| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Gene Expression through Thyroid Hormone Receptor β/Retinoid X Receptor
-Dependent Activation of Hepatic Leukemia FactorInstitut für Physiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, D-45122 Essen, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Joachim Fandrey, M.D., Institut für Physiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany. E-mail: joachim.fandrey{at}uni-due.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
regulation by T3. We found that T3-dependent HIF-1 activation is not limited to hepatoma cells but is also observed in primary human hepatocytes, kidney and lung carcinoma cells. T3 increased the HIF-1
subunit mRNA and protein within a few hours through activation of the thyroid hormone receptor β retinoid X receptor
heterodimer because knockdown of each of the partners abrogated the stimulation by T3. However, T3 had no direct effect on transcription of HIF-1
, but activation of the thyroid hormone receptor β/retinoid X receptor
heterodimer by T3 stimulated expression of the hepatic leukemia factor, which increases HIF-1
gene expression. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit (120 kDa) and the constitutively expressed HIF-1β (91–94 kDa, arylhydrocarbon nuclear translocator). Both subunits belong to a subfamily of bHLH-PAS-transcription factors that also includes the HIF-1
orthologues HIF-2
and HIF-3
(1).
The activation of HIF-1 is a multistep process, including posttranslational stabilization, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional activation. Under normoxia HIF-1
is subjected to oxygen-dependent hydroxylation, ubiquitinylation, and degradation in proteasomes. Hydroxylated HIF-1
binds von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein, which acts as a recognition site for an E3-ubiquitin ligase that marks HIF-1
for degradation by polyubiquitinylation (2). The interaction between HIF-1
and von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein requires the O2- and iron-dependent hydroxylation of proline 402 and 564 in the central oxygen-dependent degradation domains of HIF-1
by prolyl hydroxylases (1, 2, 3). Because of the oxygen dependence of prolyl hydroxylase activity, these enzymes are classified as the cellular oxygen sensors, which regulate the amount of HIF-1
-subunits in the cell (3). Under hypoxia the hydroxylation and subsequent degradation of HIF-1
cease, and the HIF-1
subunits can accumulate.
Transactivation is dependent on an additional oxygen sensor, the HIF-asparaginyl-hydroxylase factor inhibiting HIF-1, which hydroxylates the asparagine (Asn803 in human HIF-1
) within the C-terminal transactivation domain. Hydroxy-Asn prevents the binding of p300/CBP to HIF-1
that serves as a scaffold for recruiting further transcription factors, and can facilitate the transcription by acetylation and relocation of histone proteins (4). As a consequence the HIF-1
-C-terminal transactivation domain remains inactive under normoxic conditions (5). Well-known HIF-1 target genes are erythropoietin (EPO) (5, 6), adrenomedullin (ADM) (7), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (8), glucose transporters (GLUTs) (9), or glycolytic enzymes (10) that control erythropoiesis, angiogenesis, and glucose use, demonstrating the central role of HIF-1 for hypoxic adaptation on systemic, local, and cellular levels (11).
Thyroid hormone T3 as a mediator of increased metabolic rate and oxygen consumption has regulated HIF-1
protein accumulation (12, 13). However, discrepancies with respect to the time course and mechanism of HIF-1
induction were observed. Short-term regulation of HIF-1
by T3 in human hepatoma cells HepG2 was attributed to increased translation of HIF-1
mRNA, but no evidence for the engaged signaling pathways was provided (12). In contrast, primary human fibroblasts reacted with late HIF-1
stimulation, i.e. after 24 h, by T3-mediated induced transcription using nonnuclear signaling via phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3)-kinase (13).
Compared with nonnuclear signaling, T3 classically binds to specific nuclear receptors, the thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) (14). TRs are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, which includes receptors for steroid hormones and retinoids and that act as transcriptions factors directly regulating target gene expression by binding to regulatory DNA elements and coactivator complexes (15). Two isoforms of TRs, TR
and TRβ, can either bind to DNA as monomers, or form homodimers or heterodimers (14) with proteins such as retinoid X receptors (RXRs) to bind to thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) (16). TRs can either repress or activate gene expression, depending on the presence of active T3. If T3 is not available, receptors interact with a transcriptional corepressor complex, including histone deacetylases, to form a compact, "turned-off" conformation of chromatin. T3 binding to receptors results in a conformational change. The corepressor complex dissociates and enables binding to the coactivator complex with histone transacetylase activity, which imposes an open configuration on adjacent chromatin. This molecular rearrangement alters repressed receptors into transcriptional activators (17).
Interestingly, functions and, therefore, target genes of T3 and HIF-1
are overlapping, such as expression of EPO (6, 18), ADM (19), GLUT, and glycolytic enzymes (13). Thus, here, we studied how thyroid hormones exert their effects on HIF-1 by classical signaling through the TRβ/RXR
nuclear receptor activation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For experiments cells were maintained under serum free conditions with 1% serum supplement (Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany) 24 h before and during the experiments. To achieve hypoxic conditions, all cell lines were placed in a Heraeus incubator (Hanau, Germany) with 5% CO2 and nitrogen to balance for 3% O2 concentration.
Reagents
T3, tetraiodothyro-acetic acid (Tetrac), actinomycin D, and cycloheximide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) against TRβ (hp-validated siRNA Hs_THRB_7) were from by QIAGEN (Hilden, Germany), and siRNA against TR
(ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool human TR
), RXR
(ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool human RXR
), HIF-1
(siGENOME duplex human HIF-1
siRNA), and hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) (siGENOME SMARTpool human HLF), as well as nontarget siRNA (siCONTROL nontargeting siRNA no. 2) were from Dharmacon (Perbio, Bonn, Germany). Oligofectamine and all primers were purchased from Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany). For plasmid transfection Fugene 6 (Roche GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was used. The inhibitors SB203590, Wortmannin, LY294002, and Rapamycin were purchased from Calbiochem (Merck Chemicals Ltd., Darmstadt, Germany), and PD98059 and U0126 from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). HIF-1
antibody was from Biotransduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and
-tubulin from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Heidelberg, Germany). Oligo(dT) and reverse transcriptase were obtained from Promega (Heidelberg, Germany). SYBR Green I was from Eurogentec (Köln, Germany).
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was isolated by the guanidinium isothiocyanate extraction as described (21). Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed with oligo(dT) and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega). Gene expression was quantitated using the qPCR Mastermix for SYBR Green I (Eurogentec) and the GeneAmp 5700 sequence Detection System (PE Biosystems, Applied Biosystems, Oxford, UK) or iCycler (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). The real-time PCR were set up in a final volume of 25 µl with 1 µl cDNA and a primer concentration of 10 pmol each. Used forward (F) and reverse (R) primers: ADM, (F) 5'-GGATGCCGCCCGCATCCGAG-3' and (R) 5'-GACACCAGAGTCCGACCCGG-3'; β-actin, (F) 5'-TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA-3' and (R) 5'-CAGCGGAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG-3'; HIF-1
, (F) 5'-GCTGGCCCCAGCCGCTGGAG-3' and (R) 5'-GAGTGCAGGGTCAGCACTAC-3'; TR
, (F) 5'-ATCTATCCACATTGCCACA-3' and (R) 5'-TGGTAAACTCGCTGAAGGCT-3'; TRβ, (F) 5'-GGAGAACCGGGAGAAAAGAC-3' and (R) 5'-GGGCATTGACTATTGGTGCT-3'; RXR
, (F) 5'-TTCTCCACCCAGGTGAACTC-3' and (R) 5'-GAGCTGATGACCGAGAAAGG-3'; and HLF, (F) 5'-TCAGACCAGGTCAGCTGTTG-3' and (R) 5'-GCTGTGGCTTCAGTTCTTCC-3'. Dilutions of purified PCR products starting at 1 pg to 0.001 fg were used as standards. Amplification conditions were set to 10 min at 95 C, followed by 40 PCR cycles for β-actin and 45 PCR cycles for the other genes (15 sec at 95 C, 1 min at 60 C). The quantity of any cDNA was normalized to β-actin cDNA and expressed as fold induction.
Protein extract preparation and Western immunoblotting
For whole cell lysates, primary liver cells were lysed with 100 µl and all other cell lines with 50 µl extract buffer [0.1% NP-40, 300 mM NaCl, 10 nM Tris (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 1:10 dilution protein-inhibitor-cocktail] for 20 min on ice. Extracts were centrifuged (3600 x g for 5 min at 4 C), and the supernatant was quantitated using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent and stored at –20 C. After addition of one fourth volume of 4x sample buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.0125% bromphenol blue, and 1% glycerin], samples were subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE, separated, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (0.2-µm pore size; Whatman, Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). Blots were stained with Ponceau S solution (Bio-Rad) to ensure equal protein loading and transfer. The membranes were blocked with blocking solution (5% nonfat dry milk powder in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20) overnight and afterwards were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (HIF-1
and HIF-1β 1:500). After washing with Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 [20 mM Tris-Base, 140 mM NaCl (pH 7.6) with 1:2000 Tween 20], horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse IgG or antirabbit antibodies were used as a secondary antibody at a 1:1000 dilution in blocking solution. Anti-
-tubulin antibody (at a 1:750 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a loading control. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the luminol coumarin acid H2O2 system [per membrane: 12.5 µl 90 mM coumarin acid, 25 µl 250 nM luminol, 1.5 µl 30% H2O2 in 5 ml 100 mM Tris/Cl (pH 8.5)] for hepatic cells and ECL Advanced System (GE Healthcare, formerly Amersham Biosciences, Munich, Germany) for all other cells, followed by exposure to x-ray film (Agfa, Cologne, Germany).
Immunohistochemistry
To ensure the stabile adhesion to glass, sterile coverslips were incubated with poly-D-lysin for 30 min before adding cells. After the experiments cells were fixed with a 1:1 acetone-methanol mixture and finally blocked with 3% BSA diluted in PBS for 30 min. Including three washing steps with PBS between both steps, the first antibody (1:50 in blocking solution) was incubated for 2 h, and then the second antibody (Alexa 568 antimouse, 1:400 in PBS) was incubated dry and lightproof for 1 h. The coverslips were fixed on the slides using Moviol and were dried overnight in the dark. The immunostained cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy on the next day.
Transient transfection assays
For reporter gene assays, cells were transfected with Fugene 6 (Roche GmbH). The luciferase reporter gene plasmid pH3SVL containing an SV40 promoter-luciferase unit downstream of six HIF binding sites from the transferrin enhancer was a kind gift of Professor R. Wenger (Zurich, Switzerland). The promoter plasmid pGL3-Prom800 containing the 5'-untranslated region (UTR) and the promoter of HIF-1
(–541 to –1 bp) was a kind gift of Professor C. Michiels (Namur, Belgium). The bicistronic vector RhifF contains the complete 5'-UTR of HIF-1
, which includes an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). It was a kind gift of Professor B. Brune (Frankfurt, Germany).
Cells were transfected with 0.25 µg plasmid and 0.75 µl Fugene six per 24-well. After overnight incubation in serum free media, experiments were started. Afterwards, cells were lysed with 100 µl 1x lysis buffer. After 24 h at –20 C, luciferase activity was measured with the Firefly Luciferase assay kit (Biotium, Biotrend Chemikalien GmbH, Cologne, Germany) or Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) regarding the description and was expressed in relative light units (RLUs) normalized to total cellular protein.
siRNA transfection assays
Different end concentrations of 20 µM stocks of siRNAs were transfected with 10 µl Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) per six-well dish. After 24-h incubation without serum and antibiotics, the medium was changed, and experiments were started.
Statistics
Statistical significance was calculated using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA) applying the one-way ANOVA, followed by the Bonferroni test. An asterisk indicates a P value less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
accumulation, nuclear translocation, and HIF-1 target gene expression
protein levels after 5 h hypoxic incubation, whereas an increase under normoxia was almost undetectable by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1A
was not affected by T3 (data not shown), confirming our earlier data (12) and excluding aggravated hypoxia due to T3-stimulated O2 consumption as a cause for increased HIF-1
levels. Immunohistochemistry for HIF-1
revealed a remarkable increase of nuclear HIF-1
after 5-h incubation with T3, even under normoxia, whereas constitutively expressed HIF-1β was not changed (Fig. 1B
|
exhibits transcriptional activity by forming a heterodimeric complex with HIF-1β that binds to HIF-1 binding sites, we transfected HepG2 cells with a reporter construct containing six HIF-1 binding sites. T3 increased HIF-1 activity after 5 h compared with hypoxia alone, which corresponds well to the highest levels of HIF-1
protein (Fig. 1C
T3-dependent HIF-1
induction is not mediated by kinase pathways
T3 may exert its function by activation of nonnuclear second messenger pathways or acting via nuclear receptors. Incubation with T3 for 24 h has recently been reported to induce HIF-1
by nonnuclear pathways (22). Therefore, we started to inhibit MAPKs p38 with SB203590 and p42/44 with PD98059, and the more specific U0126. None of the MAPK-inhibitors had an effect on T3-mediated HIF-1
accumulation but, depending on concentration, reduced hypoxic HIF-1
(Fig. 2
). Likewise, the inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase by Wortmannin and LY294002, as well as the inhibition of P70S6-kinase/mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTor) by Rapamycin had no effect on T3-induced HIF-1
protein.
|
induction is mediated by TRβ and RXR
in hepatoma cells and primary human hepatocytes
transcription via nuclear receptors, we transfected HepG2 cells with siRNA against the two isoforms of TR and the heterodimerization partner retinoid receptor RXR
. Although a knockdown of TR
(87% efficiency) did not reduce the T3-mediated HIF-1
accumulation, knockdown of TRβ (86% efficiency) as well as knockdown of RXR
(78% efficiency) abrogated the T3 effect on HIF-1
(Fig. 3
accumulation.
|
in nonmalignant cells. As in HepG2 cells, a maximum of HIF-1
induction by T3 was observed after 5 h incubation (Fig. 4A
accumulation was faster than in HepG2 cells. Knockdown of TRβ (70% efficiency) and RXR
(70% efficiency) in primary hepatocytes abolished T3-stimulated HIF-1
accumulation, whereas the knockdown of TR
(73% efficiency) had no effect (Fig. 4B
, ADM expression was even more reduced by TRβ knockdown, indicating that T3 may directly induce ADM in addition to the effects through HIF-1
.
|
protein levels, we studied whether T3 affects HIF-1
mRNA translation. HepG2 cells were treated with 10 µg/ml cycloheximide to inhibit translation that had, however, no effect on T3-induced HIF-1
levels but decreased hypoxic HIF-1
accumulation (Fig. 5A
with an IRES exhibited a strong increase in translational efficiency under hypoxia, but no additional induction by T3 (Fig. 5B
|
accumulation (Fig. 5C
Active T3 does not induce HIF-1
expression through the –541 to –1 bp HIF-1
promoter but a further upstream HLF binding site
To determine effects of T3 on hif-1
gene expression, we quantitated hif-1
mRNA isolated from HepG2 cells at different time points. Maximum induction by T3 was found after 4 h incubation (Fig. 6A
), which matches with T3-induced HIF-1
protein after 5 h incubation. To examine whether this effect is mediated by activation of the hif-1
promoter, HepG2 cells were transfected with reporter gene construct in which luciferase was under control of the previously published promoter sequences (–541 to –1) of hif-1
. This vector did not contain sequences responsible for the induction of HIF-1
expression by T3 (Fig. 6B
). However, extension of the promoter by 120 bp revealed a potential binding site for HLF (Fig. 6C
).
|
transcription (data not shown). In contrast, in kidney carcinoma cells, KiKa and lung cancer cells A549 T3 increased HIF-1
protein after 4–5 h (Fig. 7A
protein accumulation was almost completely abrogated (Fig. 7D
|
-dependent expression of HLF, which bind to upstream promoter sequences of hif-1
, thus increasing hif-1
gene expression. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
accumulation in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) and primary fibroblasts (12, 13). However, whereas T3 increased HIF-1
after 5-h incubation in HepG2 cells, human primary fibroblasts only responded after 24 h. Because in our previous study higher T3 concentrations (100 nM) were used (12), here, we reduced T3 to a high (patho) physiological concentration that we also measured in FCS used for culturing the cells (data not shown; measured by Biofocus, Recklinghausen, Germany). T3 still induced HIF-1
accumulation (Fig. 1A
PI3-kinase dependent signaling had been implied for long-term stimulation of HIF-1
protein by T3 in primary fibroblasts (22). However, our data (Fig. 2
) exclude a significant contribution of the major protein kinase pathways to T3 signaling during the early effects on HIF-1
. We confirmed that hypoxic HIF-1
accumulation is influenced by MAPK p38 (33, 34) as well as MAPK p42/44 (35, 36). Therefore, we focused on the meaning of nuclear TRs. Indeed, the targeted knockdown of TRβ and RXR
resulted in the loss of T3-induced HIF-1
accumulation (Fig. 3
). By contrast, T3-induced HIF-1
protein remained unaffected when TR
was inhibited. Although HIF-1β is able to interact with the corepressor silencing mediator of retinoid acid thyroid hormone (23) and might play an important role in activating the TRs, HIF-1β was not influenced by blocking any TRs (Fig. 3
). Therefore, we conclude that T3 effects on HIF-1
depend on the TRβ/RXR
heterodimer.
To address the concern that the effect of T3-induced HIF-1
accumulation is only observed in a tumor-cell line, we repeated the critical previous experiment with primary human hepatocytes. Administration of T3 induced HIF-1
protein after 4–5 h (Fig. 4A
) and exhibited the same dependence of TRβ (Fig. 4B
) as in HepG2 cells. Additional experiments showed that T3-induced ADM expression was blocked by the knockdown of HIF-1
as well as TRβ (Fig 4C
). Thus, our data from the permanent tumor cell line HepG2 were fully confirmed in primary human hepatocytes.
Because Ma et al. (12) had suggested an induction of HIF-1
mRNA translation by T3, we examined HIF-1
accumulation in cells treated with the inhibitor of translation cycloheximide (Fig. 5A
). Although general hypoxic HIF-1
levels were reduced by cycloheximide, no specific reduction of the T3 was achieved. Cap-independent translation via an IRES in the HIF-1
-5'-UTR (37) was studied by a bicistronic vector. We confirmed that hypoxia-mediated cap-independent translation for HIF-1
was effective (38), but we did not observe any inducibility by T3 (Fig. 5B
), confirming our data on the lack of mTOR involvement in the T3 effect (Fig. 2B
). However, inhibition of transcription by actinomycin D completely abrogated T3-mediated HIF-1
accumulation. Because the increase in HIF-1
mRNA was not mediated through regulatory DNA elements in the so far known HIF-1
promoter (–541 to –1 to the start of the 5'-UTR), we searched for transcription factor binding sites using the program TFsearch (Computational Biology Research Center; www.cbrc.ip). TFsearch revealed no TRE but indicated high-score binding sites (score > 90) for three proteins potentially involved in T3-regulated HIF-1
transcription: c-Rel, a member of the nuclear factor-
B pathway; CAATT/enhancer binding protein
; and HLF (Fig. 6C
). In contrast to the ubiquitous abundance of c-Rel and thyroid hormone-regulated CAATT/enhancer binding protein
(39), HLF is limited to the liver, kidney, lung, and adult nervous system (40). Additional experiments had shown no effect of T3 on HIF-1
in ovarian carcinoma (OVCAR3) and osteosarcoma (U2OS) cells (data not shown), but a T3-dependent increase in kidney and lung carcinoma cells (Fig. 7A
). This cell-specific HIF-1
induction by T3 very much reflects the expression pattern of HLF, which is induced by T3 after 3 h in KiKa cells (Fig. 7B
) and HepG2 (Fig. 7C
).
The human HLF gene was originally isolated from leukemic blasts of patients with pro-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. HLF belongs such as the thyrotroph embryonic factor and albumin promoter D-box binding protein to the proline and acidic amino acid-rich protein subfamily of basic leucine-zipper transcription factors. Subfamily members are able to form heterodimers among each other and bind to similar DNA consensus sequences. These members have important roles in the control of normal growth and differentiation (40, 41). Despite of the potential role of HLF in regulation of programmed cell death and synaptic transmission, HLF-mediated functions remain vague, especially in mammals (42). To establish HLF as the connecting factor between TRs and HIF-1 expression, we searched for possible TREs in regulatory domains of HLF. Indeed, we identified two potential TREs (consensus sequence in boldface letters): a composite element 5'-ACGAGGTCAAACTGGCAGAGGGACACGC-3' (at –834 bp upstream of transcriptional start site; ER-9 element), and a single TRE 5'-AGAGGTCACTA-3' (at –1304 bp), which might serve as binding sites for the heterodimer TRβ/RXR
to control HLF expression by T3. Finally, when we knocked down HLF, T3-induced HIF-1
accumulation was abrogated.
In summary, our results provide evidence that T3-induced HIF-1
accumulation depends on increased expression of the hif-1 gene mediated by HLF. HLF activation results from classical nuclear signaling of the TRβ/RXR
receptor heterodimer. Our results do not appear to be limited to tumor cells but were confirmed in primary human hepatocytes. Thus, T3-induced HIF-1
expression may cooperate with hypoxic HIF-1 activation and expression of HIF-1 target genes like ADM and EPO in a tissue-specific manner that depends on the presence of HLF.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: T.O. has nothing to declare. J.F. has served as an expert witness for Johnson & Johnson and Ortho Biotech.
First Published Online January 31, 2008
Abbreviations: ADM, Adrenomedullin; EPO, erythropoietin; FCS, fetal calf serum; GLUT, glucose transporter; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; HLF, hepatic leukemia factor; IRES, internal ribosomal entry site; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3, phosphatidylinositol 3; RLU, relative light unit; RXR, retinoid X receptor; siRNA, small interfering RNA; Tetrac, tetraiodothyro-acetic acid; TR, thyroid hormone receptor; TRE, thyroid hormone response element; UTR, untranslated region; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Received September 7, 2007.
Accepted for publication January 18, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-p300 interaction. A leucine-rich interface regulated by a single cysteine. J Biol Chem 276:3550–3554
and glycolytic genes. Mol Endocrinol 19:2955–2963
IRES-mediated translation during hypoxia. Nucleic Acids Res 33:6884–6894This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Liu, Z. Li, S. Bai, H. Zhang, M. Tang, Y. Lei, L. Chen, S. Liang, Y.-l. Zhao, Y. Wei, et al. Mechanism of Cancer Cell Adaptation to Metabolic Stress: Proteomics Identification of a Novel Thyroid Hormone-mediated Gastric Carcinogenic Signaling Pathway Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 70 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |