| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
in Insulin Action in Cultured Human Skeletal Muscle CellsVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161; and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert R. Henry, M.D., Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, California 92161. E-mail: rrhenry{at}vapop.ucsd.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-isoform of GSK3 in insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle cells from nondiabetic subjects maintained in culture. Transfection of muscle cells with specific antisense oligonucleotides resulted in a 30–50% decrease of GSK3
protein expression (P < 0.05). Whereas neither the basal fractional velocity of glycogen synthase (GS FV) (an indicator of the activation state of the enzyme) nor glucose uptake (GU) were altered, reducing GSK3
expression resulted in increases in insulin stimulation of both GS FV and GU. GSK3
overexpression (60–100% increase over control) did not alter basal GS FV or GU but impaired insulin stimulation of both responses. Knockdown of GSK
also led to an increase in insulin receptor substrate-1 protein expression but did not alter insulin stimulation of pS473-Akt phosphorylation. However, GSK3
overexpression impaired insulin action on pS473-Akt. In summary, we concluded the following: 1) modulation of GSK3
expression has no effect on basal GU and glycogen synthase activities; 2) reduction of GSK3
expression results in improvements in insulin action; and 3) elevation of GSK3
in human skeletal muscle cells can induce insulin resistance for several responses. We conclude that GSK3
is an important regulator of muscle insulin action. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor (reviewed in Ref. 2). It has also been reported that GSK3 can phosphorylate the insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1, thereby possibly playing a role in regulation of insulin action (3).
Two isoforms of GSK3,
-isoform and ß-isoform, have been identified in humans; encoded by two distinct genes located on chromosomes 19q13.1–2 and 3q13.3-q21, respectively (4). The
-isoform is a 51- to 53-kDa polypeptide, whereas the ß-isoform is a 47-kDa polypeptide with 85% amino acid homology to GSK3
. GSK3 is active in the resting state and is inhibited by hormones such as insulin, endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor (2). Inactivation due to acute insulin exposure occurs through phosphorylation of Ser21 on GSK3
and Ser9 on GSK3ß.
An association between skeletal muscle GSK3 and insulin resistance has been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes and animal models of insulin resistance (5, 6, 7). We found the expression and activity of both GSK3 isoforms to be elevated in skeletal muscle from a group of poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients, showing an inverse relationship to insulin action measured during a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp (6). Others have shown skeletal muscle GSK3 expression to be normal in diabetic subjects (8). In addition, chemical inhibition of GSK3 leads to improvements in glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis, and insulin action (7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13), both in vivo and in vitro. However, the use of such inhibitors does not permit discrimination between the roles of the
- and ß-isoforms of GSK3 in metabolic regulation.
Evidence exists to suggest that GSK3
and -ß are not functionally interchangeable. Knockout of the GSK3ß gene in mice proves to be lethal in the embryonic stage with no rescue by an intact GSK3
isoform, leading to the idea that the ß-isoform may play an important role in cell growth and differentiation (14). Studies from our laboratory regarding insulin regulation of phosphorylation and activity of GSK3 isoforms in human skeletal muscle indicated that the
-isoform was more insulin responsive and had a stronger association with parameters of insulin resistance (6). In the present study, we therefore chose to specifically modulate the expression of GSK3
in human skeletal muscle cells to evaluate its role in regulation of glucose metabolism. In so doing, we have been able to demonstrate that knockdown of GSK3
leads to improvements in insulin action. Conversely, we found that overexpression of GSK3
generates a state of impaired insulin responsiveness.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
L-[14C] glucose, [3H]2-deoxyglucose, and [14C]uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose, were obtained from DuPont NEN Life Science Products (Boston, MA). Cell culture materials were purchased from Irvine Scientific (Irvine, CA) except for skeletal muscle basal medium, which was obtained from Clonetics Corp. (San Diego, CA). Fetal bovine serum was obtained from Gemini Bio-Products (Woodland, CA). BSA (fraction V) was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). Glycogen, 2-deoxyglucose, glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P), leupeptin, aprotinin, sodium fluoride, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium orthovanadate, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), dithiothreitol, and other reagents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Protein assay reagents and electrophoresis chemicals were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Anti-GSK-3/Shaggy protein kinase family (51/46 kDa) mouse monoclonal IgG, purified GSK3
and -ß from rabbit skeletal muscle, and antirat C-terminal IRS-1 rabbit polyclonal IgG were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Anti-pS473-Akt was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA) whereas anti-Akt1/2 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antirabbit IgG complexed to horseradish peroxidase and Hyperfilm were from Amersham, Inc. (Arlington Heights, IL). SuperBlock and the SuperSignal chemiluminescent substrate kit were obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). An affinity-purified chicken polyclonal antibody against GS was a gift from Dr. J. C. Lawrence, Jr. (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA). Transfection reagents used were PerFect Lipids Pfx-6 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Effectene (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA).
Full-length human GSK3
in pMT2 vector was a kind gift of Dr. J. Woodgett (Toronto, Canada) (16). Antisense oligodinucleotides (ODN) against GSK3
were identified from a screen of 78 human ODNs performed in T-24 cells (gift from Isis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA). ODNs were synthesized as full phosphorothioate chimeric oligonucleotides with 2'-O-methoxyethyl groups on bases 1–5 and 6–20 (17). The antisense ODN used in the current studies had the sequence: AGCCAATGACACCATACCTT. A scrambled ODN was a mixed sequence of the antisense ODN.
Cell culture and transfection
The method of culturing skeletal muscle cells from biopsy samples has been described in detail previously (18, 19). Briefly, satellite cells were obtained by tryptic digestion of muscle biopsy material. Cells were propagated in culture by modifications of the methods described by Blau and Webster (20) and Sarabia et al. (21). When cells attained approximately 80% confluency, they were transferred to differentiation media. After 48 h of differentiation, cells were placed in OptiMEM and treated with lipid transfection reagent (pFx-6), empty vector (pMT2), or varying amounts of GSK3
RNA in pMT2 for 6–8 h. Cells were then washed and cultured for an additional 48 h in MEM containing glutamine and 2% fetal bovine serum before analysis. Media were changed every 48 h. For down-regulation of GSK3
, differentiating cells were placed in OptiMEM and treated with scrambled or antisense ODN for 6 h, washed, and then cultured an additional 60 h before protein extraction or assay of glucose uptake. Cells from each individual were used after a single passage.
Protein extraction
After treatment, fully differentiated cells were washed in serum-free
-MEM containing 0.1% BSA and incubated for 15' at 37 C in the presence or absence of insulin (33 nM). After this treatment, separate samples of cells in 6-well plates were rapidly washed with 4 C PBS and then lysed in extraction buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl, 145 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 200 µM PMSF, 1 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 mM NaF, and 40 mM NaPP. Cells were scraped from the plates and solubilized over 30 min at 4 C with vortexing. Nonsolubilized material was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 x g (10 min, 4 C). Protein concentration was determined according to the method of Bradford (22) and cell extracts were stored at –70 C until further analysis.
Before GS assay, cells from 6-well plates were first incubated in the absence or presence of insulin (33 nM for 30 min at 37 C), washed with PBS, and scraped into 0.3 ml of extraction buffer: 50 mM HEPES, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaF, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µM leupeptin, 1 µM pepstatin, and 200 µM PMSF (pH 7.5).
Electrophoresis and Western blotting
Protein extracts were size fractionated on 7.5 or 10% polyacrylamide gels according to standard procedures (23). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked, and incubated with antibody to the particular protein of interest. Bands were visualized using secondary antibody tagged with horseradish peroxidase followed by enhanced chemiluminescence reaction. Quantification of band intensity was performed using an Alpha Innotech multiimage light cabinet and ChemiImager4000 software (version 4.04; San Leandro, CA). Results were obtained in integrated density value units per 10 µg total protein. Final values were expressed as percentage of the value in control cells for each individual.
Glucose uptake activity
At the same time as protein extraction, glucose uptake was measured in parallel plates using a previously described protocol (18). Briefly, cells were washed in serum-free media and incubated ± insulin (33 nM) for 60–90 min at 37 C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The insulin effect was maximal by 60 min and stable beyond 90 min. Uptake of the nonmetabolized analog 2-deoxyglucose (final concentration 0.01 mM) was measured over 10 min at room temperature (18). An aliquot of the suspension was removed for protein analysis. The uptake of L-glucose is used to correct each sample for the contribution of diffusion. All measures were performed in triplicate for each condition in each individual set of cells.
Assay of glycogen synthase activity
The activity of GS was measured as described in detail previously (19). Briefly, cells were washed and incubated in serum-free media for 30 min at 37 C before insulin (33 nM) was added; cells were washed and harvested after an additional 30 min incubation. GS activity was determined in duplicate for each set of cells in diluted supernatants at a physiological concentration of substrate (0.3 mM UDP-glucose) and expressed as nanomoles of UDP-glucose incorporated into glycogen per minute per milligram of total protein and as fractional velocity (FV = the ratio of activity assayed at 0.1 mM G-6-P/activity at 10 mM G-6-P).
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was evaluated with a paired student t test and/or Wilcoxon signed rank test using GraphPad Prism (version 4.0; San Diego, CA). Significance was accepted at the P < 0.05 level. All data and calculated results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Results are expressed as absolute values or normalized against the appropriate nonspecific (control) treatment. For a given manipulation, muscle cells from each subject served as its own control. Effects of gene manipulation were compared with the complete nonspecific condition; transfection reagent + scrambled ODN for knockdown and transfection reagent + empty vector for overexpression, for each individual set of cells, referred to throughout the manuscript as control. Due to limitations in cell availability, not all determinations were performed for each individual. The number of independent determinations is indicated in legends to the figures and tables. It should be noted again that different sets of subjects were used for the knockdown and overexpression studies. There were no significant differences in control activities between the two sets of subjects (Table 1
).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|

resulted in a selective reduction in GSK3
protein expression (Fig. 1
had no effect on GSK3ß protein content (Fig. 1
AS-ODN (83 ± 12% of control, P = ns). Scrambled (control) ODN was without significant effect on either GSK3
or GSK3ß expression. GSK3 activity is also influenced by serine phosphorylation (2) as well as expression. GSK3
knockdown had no significant effect on basal serine phosphorylation of either GSK3
(S21) or -ß (S9).
|
knockdown on glucose metabolism and insulin action
antisense ODN (Table 1
had no impact on basal FV (Table 1
expression (Table 1
improved insulin responsiveness of GS.
|
resulted in a 2- to 3-fold increase in the magnitude of the absolute insulin response for glucose uptake.
Overexpression of GSK3
Transfection of human skeletal muscle cells with a vector containing GSK3
resulted in an increased expression of GSK3
protein (Fig. 3
). The response was dose dependent and specific for the
-isoform. The appropriate control, including empty vector (pMT2), had no significant effect on expression of either GSK3 isoform (Fig. 3
). Basal (no added insulin) serine phosphorylation of either GSK3 isoform was unaltered by GSK3
overexpression.
|
overexpression on glycogen synthase activity
(Table 1
overexpression had no effect on the basal GS FV (Table 1
overexpression was seen on insulin-stimulated FV (Table 1
overexpression (Fig. 2A
Effect of GSK3
overexpression on glucose uptake
Transfection with GSK3
had no effect on basal glucose uptake, compared with control (Table 1
). Insulin acutely stimulated glucose uptake in both ND and T2D cells (Table 1
); this effect was decreased in GSK3
overexpressing cells and, in fact, was no longer statistically significant. Thus GSK3
overexpression results in insulin resistance for stimulation of glucose uptake (Fig. 2B
).
Effect of manipulation of GSK3
on insulin signaling
Because the major consequence of changes in GSK3
protein expression in the current studies is on insulin responsiveness (Fig. 2
), the effects of these manipulations on the expression of the key insulin signaling molecules IRS-1 and Akt 1/2 were evaluated. None of the transfection protocols themselves had any impact on IRS-1 protein content of muscle cells. Similar to what was observed from treatment with GSK3 inhibitors (9), knockdown of GSK3
led to a significant increase in IRS-1 expression (Fig. 4
) In contrast, overexpression of GSK3
did not result in significant changes in the expression of IRS-1 (Fig. 4
). Neither manipulation influenced Akt 1/2 protein expression (Fig. 4
).
|
expression on insulin signaling was studied at the level of the phosphorylation of serine-473 in Akt, a commonly accepted indicator of insulin signaling. Results in Fig. 5
expression had a significant effect on basal phosphorylation. Acute (15 min) insulin exposure resulted in stimulation of S473 phosphorylation, similar to what we reported previously (25). The insulin response in GSK3
knockdown cells was unaltered: stimulated pS473-Akt/Akt was 109 ± 9% of the control value. However, insulin stimulation of phosphorylation was reduced with GSK3
overexpression to 62 ± 14% (P < 0.05) of control. This determination was made at the same maximally stimulating insulin level (33 nM) in which we found effects of GSK3
manipulation on hormone responsiveness for GS FV and glucose uptake.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lithium, which inhibits GSK3 by competing for the cofactor Mg+2, increases both glucose metabolism and insulin action in experimental systems (27, 28). Recently more selective inhibitors of GSK3 have been synthesized, which are ATP competitive (29) or substrate competitive (30). These compounds have frequently been found to be insulin mimetic, increasing GS activity, glycogen synthesis, and glucose uptake in a number of cell lines (9, 29, 30) and improve glucose disposal in insulin-resistant animals (7, 13, 31). Such specific inhibitors have proven useful in studying the role of GKS3 but lack the ability to distinguish between the contributions of the
- and ß-isoforms. This fact is important because, whereas GSK3
and GSK3ß are similar in many ways [97% sequence identity in the kinase domain (2)], they are products of different genes and not fully functionally interchangeable.
Although the great majority of studies on GSK3 isoforms have focused on GSK3ß, due in part to the availability of specific reagents (2), we chose to initially target GSK3
in evaluating the involvement of GSK3 in the development of insulin resistance. There were several reasons for this choice. In our previous in vivo study skeletal muscle GSK3
showed a greater reduction in activity, and increase in serine phosphorylation, after insulin infusion in humans, compared with GSK3ß (6). The correlations between the activity and expression of GSK3 for measures of insulin action were strongest for GSK3
(5). Previously Wojtazsewski et al. (32) concluded that GSK3
had a role in the response of skeletal muscle GS activity to meal-associated hyperinsulinemia in humans, whereas GSK3ß did not. Meanwhile, overexpression of wild-type GSK3ß in 3T3-L1 adipocytes reduced GS activity but did not change the fold stimulation in response to insulin (33). Taken together, these results suggest that GSK3
could be the predominant isoform for the regulation and mediation of insulin action.
This postulate was tested in cultured human skeletal muscle cells. An advantage of this system is that we (18) and others (34) have shown that this system maintains many of the metabolic properties of intact skeletal muscle, including insulin responsiveness of GS (18, 34) and GSK3 (9, 35). However, culturing muscle cells under controlled conditions may obscure some of the features of the type 2 diabetic phenotype that are acquired from the hyperglycemic, hyperinsulinemic environment present in vivo. A further benefit of cultured human skeletal muscle cells is that they are amenable to transfection and have been used by multiple investigators to probe the role of specific genes in the control of muscle metabolism and insulin action (36, 37, 38). The ability to compare the impact of such manipulations with the in vivo diabetic metabolic phenotype represents an advantage of this experimental system.
Comparison of the results from our previous work on global chemical inhibition of GSK3 in human muscle cells (9) with the effects of targeted knockdown of GSK3
should provide insights into specific roles of GSK3
. Several caveats should be considered when making such comparisons. One relates to possible dose effects. We previously attained an approximately 90% reduction in total GSK3 activity by use of selective inhibitors (9). Because GSK3
is the less abundant form in human muscle cells, 38 ± 2% of total GSK3 protein, a 50% reduction in expression may be estimated to cause an approximately 20% reduction in total enzyme activity. Another concern is that whereas chemical inhibitors affect GSK3 throughout the cell, it is not known whether GSK3
knockdown alters the subcellular distribution of GSK3 isoforms, which could influence access to specific substrates. With those concerns in mind, specific GSK3
knockdown and general GSK3 inhibition have several common effects. One is that both interventions increased insulin stimulation of GS FV and glucose uptake. Another is that both led to an up-regulation of IRS-1 protein expression, suggesting that a normal cellular content of GSK3
can suppress both IRS-1 expression and insulin action. Differences are also apparent in that chronic GSK3 inhibition elevated glucose uptake and GS activities, even in the absence of insulin, whereas GSK3
knockdown had no such effect, suggesting that changing both GSK3
and -ß activity influenced basal activities, whereas GSK3
is linked to the insulin response. This would be consistent with the results from Zucker diabetic fatty rats, in which inhibition of GSK3 enhanced GLUT4 translocation in isolated skeletal muscles (10).
Conversely, the hypothesis generated from our previous in vivo studies and the work of multiple investigators with GSK3 inhibitors would predict that a relative up-regulation of GSK3 would contribute to insulin resistance and other aspects of the diabetic metabolic phenotype. Indeed, the phenotype in muscle cells resulting from overexpression of GSK3
does have several features that are present in muscle from type 2 diabetic subjects, compared with nondiabetics: reduced insulin stimulation of GS FV (39) and glucose uptake (40) and normal expression of IRS-1 (41). There are also differences. It is interesting to note that the commonly observed diabetes-related defects in basal glucose uptake in skeletal muscle (40) are lacking after GSK3
overexpression, implicating involvement of kinases besides GSK3
, possibly including GSK3ß, in the control of this basal activity. Thus, a relative overexpression of GSK3
in muscle cells induces some, but not all, of the features of type 2 diabetes in muscle.
GSK3 could contribute to the development of insulin resistance in several ways. The previously demonstrated ability of GSK3 to phosphorylate IRS-1 and interfere with its ability to be tyrosine phosphorylated by the insulin receptor (3) could lead to impaired insulin action in the presence of normal IRS-1 protein expression, as was the case with GSK3
overexpression. Conversely, down-regulation of GSK3
could serve to improve insulin signaling by reducing serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. In addition, hyperphosphorylation of IRS-1 on serine resides increases proteosomal-mediated degradation of IRS-1 (reviewed in Ref. 42). GSK3-mediated phosphorylation of IRS-1 could be contributing to this response so that with GSK3
knockdown turnover of IRS-1 is reduced and steady-state levels of the protein increase. These conjectures need to be tested directly.
Whereas the ability of GSK3 to phosphorylate IRS-1 has been proposed as crucial for the generation of insulin resistance (43), the impact of this phosphorylation on downstream insulin signaling events in human skeletal muscle is unknown. We selected serine-473 phosphorylation of Akt as the signal step distal to IRS-1 for further study and found that knockdown of GSK3
did not alter insulin stimulation of S473-Akt phosphorylation, even as responsiveness of GU and GSFV were augmented. This result is consistent with two studies using different GSK3 inhibitors (9, 11) in which Akt phosphorylation was also not effected. However, overexpression of GSK3
did result in impaired maximal insulin action on S473-Akt phosphorylation as well as for glucose uptake and glycogen synthase. The difference between these two outcomes is suggestive of a threshold effect, that a relative excess of GSK3
is required to impede signaling at the level of S473-Akt phosphorylation. If the same behavior occurs for T308-Akt phosphorylation, the other insulin-responsive event is unknown.
In summary, the current results, in which the major effects of manipulation of GSK3
expression were on insulin-stimulated events, offer evidence to support the idea that although similar in structure, GSK3
and GSK3ß may have differing roles within the skeletal muscle cell. Whereas GSK3
is involved with insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism, GSK3ß may be the isoform most responsible for basal energy expenditure, cell growth, and differentiation. Further studies are needed to elucidate the specific roles of GSK3ß because the proposed distinction need not be absolute because muscle-specific overexpression of GSK3ß results in male transgenic mice that are glucose intolerant and display reduced IRS-1 protein levels (44). Targeting the specific GSK3 isoform most closely involved with insulin regulation of metabolism represents an approach worthy of further investigation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: T.P.C., S.E.N., R.A.B., and L.C. have nothing to declare. R.R.H. is a member of the Board of Directors, consults for, and has stock in Isis Pharmaceuticals.
First Published Online June 14, 2007
Abbreviations: FV, Fractional velocity; G-6-P, glucose-6-phosphate; GS FV, fractional velocity of glycogen synthase; GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase-3; GU, glucose uptake; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; ODN, oligodinucleotide; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; UDP; uridine diphosphate.
Received July 12, 2006.
Accepted for publication June 5, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß isoforms in patients with NIDDM. Diabetologia 40:940–946[CrossRef][Medline]
B activation. Nature 406:86–90[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Boura-Halfon and Y. Zick Phosphorylation of IRS proteins, insulin action, and insulin resistance Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2009; 296(4): E581 - E591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Waraich, C. Weigert, H. Kalbacher, A. M. Hennige, S. Z. Lutz, H.-U. Haring, E. D. Schleicher, W. Voelter, and R. Lehmann Phosphorylation of Ser357 of Rat Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Mediates Adverse Effects of Protein Kinase C-{delta} on Insulin Action in Skeletal Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11226 - 11233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |