| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita (P.d.L., A.F., M.R., R.S., A.La.), Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, 81100 Caserta, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche ed Ambientali (M.M., E.S., F.G.), Università degli Studi del Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy; Dipartimento delle Scienze Biologiche (A.Lo.), Sezione Fisiologia ed Igiene, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II," 80134 Napoli, Italy; and Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular (R.A., F.V.). Universitat de Barcelona, and CIBER Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Antonia Lanni, Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy. E-mail: antonia.lanni{at}unina2.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) (within 24 h) and PPAR target gene expression (after 24 h). This T3-induced early UCP3 expression depended on fatty acid-PPAR signaling because depleting serum fatty acid levels abolished its expression, restorable by administration of the PPAR
agonist L165,041 (4-[3-(4-acetyl-3-hydroxy-2-propylphenoxy)propoxy]phenoxy]acetic acid). In transfected rat L6 myoblasts, only the rat UCP3 promoter positively responded to T3 and L165,041 together in the presence of MyoD, thyroid hormone receptor ß1 (TRß1), PPAR
, or PPAR
plus the TR dimerization partner retinoid X receptor
. All promoters share a response element common to TR and PPAR (TRE 1), but the observed species differences may be attributable to different localizations of the MyoD response element, which in the rat maps to exon 1. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TRß) (3). However, the molecular mechanisms by which T3 regulates energy expenditure are only starting to be elucidated, and, over the past 10 yr, opinions have varied as to the nature of the genes involved. Mitochondria, by virtue of their biochemical functions, are key cellular sites for the metabolic effects of thyroid hormones (1). Skeletal muscle constitutes the bulk of the total metabolically active body mass, by virtue of its significant mitochondrial capacity, and it thus represents an important target for the action of T3 (1). The discovery of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCPs) 2 and 3, which are similar to the UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT), suggested that these proteins might be potential targets for thyroid hormone and indeed may serve as mediators of the effects of thyroid hormone on energy expenditure (4). In contrast to UCP2, which is ubiquitously expressed (5), UCP3 is expressed to some extent in BAT but to a greater extent in muscle (more in skeletal muscle than in heart) (6, 7). The induction of UCP3 expression has been shown to be a clear target for T3 in skeletal muscle of humans (8, 9) and rats (10, 11, 12), although the situation is controversial in mice. Transgenic mice harboring the human UCP3 transgene show no significant T3-induced stimulation of the transcription of the endogenous UCP3 gene in their muscle, whereas transcription of the human transgene is clearly stimulated (13). In addition, T3 is able to induce UCP3 protein accumulation and UCP3-mediated uncoupling in skeletal muscle mitochondria in rats (12, 14), but, once again, the situation is different in mice. In a recent report (15), the hypothesis was tested that UCP3 mRNA levels might show a positive correlation with resting metabolic rate (RMR) and proton leak in mice in various thyroid states, and it was concluded that T3 does not influence the intrinsic mitochondrial properties and that variations in UCP3 mRNA levels may only partly explain the variations in RMR. Another study in mice (16) seems not to support UCP3 serving as one of the determinants of the induction of RMR by T3 as it does in the rat (12). Indeed, during repeated treatment with high doses of T3, UCP3 knockout mice show a nonsignificantly lower stimulation of RMR compared with their wild-type controls (16). These discrepancies indicate, as also suggested by the previously cited authors (15), the existence of species differences in the action of T3 on UCP3 expression, and this has caused considerable uncertainty about the role performed by UCP3 as a thermogenic protein mediating the action of T3 in skeletal muscle (4).
Sequence comparisons between human and rodent UCP3 promoters has indicated a rapid phylogenetic evolution, suggesting functional and regulatory diversification (17). Human UCP3 contains two tissue-specific transcription start sites for skeletal muscle and BAT, respectively, whereas rat and mouse transcripts initiate at the same site for BAT and for muscle tissue (17). Mechanistically, transcription of the human UCP3 gene in skeletal muscle is dependent on the presence of the transcription factor MyoD, which has been shown to bind to a multiple E-box present in the proximal promoter region (18). The human UCP3 gene is regulated by both fatty acids and retinoic acid, through a response element in the UCP3 promoter described previously (18, 19), and T3 directly stimulates human UCP3 expression through the same element, termed TRE 1 (13). This element is a nonperfect direct repeat with one nucleotide spacing (DR+1) of the sequence AGGTTTCAGGTCA. Although the proximal promoter-exon 1 structures of rodent and human UCP3 diverge, the TRE1 element and its surrounding sequences, as well as the MyoD E-box, are 100% conserved in the mouse UCP3 promoter (13). However, unlike in humans, T3 only weakly affects mouse UCP3 expression (13, 15). Thus, it seems increasingly evident that T3 regulates the UCP3 gene in a species-dependent manner and that simply collating all available data without taking into account the animal models from which they were derived may hinder our understanding of the actual role of UCP3. To our knowledge, no published data are available concerning the mechanism by which T3 regulates the rat UCP3 gene. Because the rat UCP3 is a clear target for T3, studying the regulation of the rat UCP3 gene may help to clarify this issue. UCP3, together with several genes involved in lipid metabolism, such as carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1b (CPT1b) and mitochondrial thioesterase I (MTE I), is a target of transcriptional regulation by fatty acids through their binding to peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) (20, 21, 22). Because T3 induces lipolysis (2), we measured the stimulation of the UCP3 gene by T3 and verified the dependence of this action of T3 on the presence of fatty acids both in vivo (in rat skeletal muscle) and ex vivo (in transfected rat L6 myoblasts). Next, because of the relatively high expression of PPAR
in skeletal muscle [PPAR
is expressed in skeletal muscle at 10- and 50-fold higher levels than PPAR
and PPAR
, respectively, with a relative high expression in oxidative muscle fibers (see Ref. 20)], we used the same in vivo and ex vivo models to investigate whether PPAR
influences T3-induced UCP3 expression through its activation by the specific ligand L165,041, known to induce UCP3 expression (23). Finally, in transfected L6 cells, we analyzed the responses of the human, rat, and mouse UCP3 promoters to T3 via TRß, retinoic acid receptor
(RXR
), and PPAR
, and we also compared the structure of the proximal promoter among the different species.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
T3, 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil (P), iopanoic acid (I), and the PPAR
agonist L165,041 (4-[3-(4-acetyl-3-hydroxy-2-propylphenoxy)propoxy]phenoxy]acetic acid) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Nicotinic acid (NA) was from Fluka Biochimica (Buchs, Switzerland). The pSG5-hPPAR
construct (24) was kindly provided by Dr. Bart Staels (Department of Atherosclerosis at the Institut Pasteur de Lille, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Lille, France). The r-AOX-602-Luc construct was kindly provided by Dr. Ronald Evans (The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA).
Animals
Male Wistar rats (220250 g) were kept, one per cage, in a temperature-controlled room at 28 C under a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. A commercial mash and water were available ad libitum. To determine the dose of the PPAR
agonist L165,041 that effectively induced UCP3 transcription, 500 µg/100 g or 1 mg/100 g body weight (BW) were administered intraperitoneally to euthyroid control rats. Hypothyroidism was induced by simultaneous injection of P and I, as described previously (12) (P+I rats). For time-course experiments, hypothyroid rats were injected with 25 µg T3/100 g BW. This dose was used because it produces a clear-cut effect on RMR and indeed restores it to the level observed in euthyroid controls (25). This dose given acutely is not a large dose; in fact, it has been established that 200 µg/100 g BW, given iv, is the acute dose needed to obtain at least 95% nuclear receptor saturation for 24 h (26). Animals were killed at 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after T3 injection. In a subgroup of rats (derived from the 8 h group and the P+I controls), the antilipolytic agent NA was administered at 10 mg/100 g BW intraperitoneally every 2 h for 8 h before the animals were killed, in the presence or absence of L165,041, which was administered at 500 µg/100 g BW. At the end of the treatments, rats were anesthetized using an ip injection of chloral hydrate (40 mg/100 g BW) and were then killed by decapitation. Gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, as well as hearts, were excised, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80 C for later processing.
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIZOL standard protocol (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy). Tissue/TRIZOL mixtures were homogenized using a polytron, keeping the viscosity of the solution to a minimum to ensure effective inactivation of endogenous ribonuclease activity.
RT-PCR assays
One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using 100 pmol random hexamers (Invitrogen), 2.0 U Superscript reverse transcriptase, 0.5 U ribonuclease inhibitor, and 1 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) in reverse-transcriptase buffer (all from HT Biotechnology, Cambridge, UK). The total volume was adjusted to 20 µl with distilled H2O, and the reaction was performed for 1 h at 40 C. One quarter of the RT reaction mixture was used directly for the PCR reaction in a total volume of 25 µl, containing 0.25 U SuperTaq polymerase, 0.25 mM dNTPs, SuperTaq PCR buffer (all from HT Biotechnology), 5% (vol/vol) dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma), and 0.38 pmol of the relevant oligonucleotide primers (Sigma Genosys, Cambridge, UK). Gene expression signals were normalized with respect to the signal for the nonregulated 40S ribosomal protein S12 (RPS12), because this gene did not vary its expression in the tested conditions, in contrast to the usually applied ß-actin gene. The primers used had the following sequences: RPS12 sense, 5'-GCTGCTGGAGGTGTAATGGA-3'; RPS12 antisense, 5'-CTACAACGCAACTGCAACCA-3'; CPT1b sense, 5'-CTCAGCCTCTACGGCAAATC-3'; CPT1b antisense, 5'-CTTCTTGATCAGGCCTTTGC-3'; PPAR
sense, 5'-AACATCCCCAACTTCAGCAG-3'; PPAR
antisense, 5'-GGAAGAGGTACTGGCTGTCG-3'; UCP3 sense, 5'-ATGGATGCCTACAGAACCAT-3'; UCP3 antisense, 5'-CTGGGCCACCATCCTCAGCA-3'; MyoD sense, 5'-CTGCTCTGATGGCATGATGG-3'; MyoD antisense, 5'-GGACACTGAGGGGTGGAGTC-3'; MTE I sense, 5'-CCTCGTCTTTCGCTGTCCTG-3'; MTE I antisense, 5'-GTGTCCGTCCAGCACCTCCA-3'; TRß1 sense, 5'-GTTCAAGAGGAGCCACACTG-3'; and TRß1 antisense, 5'-CAGGCTTCGGACATTCCTAC-3'. For all genes tested, parallel amplifications (20, 25, and 30 cycles) of the same cDNA were used to determine the optimum number of cycles. After 30 cycles, a readily detectable signal within the linear range was observed. For the actual analysis, samples were heated for 5 min at 94 C and then 30 cycles were performed, each consisting of 1 min at 94 C, 1.5 min at 61 C, and 1.5 min at 72 C. This was followed by a final 10-min extension at 72 C. The quantities of the PCR products were determined in separate preparations from three rats. Separation of the PCR reaction products was performed on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide, and the products were readily visualized. Reverse-image signals of the RT-PCR bands were quantified by means of a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) Molecular Imager FX using the supplied software. Primary, reverse-image RT-PCR data are shown in the figures, with quantities being displayed for each gel. The accuracy of the RT-PCR method has been confirmed by confronting the obtained data with those of Northern analysis of UCP3 expression using the same treatments (12).
Measurement of circulating free fatty acid (FFA) levels
Serum fatty acid levels were measured using a Wako NEFA C kit (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany).
Construction of the rat UCP3-promoter transfection plasmid
A fragment from 2134 to +43 of the rat UCP3 gene was amplified by PCR from 200 ng of genomic DNA using the following oligonucleotides: sense, 5'-CCCCTCGAGCCAGGTCATGGACAGTTG-3'; and antisense, 5'-CCCCTCGAGCATTCACTGTTGTCTCTG-3'. The PCR amplification protocol was as described above, with the following amendments: the final dNTP concentration was 0.3 mM, the final MgCl2 concentration was 1.75 mM, the cycle number was 40, the annealing temperature was 50 C, and the extension period was 2 min at a temperature of 68 C. The obtained fragment was digested with XhoI and cloned into pGL3 basic (Promega, Milan, Italy), which contains the cDNA for firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase (Luc) as a reporter gene. The integrity of the fragment was verified by direct DNA sequencing performed using a commercially available sequencing kit (USB Sequenase PCR product sequencing kit; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) using an antisense oligo complementary to the Luc gene ranging from nucleotide positions 120 to 139 of the pGL3 plasmid (Promega) of the sequence 5'-CCAGCGGATAGAATGGCGCC-3'.
Cell culture and transient transfection assays
Rat myoblastic L6 cells were obtained from the Cell Bank (Interlab Cell Line Collection) of the National Institute for Cancer Research (Genoa, Italy), cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT). Transfection experiments were performed using L6 cells seeded at 50% confluence in DMEM containing 10% dextran/charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) (using Lipofectamine 2000 in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer; Invitrogen). For L6 transfection, each point was assayed in triplicate in a 12-well plate. Cells were transfected with 750 ng/well 2134/+43rUCP3-Luc, 1946/+60mUCP3-Luc (14), or 1588/+47hUCP3-Luc reporter vectors (17), 150 ng/well of the mammalian expression vectors pCMV-MyoD, pRSV-hTRß1, pSG5 hPPAR
(23), and PRSV-hRXR, together with 1.5 ng/well phRL-TK-Luc (Promega), with an expression vector for the sea pansy (Renilla reniformis) Luc being used as an internal transfection control. Cells were incubated for 48 h after transfection and treated with T3 and/or the PPAR
agonist L165,041 for 24 h before harvest. T3 was added in the concentration range of 0100 nM, as indicated in the figures, or at a fixed concentration of 100 nM in the presence or absence of 50 µM L165,041. Luminescence was measured in a Turner Biosystems Luminometer (model TD20/20) using the Dual Luciferase Reporter assay system kit (Promega).
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as means ± SEM. The statistical significance of differences between groups was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PPAR-responsive genes
mRNA was already at a clearly detectable level. At 12 h, the PPAR
mRNA level was doubled, and it reached a maximal increase of around 6-fold at 24 h. The mRNA levels for the PPAR target genes MTE I and CPT1b were significantly increased only at the 48-h time point after T3 administration. At first glance, these data favor direct regulation of UCP3 by T3, followed by up-regulation of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation through PPAR signaling, an effect attributable to the lipolytic activity of T3 that is secondary to its direct transcriptional effect through its binding to TRs.
|
agonist L165,041 up-regulates UCP3 expression in skeletal muscle with similar kinetics to T3
agonist L165,041 increased UCP3 expression in gastrocnemius muscle within 8 h, by 2.5- and 3-fold, respectively, whereas PPAR
expression was not increased (Fig. 2A
can induce UCP3 expression, without the need for a preceding increase in the PPAR
mRNA level. In hypothyroid gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, a single administration of T3 up-regulated UCP3 expression 3-fold, whereas PPAR
expression was affected only slightly, if at all (Fig. 2
expression in gastrocnemius muscle was not different from that in the euthyroid controls (Fig. 2B
|

agonist L165,041 regulated UCP3 with rapid kinetics through the residing PPAR
, they suggested that UCP3 expression was directly regulated by T3 (through TRs), preceding PPAR signaling. To test whether UCP3 can indeed be regulated by T3 without the need for fatty acids, a subgroup of hypothyroid rats was treated with T3 alone or cotreated with T3 plus NA at 8 h before the animals were killed, and the effects on the expressions of UCP3 and TRß1 were measured in soleus muscle. Surprisingly, NA abolished the T3-mediated induction of UCP3 mRNA level, whereas TRß1 expression remained inducible by T3 in the absence of fatty acids, showing that TRß1 is directly regulated by T3 independently of fatty acids (Fig. 3A
activation rescues T3-mediated UCP3 expression in rat skeletal muscle, in the absence of fatty acids. PPAR
and MyoD mRNA levels remained unaltered by all treatments (results not shown). The short-term lipolytic effect of T3 and the efficiency of the NA treatment was verified by measurement of serum fatty acid levels (Fig. 3B
|
|
and RXR
alone or pSG5-hPPAR
plus PRSV-hRXR. Cotransfection of the PPAR
expression plasmid diminished only slightly the response to T3 shown by the rat UCP3 promoter, whereas it completely blunted that of the mouse UCP3 promoter and strongly suppressed that of the human UCP3 promoter. The mouse and human UCP3 promoters each failed to respond to L165,041 (Fig. 5
, cotransfection of PPAR
and addition of L165,041 caused a weak, but significant, increase in the mouse UCP3 promoter (data not shown). The only activating effect of L165,041 administration was on the rat UCP3 promoter (by 1.3-fold), but this agonist did not enhance the effect of T3 in this condition (T3-induced Luc activity being enhanced by around 1.5-fold in both the presence and absence of L165,041). During cotransfection with both the PPAR
and RXR
expression plasmids, 1) the mouse UCP3 promoter failed to increase in response to any of the treatments, whereas 2) the activating effect of T3 on the human UCP3 promoter (which was still present when PPAR
alone was cotransfected) was now completely blunted. In contrast, rat UCP3 promoter activity was increased 1.4-fold by T3 and 1.5-fold by L165,041 but 1.8-fold by T3 plus L165,041 (significantly more than with T3 treatment alone). Thus, only the rat UCP3 promoter was activated by T3-bound TRß1 as well as by L165,041-bound PPAR
, and it showed a slight additive increase in activity when both TRß and PPAR
were activated by their respective ligands. It should be noted that cotransfection of RXR
without ligand significantly (P < 0.05) decreased basal UCP3 promoter activity from all species, which we interpret as being a nonspecific squelching effect, probably caused by competition for common transcription factors between the different expression vectors.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vivo, induction of UCP3 expression by T3 in hypothyroid gastrocnemius muscle clearly preceded the inductions of the PPAR
, CPT1b, and MTE I genes (Fig. 1
) [both CPT1b and MTE I genes are known to be PPAR regulated (see Refs. 21 , 22)]. The presence of TREs in the promoter of the UCP3 gene may explain the difference in kinetics observed between the up-regulation of UCP3 on the one hand and CPT1b and MTE I (not containing TREs but containing PPAR response element) on the other. The T3-induced regulation of the latter two genes is thus very likely mediated by PPARs, which are activated by the increased FFA levels elicited by T3 (Fig. 3B
). This would seem to suggest that UCP3 can be directly regulated by T3 without the need for fatty acid-mediated PPAR signaling. However, 1) the PPAR
agonist L165,041 up-regulated UCP3 expression within 8 h after its administration to euthyroid rats (Fig. 2A
), and 2) in the hypothyroid state, PPAR
mRNA was already present at high levels (i.e. before its up-regulation by T3) in both gastrocnemius and soleus muscle (Fig. 2C
) (in soleus muscle, PPAR
mRNA levels were even higher in P+I rats than in the euthyroid controls). This suggests that, in the hypothyroid state, the residing PPAR
would be sufficient for the induction of short-term T3/FFA-mediated transcriptional effects and thus may play a functional role in the short-term effects of T3. Indeed, additional analysis revealed that the rat UCP3 gene was clearly dependent on fatty acids for its short-term up-regulation by T3 in skeletal muscle, because NA treatment completely abolished the induction of its expression (Fig. 3A
). This was underlined by the finding that T3 treatment increased serum fatty acid levels within 8 h, well before its up-regulation of PPAR
expression (Fig. 3B
). It has been shown recently that NA inhibits white adipose tissue lipolysis through binding to receptors termed PUMA-G and HM74 (27). Consequentially, short-term treatment with this compound decreases triglyceride content in liver, heart muscle, and oxidative-fibered skeletal muscle without any change in cholesterol content (28). We used the oxidative-fibered soleus muscle to examine the effects of NA on short-term T3-induced UCP3 transcription, because NA treatment was ineffective at inhibiting short-term UCP3 transcription in mixed-fibered gastrocnemius muscle (data not shown). This is probably attributable to the considerable intramuscular fatty acid reserves in the latter muscle.
PPARs are necessary for the T3/TR-mediated induction of rat UCP3 expression, and TRs are necessary for the FFA/PPAR-mediated induction of UCP3 expression. Evidence for this comes from our observation that the PPAR
agonist L165,041 alone did not induce UCP3 expression in skeletal muscles from P+I rats (Fig. 3A
), which had low TRß1 mRNA levels (Fig. 2
, B and C), whereas administration of the same dose of L165,041 caused a 2.5-fold increase in UCP3 mRNA levels in euthyroid rats, in which TRß1 levels are higher (Fig. 2A
). In addition, in L6 cells cotransfected with TRß, MyoD, and PPAR
(in the presence or absence of RXR
), L165,041 increased rat UCP3 promoter activity (Fig. 5
). Although PPAR
is the predominant isoform in skeletal muscle, we cannot exclude the possibility that PPAR
can mediate the described effects as well. Indeed, it has been shown that PPAR
can bind to the TRE1 element of the human UCP3 promoter (19). However, on the basis of the results obtained in the hypothyroid state (in which a selective downregulation of TR ß1, with respect to TR
, abolished the PPAR
-induced stimulation of UCP3 transcription), the effects described in vivo very likely involve TRß1. Support for this assumption comes from transient transfection experiments showing that a stimulatory interaction between TRß1 and PPAR
on a direct repeat with two nucleotide spacing (DR+2) TRE stimulated gene expression, whereas in contrast, TR
-PPAR
interactions negatively influenced gene expression (29). In addition, (repressing) interactions between TR
and PPAR
on natural TREs have been demonstrated recently in vivo (30). In these studies, however, PPAR
was not taken into consideration.
Unlike UCP3, TRß1 appears to be directly regulated by T3 in soleus muscle, with or without suppression of fatty acids (compare the P+I/T3 with the P+I+NA/T3 levels of TRß1 mRNA in Fig. 3A
), whereas TR
1 expression remained unaltered (results not shown). However, it is conceivable that TR
1 functions as a T3-dependent inducer of TRß1 in skeletal muscle; indeed, it has been demonstrated that, in the mouse heart, up-regulation of TRß1 by T3 is mediated through ligand-bound TR
(31).
In L6 cells transiently transfected with MyoD and TRß1 plus one of the UCP3 promoter constructs, 1) the human UCP3 promoter responded much more strongly to T3 treatment than either the mouse or rat UCP3 promoter, whereas 2) the rat UCP3 promoter was unique in responding positively to T3 and/or PPAR
agonist treatment when PPAR
was cotransfected and even more so when PPAR
and RXR
were cotransfected (Fig. 5
). Thus, the data from the transfection studies are in line with the observed strong, direct effect of T3 on the human UCP3 transgene promoter as opposed to the weak response of the endogenous UCP3 promoter obtained in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice (13). In addition, they underline the strong response to T3 treatment shown by skeletal muscle in hypothyroid rats in vivo in the current and a previous study (12), a response that we show here to depend on the presence of FFA acting through PPAR signaling.
Phylogenetic analysis has revealed that mouse and rat sequences are nearly the same distance from a putative common ancestor sequence (with a nucleotide substitution rate of <10% per site), whereas the human UCP3 promoter-exon 1 region is highly divergent (with a nucleotide substitution rate of >30% per site) (17). The additional comparison performed in this study between the mouse and the rat proximal UCP3 promoters, however, has revealed an important species difference: namely, a differential localization of the MyoD response element in the different species (it is located in exon 1 of the rat UCP3 gene, whereas it surrounds the transcription start site in the mouse UCP3 gene and is positioned within the promoter of the human UCP3 gene). This may imply a different folding of the rat promoter around the basic transcription factor-RNA polymerase II complex than that present in the human and mouse UCP3 genes, and this may explain the different response to T3 and fatty acids seen for the rat UCP3 gene than for the mouse and human UCP3 genes. Because TRß can form trimers when bound to natural response elements comprising reiterated half-sites (32), it is conceivable that PPAR
and TRß1, in the presence of RXR
, interact in an additive manner with the natural TRE1 element of the rat UCP3 promoter. The more upstream position of the MyoD response element in the mouse and human UCP3 promoters may not allow this interaction (for a schematic representation, see Fig. 6
). This would result, in vivo, in a fatty acid-dependent stimulatory effect of T3 only in the case of the rat UCP3 gene. In a previous study (19), a specific role of MyoD acetylation in UCP3 promoter activity was indicated by the reduced transactivation capacity of a nonacetylable mutant form of MyoD. The finding that the nonacetylable form of MyoD remained partially sensitive to PPAR-dependent activation may indicate that other factors or histones are acetylated by p300 (19).
The present data have highlighted important differences between the T3-mediated regulation of UCP3 in different species, which may help to shed light in the interpretation of data on the effect of T3 on both UCP3 expression/activity and on its role in energy metabolism. In contrast to the situation in the rat, single-dose T3 administration (10 µg/100 g BW) does not significantly increase UCP3 mRNA expression in mouse skeletal muscle, although a trend toward a weak increase was observed (16), and administration of T3 (2.5 µg/100 g BW, daily for 6 d) to euthyroid or thyroidectomized mice induced UCP3 mRNA expression only to a maximum of 1.5-fold (15) (in both studies, mitochondrial UCP3 protein levels have not been measured). Taking our recent and previous (12) data into consideration, it may be that a relatively higher dose of T3 has to be applied to achieve a pronounced effect on UCP3 transcription in mouse skeletal muscle. In a study comparing the effect of T3 on wild-type and UCP3 knockout mice (16), a higher dose of T3 was used (100 µg/100 g BW, daily for 4 d), but unfortunately UCP3 expression data (mRNA and mitochondrial protein levels) in wild-type littermates were not reported. In these supraphysiological hyperthyroid conditions, the UCP3 knockout mice showed a lower RMR value than their wild-type littermates (+72 and +89%, respectively), but the differences were not significant. These data may be interpreted in the sense that UCP3 does not play any role in the effects elicited by T3 on RMR even if in a previous study we showed that UCP3 has the potential to be a molecular determinant of T3-induced increase in RMR. These discrepancies, however, may be apparent rather than real. Indeed, apart from the differences in the promoter behavior, other aspects should be considered and, in particular, 1) the doses used by the previous authors (16) were very high and, in these conditions, other thermogenic mechanisms may be overactivated, and 2) injecting T3 in condition in which the deiodinase enzymes are active a deiodinated product of T3 may be effective in stimulating RMR, such as 3,5-diiodothyroinine, which is able to increase RMR and whose effects may overrule those of UCP3 (33). For this reason, in our previous (12) and present studies in the rat, we chose to generate hypothyroid animals by simultaneous administration of P and I. This combined treatment produces hypothyroid animals and at the same time inhibits all three known types of deiodinase enzymes, which should permit us to attribute the observed effects to T3 rather than to any of its deiodinated products (34).
Together, the results of this study clearly indicate a differential regulation of UCP3 by relatively low doses of T3 among mice, rats, and humans, and we suggest that this should be taken into account when hypotheses are put forward regarding the putative role of this protein related to T3-mediated effects on energy metabolism in physiological situations.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online May 3, 2007
Abbreviations: BAT, Brown adipose tissue; BW, body weight; CPT1b, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1b; dNTP, deoxynucleotide triphosphate; FFA, free fatty acid; I, iopanoic acid; Luc, luciferase; MTE I, mitochondrial thioesterase I; NA, nicotinic acid; P, 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor; RMR, resting metabolic rate; RPS12, ribosomal protein S12; TR, thyroid hormone receptor; TRE, thyroid hormone response element; UCP, uncoupling protein.
Received February 12, 2007.
Accepted for publication April 20, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: a dagger in the heart of the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 116:590597[CrossRef][Medline]
-regulated gene in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287:E888E895
induces fatty acid ß-oxidation in skeletal muscle and attenuates metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1592415929
ligands. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:45284532[CrossRef][Medline]
antagonizes peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
signaling in vivo and impairs fatty acid oxidation. Endocrinology 148:12061217This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. de Lange, R. Senese, F. Cioffi, M. Moreno, A. Lombardi, E. Silvestri, F. Goglia, and A. Lanni Rapid Activation by 3,5,3'-L-Triiodothyronine of Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase/Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase and Akt/Protein Kinase B Signaling Pathways: Relation to Changes in Fuel Metabolism and Myosin Heavy-Chain Protein Content in Rat Gastrocnemius Muscle in Vivo Endocrinology, December 1, 2008; 149(12): 6462 - 6470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Mazzatti, M. A. Smith, R. C. Oita, F.-L. Lim, A. J. White, and M. B. Reid Muscle unloading-induced metabolic remodeling is associated with acute alterations in PPAR{delta} and UCP-3 expression Physiol Genomics, July 1, 2008; 34(2): 149 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Silvestri, A. Lombardi, P. de Lange, L. Schiavo, A. Lanni, F. Goglia, T. J. Visser, and M. Moreno Age-related changes in renal and hepatic cellular mechanisms associated with variations in rat serum thyroid hormone levels Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2008; 294(6): E1160 - E1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |