Endocrinology Vol. 148, No. 8 3591-3594
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society
Multiple Ovulations, Ovarian Epithelial Inclusion Cysts, and ItSMAD Two!
T. Rajendra Kumar, Ph.D.
Departments of Molecular & Integrative Physiology Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City, Kansas 66160
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: T. Rajendra Kumar, Ph.D., Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160. E-mail: tkumar{at}kumc.edu.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Ovarian cancer has the highest incidence among all the gynecological cancers in women (1). The most common malignant form is originated from surface epithelial cells that line the periphery of the ovary (1, 2). These cells are almost inconspicuous and do not express any specific markers, and thus an early diagnosis of this type of cancer is often very difficult. It is believed that these cells are progenitors for the majority of ovarian cancers (1, 2). Current in vitro and in vivo models recapitulate only some, but not all, characteristics of the human ovarian epithelial cancers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the mechanistic basis for development of the ovarian epithelial cancer, including incessant ovulations as one of the important factors contributing to the onset of this cancer (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). A model that emerged based on this hypothesis is that chronic ovulations cause invaginations of ovarian surface epithelial cells, leading to formation of inclusion cysts that serve as precursors for more malignant epithelial cancers. However, this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested in a genetic model system. Furthermore, the characteristics of cysts and the key players involved in cyst formation have not been well studied.
In this issue of Endocrinology, Burdette et al. (12) exploit a combination of pharmacological and in vivo approaches, and provide evidence that gonadotropin-induced multiple ovulations cause ovarian epithelial inclusion cysts in a unique strain of transgenic mice.
 |
Transgenic Mouse Models to Study Ovarian Epithelial Inclusion Cysts
|
|---|
The Mayo and Woodruff groups have previously developed two novel mouse models that closely phenocopy human endosalpingiosis (9, 13), a disease in which, among other complications, cystic glandular structures lined by benign tubal/salpingeal epithelium commonly occur (1). These ovarian cysts are often known to be associated with pelvic pain in women (1). The groups led by Mayo and Woodruff addressed the roles of inhibins and activins, members of TGF-ß superfamily, in ovarian development and function using both these mouse models.
The common activins are either homo- or heterodimers of ßA- or ßB-subunits and inhibins are heterodimers consisting of an
-subunit and either ßA- or ßB-subunit (14, 15, 16, 17). Members of the TGF-ß superfamily typically act through the serine/threonine kinase signaling pathway that involves a cascade of phosphorylations, followed by transcriptional responses generated by specific combinations of homologs of both the Caenorhabditis elegans protein SMA and the drosophila protein, mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) proteins (18, 19, 20).
In the first mouse model, rat inhibin
-subunit is overexpressed, and this has likely caused a sequestration of activin subunits resulting in a loss of activin signaling (13). In a second mouse model, a dominant-negative form of Smad2 (Smad2DN) also caused loss of activin signaling by blocking both SMAD2 and SMAD3 (9). These are typical SMADs through which activins normally signal in many tissue/cell types including ovary (15, 20, 21). Both of the above transgenic mouse models have been generated using promoter sequences of Müllerian-inhibiting substance [the coding sequences encode MIS (also known as anti-Müllerian hormone, AMH) is also a TGF-ß family member] that direct transgenes specifically to the gonads (9, 22).
Strikingly, female mice of the above two strains develop, as early as 3 months of age, cysts that are continuous with the ovarian surface epithelium (9, 13). This remarkable recapitulation of the human endosalpingiosis phenotype in these transgenic mice suggests that the cyst cells may be derived from the highly plastic ovarian surface epithelial cell layer. In the present study, Burdette et al. (12) performed elegant experiments to define the characteristics of ovarian inclusion cysts that develop in Smad2DN transgenic mice. However, it is not clear why they chose the second mouse model over the first one.
 |
Major Findings of Burdette et al. (12): An Insight into Morphometric and Functional Aspects of Ovarian Epithelial Inclusion Cysts
|
|---|
With the ovarian epithelial cyst-prone Smad2DN transgenic mouse model already available (9), Burdette et al. (12) have sought to determine whether chronic superovulation of these mice would enhance the formation of inclusion cysts. The goal was also to test whether the cysts would undergo neoplastic transformation and progress to ovarian cancer. In a series of experiments, they addressed the characteristics of cysts such as cyst area, alterations in the regions of cyst formation, cyst proliferation rate, regulation of TGF-ß signaling pathways, and hormone responsiveness of cysts.
First, the authors have compared the effect of chronic superovulation of Smad2DN transgenic mice (on a CD1 genetic background) and normal CD1 mice. Chronic superovulation of mice at 42 d of age was achieved by periodic injections of equine chorionic gonadotropin followed by human chorionic gonadotropin. Superovulation with hormones continued for approximately 4.5 months and subsequently, the cyst number was quantified. Interestingly, chronic superovulation did not significantly increase cyst number when noninjected and hormone-treated CD1, or Smad2DN mouse groups were compared. However, when cyst number in noninjected CD1 group was compared with that in superovulated Smad2DN group, a significant increase was found. Most importantly, the cysts were all cytokeratin 8-immunopositive indicating that the cysts had originated from epithelium.
Second, the authors have identified that chronic superovulation of Smad2DN mice caused a location-dependent cyst accumulation in the ovary. These labor-intensive and quantifiable morphometric data revealed that the highest percentage of cysts was observed in the center of the ovary. These observations are consistent with earlier published data that demonstrated chronic superovulation resulted in greater number of cysts located in the center of the ovary in normal mice (23, 24). Whether this phenomenon is purely a stochastic event or an extracellular matrix-driven regulated process remains to be investigated.
Third, the effect of superovulation on cyst area, a criterion that is predicted to vary between genotypes and hormone treatments, was assessed. These studies indicated that total cyst area is dramatically increased in Smad2DN group compared with that observed in noninjected or superovulated CD1mice. However, the cyst area was decreased when each of the superovulated groups was compared with the corresponding noninjected control groups, respectively (i.e. superovulated vs. noninjected CD1 mice and superovulated vs. noninjected Smad2DN mice). Thus, superovulation caused a reduction in average cyst area, presumably due to accelerated formation of new cysts that are relatively small to begin with.
Fourth, the hypothesis that activins/TGF-ß are antiproliferative in many cells, generated based on several in vitro studies, was directly tested. In vivo 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine labeling experiments using the Smad2DN mouse model were designed. The rationale was that blocking activin/TGF-ß signaling, by directing a dominant-negative form of SMAD2 selectively to the ovarian surface epithelium, would be expected to increase cell proliferation and thus might explain rapid cyst formation in superovulated Smad2DN mice. Data from this elaborate set of experiments confirmed that neither the proliferation rate of cells lining the ovarian cysts nor that of the ovarian surface epithelia cells was significantly enhanced. Thus, although cells within the cystic structures are highly proliferative (high 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-labeling index), the overall rate of proliferation did not change with superovulation.
One reason for the rapid proliferation of cells within the cysts could be prolonged stimulation by excess steroids, notably estrogen, produced as a result of normal or superovulation. Supporting this theory is the observation that these cells express both estrogen and progesterone receptors (7, 10). An additional source of estrogen would be the growing follicles stimulated in response to superovulation (7, 10).
Finally, how does SMAD2 phosphorylation in surface epithelium and cells within the inclusion cyst correlate in ovaries of Smad2DN mice? Experiments to address this issue provided intriguing and exciting data. Undetectable SMAD2 phosphorylation was observed in ovarian surface epithelium of 60% of transgenic mice, whereas in only 30% of CD1 mice. Interestingly, comparison within the same ovary indicated that the cysts, presumably originated from SMAD2-negative surface epithelium, contained more SMAD2 phosphorylation.
The regain of SMAD2 phosphorylation in the cysts, but its absence in surface epithelium of the majority of the transgenic mice may be explained as follows. Because the endogenous Amh promoter is active in ovarian surface epithelium, expression of SMAD2DN form would block phosphorylation of SMAD2 in these cells in transgenic mice. Although expression of MIS (produced from the endogenous mouse promoter) itself was retained in the cysts of normal mice, it was lost in those in ovaries of Smad2DN transgenic mice. This would suggest that the cysts in transgenic mice lose Amh promoter activity leading to loss of expression of SMAD2DN form, and thus SMAD2 phosphorylation is regained. It is also possible that Amh promoter may be temporally regulated in the cysts of transgenic mice; the promoter may be active during initial stages of cyst formation to produce SMAD2 DN and subsequently, its expression is lost as the cysts continue to grow.
 |
Final Remarks and Future Directions
|
|---|
The present studies by Burdette et al. (12) are in close agreement with previous (6, 8, 25, 26) and more recent observations made using age-matched breeder and incessantly ovulated CD1 mice (27). It is interesting to note that blocking SMAD2 and SMAD3, components downstream of activin/TGFß signaling pathway results in ovarian phenotypes (present study) that are distinct from those (pronounced atresia) seen in mice with Smad3 gene deletion (28). The cyst phenotypes of superovulated Smad2DN mice are actually reminiscent of those in transgenic mice that ectopically express high levels of gonadotropins (29, 30). In contrast, conditional inactivation of Brca, p53 in mouse ovaries causes more severe preneoplastic lesions (3, 31) than observed by Burdette et al. (12), indicating that additional genes must be "hit" to drive the inclusion cysts to transform into a full-blown cancer (Fig. 1
), similar to the "multiple hit" scenario in case of human ovarian epithelial cancers (32, 33, 34).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1. Comparison of ovarian epithelial cancer in humans and Smad2DN mice. Human ovarian cancers are mostly derived from ovarian surface epithelium (A). The inclusion cysts, precursors to full-blown cancer (A), are believed to progress to form aggressive cancer via multiple genetic alterations (C). Burdette et al. (12 ) have developed transgenic mice with ovary-directed expression of a Smad2 dominant-negative (Smad2DN) transgene using anti-Müllerian hormone promoter (Amhp) sequences. These transgenic mice develop only ovarian epithelial inclusion cysts but no ovarian epithelial cancer, when chronically treated with superovulatory doses of gonadotropins (B). Notably, the cysts accumulate in the center (B). SMAD2 and SMAD3 are critical downstream proteins that typically transduce activin signaling. Inhibins, antagonists of activins may also act through this pathway (D). It is predicted that additional genetic "hits" may be required for the cysts to transform to a more severe ovarian epithelial cancer phenotype in these superovulated Smad2DN transgenic mice (D).
|
|
The studies by Burdette et al. (12) have opened up several new avenues for future research. Several questions need to be addressed, however. Because, SMAD2DN blocks both SMAD2 and SMAD3, it remains to be determined which downstream targets are more critical for cyst formation: those of SMAD2 or SMAD3? One genetic approach would be to perform chronic superovualtoins using ovary-/surface epithelium-specific conditional knockout mice (with Amh-Cre) lacking either Smad2 or Smad3. An alternative approach would be to use RNA interference and achieve selective knockdown of these proteins.
What other signaling pathways interact to induce cyst formation? For example, Wnt signaling has been implicated in human ovarian epithelial cancers (35, 36, 37) and perhaps regulation of this pathway can be evaluated in cyst formation in Smad2DN mice. Would superovulations of Smad2DN mice on a tumor suppressor null background (such as p53, Rb, Pten, Brca1) cause more advanced neoplastic changes or even cancer (Fig. 1
)? Genetic intercrosses with Smad2DN and the available tumor suppressor null mice can be performed.
Why is SMAD2 phosphorylation in Smad2DN mice variable (undetectable in only 60% of mice)? Recently, Hox genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract have been implicated to cause variations in human ovarian epithelial cancers and in their appearance of Müllerian-like features (38). Because the transgene in the present study is expressed from the Amh promoter, this may explain the variability of SMAD2 phosphorylation in Smad2DN transgenic mice.
Finally, because the cyst formation occurs progressively, it will be feasible to "laser capture" cells within the cyst at different stages of development (39, 40, 41). This powerful genetic resource should be useful for large-scale expression profiling to identify both mRNAs and microRNAs that are developmentally regulated in cysts (39, 40, 41). Data from these experiments could identify several known and unknown gene interaction networks. It is hoped that such studies with the existing genetic model, coupled with comparative genomics with human tissue samples would ultimately help to accurately model human ovarian epithelial cancer in mice (32, 33). This knowledge would in turn be useful to design novel strategies for diagnosis and treatment of human ovarian epithelial cancer.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
I thank Mr. Stanton Fernald for assistance with graphics and Dr. Lane Christenson for critically reading the manuscript.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The author has nothing to disclose
Abbreviations: SMAD, Homologs of both the Caenorhabditis elegans protein SMA and the drosophila protein, mothers against decapentaplegic; Smad2DN, dominant-negative form of Smad2.
Received May 1, 2007.
Accepted for publication May 2, 2007.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Cotran R, Kumar V, Collins T 1999 Robbins pathologic basis of disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.
- Scott M, McCluggage WG 2006 Current concepts in ovarian epithelial tumorigenesis: correlation between morphological and molecular data. Histol Histopathol 21:8192[Medline]
- Christie M, Oehler MK 2006 Molecular pathology of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Br Menopause Soc 12:5763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Orsulic S, Li Y, Soslow RA, Vitale-Cross LA, Gutkind JS, Varmus HE 2002 Induction of ovarian cancer by defined multiple genetic changes in a mouse model system. Cancer Cell 1:5362[CrossRef][Medline]
- Roby KF, Taylor CC, Sweetwood JP, Cheng Y, Pace JL, Tawfik O, Persons DL, Smith PG, Terranova PF 2000 Development of a syngeneic mouse model for events related to ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis 21:585591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lowry S, Russell H, Hickey I, Atkinson R 1991 Incessant ovulation and ovarian cancer. Lancet 337:15441545[CrossRef][Medline]
- Risch HA 1998 Hormonal etiology of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a hypothesis concerning the role of androgens and progesterone. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:17741786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Purdie DM, Bain CJ, Siskind V, Webb PM, Green AC 2003 Ovulation and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 104:228232[CrossRef][Medline]
- Bristol-Gould SK, Hutten CG, Sturgis C, Kilen SM, Mayo KE, Woodruff TK 2005 The development of a mouse model of ovarian endosalpingiosis. Endocrinology 146:52285236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Choi JH, Wong AS, Huang HF, Leung PC 2007 Gonadotropins and ovarian cancer. Endocr Rev 28:440461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Terry KL, Titus-Ernstoff L, McKolanis JR, Welch WR, Finn OJ, Cramer DW 2007 Incessant ovulation, mucin 1 immunity, and risk for ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:3035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Burdette JE, Oliver RM, Ulyanov V, Kilen SM, Mayo KE, Woodruff TK 2007 Ovarian epithelial inclusion cysts in chronically superovulated CD1 and Smad2 dominant-negative mice. Endocrinology 148:35953604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- McMullen ML, Cho BN, Yates CJ, Mayo KE 2001 Gonadal pathologies in transgenic mice expressing the rat inhibin
-subunit. Endocrinology 142:50055014[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bilezikjian LM, Blount AL, Leal AM, Donaldson CJ, Fischer WH, Vale WW 2004 Autocrine/paracrine regulation of pituitary function by activin, inhibin and follistatin. Mol Cell Endocrinol 225:2936[CrossRef][Medline]
- Pangas SA, Woodruff TK 2000 Activin signal transduction pathways. Trends Endocrinol Metab 11:309314[CrossRef][Medline]
- Gaddy-Kurten D, Tsuchida K, Vale W 1995 Activins and the receptor serine kinase superfamily. Recent Prog Horm Res 50:109129[Medline]
- Vale W, Rivier C, Hsueh A, Campen C, Meunier H, Bicsak T, Vaughan J, Corrigan A, Bardin W, Sawchenko P, Petraglia F, Yu J, Plotsky P, Spiess J, Rivier J 1988 Chemical and biological characterization of the inhibin family of protein hormones. Recent Prog Horm Res 44:134[Medline]
- Xu L 2006 Regulation of Smad activities. Biochim Biophys Acta 1759:503513[Medline]
- Massague J, Gomis RR 2006 The logic of TGFß signaling. FEBS Lett 580:28112820[CrossRef][Medline]
- Kaivo-oja N, Jeffery LA, Ritvos O, Mottershead DG 2006 Smad signalling in the ovary. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 4:21[CrossRef][Medline]
- Woodruff TK 2002 Role of inhibins and activins in ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Res 107:293302[Medline]
- Narula A, Kilen S, Ma E, Kroeger J, Goldberg E, Woodruff TK 2002 Smad4 overexpression causes germ cell ablation and leydig cell hyperplasia in transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 161:17231734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shedden KA, Kshirsagar MP, Schwartz DR, Wu R, Yu H, Misek DE, Hanash S, Katabuchi H, Ellenson LH, Fearon ER, Cho KR 2005 Histologic type, organ of origin, and Wnt pathway status: effect on gene expression in ovarian and uterine carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 11:21232131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tan OL, Hurst PR, Fleming JS 2005 Location of inclusion cysts in mouse ovaries in relation to age, pregnancy, and total ovulation number: implications for ovarian cancer? J Pathol 205:483490[CrossRef][Medline]
- Fleming JS, Beaugie CR, Haviv I, Chenevix-Trench G, Tan OL 2006 Incessant ovulation, inflammation and epithelial ovarian carcinogenesis: revisiting old hypotheses. Mol Cell Endocrinol 247:421[CrossRef][Medline]
- La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Gallus G, Decarli A, Liberati A, Tognoni G 1983 Incessant ovulation and ovarian cancer: a critical approach. Int J Epidemiol 12:161164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fleming JS, McQuillan HJ, Millier MJ, Beaugie CR, Livingstone V 2007 E-cadherin expression and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation during development of ovarian inclusion cysts in age-matched breeder and incessantly ovulated CD-1 mice. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 5:14[CrossRef][Medline]
- Tomic D, Miller KP, Kenny HA, Woodruff TK, Hoyer P, Flaws JA 2004 Ovarian follicle development requires Smad3. Mol Endocrinol 18:22242240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kumar TR, Palapattu G, Wang P, Woodruff TK, Boime I, Byrne MC, Matzuk MM 1999 Transgenic models to study gonadotropin function: the role of follicle-stimulating hormone in gonadal growth and tumorigenesis. Mol Endocrinol 13:851865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Matzuk MM, DeMayo FJ, Hadsell LA, Kumar TR 2003 Overexpression of human chorionic gonadotropin causes multiple reproductive defects in transgenic mice. Biol Reprod 69:338346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Clark-Knowles KV, Garson K, Jonkers J, Vanderhyden BC 2007 Conditional inactivation of Brca1 in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium results in an increase in preneoplastic changes. Exp Cell Res 313:133145[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rangarajan A, Weinberg RA 2003 Opinion: Comparative biology of mouse versus human cells: modelling human cancer in mice. Nat Rev Cancer 3:952959[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hahn WC, Weinberg RA 2002 Modelling the molecular circuitry of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:331341[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA 2000 The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:5770[CrossRef][Medline]
- Chamorro MN, Schwartz DR, Vonica A, Brivanlou AH, Cho KR, Varmus HE 2005 FGF-20 and DKK1 are transcriptional targets of ß-catenin and FGF-20 is implicated in cancer and development. EMBO J 24:7384[CrossRef][Medline]
- Peltoketo H, Allinen M, Vuosku J, Kujala S, Lundan T, Salminen A, Winqvist R, Vainio S 2004 Characterization and expression of the human WNT4; lack of associated germline mutations in highto moderaterisk breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 213:8390[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rask K, Nilsson A, Brannstrom M, Carlsson P, Hellberg P, Janson PO, Hedin L, Sundfeldt K 2003 Wnt-signalling pathway in ovarian epithelial tumours: increased expression of ß-catenin and GSK3ß. Br J Cancer 89:12981304[CrossRef][Medline]
- Cheng W, Liu J, Yoshida H, Rosen D, Naora H 2005 Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancers is controlled by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract. Nat Med 11:531537[CrossRef][Medline]
- Esposito G 2007 Complementary techniques: laser capture microdissectionincreasing specificity of gene expression profiling of cancer specimens. Adv Exp Med Biol 593:5465[Medline]
- Nambiar PR, Boutin SR, Raja R, Rosenberg DW 2005 Global gene expression profiling: a complement to conventional histopathologic analysis of neoplasia. Vet Pathol 42:735752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Luzzi VI, Holtschlag V, Watson MA 2005 Gene expression profiling of primary tumor cell populations using laser capture microdissection, RNA transcript amplification, and GeneChip microarrays. Methods Mol Biol 293:187207[Medline]