development of the prostate in Ames dwarf male animals, and also inhibit multiple aspects of prostate development in both the fibromuscular and glandular compartments of intact male mice through inhibiting cell division and stimulating apoptosis (33). It is likely that IGFBP-1 acted by competitively inhibiting IGF-I action (34), but other mechanisms have also been proposed (35). Presumably, other inhibitors of IGF-I action would behave similarly.
That IGFBP-1 inhibited the normal development of the fibromuscular compartment in eugonadal intact mice supports the likelihood that IGF-I inhibition would be effective in reducing the size of the stromal compartment, even in the absence of supraphysiological concentrations of IGF-I and in the presence of circulating testosterone.
BPH is a disease of unknown etiology that affects millions of men (5, 36), and causes obstructive and irritative symptoms. It is a disease of hyperplasia of both fibromuscular and glandular tissue, with fibromuscular tissue being the larger component (9, 10). The SER is higher in men with BPH than in controls, and younger men with familial forms of BPH have a much higher SER than older men with BPH (10). Monti et al. (37) examined IGF-IR in periurethral, intermediate and subcapsular regions of prostates from men with BPH. They found that IGF-IR mRNA was highest in the periurethral portion of the tissue, the problem area in BPH. There is also crosstalk between IGF-I and IGFBPs in the prostate (33, 38, 39). Additionally, high-serum IGF-I is associated with an increased risk for BPH (40, 41). A relative reduction in apoptosis compared with cell proliferation has been noted in stromal tissue (42, 43). It should be pointed out that mouse prostate development is not a model for BPH because periurethral fibromuscular hyperplasia does not occur in mice as it does in dogs or human beings (44, 45).
Because testosterone, through dihydrotestosterone, is centrally involved in prostate development, and castration causes shrinkage of the prostate (46), most attempts to treat BPH hormonally have centered on inhibition of dihydrotestosterone formation by 5
-reductase inhibitors (11, 12). Although these medications may reduce symptoms of BPH and the need for surgical intervention in select individuals, the overall effect has been disappointing (47). Assuming that the hormones that control prostate development in human beings are similar to those in mice, we would expect that testosterone inhibition would reduce the size of the glandular compartment (13) and increase the size of the fibromuscular compartment because the inhibitory effect of testosterone on IGF-I stimulated fibromuscular development would be removed. This could explain the relative failure of 5
-reductase inhibitors in BPH. Although IGF-I inhibitors would not necessarily impair the action of testosterone on the glandular compartment, the relative reduction of both compartments might be sufficient to relieve the obstructive aspects of BPH or prevent further BPH, or both. This suggestion is only theoretical in that the possible use of IGF-I inhibition in BPH would have to be proven in other models, including the human being. If it is proven, IGF-I inhibition might prevent or inhibit prostate hyperplasia, and treat associated signs and symptoms without the need for reducing or specifically inhibiting circulating testosterone.
Although this work implies a potential therapeutic benefit of IGF-I inhibition for the treatment of BPH, risks posed by systemic IGF-I inhibition must be considered. Local administration of IGF-I inhibitors deserves consideration, as do drugs that might inhibit IGF-I action locally in the prostate. Although we are not aware of such candidate drugs for prostate, an example of such a drug that inhibits IGF-I activity in the mammary gland via somatostatin receptors is the somatostatin analog SOM230 (15).
Conclusions
This work provides evidence that the development of the two compartments of the prostate differs in regard to the actions of testosterone and IGF-I. In the glandular compartment these hormones stimulate development both individually and together. Testosterone has a greater effect on epithelial and luminal development than IGF-I. When given together IGF-I and testosterone increase epithelial (additive) and luminal (synergistic) development. IGF-I also potentiates the effect of testosterone on probasin production in the epithelial cells. In sharp contrast, IGF-I stimulated fibromuscular development, and testosterone inhibited this action of IGF-I. IGFBP-1, an inhibitor of IGF-I action, was found to inhibit both glandular and fibromuscular development. Therefore, these results suggest that if prostate development in human beings is similar to the mouse, IGF-I inhibition could be more effective than 5
-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of BPH.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: Regarding D.L.K. and W.R., NYU School of Medicine is applying for a patent based on this work. K.T.K., and D.Y. have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online November 30, 2006
Abbreviations: bGH, Bovine GH; BP, binding protein; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; CD; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; pY-IRS1, phosphorylated insulin receptor substrate 1; SER, stromal epithelial ratio; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin end labeling of fragmented DNA.
Received September 15, 2006.
Accepted for publication November 17, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |