| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Treatment Causes Insulin Resistance via Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Serine Phosphorylation and Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling-3 Induction in 3T3-L1 AdipocytesThe First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Isao Usui, M.D., Ph.D., The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan. E-mail: isaousui-tym{at}umin.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. TNF
transiently stimulated serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 from 10 min to 1 h, whereas insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was inhibited only after TNF
treatment longer than 4 h. These results suggest that serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 alone is not the major mechanism for the inhibited insulin signaling by TNF
. TNF
stimulation longer than 4 h enhanced the expression of SOCS3 and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 phosphorylation, concomitantly with the production of IL-6. Anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody ameliorated suppressed insulin signaling by 24 h TNF
treatment, when it partially decreased SOCS3 induction and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 phosphorylation. These results suggest that SOCS3 induction is involved in inhibited insulin signaling by TNF
. However, low-level expression of SOCS3 by IL-6 or adenovirus vector did not affect insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. Interestingly, when IRS-1 serine phosphorylation was enhanced by TNF
or anisomycin in the presence of low-level SOCS3, IRS-1 degradation was remarkably enhanced. Taken together, both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and SOCS3 induction are necessary, but one of the pair is not sufficient for the inhibited insulin signaling. Chronic TNF
may inhibit insulin signaling effectively because it causes both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and the following SOCS3 induction in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and insulin resistance and their molecular mechanisms were mostly examined among such proinflammatory cytokines (3, 4). Serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 is a well-known mechanism by which insulin signaling is negatively regulated. TNF
phosphorylates serine residues on IRS-1 through the activation of several serine kinases including inhibitory-
B kinase (5), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (6, 7), and mammalian target of rapamycin (8). Serine phosphorylation hinders insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and consequently suppresses the activation of the downstream insulin signaling. Another important mechanism is induction of signal transducer and activator of transcription (SOCS) proteins. SOCSs were originally cloned as proteins that were induced after the activation of cytokine signaling, such as janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), and negatively regulate cytokine signaling (9, 10, 11). Recently SOCSs are reported to be induced by not only cytokines but also other stimuli including adipokines, growth factors, or hormones (12, 13, 14, 15). Signal transductions other than cytokine signaling are also suppressed by SOCS. SOCS family consists of eight members (SOCS1-SOCS7 and cytokine-induced SH2 domain-containing protein), and insulin signaling is inhibited mainly by SOCS1 and SOCS3. For example, Ueki et al. (16) reported that SOCS1 and SOCS3 bind to insulin receptor and block signal transduction from the receptor to IRS proteins. Another group has reported that SOCS1 and SOCS3 promote the degradation of IRS-1 and IRS-2, resulting in inhibited insulin signaling (17). However, most of such studies were performed in overexpression of the exogenous SOCS proteins (16, 17). It has not been fully understood whether the induction of endogenous SOCS is really implicated in the mechanisms for insulin resistance.
IL-6 is another proinflammatory cytokine closely related to insulin resistance (18, 19, 20). It is well known that IL-6 induces SOCS3 expression through the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway (21). Because JAK-STAT is not the major signaling pathway for TNF
(22), it is not clear whether SOCS3 induction may be involved in the mechanisms for TNF
-induced insulin resistance as well as serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. We conducted the present study to clarify the involvement of SOCS3 induction as a mediator of TNF
-induced insulin resistance, especially in its relationship to IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (p65) (Ser536), antiphospho-STAT3 (Tyr705), anti-STAT3, antiphospho-Akt (Ser473), and anti-Akt were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-IL-6 antibody was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse and antirabbit IgG antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Lactacystin was from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Recombinant human TNF
was kindly provided by Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Endogen mouse IL-6 ELISA kit was from Pierce Biotechnology, Inc. (Rockford, IL). All other reagents were from standard supplies.
Cell culture and treatment
Murine 3T3-L1 cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) were cultured, maintained, and differentiated essentially as previously described (23, 24). Briefly, cells were plated and grown for 2 d after confluence in DMEM/high glucose supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal calf serum in a 10% CO2 environment. Differentiation was then induced by changing the medium to the same one containing 0.5 mmol/liter 3-isobuty-1-methylxanthine, 1 µmol/liter dexamethasone, and 1 µmol/liter insulin for 3 d and then to the medium containing 0.8 µmol/liter insulin for another 3 d. On 1416 d after the induction of differentiation, when more than 95% of the cells had the morphological and biochemical properties of adipocytes, the cells were used for experiments. TNF
was dissolved in PBS and added to the cell culture medium.
Adenovirus vectors
Adenovirus vectors encoding SOCS1 and SOCS3 were kindly provided by Dr. Tetsuji Naka (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). A virus vector encoding ß-galactosidase (LacZ) was used as a control. Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were infected with adenovirus 48 h before the experiments.
Real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from 3T3-L1 adipocytes using ISOGEN according to the manufacturers instruction (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). It was reverse transcribed with standard reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A volume of 3.85 µl of each reverse-transcribed reaction was amplified in a 10-µl PCR mixture with the TaqMan PCR kits according to the manufacturers instruction (TaqMan; Applied Biosystems). Briefly, samples were incubated at 95 C for 10 min for an initial denaturation, followed by 40 PCR cycles. Each cycle consists of 92 C for 15 sec and 60 C for 1 min.
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (23, 24). Briefly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were lysed in a cell-solubilizing buffer containing 30 mmol/liter Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 10 mmol/liter EDTA, 1% Nonidet-P40, 1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 10 µmol/liter leupeptin, 1 mmol/liter Na3VO4, and 50 mmol/liter NaF. The cell lysates were boiled with Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min, resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) in the Trans-Blot cell apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were blocked with dried milk and incubated with the indicated antibodies, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The proteins were visualized with chemiluminescence reagents according to the manufacturers protocol (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). The intensities of blots were quantified by scanning the film using Scion Image (Frederick, MD).
Quantification of cytokine production
The concentration of IL-6 in the culture medium was measured using an endogen mouse IL-6 ELISA kit according to the manufacturers instruction (Pierce Biotechnology). The absorbance was measured by iEMS Reader MF (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as means ± SEM. The statistical comparison among the groups was carried out using Students t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
treatment enhances serine phosphorylation but does not inhibit tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1
treatment on insulin signaling was first examined. Insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 was not inhibited during the early time period (Fig. 1A
treatment for 4 h slightly and for 24 h dramatically decreased both protein levels and tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1. The ratio of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation to IRS-1 protein tended to be reduced after TNF
exposure longer than 4 h, compared with the ratio without TNF
stimulation, but the reduction was not statistically significant (Fig. 1B
treatment (Fig. 1C
treatment, we next examined serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 using specific antibodies, which recognize phosphorylated IRS-1 on Ser307, Ser612, or Ser636. TNF
transiently enhanced serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 with the maximal response at 30 min to 1 h on Ser307 and 1015 min on Ser612/636 (Fig. 1D
treatment longer than 4 h in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
|
stimulation enhances IL-6 secretion, STAT3 phosphorylation, and SOCS3 expression
-induced insulin resistance. We examined the induction of SOCS3 mRNA after the stimulation with TNF
up to 24 h, and compared the results with IL-6 stimulation, a well-known inducer of SOCS3. The expression of SOCS3 started to increase at 2 h and reached the peak level at 24 h after TNF
treatment (Fig. 2A
20% of the peak) continued thereafter until 24 h (Fig. 2B
|
or IL-6 stimulation, we examined the phosphorylation of nuclear factor-
B (NF
B), a major signaling molecule for TNF
, and STAT3, a major molecule for IL-6 signaling (Fig. 2
treatment, NF
B phosphorylation transiently enhanced at 5 min and returned to the lowest phosphorylation level (
15% of the peak) at 30 min, followed by the second enhancement (
30% of the peak) at 24 h. Phosphorylation of STAT3 started at 4 h and continued until 24 h (Fig. 2C
20% of the maximum) until 24 h. IL-6 did not enhance the phosphorylation of NF
B (Fig. 2D
or IL-6, but time course of NF
B phosphorylation was quite different.
These results suggest that the induction of SOCS3 after TNF
treatment is not dependent on the activation of NF
B but is possibly dependent on STAT3 activation. Because STAT3 is not the major signaling molecule for TNF
, we hypothesized that TNF
might stimulate STAT3 phosphorylation via the production of other cytokines. The production of IL-6 was measured as one of such candidate cytokines. Concentration of IL-6 in the cell culture media increased continuously from 2 to 24 h after TNF
treatment (Fig. 2E
). The time course was not quite similar to that of SOCS3 induction or STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 2
, A and C). We examined the dose dependency of IL-6 for SOCS3 induction and STAT3 phosphorylation. The maximal responses of SOCS3 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation were induced by 2 ng/ml IL-6, which was the concentration secreted 4 h after TNF
treatment. IL-6 concentration higher than 2 ng/ml did not have a stronger effect on SOCS3 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation (data not shown). We theorized that TNF
treatment for 4 h was sufficient for IL-6 secretion much enough for the maximal STAT3 phosphorylation and SOCS3 induction.
IL-6 stimulation or low-level expression of SOCS3 alone does not affect insulin signaling
Because the data in Fig. 2
suggest the involvement of IL-6 production and SOCS3 induction in the mechanisms for insulin resistance by long-term TNF
treatment, we examined the direct effects of IL-6 stimulation or SOCS3 expression on insulin signaling. First, the effects of IL-6 treatment on insulin signaling were examined. As shown in Fig. 3A
, IL-6 treatment up to 24 h did not alter IRS-1 protein, insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Akt phosphorylation. These results suggest that the IL-6 production alone does not explain the mechanism for insulin resistance induced by long-term TNF
treatment. Then the effects of SOCS3 expression on IRS-1 level were examined by using adenovirus vectors encoding SOCS3 (Fig. 3B
). Infection of the highest titer of SOCS3 adenovirus vector [30 multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.)] increased SOCS3 mRNA level to approximately 1000-fold of the basal (Fig. 3
, lane 5). Less titer of the virus vector (3 m.o.i.) or 30 min IL-6 treatment increased SOCS3 mRNA to the lower level (
100-fold of basal) (Fig. 3B
, lanes 3 and 6). Western blot analysis using anti-SOCS3 antibody detected the proteins only when the high amount of SOCS3 was expressed by virus vectors (lanes 4 and 5). IRS-1 protein was decreased only by the highest expression of SOCS3 (lane 5), probably due to the degradation of the protein as reported recently (17). In contrast, less expressions of SOCS3 by adenovirus vectors (lanes 24) or IL-6 (lane 6) did not change IRS-1 level, suggesting that a large amount of SOCS3 is necessary to degrade IRS-1 by itself. Interestingly, 24 h TNF
treatment decreased IRS-1 protein (lane 7), although it induced SOCS3 mRNA to the lower level (3- to 4-fold of basal) than 30 min IL-6 treatment (
100-fold of basal). These results suggest that other mechanisms exist, which help the insufficient ability of less expression of SOCS3 to cause insulin resistance in long term TNF
treatment.
|

treatment, we examined the effects of anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody on insulin signaling. To know the efficacy of the antibody before testing its effects on insulin signaling, we first examined the dose dependency of the antibody on IL-6-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation. The final concentration of 0.5 µg/ml completely inhibited the STAT3 phosphorylation, indicating that it can be used as a neutralizing antibody for IL-6 signaling (data not shown). The anti-IL-6 antibody decreased STAT3 phosphorylation and SOCS3 expression induced by 24 h TNF
stimulation by 57 and by 38%, respectively (Fig. 4
B was not affected (Fig. 4
stimulation. Partial inhibition by the IL-6 antibody may be explained as follows: some mechanisms other than IL-6 secretion may also be required, such as concomitant secretion of other cytokines. Another possibility is that the antibodys efficiency may be limited by accessibility to membrane-bound or intracellular IL-6.
|
-induced insulin resistance was examined. TNF
treatment for 24 h decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, expression of IRS-1, and phosphorylation of Akt by 66, 65, and 47%, respectively (Fig. 5
stimulation clearly but partially inhibited TNF
-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in both the presence and absence of insulin (Fig. 5
treatment.
|
is enhanced with low-level expression of SOCS3 or IL-6 stimulation
treatment was associated with insulin resistance, we next examined the effects of low-level expression of SOCS3 on insulin signaling together with TNF
treatment. As observed in Fig. 3B
treatment. Furthermore, the combination treatment of low level SOCS3 expression and short-term (1 h) TNF
treatment suppressed insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 6B
on insulin signaling was examined (Fig. 6
treatment (Fig. 6C
treatment only in the presence of the concomitant IL-6 treatment (Fig. 6D
-induced IRS-1 degradation, leading to the inhibited insulin signaling.
|
treatment caused IRS-1 degradation, although it induced just a low-level expression of SOCS3, we hypothesized that serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 might help the function of SOCS3 to degrade IRS-1. Anisomycin is well known to stimulate IRS-1 serine phosphorylation as TNF
is (26). To clarify this hypothesis, the effects of anisomycin on IRS-1 degradation were examined with or without low-level expression of SOCS3. Anisomycin treatment for 4 h did not affect the expression level of IRS-1 by itself, but it enhanced IRS-1 degradation with the low-level expression of SOCS3 by adenovirus (Fig 7A
may effectively induce IRS-1 degradation by enhancing both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation after short-term stimulation and then SOCS3 induction after long-term stimulation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
suppresses insulin signaling. The involvement of serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 has been documented (5, 6, 8, 27, 28). However, the time course of suppressed tyrosine phosphorylation and serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 were quite different, as shown in Fig. 1
-induced insulin resistance at least in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In this study, we first examined the involvement of IL-6 production and SOCS3 induction as the mechanisms for TNF
-induced insulin resistance. Long-term TNF
actually promoted the production and secretion of IL-6 in the culture media, the concentration of which was high enough to stimulate SOCS3 induction (Fig. 2
treatment (Fig. 5A
-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Recent studies reported the close relationship between IL-6 and insulin resistance. For example, expression levels of IL-6 as well as TNF
in adipose tissue from obese people are higher than lean control (29). However, the relationship between IL-6 and TNF
is not fully understood, when they induce insulin resistance. The current results are meaningful in the sense that a function of IL-6 in the process of TNF
-induced insulin resistance was clarified.
A recent study reported that SOCS3 induced insulin resistance by directly binding to IRS-1 and promoting the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of IRS-1 (17). In the current study, we also confirmed that adenovirus-mediated overexpression of exogenous SOCS3 (
1000-fold of the basal mRNA level) decreased IRS-1 expression by itself. But the maximum induction of endogenous SOCS3 by IL-6 or TNF
stimulation was only approximately 100- or approximately 4-fold of basal expression, respectively. The dose dependency experiment using different m.o.i. of adenovirus vector revealed that low-level expression of SOCS3 (
100-fold of basal) induced by 3 m.o.i. adenovirus vector or by short-term IL-6 stimulation alone could not cause IRS-1 degradation or inhibition of the downstream insulin signaling (Fig. 3
). Interestingly, not only TNF
stimulation but also anisomycin enhanced IRS-1 degradation in the presence of the low level expression of SOCS3 by adenovirus vector or IL-6 treatment (Figs. 6
and 7
). Furthermore, our previous study has revealed that the combination treatment of IL-1
and IL-6 efficiently inhibits insulin signaling, although separate treatment with either IL-1
or IL-6 does not (30). Because either anisomycin or IL-1
stimulates IRS-1 serine phosphorylation as TNF
does, these results suggest that the existence of both IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and SOCS3 induction are necessary for IRS-1 degradation. In case of TNF
stimulation, we speculate that short-term TNF
first enhanced serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 by activating inhibitory-
B kinase or c-Jun N-terminal kinase and then long term TNF
-induced SOCS3 expression through the production of IL-6, leading to the degradation of IRS-1. This may explain why short-term IL-6 stimulation or short-term TNF
stimulation failed to cause IRS-1 degradation and insulin resistance because the former induces SOCS expression but does not enhance IRS-1 serine phosphorylation, and the latter stimulates serine phosphorylation but does not induce SOCS expression (30). We further speculate that the endogenous SOCS3 recognizes IRS-1 protein only when IRS-1 is serine phosphorylated, whereas the overexpression of SOCS3 over the physiological limit (
1000-fold of basal) may cause IRS-1 degradation by recognizing IRS-1 nonspecifically, even if IRS-1 is not serine phosphorylated.
As shown in Fig. 5
, anti-IL-6 antibody recovered insulin signaling inhibited by TNF
partially, suggesting that other mechanisms exist, in addition to IRS-1 degradation via SOCS3 induction. IRS-1 serine phosphorylation is one of such mechanisms as mentioned above. And the altered localization of IRS-1 may also be a part of the inhibited activation of IRS-1, as we reported recently (24, 26). Furthermore, the induction of SOCS1 may also be another important mediator to suppress insulin signaling by TNF
. Ueki et al. (16) recently reported that SOCS1 binds to the kinase domain of insulin receptor and suppresses tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1. We confirmed that TNF
induced the expression of SOCS1 mRNA, which was not affected by adding anti-IL-6 antibody in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (data not shown). This result indicates that SOCS1 induction after long-term TNF
stimulation may be independent of IL-6-stimulated STAT3 activation. All these possible mechanisms may explain the reason for the partial recovery of insulin signaling by anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody in cells treated with TNF
(Fig. 4
).
In conclusion, the current study has revealed that IRS-1 serine phosphorylation or SOCS3 induction may not cause insulin resistance separately, but the concomitant existence of these two mechanisms is necessary for the effective suppression of insulin signaling after chronic TNF
treatment in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. IL-6 production and the activation of the IL-6 signaling play important roles during this process.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: IRS, Insulin receptor substrate; JAK, janus kinase; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; NF
B, nuclear factor-
B; SOCS, suppressor of cytokine signaling; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription.
This work was supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 17590918 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (to M.K.).
Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.
Received December 18, 2006.
Accepted for publication March 13, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B kinase complex. J Biol Chem 277:4811548121
, overexpressed in human fat cells from insulin-resistant subjects. J Biol Chem 278:4577745784
in the adipose tissue of obese mice. J Biol Chem 276:4794447949
and anisomycin leads to impaired insulin signaling through serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS proteins. J Biol Chem 277:89618969
-induced insulin resistance in 3T3L1 adipocytes is accompanied by a loss of insulin receptor substrate-1 and GLUT4 expression without a loss of insulin receptor-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem 272:971976
Inhibits insulin signaling with phosphorylating insulin receptor substrate-1 on serine residues in 3T3L1 adipocytes. Mol Endocrinol 20:114124This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. R. Parathath, L. A. Mainwaring, A. Fernandez-L, D. O. Campbell, and A. M. Kenney Insulin receptor substrate 1 is an effector of sonic hedgehog mitogenic signaling in cerebellar neural precursors Development, October 1, 2008; 135(19): 3291 - 3300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Anderson and J. Borlak Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets in Steatosis and Steatohepatitis Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 60(3): 311 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Whelan, M. D. Lane, and G. W. Hart Regulation of the O-Linked {beta}-N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase by Insulin Signaling J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21411 - 21417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. LaRosa, J.-J. M. Riethoven, H. Chen, Y. Xia, Y. Zhou, M. Chen, J. Miner, and M. E. Fromm Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid activates the integrated stress response pathway in adipocytes Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 544 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |