| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The Wenner-Gren Institute (A.B., A.Jac., A.Jak.), The Arrhenius Laboratories F3, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Centre de Genètica Mèdica i Molecular (S.F., A.P.), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge; Institut de Neuropatologia de Bellvitge (S.F., A.P.), and Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Spain; and Catalan Institution of Research and Advanced Studies, ICREA (A.P.), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Anders Jacobsson, The Wenner-Gren Institute, The Arrhenius Laboratories F3, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: anders.jacobsson{at}wgi.su.se.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Formation of VLCFAs mainly occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (6) and is controlled by at least six different elongation of VLCFA (ELOVL) enzymes that are believed to exert substrate-specific elongation with respect to fatty acid length and unsaturation (7, 8, 9). ELOVL6 regulates the synthesis of C18:0 and 18:1, whereas ELOVL1 and ELOVL3 are suggested to regulate the synthesis of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids up to C26 and C24, respectively. ELOVL2, -4, and -5 use polyunsaturated fatty acid as substrates. All six Elovl genes show a diverse tissue-specific expression pattern, indicating a unique role for different VLCFAs in different cell types. Nevertheless, there are hardly any reports on how the levels of VLCFAs are controlled in any organism or the significance of endogenous synthesized VLCFAs vs. VLCFAs taken up from the diet.
So far, no data exist on posttranscriptional control of any ELOVL protein or fatty acid synthase (FAS). Available data rather favor that the activity is controlled by transcriptional regulation. We know from expression studies in mouse brown adipose tissue and primary cell cultures that Elovl3 expression is under a synergistic control of glucocorticoids and noradrenalin (10). Recent studies show that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are, in conjunction with norepinephrine and glucocorticoids, very potent inducers of Elovl3 expression (11, 12). On the other hand, we found that the stimulation of Elovl3 expression was independent of activation of the lipogenic factors liver X receptor (LXR) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1, which normally induce lipogenic genes including acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), FAS, and Elovl6 (11, 13, 14, 15).
Elovl3-ablated mice show impaired formation of triglycerides and lipid droplets in both skin and brown adipose tissue (16, 17). Data imply that activation of Elovl3 expression is linked to increased FA oxidation and that the function for the enzyme in brown adipocytes during cold exposure is to replenish the intracellular pool of fatty acids to maintain lipid homeostasis.
Liver is a highly metabolic organ responsible for uptake, storage, and release of lipids into the circulation to meet the energy demands of the body. To maintain proper lipid homeostasis, the regulation of lipid synthesis is highly coordinated with fatty acid and glucose uptake from the diet (18).
Several of the genes involved in fatty acid synthesis such as ACC and FAS show a diurnal variation of their expression, which is strongly correlated with food intake (19). Studies also imply that the diurnal expression of ACC and FAS is controlled by the PPAR
(20). In brown adipose tissue, cold-induced Elovl3 expression is significantly reduced in PPAR
–/– mice (11).
Recently Anzulovich et al. (21) showed that, in liver, Elovl3 expression follows a circadian pattern, which is perturbed in mutant CLOCK mice. Elovl3 promoter analyses revealed that RevErba repressed the expression, whereas SREBP-1 had a stimulatory effect.
Here we show that hepatic Elovl3 expression is under a strong diurnal control exclusively in sexual mature male mice, which is independent of PPAR
. The expression is not affected by fasting or daily food intake but rather controlled by a circadian release of glucocorticoids and gender-specific steroids.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ablated mice, backcrossed on DBA background, were used (kind gift from Dr. F. Gonzales) (22). As control mice, age-matched mice from this backcross, which were bred under the same conditions as the PPAR
-ablated mice, were used. Mice overexpressing or lacking the ATP-binding cassette subfamily D(ALD) member (ABCD) 2 protein have already been described (23, 24). In this study we used 6-wk-old male mice of a mixed genetic background (75% C57BL/6J and 25% 129Sv). All mice were housed in 22 C and maintained on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle [lights on at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 0]. Animals were fed ad libitum, unless otherwise stated, with rat and mouse standard diet no.1 (BeeKay Feeds; B&K Universal, Stockholm, Sweden) and had free access to water. In feeding experiments, male mice were food deprived for 17 h, starting at ZT10 (1800 h). The animals were either refed with chow diet or high-fat diet, (45 kcal% fat) (D12451; Research Diets, New Brunswick NJ). For the conditional feeding experiment, NMRI mice received food only during the day (ZT0-ZT12) for 9 d, and the control mice were fed ad libitum. For actinomycin treatment. mice were injected ip with either actinomycin D (A5156; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.025 mg/mouse, or sterilized NaCl-solution (control group). One group of mice were injected at ZT22 (0600 h), and the other group of mice were injected at ZT2.5 (1030 h). Both groups were killed 3.5 h after injection. For dexamethasone treatment, mice were injected ip with dexamethasone (Vetranal, 46165; Sigma), 0.1 mg/ mouse, or vehicle at ZT2. The livers were dissected at ZT10 and total RNA was isolated. All mice were killed with CO2 and the livers were dissected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Before experiments the animals were accustomed to the environment for at least 1 wk.
All studies were carried out with ethical permission from the Animal Ethics Board in Stockholm, Sweden.
RNA analysis
RNA was isolated with Ultraspec RNA isolation solution (Biosite, San Diego, CA), and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturers procedure. Ten or 15 µm of total RNA were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gel containing ethidium bromide and blotted to Hybond-N membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Prehybridization and hybridization were carried out overnight at 42 C in 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 5x saline sodium citrate (SSC), 5x Denharts solution (2% Ficoll, 2% BSA, and 2% polyvinylpyrolidone), 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.5), and 0.1 mg/ml degraded herring sperm DNA. Membranes were washed twice in 2x SSC and 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 15 min and once in 0.1x SSC and 0.1% SDS at 42 C for 20 min. cDNA fragments, identified by BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi), and verified by sequencing for Elovl1 and Elovl3 (25), 11β-Hsd1 [IMAGE EST clone GenInfo Identifier (gi) 14605089 (I.M.A.G.E. Consortium, Geneservice Ltd., Cambridge, UK)], Elovl6 (gi: 15715540), LXR
(gi: 15215049), FAS (gi: 11366366), PPAR
(gi: 11271556), were [32P]dCTP-labeled by using random-primed DNA labeling kit Ready to go DNA labeling beads (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) Aylesbury, UK) and used as probes. Blots were exposed to a PhosphoImager screen analyzed in a FLA-3000 reader (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan). 18S rRNA was detected using a 473-nm laser in the FLA reader and used for normalization. RNA levels were quantified using Fuji Film Science Lab software (Tokyo, Japan), and statistics were calculated in GraphPad PRISM (San Diego, CA). Statistical differences were calculated with unpaired t test (P < 0.05).
For reverse transcription (RT) and quantitative PCR, 1 µg total RNA was mixed with 4 µl random hexamers (0.05 µg/µl) and diethylpyrocarbonate water and incubated 5 min on 70 C and then chilled on ice and briefly centrifuged.
Subsequently 4 µl of RT reaction buffer (5 times), 1 µl RNase out (40 U), and 2 µl deoxynucleotide triphosphates (10 mM) were added to the mixture and incubated for 5 min at 25 C. One microliter of Moloney murine leukemia virus RT enzyme (200 U/µl) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 10 min at 25 C followed by an incubation for 60 min at 42 C. The reaction was inactivated by incubation for 10 min at 70 C. RT-quantitative PCR aliquots with 2 µl of the sample cDNA were mixed with TaqMan master mix (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA), 18S, or Elovl3 probes and double-distilled H2O to a final volume of 24 µl/well and were measured in triplicate for each sample. Two animals were used in each group. Assay-on-demand gene expression products, purchased from Applied Biosystems, were used (Elovl3-Mm00468164_m1 and 18S-HS99999901_S1). Expression was analyzed in a Applied Biosystems Prism 7000 sequence detection system.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, SREBP-1, and PPAR
(11). As seen in Fig. 1A
, Elovl1, and Elovl6, a dramatic change was seen for the Elovl3 expression in liver during the day. There was a distinct increase in the amount of Elovl3 mRNA during the end of the dark phase at ZT20 (0400 h) and a dramatic decrease after ZT 8 (1600 h) at the end of the light period. The highest Elovl3 expression was seen at ZT2 (1000 h) in the beginning of the light period (Fig. 1B
(19, 26). In addition, we did not detect any zonal differences in mRNA expression of Elovl3 within the liver (data not shown).
|
|
Transcriptional control of circadian Elovl3 expression
Because the mRNA level of Elovl3 was dramatically reduced at the end of the light period, we asked whether this was due to a change in transcription activity or a decreased half-life of the transcript or both. To investigate this, transcription was blocked by injecting animals with actinomycin D, and mRNA levels were analyzed 3.5 h later, both during the induction phase (ZT22-ZT1.5) when Elovl3 mRNA level normally is increased and during the reduction phase (ZT2.5-ZT6) when the mRNA level normally is decreased. During the induction phase, the Elovl3 mRNA level was further increased in saline injected mice (Fig. 3A
). However, in actinomycin-injected mice, the mRNA level was decreased to about 60% of starting level. In contrast, during the reduction phase, there was no statistical difference between actinomycin- and saline-injected mice (Fig. 3B
). The mRNA levels were reduced to about 50% in both groups. The mRNA levels of Elovl1 did not change significantly at any time (Fig. 3C
). This implies that transcription is the major regulator of the Elovl3 mRNA level in liver and that the estimated half-life of the transcript is about 3 h, which does not significantly change during the day. Interestingly, this is in sharp contrast to what we have seen in brown adipose tissue in which the level of Elovl3 transcript is controlled by both transcription and mRNA stability and with an estimated half-life of about 20 h (12).
|
Daytime feeding for a period of time alters the daily glucocorticoid secretion in nocturnal animals independently of the light cycle (33). If the circadian Elovl3 expression in liver is dependent on the level of glucocorticoids, the latency period is approximately 8 h. To test this, the synthetic glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone, which has been shown to be a potent phase-shifting agent in peripheral tissues (35), was injected ip into mice at ZT2 when serum levels of glucocorticoids normally are low. Eight hours later the mRNA levels of Elovl3 in liver were analyzed. As seen in Fig. 4
, A and B, there was an increased level of Elovl3 but not of Elovl1 transcript at ZT10 in the animals injected with dexamethasone, compared with the animals injected with sodium chloride, which suggest that the diurnal control of Elovl3 expression is dependent on the level of glucocorticoids in the serum. In a recent study (12) on cultured brown adipocytes, we suggested that glucocorticoids are required for enhanced Elovl3 mRNA stability, which is a mechanism that we cannot rule out and also takes place in liver. Injection of norepinephrine, which has been shown to induce Elovl3 expression in brown adipose tissue, had no effect on Elovl3 expression in liver (not shown).
|
|
-independent regulation of circadian Elovl3 expression
. Although PPAR
is a promoting actor of catabolic processes, it has also been shown to be involved in de novo lipogenesis in liver. For example, the diurnal rhythms for ACC and FAS are abolished in PPAR
–/–mice (20). We have earlier shown that the induced Elovl3 expression in brown adipocytes, in both animals and primary cell cultures, was significantly reduced in PPAR
–/– mice (11). Because glucocorticoids are known to induce PPAR
activity (26), we asked the question whether PPAR
is involved in the diurnal variation of Elovl3 expression. To elucidate this further, we analyzed the Elovl3 mRNA expression in PPAR
-ablated mice. Livers from 8- to 10-wk-old male wild-type and PPAR
–/– mice were analyzed at different time points during the day (ZT0, ZT4, ZT10, ZT14). Surprisingly, no significant difference was observed between PPAR
–/– and wild-type animals (Fig. 6
|
When analyzing the expression of Elovl1 and Elovl3 in different tissues such as liver and skin, in which Elovl3 normally is expressed, and different areas of the brain, from ABCD2 knockout mice, we found a significant increase in Elovl3 expression exclusively in liver, whereas Elovl1 expression was unchanged (Fig. 7A
). In contrast, in the liver of transgenic mice with overexpression of the ABCD2 protein, Elovl3 expression was significantly reduced (Fig. 7B
), whereas the Elovl1 expression was not affected, thus establishing a functional cross talk between Elovl3 and ABCD2. Although the level of expression was modified in the ABCD2 mutant mice, the diurnal variation was maintained (Fig. 7C
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, PPAR
, and PPAR
(10, 11, 12). Here we show that Elovl3 displayed a strong diurnal expression pattern exclusively in sexually mature male mouse liver, which in part could be explained by modulation of circulating glucocorticoid and androgen levels. In addition, in contrast to the expression of several enzymes involved in fatty acid synthesis, Elovl3 expression was not affected in liver by either fasting or refeeding. This implies that Elovl3 is not involved in insulin regulated fatty acid synthesis for storage under normal feeding conditions as most of the other lipogenic enzymes. Recent data rather suggest that the function of the ELOVL3 enzyme is to maintain the intracellular pool of specific VLCFAs to support the formation of lipid droplets within the cell, especially under conditions when the energy expenditure is increased (11, 16). It is well known that daytime feeding for a period of time alters the daily glucocorticoid secretion in nocturnal animals independently of the light cycle (33). In this study, we show that there was a 12-h shift in Elovl3 expression in conditionally fed animals with the highest mRNA level at the beginning of the dark period, whereas Elovl1 expression was not particularly affected by restricted daytime feeding. Quite recently, in the course of this study, Anzulovich et al. (21) showed a circadian expression of Elovl3 in liver, which was abolished in Clock mutant mice. To synchronize physiology with external time, the suprachiasmatic nucleus emits signals via the hypophysical ACTH to a series of peripheral circadian clocks found in most organs. Among peripheral clocks, the one in the adrenal gland is particularly interesting because adrenal corticoids synchronize metabolic rhythms in liver (35). If the circadian expression of Elovl3 in liver is dependent on the levels of glucocorticoids, the expected latency period would be approximately 8 h. In animals injected ip with dexamethasone, there was a distinct increase in Elovl3 mRNA 8 h later, compared with control animals, suggesting that the elevated Elovl3 expression in liver, like in brown adipose tissue, is controlled by glucocorticoids. However, in contrast to liver, no sign of diurnal Elovl3 expression has been observed in either brown adipose tissue or the skin, which, except liver, are the tissues in which the highest Elovl3 expression has been detected.
In addition to fluctuating glucocorticoid levels within the circulation, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11β-HSD1) constitutes a local determinant of the active glucocorticoid levels within peripheral tissues, as 11β-HSD1 catalyzes the interconversion of inactive keto- and active hydroxycorticosteroids in most tissues (42). The 11β-HSD1 mRNA level has been shown to be regulated in a similar way as Elovl3 in primary brown adipocytes (11). However, because we did not detect any clear circadian variation in the expression of 11β-Hsd1 in liver (Fig. 1A
), we assumed that the glucocorticoid control of Elovl3 expression is dependent on the circadian release of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex. This is supported by data showing that the diurnal phase of circadian genes like Per, Cry, and Rev-erb
becomes entirely inverted locally in liver when feeding is restricted to daytime (31) or shifted by injection of dexamethasone into mice (35), which, taken together, suggest that diet intake directs Elovl3 expression via glucocorticoid signaling to the local clock in the liver.
Except glucocorticoids, our data also clearly revealed a role of gender-specific hormones in the control of Elovl3 expression in liver. Interestingly, and in strong contrast to Elovl3, Améen et al. (43) found higher mRNA levels of the lipogenic transcription factor SREBP-1c and FAS in females, whereas no sex difference was detected for ACC1 and SCD1 mRNA, which again underlines a different role in lipid synthesis for Elovl3 and the other lipogenic enzymes involved in fatty acid synthesis.
Several reports also underline the existence of a daily rhythm of androgens in both humans and rodents (44, 45). The oscillation of androstendione and testosterone secretion is, like for glucocorticoid secretion, controlled by ACTH release from the hypophysis showing a maximal secretion in late evening and minimal secretion in early morning in rodents. On the contrary, adult male rats display a diurnal variation for nuclear estrogen receptors in liver as well as serum levels of estradiol with the maximal level in the morning and the lowest level in the evening. Bryzgalova et al. (46) recently show that in liver of estrogen receptor-
(ER
) knockout female mice, Elovl3 expression is highly induced, which implies that estrogen suppresses Elovl3 expression under normal conditions. However, our analysis of ovariectomized mice suggests that reduced estrogen levels are not enough to stimulate Elovl3 expression in female mice. If estrogen receptor-
acts as a suppressor of Elovl3 expression in male mice, the lag phase of response is approximately 8 h, which is very similar to what was suggested for the positive glucocorticoid response in this study.
Our finding of sex difference in Elovl3 expression also raise the possibility that it is regulated by GH plasma level because gender-specific control of liver genes has been extensively associated with sexually dimorphic pattern of GH secretion (47). Accordingly, further studies are needed to explain the sex-dependent regulation of Elovl3 expression.
Nutritional studies on adult rats suggest that hepatic elongase expression might, in part, be controlled by PPAR
(30), which is generally accepted to be involved in activating genes coding for enzymes involved in catabolic processes like β-oxidation (48). Interestingly, here we show that the diurnal variation in liver of male mice was independent of PPAR
. However, our data on the ABCD2 mutant mice show that although the control of diurnal Elovl3 expression in liver is independent of PPAR
, it can be significantly elevated through a mechanism, which involves peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation. It has been shown that accumulation of VLCFAs leads to an up-regulation of β-oxidation enzymes in wild-type mice, but this mechanism is abolished in PPAR
–/– mice (49). However it is not known whether the impaired Elovl3 expression in the ABCD2 mutant mice is PPAR
dependent. Interestingly, although both Elovl3 and Elovl1 have been suggested to control the synthesis of saturated and monounsaturated VLCFAs, Elovl1 is ubiquitously expressed but not affected in ABCD2 mutant mice. Our results suggests that the levels of ABCD2 expression, and presumably of its transported substrates into or outside peroxisomes, might directly or indirectly modulate regulation of Elovl3 expression in mouse liver. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms linking peroxisomes with fatty acid elongation remains to be elucidated.
In conclusion, whereas the classical lipogenic enzymes such as FAS, ACC, and SCD1, which are highly expressed around ZT8-ZT22 in liver, are involved in fuel storage controlled by daily food intake, the circadian rhythm of Elovl3 was not altered by fasting and refeeding. Instead, our data here suggest that the diurnal variation of Elovl3 in liver is regulated and maintained by a coordinated release of different steroid hormones, i.e. glucocorticoids, androgens, and estrogens, from peripheral tissues, which, in turn, is defined by diurnal food intake in a more long-term perspective. However, to unravel the question why this is controlled differently in females and males, more detailed studies on endogenous lipid synthesis vs. food intake are needed in both liver and whole animals.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online February 21, 2008
Abbreviations: ABCD, ATP-binding cassette, subfamily D(ALD); ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ELOVL, elongation of VLCFA; FAS, fatty acid synthase; 11β-HSD1, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; LXR, liver X receptor; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RT, reverse transcription; SCD1, sterol CoA desaturase-1; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein; SSC, saline sodium citrate; VLCFA, very long chain fatty acid; ZT, Zeitgeber time.
Received October 12, 2007.
Accepted for publication February 14, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and LXRβ. Genes Dev 14:2819–2830
-deficient mice. J Lipid Res 42:328–337
isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol Cell Biol 15:3012–3022[Abstract]
gene is stimulated by stress and follows a diurnal rhythm. J Biol Chem 271:1764–1769
plays an important role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice: insulin sensitivity in the liver. Diabetologia 49:588–597[CrossRef][Medline]
: an adaptive metabolic system. Annu Rev Nutr 21:193–230[CrossRef][Medline]
and peroxisomal fatty acyl-CoA oxidase. Genotype correlation with fatty liver phenotype. J Biol Chem 274:19228–19236This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Shimamura, H. Takahashi, H. Kitazawa, Y. Miyamoto, A. Nagumo, C. Tang, D. Dean, T. Nagase, N. Sato, and S. Tokita Identification and Characterization of a Selective Radioligand for ELOVL6 J. Biochem., September 1, 2009; 146(3): 429 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shimamura, H. Kitazawa, Y. Miyamoto, M. Kanesaka, A. Nagumo, R. Yoshimoto, K. Aragane, N. Morita, T. Ohe, T. Takahashi, et al. 5,5-Dimethyl-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-3,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indole-2,4-dione, a Potent Inhibitor for Mammalian Elongase of Long-Chain Fatty Acids Family 6: Examination of Its Potential Utility as a Pharmacological Tool J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2009; 330(1): 249 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Bur, A. M. Cohen-Solal, D. Carmignac, P.-Y. Abecassis, N. Chauvet, A. O. Martin, G. T. J. van der Horst, I. C. A. F. Robinson, P. Maurel, P. Mollard, et al. The Circadian Clock Components CRY1 and CRY2 Are Necessary to Sustain Sex Dimorphism in Mouse Liver Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., April 3, 2009; 284(14): 9066 - 9073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |