help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-0584
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnaard-Huiban, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, J. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnaard-Huiban, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, J. J. R.
Endocrinology Vol. 149, No. 1 28-31
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society


BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Fadrozole Reverses Cardiac Fibrosis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Heart Failure Rats: Discordant Enantioselectivity Versus Reduction of Plasma Aldosterone

Monica Minnaard-Huiban1, Judith M. A. Emmen1, Luc Roumen, Ilona P. E. Beugels, Géraldine M. S. Cohuet, Helma van Essen, Eveline Ruijters, Koen Pieterse, Peter A. J. Hilbers, Harry C. J. Ottenheijm, Ralf Plate, Marcel E. de Gooyer, Jos F. M. Smits and J. J. Rob Hermans

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology (M.M-H., J.M.A,E., I.P.E.B., G.M.S.C., H.v.E., E.R., H.C.J.O., J.F.M.S., J.J.R.H.), Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Maastricht, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; Biomodeling and Bioinformatics (L.R., K.P., P.A.J.H.), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; NV Organon (R.P., M.E.d.G.), R&D Laboratories, 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. J. J. Rob Hermans, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Universiteit Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: r.hermans{at}farmaco.unimaas.nl.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reversal of cardiac fibrosis is a major determinant of the salutary effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure. Recently, R-fadrozole was coined as an aldosterone biosynthesis inhibitor, offering an appealing alternative to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to block aldosterone action. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of R- and S-fadrozole on plasma aldosterone and urinary aldosterone excretion rate and to compare their effectiveness vs. the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist potassium canrenoate to reverse established cardiac fibrosis. Male lean spontaneously hypertensive heart failure (SHHF) rats (40 wk) were treated for 8 wk by sc infusions of low (0.24 mg/kg·d) or high (1.2 mg/kg·d) doses of R- or S-fadrozole or by potassium canrenoate via drinking water (7.5 mg/kg·d). At the high dose, plasma aldosterone levels were decreased similarly by R- and S-fadrozole, whereas urinary aldosterone excretion rate was reduced only by S-fadrozole. In contrast, whereas at the high dose, R-fadrozole effectively reversed preexistent left ventricular interstitial fibrosis by 50% (vs. 42% for canrenoate), S-fadrozole was devoid of an antifibrotic effect. The low doses of the fadrozole enantiomers did not change cardiac fibrosis or plasma aldosterone but similarly reduced urinary aldosterone excretion rate. In conclusion, R-fadrozole may possess considerable therapeutic merit because of its potent antifibrotic actions in the heart. However, the observed discordance between the aldosterone-lowering and antifibrotic effects of the fadrozole enantiomers raises some doubt about the mechanism by which R-fadrozole diminishes cardiac collagen and about the generality of the concept of lowering aldosterone levels to treat the diseased heart.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ALTHOUGH ISOLATED MORE than 50 yr ago, it took several decades before it was realized that the adrenocortical steroid hormone aldosterone plays a crucial role in pathological cardiovascular remodeling and chronic heart failure (1). The clinical relevance of aldosterone in chronic heart failure became evident in the CONSENSUS trial showing that the mortality of heart failure patients correlated with plasma aldosterone (2). Later, the RALES study demonstrated that the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone greatly reduced mortality and symptoms in patients with severe heart failure (3). This aroused renewed interest in aldosterone-related pharmacology, resulting among others in the launching of the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone, which proved to be salutary in post-myocardial infarction patients in the EPHESUS trial (4).

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists block aldosterone actions that may compromise heart function and structure and provoke arrhythmias, such as inducing excessive cardiac fibrosis, cardiovascular inflammation, and shifts in electrolyte and autonomic nervous balances (5). A particularly important determinant for the therapeutic benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists seems to be their ability to prevent and reverse cardiac fibrosis (5, 6, 7). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve clinical outcome only in heart failure patients with high cardiac collagen deposition, whereas patient prognosis correlates with the extent by which cardiac collagen levels are reduced (6, 7).

In view of the successes of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and the established role of aldosterone in various diseases, it is not surprising that various groups, including ours, started a quest for drug candidates that interfere with aldosterone action in a manner alternative to blocking its receptor, i.e. by decreasing aldosterone biosynthesis. However, the therapeutic potential of this concept still needs to be investigated.

Recently, FAD 286A, the R(+)-enantiomer of fadrozole (a racemate also known as fadrazole or CGS 16949 A), has been identified as an aldosterone biosynthesis inhibitor (8, 9, 10). It was shown to reduce aldosterone levels in rats (8, 9) and to (partially) prevent angiotensin II-induced mortality, cardiac remodeling, and renal damage in transgenic human renin- and angiotensinogen-overexpressing rats (8). However, no information exists on aldosterone synthesis inhibitors with respect to cardiac remodeling in animals without excessive renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation. Also, their ability to reverse preexisting cardiac fibrosis and their effectiveness compared with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have never been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of R-fadrozole and its enantiomeric counterpart S-fadrozole on plasma aldosterone levels as well as urinary aldosterone excretion rate and compared their effectiveness vs. the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist potassium canrenoate regarding their ability to reverse preexistent cardiac fibrosis in 40-wk-old lean spontaneously hypertensive heart failure (SHHF) rats. This hypertensive rat strain is characterized by extensive cardiac fibrosis and cardiac remodeling, which eventually results in heart failure (11).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Fadrozole was synthesized by SyMO-Chem (Eindhoven University of Technology) essentially as described (12) (route C). The fadrozole enantiomers (>97.5% purity) were separated by Chiral Technologies Europe (Illkirch, France).

Forty-week-old male lean SHHF rats (Charles River Laboratories, Boston, MA) were randomly assigned to six weight-matched groups (n = 8 each) to be treated with a sc infusion of 1) vehicle (4:6 vol/vol polyethylene glycol 400 in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 5), 2) R-fadrozole at a dose rate of 0.24 mg/kg·d, 3) R-fadrozole at 1.2 mg/kg·d, 4) S-fadrozole at 0.24 mg/kg·d, 5) S-fadrozole at 1.2 mg/kg·d, or 6) vehicle and potassium canrenoate via drinking water (7.5 mg/kg·d). For the infusions, osmotic minipumps (2ml4; Durect, Cupertino, CA) were implanted sc under isoflurane anesthesia. These pumps produce a constant flow of 2.5 µl/h for at least 4 wk. After 4 wk, pumps were exchanged under isoflurane anesthesia. After 8 wk of treatment, rats were killed under pentobarbitone anesthesia (60 mg/kg ip), and blood and organs were harvested for analyses and snap frozen. At d 50 of the treatment, 24-h urine was collected for steroid and electrolyte (flame photometry) analyses.

The experiments were performed according to institutional guidelines and approved by the local ethical committee for experimental animal use, conforming with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).

Mean arterial blood pressures were recorded at treatment end under pentobarbitone anesthesia, using a high-fidelity catheter tip micromanometer (Mikro-tip 1.4 F, SPR-671; Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) that was inserted into the right carotid artery

Plasma and urinary corticosterone were analyzed by HPLC, similarly as described for cortisol (13). Plasma and urinary aldosterone were analyzed in a single assay by RIA (Coat-a-Count aldosterone kit; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Because urine samples involve an extraction step, calibration curves were constructed from samples that were identically processed as the experimental samples. The intraassay coefficient of variation was about 3.3% for plasma and 8% for urine, and the assay sensitivity was 0.05 nM.

Quantification of left ventricular (LV) collagen/tissue area ratios of Sirius Red-stained frozen (5 µm) heart sections, and assessment of ratios of tissue mRNA levels vs. phosphoglycerate kinase-1 by quantitative RT-PCR, were conducted as described previously (14). The primers sets are given in supplemental Table 1 (published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http://endo.endojournals.org).

All analyses were conducted in a blinded fashion. Data are given as means ± SE and were statistically tested by ANOVA, followed by post hoc testing by calculation of least significant differences (LSD test).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The treatment groups showed no differences in their body weights, heart/body weight ratios, mean arterial blood pressures, or sodium or potassium levels in plasma (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the treated animals

 
Plasma aldosterone levels (Fig. 1AGo) were reduced by 8 wk of treatment with the high dose of R-fadrozole, corroborating with findings by others (8, 9), and were also reduced to a similar extent by the high dose of S-fadrozole. Urinary aldosterone excretion rates were reduced to a similar extent by the low dose of R- and S-fadrozole (Fig. 1BGo). At the high dose, however, only for S-fadrozole was a significant reduction of urinary aldosterone excretion rate observed, resulting in a significantly lower urinary aldosterone excretion rate than for R-fadrozole. No significant changes in plasma corticosterone levels (Fig. 1CGo) or urinary corticosterone excretion rates (Fig. 1DGo) were seen. This indicates that the reduction of plasma aldosterone by fadrozole is due to inhibition of the final aldosterone biosynthesis steps, catalyzed by aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2), because corticosterone and aldosterone share common precursors in their biosynthesis (see e.g. Ref. 15).


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. A, Plasma aldosterone levels at treatment end (d 56). *, Significantly different from vehicle, P < 0.05 (ANOVA, LSD). B, Urinary aldosterone excretion at d 50 of treatment. *, Significantly different from vehicle, P < 0.05 (ANOVA, LSD); #, significantly different from R-fadrozole (R-fad) high, P < 0.05 (ANOVA, LSD). C, Plasma corticosterone levels at treatment end (d 56). D, Urinary corticosterone excretion at d 50 of treatment.

 
Figure 2AGo shows that in untreated SHHF rats, LV cardiac collagen fractions were constant between 39 and 52 wk of age. After 8 wk of treatment (starting age, 40 wk), however, both canrenoate and the high dose of R-fadrozole (Fig. 2BGo) decreased LV collagen fractions by 42 and 50%, respectively, whereas other treatments had no effect. Hence, combining Fig. 2Go, A and B, shows that R-fadrozole reversed preexistent LV fibrosis at least equally efficiently as a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. The decrease in steady-state LV collagen levels is, however, not (solely) due to reduced procollagen gene transcription (Fig. 2CGo), because LV procollagen {alpha}1 type I and III mRNA levels are not reduced by any treatment; in fact, in high-dose R-fadrozole-treated animals, procollagen mRNAs tended to be increased (not significant in ANOVA). Moreover, assessment of mRNA expression levels of several genes including those encoding reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase subunits gp91phox, p22phox, and p47phox, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), and osteopontin (OPN) in the LV of the heart; CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 in the adrenal; and renin in the kidney did not reveal any treatment effects (supplemental Table 2, published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http://endo.endojournals.org).


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. A, Epicardial LV collagen tissue area fractions of untreated SHHF rats at ages between 39 and 52 wk. Each data point represents the collagen tissue fraction for one individual untreated SHHF rat, standardized for the mean observed value for 40-wk-old SHHF rats. B, The effect of treating SHHF rats for 8 wk with potassium canrenoate or two different infusion doses of R- or S-fadrozole (R- or S-fad) on epicardial LV collagen tissue area fractions. *, Significantly different from vehicle-treated animals, P < 0.05 (ANOVA, LSD). C, LV procollagen {alpha}1 type I and III mRNA levels relative to phosphoglycerate kinase-1 and standardized for vehicle-treated rats in SHHF rats after various treatments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study shows that in SHHF rats, preexistent LV fibrosis is effectively reduced by the high dose of the R-enantiomer of fadrozole. In contrast, at the high dose, both enantiomers reduce plasma aldosterone, whereas urinary aldosterone excretion rate was reduced only by S-fadrozole.

Cardiac fibrosis is a key phenomenon in pathological cardiac remodeling, resulting in increased myocardial stiffness and dispersion of electrical conductance, hence impaired cardiac function and increased risk for arrhythmias (16). Mineralocorticoid antagonists, even in combination with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, reduce collagen synthesis and reverse existing cardiac fibrosis in heart failure patients (6, 7). Recently, R-fadrozole was coined as aldosterone synthetase inhibitor and shown to prevent angiotensin II-induced cardiac and renal damage (8) and to reduce aldosterone levels in rats (9, 10), but no information on the S-enantiomer was given. Here we show that the potential of R-fadrozole stretches beyond prevention in a situation of extensive renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation; R-fadrozole regresses existing cardiac fibrosis in SHHF rats at least as efficiently as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This is an important observation, because the therapeutic outcome of heart failure patients is intimately linked to the extent of cardiac fibrosis (6, 7). Nevertheless, in the present study, neither R- or S-fadrozole nor potassium canrenoate seemed to induce an apparent improvement of cardiac function when assessed (by similar methods as described in Ref. 14) by echocardiography and determination of basal and maximal LV +dP/dt (contractility rate) or –dP/dt) (relaxation rate). This lack in functional improvement can probably be explained by the fact that SHHF rats at this age still display a normal cardiac function (11).

In the present study, both of the high doses of R- and S- fadrozole were shown to decrease plasma aldosterone in vivo in SHHF rats to similar extents. Because these aldosterone levels represent only a single time point, urinary aldosterone excretion rates were also determined as an indication of the 24-h aldosterone turnover. Although the observed treatment effects on the urinary aldosterone excretion rates are somewhat complex, the combination of these data with the observed plasma aldosterone levels indicates that S-fadrozole reduced aldosterone production in the SHHF rats to (at least) a similar extent as R-fadrozole. Surprisingly, however, S-fadrozole was devoid of an antifibrotic effect, in contrast to R-fadrozole, which clearly decreased LV collagen. This is an important observation because it raises some doubt about the mechanism by which R-fadrozole lowers cardiac collagen and about the generality of the concept of lowering aldosterone levels to treat the diseased heart. Possibly, R-fadrozole reverses cardiac collagen by additional non-aldosterone-related, yet to be identified, mechanisms. Alternatively, S-fadrozole may exert additional, currently unknown, actions that mask the potential antifibrotic effect of lowering plasma aldosterone. In any case, this discrepancy indicates that decreasing plasma aldosterone levels as such is not sufficient to reduce cardiac fibrosis in every setting and that multiple factors determine the outcome.

These observations clearly underline the need for additional studies on the therapeutic potential of other compound classes of aldosterone synthase inhibitors, next to R-fadrozole; such studies are in progress in our laboratory. Nevertheless, the here described capability of R-fadrozole to regress cardiac fibrosis, combined with the cited findings by others, indicates that R-fadrozole is a pharmacological tool of considerable merit.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation (STW) Grant No. MFA.6504 and the Dutch Heart Foundation Grant No. 2001B054.

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online September 20, 2007

1 M.M.-H. and J.M.A.E. equally contributed to this work. Back

Abbreviations: CYP11B2, Aldosterone synthase; LSD, least significant difference; SHHF, spontaneously hypertensive heart failure.

Received May 7, 2007.

Accepted for publication September 11, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Williams JS, Williams GH 2003 50th Anniversary of aldosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2364–2372[Free Full Text]
  2. Swedberg K EP, Kjekshus J, Wilhelmsen L 1990 Hormones regulating cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and their relation to mortality. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Circulation 82:1730–1736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, Wittes J 1999 The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 341:709–717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, Bittman R, Hurley S, Kleiman J, Gatlin M 2003 Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 348:1309–1321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Struthers AD 1999 Why does spironolactone improve mortality over and above an ACE inhibitor in chronic heart failure? Br J Clin Pharmacol 47:479–482[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Zannad F, Alla F, Dousset B, Perez A, Pitt B 2000 Limitation of excessive extracellular matrix turnover may contribute to survival benefit of spironolactone therapy in patients with congestive heart failure: insights from the randomized aldactone evaluation study (RALES). Rales Investigators. Circulation 102:2700–2706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Izawa H, Murohara T, Nagata K, Isobe S, Asano H, Amano T, Ichihara S, Kato T, Ohshima S, Murase Y, Iino S, Obata K, Noda A, Okumura K, Yokota M 2005 Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism ameliorates left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis in mildly symptomatic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a pilot study. Circulation 112:2940–2945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fiebeler A, Nussberger J, Shagdarsuren E, Rong S, Hilfenhaus G, Al-Saadi N, Dechend R, Wellner M, Meiners S, Maser-Gluth C, Jeng AY, Webb RL, Luft FC, Muller DN 2005 Aldosterone synthase inhibitor ameliorates angiotensin II-induced organ damage. Circulation 111:3087–3094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Menard J, Gonzalez MF, Guyene TT, Bissery A 2006 Investigation of aldosterone-synthase inhibition in rats. J Hypertens 24:1157–1163[Medline]
  10. Menard J, Pascoe L 2006 Can the dextroenantiomer of the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole be useful for clinical investigation of aldosterone-synthase inhibition? J Hypertens 24:993–997[Medline]
  11. Heyen JR, Blasi ER, Nikula K, Rocha R, Daust HA, Frierdich G, Van Vleet JF, De Ciechi P, McMahon EG, Rudolph AE 2002 Structural, functional, and molecular characterization of the SHHF model of heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H1775–H1784
  12. Browne LJ, Gude C, Rodriguez H, Steele RE, Bhatnager A 1991 Fadrozole hydrochloride: a potent, selective, nonsteroidal inhibitor of aromatase for the treatment of estrogen-dependent disease. J Med Chem 34:725–736[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hermans JJ, van Essen H, Struijker-Boudier HA, Johnson RM, Theeuwes F, Smits JF 2002 Pharmacokinetic advantage of intrapericardially applied substances in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:672–678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Baumann M, Janssen BJ, Hermans JR, Peutz-Kootstra C, Witzke O, Smits JF, Struijker Boudier HA 2007 Transient AT1 receptor-inhibition in prehypertensive spontaneously hypertensive rats results in maintained cardiac protection until advanced age. J Hypertens 25:207–215[Medline]
  15. Connell JM, Fraser R, MacKenzie S, Davies E 2003 Is altered adrenal steroid biosynthesis a key intermediate phenotype in hypertension? Hypertension 41:993–999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Swynghedauw B 1999 Molecular mechanisms of myocardial remodeling. Physiol Rev 79:215–262[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnaard-Huiban, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, J. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnaard-Huiban, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, J. J. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals