| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Tetsuo Maruyama, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. E-mail: tetsuo{at}sc.itc.keio.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date, cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) and progestin-mediated signaling pathways have emerged as key cellular events to drive decidual transformation (3). These two signaling pathways cooperatively regulate the activity of decidua-selective transcription factors through their cross talk and convergence, thereby up-regulating decidua-specific genes, eventually leading to terminal differentiation (3). Also, decidualized hESCs produce many bioactive substances, including growth factors and cytokines, whose downstream signaling pathways contribute to decidual transformation in a paracrine/autocrine manner (4, 5, 6). For instance, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-5, a latent transcription factor activated by numerous cytokines and peptide growth factors, is a candidate signaling molecule thought to regulate decidualization (7, 8, 9).
We previously reported that kinase activation of v-src sarcoma (Schmidt-Ruppin A-2) viral oncogene homolog (SRC) is closely associated with in vitro and in vivo decidualization of hESCs (10, 11). SRC is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that associates with many surface receptors including growth factors and cytokine receptors, becomes activated upon ligand binding, and converts the extracellular stimuli to intracellular signals (12). The kinase activity of SRC is up-regulated by dephosphorylation of its negative regulatory tyrosine residue, tyrosine 527 (corresponding to tyrosine 530 in humans), located at the carboxyl terminus and further enhanced by autophosphorylation of tyrosine 416 (12). Given that many growth factors and cytokines are locally produced from decidual cells (4, 5, 6), it seems reasonable that SRC activation is accompanied by decidualization. However, it remains uncertain whether it is absolutely essential for the process of decidual changes. To address the essential role of SRC in decidualization of hESCs, we previously performed knockdown experiments to abrogate decidual SRC activity using specific inhibitors of SRC family kinases, 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP1) and 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]-pyrimidine (PP2) (13); however, these inhibitors unexpectedly promoted decidualization together with paradoxical SRC activation (13). Although we demonstrated that SRC is an indispensable signaling component for maximal decidualization in mice (14), it remains unclear whether SRC and its kinase activity are essential for decidualization in humans.
To clarify this point, we conducted experiments in which adenovirus was used to introduce dominant-negative mutants of SRC into hESCs. We subsequently asked whether the elimination of SRC kinase activity by overexpression of these mutants influenced decidualization of hESCs in vitro. We now provide direct evidence that SRC kinase activation together with STAT5 phosphorylation is required for decidualization of hESCs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/STAT5β (total STAT5) polyclonal antibody and anti-phospho-STAT5
/STAT5β (tyrosine 694) polyclonal antibody recognizing the phosphorylated forms of STAT5
/STAT5β were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA).
Plasmids and recombinant adenovirus construction
Two pBabe vectors, one encoding a chicken c-SRC kinase-inactive dominant-negative mutant (SRC/K295R) and a second chicken c-SRC inactive autophosphorylation site mutant (SRC/Y416F) were kindly provided by Hidesaburo Hanafusa and Tsuyoshi Akagi (Molecular Oncology, Osaka Bioscience Institute). The recombinant adenovirus vectors carrying SRC/K295R or SRC/Y416F genes were constructed by using the Adeno-X expression system (CLONTECH). Briefly, for the construction of pShuttle SRC/K295R and SRC/Y416F expression vectors, the pBabe-based vectors were digested with BamHI and EcoRI. Then the fragments containing the full-length SRC/K295R or SRC/Y416F cDNAs were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase and ligated with pShuttle vectors that had been digested with NheI and blunt ended. In addition, to construct adenovirus shuttle plasmid pAdeno vectors carrying SRC/K295R or SRC/Y416F, the recombined pShuttle vectors were digested with PI-SceI and I-CeuI, and ligated with pAdeno vectors. The mutated sites and junctions were verified by sequencing and restriction enzyme mapping. The newly recombined pAdeno vectors carrying SRC/K295R or SRC/Y416F were digested with PacI and transfected into HEK 293 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions for the construction of adenovirus vectors. Adenovirus vectors encoding EGFP (Ad-EGFP), SRC/K295R (Ad-SRC/K295R), or SRC/Y416F (Ad-SRC/Y416F) were packaged and propagated in HEK 293 cells. After being purified by cesium chloride gradient centrifugation at 300,000 x g for 3.5 h at 4 C, the adenovirus vectors were dialyzed in PBS overnight at 4 C and stored at –80 C before cell infection in vitro. The viral titer of purified adenovirus was 2.5 x 1010 pfu/ml. About 80% NIH-3T3 cells and 70% hESCs were infected with Ad-EGFP, Ad-SRC/K295R, or Ad-SRC/Y416F when the multiplicity of infection reached 50.
Tissue specimens
Endometrial specimens from the proliferative or early secretory phases of the regular menstrual cycle were obtained from consenting patients undergoing endometrial biopsies or total abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. The use of these human specimens was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at Keio University. No abnormalities or malignancies in these specimens were detected by histological examination.
Isolation of hESCs
hESCs were isolated from human cycling endometria as previously described (15, 16). Briefly, tissue specimens were washed in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and minced with scissors into small pieces less than 1 mm3 in size. The tissues were then gently agitated in tubes for 2 h at 37 C in DMEM with 0.2% (wt/vol) collagenase (Wako Bio-chemicals, Osaka, Japan), 0.05% DNase I (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY). After enzymatic digestion, cell clumps were dispersed by pipetting. Most of the digested hESCs presented as single cells or small aggregates were filtered sequentially through a 70-µm cell strainer nylon filter (Falcon 2350; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) to remove gland cells, layered onto Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), and centrifuged at 500 x g for 15 min at 4 C to remove erythrocytes. The isolated hESCs were collected from the Ficoll interface, resuspended in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture, and transferred to individual wells of 24-well plates, 6-cm dishes, or eight-glass chamber microscope as described below.
Cell culture, hormonal treatment, and adenovirus transfection
Murine fibroblast NIH-3T3 cells were inoculated into 6-cm dishes (1.0 x 105 cells/dish) and maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture at 37 C under 5% CO2 in humidified air. Once 80% confluent, the cells were washed twice in PBS and cultured under serum starvation in DMEM with 0.1% FBS. Then, NIH-3T3 cells were infected with Ad-EGFP or Ad-SRC/K295R, or Ad-SRC/Y416F or treated with control medium for 48 h (uninfected control). These cells were then treated with 100 ng/ml recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 min and harvested before the collection of total cell lysates.
Isolated hESCs were transferred to 24-well plates (5.0 x 105 cells/well) or 6-cm dishes, and grown at 37 C under 5% CO2 in humidified air. Once 70% confluent, the cells were washed twice in PBS and infected with Ad-EGFP, Ad-SRC/K295R, or Ad-SRC/Y416F. After 48 h infection, the cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture. Subsequently hESCs were stimulated without or with 10 nM 17β-estradiol (Sigma-Aldrich) plus 1 µM progesterone (Sigma-Aldrich) (EP) for 12 d to induce decidualization. Supernatants were harvested every 2 d, centrifuged at 2000 x g to remove any nonadherent cells, and stored at –80 C. On d 12, total RNA was isolated from cultured hESCs. The morphological changes of hESCs treated with or without EP were viewed with a Leica DM IRE2 inverted fluorescent microscope using a x20 objective (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberger GmbH, Germany).
Immunoblot analysis
Noninfected or infected NIH-3T3 cells in 6-cm dishes were washed twice in cold PBS containing 1 mM Na3VO4 and lysed with 200 µl cold lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, and 1 mM Na2MoO4] containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). After stirring three times for 15 sec and chilling for 5 min at 4 C, the cell lysates were centrifuged at 17,000 x g for 10 min at 4 C and stored immediately at –80 C until electrophoresis.
Cell extracts from hESCs were prepared by the method of Schreiber et al. (17). hESCs in 6-cm dishes were washed twice in cold PBS containing 1 mM Na3VO4. We then added 200 µl cold buffer A [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Na3VO4, 20% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40] containing protease inhibitor cocktail. The cells were subjected to hypotonic lysis on ice for 5 min and then collected by means of a scraper. After chilling for 10 min, the cell lysates were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 C. The supernatants were stored immediately at –80 C as cytoplasmic fractions for protein analysis by electrophoresis. The nuclear pellets were resuspended in 100 µl cold buffer B [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 500 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Na3VO4, 20% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40] containing protease inhibitor cocktail and vigorously vortexed for 10 sec. After chilling for 30 min, the mixtures were pelleted by centrifugation at 17,000 x g for 15 min at 4 C. The supernatants were stored immediately at –80 C as nuclear fractions for protein electrophoresis. The protein concentrations were measured using the DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
In typical experiments, 10 µg lysates of NIH3T3 cells were mixed with lysis buffer and 20 µg cytoplasmic or nuclear extracts of hESCs were mixed with buffer A or buffer B, respectively. After addition of 2x SDS sample buffer, samples were heated at 95 C for 5 min. The heated samples were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE for 2 h at 125 V and subsequently transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Immobilon P; Millipore, Bedford, MA) using transfer buffer (50 mM Tris aminomethane, 40 mM glycine, 0.04% SDS, and 20% methanol) for 2 h at 52 V. The membrane was incubated in TBS-T [20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl (pH 7.6), and 0.1% Tween 20] containing 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature to block nonspecific binding sites. After three 10-min washes in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibodies against SRC (1:1000 dilution), EGFP (1:1000 dilution), ACTB (1:1000 dilution), phospho-MAPK (1:5000 dilution), phospho-STAT5 (1:1000 dilution), and total-STAT5 (1:1000 dilution) in TBS-T containing 1% BSA. After overnight incubation, membranes were washed three times in TBS-T for 10 min per wash and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) diluted 1:10,000 in TBS-T containing 1% BSA. After washing three times for 10 min in TBS-T, bound antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence plus detection kit (Amersham Biosciences Co., Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturers instructions and exposed to x-ray films (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Immunoblots were stripped in the buffer [62.5 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, and 100 mM β-mercaptoethanol] at 50 C for 30 min and reprobed with antibody against total MAPK (1:5000) in TBS-T containing 1% BSA.
Immunofluorescent analysis
For visualization of filamentous actin (F-actin), hESCs grown on 8-glass chamber microscope slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 20 min at 37 C and washed three times for 5 min each time with PBS. Then cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Wako Chemical)/PBS for 15 min at 37 C. After washing three times for 5 min each time with PBS, cells were blocked for nonspecific staining with 5% fetal calf serum/PBS for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Subsequently cells were incubated with 1: 500 Texas Red-X conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 1 h at RT or overnight at 4 C and washed three times for 10 min each time with PBS. Counterstaining was conducted with 2 mg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) to visualize DNA by incubation for 20 min at RT. The morphological changes were viewed with a DMIRE2 inverted fluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems) using a x40 oil immersion objective. For digitally enhanced images, on-chip integration, background subtraction of white noise, and frame averaging, image processing was performed using Adobe Photoshop CS2 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
Extraction of total RNA and semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis
The expression levels of transcripts in hESCs grown on 24-well plates were determined by RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from cultured hESCs using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions, treated with deoxyribonuclease, purified by RNeasy Spin columns (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA), and resuspended in 20 µl of diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. Semiquantitative RT-PCR of human IGF binding protein 1 (IGFBP1), prolactin (PRL), ACTB, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), and SRC were carried out with 500 ng of total cellular RNA, on which RT was performed, using One-Step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturers recommendations. Primers used to amplify IGFBP1, PRL, ACTB, MMP2, and SRC were designed using known sequences and shown in Table 1
. The conditions used for PCR were as follows: 50 C for 30 min, 95 C for 15 min, x-cycles (94 C for 60 sec, y C for 60 sec, and 72 C for 90 sec), and then 72 C for 10 min. The extension cycle and annealing temperature, shown as x and y, respectively, are given in Table 1
. After PCR amplification, 10 µl of the PCR products were electrophoresed in 3% agarose gels, visualized by ethidium bromide staining, and photographed under UV illumination.
|
Statistical analysis
Data are mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments, except for results of RT-PCR analysis, in which case a representative experiment is depicted in the figure. ANOVA was performed and significant differences from control were determined using the Dunnetts test. All data were analyzed with the JMP 6.0.3 statistical analysis program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Differences were considered significant when P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To verify our adenovirus constructs, we first examined whether Ad-SRC/K295R and Ad-SRC/Y416F function as predicted. It is known that EGF stimulation leads to phosphorylation of MAPK through kinase activation of SRC in NIH-3T3 cells (20). We therefore introduced these SRC mutants into NIH-3T3 cells via adenovirus, cultured the infected cells under serum starvation, and then stimulated them without or with EGF. After 4 min stimulation, the cells were harvested for protein extraction and subjected to immunoblot analysis.
As shown in Fig. 1A
, NIH-3T3 cells infected with Ad-EGFP and Ad-SRC/K295R strongly expressed EGFP and SRC mutant protein, respectively (Fig. 1
, top two panels). EGF stimulation induced expression of the phosphorylated form of MAPK in noninfected or Ad-EGFP-infected NIH-3T3 cells (Fig. 1A
, third panel from top). As expected, EGF-induced phosphorylation of MAPK was dramatically suppressed in Ad-SRC/K295R-infected NIH-3T3 cells. Neither adenovirus infection nor EGF treatment affected the levels of total MAPK, i.e. both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms (Fig. 1A
, bottom panel). In contrast, although Ad-SRC/Y416F-infected NIH-3T3 cells prominently expressed SRC mutant protein, EGF-induced phosphorylation of MAPK was mildly suppressed, compared with Ad-SRC/K295R. Thus, Ad-SRC/K295R and Ad-SRC/Y416F displayed high transduction efficiency and exhibited dominant-negative effects on the SRC kinase-mediated signaling pathway as expected.
|
|
|
Dominant-negative SRC mutants inhibit EP-induced production of IGFBP1 and PRL by hESCs
To examine the effects of overexpression of these two SRC mutants on the production of IGFBP1 and PRL, we measured (by ELISA) the concentrations of IGFBP1 and PRL proteins in the media of noninfected or adenovirally infected EP-treated hESCs. As shown in Fig. 4
, noninfected or Ad-EGFP-infected hESCs secreted IGFBP1 and PRL in a time-dependent manner in response to treatment with EP. In contrast, Ad-SRC/K295R-infected hESCs produced very little IGFBP1 and PRL throughout the treatment with EP. Infection of Ad-SRC/Y416F also inhibited the secretion of IGFBP1 and PRL, however, less effectively than Ad-SRC/K295R infection. Thus, these SRC mutants attenuated the EP-induced production of IGFBP1 and PRL, indicating that kinase activation of SRC and its downstream signaling pathway(s) is involved in IGFBP1 and PRL production.
|
As shown in Fig. 5
, hESCs infected with Ad-EGFP, Ad-SRC/K295R, and Ad-SRC/Y416F prominently expressed EGFP and SRC mutant proteins, respectively (Fig. 5
, top two panels). Despite the reported involvement of MAPK, a downstream signaling molecule of SRC, in the course of decidualization (25), an increase in the phosphorylation level of MAPK was marginal in decidualized hESCs (Fig. 5
, third panel from top). Notably, neither of the SRC mutants affected the phosphorylation levels of MAPK. In contrast, the Y694-phosphorylated form of STAT5 was markedly up-regulated in decidualized hESCs but dramatically inhibited by the introduction of Ad-SRC/K295R (Fig. 5
, second and forth panels from bottom). The overall effect of Ad-SRC/K416F on STAT5 phosphorylation was less inhibitory than that of Ad-SRC/K295R (Fig. 5
, second and forth panels from bottom).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regulatory mechanisms of SRC and its downstream signaling pathways have been well elucidated in a variety of cells (12); however, these remain elusive in hESCs. Because SRC couples with many cell surface receptors for cytokines and growth factors, these locally produced factors may activate SRC in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Indeed, IGF-I, but not platelet-derived growth factor, can activate SRC in mouse endometrial cells (14). Alternatively, progestins are also one of the candidates that positively regulate SRC activity (29). Progestins can stimulate the SRC/MAPK pathway through indirect or direct interaction of ligand-bound progesterone receptors with SRC (30, 31). This interaction may be facilitated when SRC becomes conformationally open upon dephosphorylation of tyrosine 527 (530 in human). In agreement, we reported previously that decidual SRC becomes activated together with its dephosphorylation on tyrosine 530 (11, 13). We also found that, despite the activation of decidual SRC, focal adhesion kinase and paxillin, well-established substrates of SRC and components of the focal adhesion complex (12), remain hypophosphorylated in decidualized hESCs (32). Those results indicate that focal adhesion kinase and paxillin may not be substrates of SRC in decidualizing hESCs. In this study, we have demonstrated that SRC is responsible for Y694 phosphorylation of STAT5 in decidualizing hESCs, implicating STAT5 as a signaling molecule downstream of decidual SRC.
Members of the STAT family are activated by phosphorylation within the cytoplasm by diverse cell signaling pathways, including receptor-associated JAK (33, 34). Phosphorylation of a conserved tyrosine residue in all STAT family members induces their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus. Within the nucleus, they regulate genes involved in growth and differentiation of many tissues including adipocytes, hepatocytes, and mammary epithelial cells (34). In human endometrium, STAT5 is selectively expressed in glandular epithelium and a subset of stromal cells that also express PRL receptor during the secretory phase, suggesting a potential role in differentiation (7). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that treatment of primary hESC cultures with cAMP (with or without progestin) leads to induction, phosphorylation, dimerization, and nuclear translocation of STAT5, eventually enhancing the activity of the -332/-270 decidual PRL promoter region (3, 9). Furthermore, Mak et al. (9) reported that the nuclear accumulation of phosphorylated STAT5 in hESCs is independent of JAK activity, suggesting that other activating kinase(s) may regulate decidual STAT5. Importantly, SRC is capable of directly phosphorylating STAT5 on Y694 (23). Both our previous and present studies showed that in vitro decidualization of hESCs was accompanied by SRC activation (11, 13) and Y694 phosphorylation of STAT5. The latter process was abrogated by a kinase-inactive dominant-negative SRC mutant. Taken together, these findings and our data indicate that activation of the SRC-STAT5 pathway is required for decidualization of hESCs.
MAPK is phosphorylated and thereby activated by various growth factors including EGF and platelet-derived growth factor through diverse signaling pathways involving RAF, MAPK kinase, and SRC (35). Decidualization of hESCs is accompanied by SRC activation (10, 11) and production of many growth factors and cytokines (4, 5, 6). However, we demonstrated here that, in contrast to STAT5, MAPK phosphorylation was not evident in decidualized hESCs, which is consistent with a previous report (36). Although MAPK activation has been reported to be involved in decidualization (25, 37, 38, 39), it may be temporally required for the initiation of decidualization of hESCs rather than for the establishment and maintenance of decidual transformation. Because a dominant-negative SRC mutant inhibits the phosphorylation of decidual STAT5, but not MAPK, the data suggest that STAT5, but not MAPK, is a downstream signaling molecule in the major SRC-mediated signaling pathway in decidualizing hESCs. SRC has the potential to directly phosphorylate STAT5 on Y694 (23) and indirectly activate the MAPK kinase/MAPK pathway through tyrosine phosphorylation of RAF (35). It is therefore conceivable that, in decidualizing hESCs, MAPK phosphorylation may be intricately modulated through convergence of different signaling pathways, including the cAMP-PKA pathway as suggested elsewhere (40). Thus, in this context, SRC may not be the sole and major determinant of the MAPK activity.
Inhibition of IGFBP1 and PRL mRNA expression by dominant-negative SRC mutants indicates that SRC is integrated into the upstream signaling pathway(s) responsible for induction of IGFBP1 and PRL. It has been proposed that elevation of cAMP enhances expression and nuclear accumulation of FoxO1A and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-β in hESCs, both of which, in turn, interact with ligand-activated progesterone receptor and thereby initiate transcription of IGFBP1 and PRL genes (3). Given the reported cross talk between SRC and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways (38, 40, 41, 42), it is conceivable that SRC may affect the transcriptional activity of the decidua-specific complex containing FoxO1A and C/EBPβ. Y694 phosphorylation activates STAT5 transcriptional activity (24). Thus, in addition to the upstream cross talk between SRC and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways, STAT5 (activated by SRC through Y694 phosphorylation) may translocate into the nucleus and thereby directly regulate the promoters of decidua-specific genes including IGFBP1 and PRL through its interaction with FoxO1A, C/EBPβ, and/or progesterone receptor as proposed elsewhere (3). Intriguingly, STAT5 positively regulates the decidual PRL promoter (3, 9), whereas it inhibits the GH-induced activation of the IGFBP1 promoter (43). Thus, not only upstream but also downstream cross talk between SRC and cAMP-PKA pathways may play crucial roles in the differential regulation of decidualization marker expression. In support of this idea, different regulatory mechanisms underlying the transcriptional activation of IGFBP1 and PRL in hESCs have been suggested (44, 45).
In conclusion, SRC kinase activation and subsequent STAT5 phosphorylation are essential for in vitro decidualization of hESCs. This suggests that the SRC-STAT5 signaling pathway is critical to the molecular mechanism(s) underlying decidualization. Our findings also suggest possible therapeutic strategies to modulate endometrial function by targeting SRC-STAT5 signaling pathways.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: All authors have nothing to declare.
First Published Online December 6, 2007
Abbreviations: ACTB, β-Actin; Ad-EGFP, adenoviruses carrying EGFP alone; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; EP, estradiol and progesterone; FBS, fetal bovine serum; hESC, human endometrial stromal cell; IGFBP1, IGF binding protein 1; JAK, Janus kinase; MMP2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; PKA, protein kinase A; PRL, prolactin; RT, room temperature; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SRC, v-src sarcoma (Schmidt-Ruppin A-2) viral oncogene homolog; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TBS-T, Tris-HCl, NaCl, and Tween 20.
Received September 4, 2007.
Accepted for publication November 28, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(2)-macroglobulin, and decidual PRL involving the Jak2 and Stat5 pathway. Endocrinology 142:1242–1250
, and integrin underlies the spreading and invasiveness of gastric carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol 25:6921–6936
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |