| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Physiology (D.O.S., P.A.C.), University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; Department of Biochemistry (T.T., I.K., T.H., K.K.), National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka 565-8565, Japan; and Faculty of Health Sciences (M.S.), Hiroshima International University, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima Prefecture 730-0016, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ichiro Kishimoto, Department of Biochemistry, National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan. E-mail: kishimot{at}ri.ncvc.go.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
85%), SNA decreased to pre-MI activity. Importantly, early Ghr administration significantly reduced the high mortality rate associated with MI (61% mortality in untreated MI rats cf.
23% in Ghr-treated MI rats). These results show that early Ghr treatment prevents the increase in CSNA after MI, which may contribute to the improved chances of survival. Whether these early beneficial effects of Ghr also have long-term benefits for improving cardiac function is an area that requires further investigation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The peptide hormone ghrelin (Ghr), first discovered in 1999 (2), has improved cardiac function in patients suffering from end-stage chronic heart failure (3). Ghr is a GH-releasing peptide, and so the mechanism by which Ghr improves cardiac function has been linked, at least in part, to the anabolic properties of GH. To date, there is a paucity of studies describing the treatment of myocardial ischemia within the first few hours of onset. Indeed, it is this time period when autonomic modulation of cardiac function is enhanced, in which the opportunity to improve outcome by therapeutic intervention is so great.
Some studies have shown that Ghr is able to centrally suppress renal sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) (4, 5). More recently, we have also shown, using heart-rate spectral analyses, that Ghr treatment appears to attenuate cardiac sympathetic tone within the first week after MI (6). However, it is the initial increase in CSNA within the first hours after MI that significantly contributes to ventricular arrhythmia (1, 7) and, consequently, a high mortality (8). Therefore, in this study we hypothesized, and aimed to show, that the early administration of Ghr immediately after MI would be able to prevent, or at least attenuate, the early increase in CSNA, which could potentially improve early survival prognosis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
280–340 g). All rats were on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle at 25 ± 1 C, and provided with food and water ad libitum. All experiments were approved and conducted in accordance with the guidelines stipulated by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Otago, New Zealand.
Anesthesia and surgical preparation
Rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg, ip). Adequate anesthesia was confirmed by elimination of the limb withdrawal reflex. Throughout the experiment, body temperature was maintained at 38 C using a rectal thermistor coupled with a thermostatically controlled heating pad. The trachea was cannulated, and the lungs were ventilated with a Harvard rodent ventilator (model 680; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The inspirate gas was enriched with O2 (
50% O2), and the ventilator settings were adjusted (tidal volume
3.5 ml; breathing rate
80/min) to maintain arterial PCO2 normocapnic. The femoral artery and vein were cannulated for measurement of systemic arterial blood pressure (ABP) and fluid administration (saline at 3 ml/h), respectively. The arterial line contained heparinized saline (50 U/ml).
Recording CSNA
The stellate ganglion was exposed through a left thoracotomy between the first and second rib. The cardiac sympathetic nerve was identified as a branch from the stellate ganglion, dissected free of surrounding connective tissue, sectioned, and the proximal section (containing efferent fibers) was placed on a pair of platinum recording electrodes. The signal was filtered (low cutoff 0.1 kHz; high cutoff 1 kHz;) and amplified, and subsequently passed through an amplitude discriminator (model WD-2, Dagan Corp., Minneapolis, MN) for counting nerve discharge frequency (impulse frequency).
Raw SNA, impulse frequency, and ABP were continuously sampled at 4 KHz, 200 Hz, and 400 Hz, respectively, using a PowerLab data-acquisition system (model 8/S; ADInstruments Pty Ltd., Bella Vista New South Wales, Australia). Heart rate (HR) was derived from the arterial systolic peaks. The raw nerve signal was rectified and integrated (1-sec resetting interval) online, and the integrated nerve signal was displayed in real time.
Experimental protocol
A 7.0-Prolene suture (Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ) was loosely placed around the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, which was located between the appendage of the left atrium and the base of the pulmonary artery. CSNA, and mean ABP (MABP) and HR were continuously recorded before occlusion of the LAD coronary artery, and for 5 consecutive hours after: 1) no manipulation (sham, n = 7); 2) LAD occlusion (MI, n = 13); and 3) MI with an immediate injection of Ghr (150 µg/kg, sc) (MI plus Ghr, n = 13). We also aimed to assess whether Ghr could reduce sympathetic tone after it had already increased after MI (to simulate those patients that receive delayed therapeutic treatment). Therefore, in this study we also tested a group of rats that received Ghr 2 h after MI (MI plus delayed Ghr, n = 8). Ghr was obtained from the Peptide Institute, Inc. (Osaka, Japan).
Measurement of infarct size
At the completion of each experiment, each rat was euthanized, and the heart was excised and sectioned into 2-mm horizontal slices down the vertical plane. The sections were then stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium solution (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO) and subsequently fixed in 10% formalin for 20 min. Slices were mounted and photographed. Total infarct size was determined by measuring the area of the infarction for each slice, multiplying the area by the slice thickness, and summing the area of all slices. Infarct size was presented as a percentage of the total left ventricular wall.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using StatView (version 5.01; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All results are presented as means ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA (repeated measures) was used to test significance for temporal changes in CSNA after LAD occlusion. One-way ANOVA (factorial) was used to test for differences among the groups of rats. Where statistical significance was reached, post hoc analyses were incorporated using the paired or unpaired t test with the Dunnets correction for multiple comparisons. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival curves between saline-treated and Ghr-treated rats after LAD occlusion. A P value less than or equal to 0.05 was predetermined as the level of significance for all statistical analyses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
30 mm Hg) after the fifth hour after MI preempted the death of the remaining two rats.
|
CSNA
Typical chart recordings of hemodynamic and CSNA data before and 5 h after either MI or MI plus Ghr are presented in Fig. 3
. Baseline cardiovascular and CSNA data are presented in Table 1
. In sham rats (i.e. control), CSNA remained stable for the 5-h recording period. MI rats elicited a significant increase in CSNA (110 ± 27%), which was completely prevented in those rats that also immediately received Ghr after MI (i.e. MI plus Ghr) (Fig. 4
). Moreover, when Ghr was administered 2 h after MI (when CSNA had increased by 85 ± 23%), CSNA declined to pre-MI activity by the fifth hour of recording. MABP and HR did not significantly change in sham or MI plus Ghr rats. MI rats experienced a mild 12% decrease in MABP (
MABP 9 ± 3 mm Hg) and a 15% increase in HR (
HR 55 ± 24 beats/min; not significant). The hypotension was more pronounced in MI plus delayed Ghr rats (
MABP 14 ± 3 mm Hg), although HR did not increase.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study we reported that MI initiated an increase in CSNA, which is consistent with previous anesthetized animal models (10, 11, 12). More recently, Jardine et al. (1) described a transient increase in CSNA in conscious sheep: significant by the second hour after MI, which was sustained for at least 7 d. We also observed a rapid and sustained increase in CSNA, although, one limitation of this study is that we could only record CSNA for 5 h in an anesthetized, open-chest, rat model.
The mechanisms for the increase in CSNA after MI remain to be elucidated fully, although altered neural reflexes (e.g. from baroreceptors and chemoreceptors), increased levels of hormones (e.g. angiotensin II), and changes in central mechanisms that may amplify the responses to these inputs have been implicated (13). Although the increase in CSNA after MI appears to have immediate benefits, providing inotropic support to the heart to maintain cardiac output, this enhanced sympathetic tone is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (1), a leading cause for sudden heart failure and death (8). Indeed, we noted in our study that ventricular arrhythmias often preceded, or even instigated, cardiac failure and sudden death.
Early Ghr treatment after MI prevented the adverse increase in CSNA within the first 5 h of recording, and reduced the incidence of arrhythmias. Further research is required to reveal the exact mechanism(s) by which Ghr suppresses CSNA after MI, although studies have shown that the receptor for Ghr [GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R)] is located in the main cardiovascular control centers in neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) (5), and that the central administration of Ghr directly attenuates renal SNA (4, 5).
We have also demonstrated the existence of GHS-R in the infarcted myocardium (6). Costaining with acetylcholine esterase suggests that the GHS-R is localized in the vagal nerve terminals in the heart, which send afferent projections to the NTS, so that Ghr may act to enhance vagal tone and thereby decrease SNA.
An enhanced vagal tone has also been reported to centrally augment baroreflex control of CSNA (14). Yet, our results imply that Ghr may have reduced baroreflex sensitivity, at least in MI plus delayed Ghr rats, because we observed that CSNA was not elevated above baseline (5 h after MI), despite a 17% decrease in MABP. Matsumura et al. (4) similarly reported that Ghr (iv) reduced MABP without changing renal SNA, but further showed that centrally administered Ghr did decrease SNA, HR, and MABP, and enhance baroreflex sensitivity. They reasoned that iv Ghr has a direct peripheral vasodilatory effect as well as a direct central sympathoinhibitory effect.
Therefore, in this study it is possible that peripheral Ghr administration prevented the increase in CSNA in the acute phase after MI, at least in part, by suppressing SNA directly at the level of the NTS (which would also prevent a baroreflex increase in SNA in response to the vasodilatory effects of Ghr), and indirectly through activation of cardiac vagal afferent nerves. Of course Ghr, which can cross the blood-brain barrier (15), has diverse effects both peripherally and within the central nervous system, and, thus, it is likely that Ghr could modulate CSNA at sites other than the NTS. This is an area of research that warrants further investigation.
In this study, untreated MI rats had a survival rate of only 39%, compared with a 77% survival rate for MI rats treated with Ghr (MI plus Ghr). The observed difference between the two groups of MI rats is likely linked to the fact that Ghr prevented an increase in CSNA in treated rats. Indeed, it may be reasonable to suggest that this benefit of early Ghr treatment contributes, at least in part, to the improved survival prognosis of MI plus Ghr rats (survival of 77%), especially given that arrhythmia-related deaths were less prevalent in MI plus Ghr rats compared with MI rats.
In reality, it may not be possible for all MI patients to receive immediate treatment (i.e. within minutes), and because neurohumoral changes often precede the development of clinically recognizable symptoms of acute heart failure (13), treatment may be delayed by several hours. Yet, it is within this time interval that CSNA has already begun to increase (1). In this study we were able to demonstrate that a 2-h delayed treatment of Ghr was able to reduce the MI-induced increase in CSNA. Furthermore, the survival rate of these rats (75%) was improved compared with untreated rats.
Collectively, the results of this study appear to indicate that early Ghr treatment, at least within the first hours after MI, may improve early survival prognosis, providing clinicians with critical time for implementing supplementary therapeutic measures. Furthermore, this benefit of Ghr is likely associated with the prevention or attenuation of an enhanced cardiac sympathetic drive. Whether these early beneficial effects of Ghr also have long-term benefits for improving cardiac function, and ultimately long-term survival, is an important area that urgently requires further investigation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose. There are no conflicts of interest concerning the material in this study.
First Published Online July 3, 2008
Abbreviations: ABP, Arterial blood pressure; CSNA, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity; Ghr, ghrelin; GHS-R, GH secretagogue receptor; HR, heart rate; LAD, left anterior descending; MABP, mean arterial blood pressure; MI, myocardial infarction; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; SNA, sympathetic nerve activity.
Received April 3, 2008.
Accepted for publication June 23, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Fry and A. V. Ferguson Ghrelin modulates electrical activity of area postrema neurons Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): R485 - R492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |