| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Graduate Group of Psychology and Graduate Group of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Karolina P. Skibicka or Dr. Harvey J. Grill, Graduate Group of Psychology and Graduate Group of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104. E-mail: skibicka{at}mail.med.upenn.edu or grill{at}psych.upenn.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This paper addresses whether MC-R-bearing neurons in the caudal brainstem contribute to energy expenditure responses, and whether the sympathetic output circuits mediating the energetic effects involve processing by both caudal brainstem and forebrain structures. A useful strategy for highlighting the candidate MC-R-bearing neurons comes from studies that examine MC4-R expression in the sympathetic pre-motor neurons controlling interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT) temperature (TIBAT). Notable among the identified neurons are the MC4-R expressing neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, and lateral hypothalamic area that are retrogradely labeled with pseudorabies-virus injections into IBAT, a key thermogenic effector in rodents (11, 15). Although MC-R-bearing hypothalamic neurons, especially those of the PVN, provide a focus for many studies addressing the mediation of MC-R effects on energy expenditure (13, 14), MC4-Rs are also expressed extra-hypothalamically in several caudal brainstem nuclei that are linked to the control of IBAT and cardiac responses. Caudal brainstem neurons, including those of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), medullary raphe [raphe pallidus (RPa), raphe obscurus, raphe magnus], parabrachial nucleus, and rostroventrolateral medulla (RVLM), express MC4-R and are retrogradely labeled by IBAT pseudorabies virus injection (11). A critical role for RPa neurons in the control of IBAT thermogenesis, heart rate (HR), and sympathetic outflows is well established (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Neurons expressing MC4-R in the RPa and RVLM are also associated with cardiovascular efferent control by other investigators (24, 25, 26).
To examine the contribution of MC-R-bearing caudal brainstem neurons to energy expenditure control and to determine whether processing endemic to the hindbrain (in the absence of forebrain processing) is required for MC-R-mediated autonomic response production, MC-R agonist-induced energetic responses of neurologically intact rats were compared with those of rats whose caudal brainstem was neurally isolated from the forebrain via complete supracollicular transection. TIBAT, core temperature (TC), HR, and spontaneous activity were monitored in response to hindbrain (fourth) ventricular, medullary raphe parenchymal, and systemic (ip) injection of melanotan II (MTII), a ligand of the MC4-R and MC3-R. Results establish a role for the hindbrain MC-Rs in the control of energy expenditure, and show that endemic caudal brainstem circuits are sufficient for hindbrain-generated response production and that hypothalamic processing and hypothalamic-forebrain communication are not necessary.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgery
Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (90 mg/kg), xylazine (2.7 mg/kg), and acepromazine (0.64 mg/kg) delivered im.
Fourth intracerebroventricular (icv) and medullary raphe cannula.
Rats in experiments 1 and 3–6 received a fourth icv guide cannula (22 gauge; Plastics One, Inc., Roanoke, VA) with its tip stereotaxically positioned 2.0 mm above the fourth ventricle (coordinates: on the midline, 2.5-mm anterior to the occipital suture, and 4.5-mm ventral to the dura, with injector aimed 6.5-mm ventral from dura). Rats in experiments 4–6 also underwent a decerebration surgery. Rats in experiment 3A received a guide cannula aimed at the medullary raphe (coordinates: on the midline, 3-mm posterior to lambda, and 7.4-mm ventral to the dura, with injector aimed 9.4-mm ventral to dura). Medullary raphe injections for the rats in experiments 3B and 6 used the fourth icv guide cannula (above) with injectors positioned 5 mm below the guide cannula aimed at the medullary raphe (injector aimed 9.5-mm ventral to dura). Cannulas were attached to the skull with dental acrylic and jewelers screws, and closed with an obturator.
Decerebration surgery.
Supracollicular decerebration was performed in two hemi-transection stages separated by at least 1 wk, as previously described (27). Decerebrate rats received fourth icv cannulas during the second hemisection surgery. Pair-fed neurologically intact control rats were also anesthetized on two occasions and implanted with fourth icv cannulas during the second surgery. Rats recovered for at least 1 wk before the experiment started. The completeness of the intended transection was verified histologically after the experiment. Only rats with a histologically verified complete transection were included in the data analyses.
Telemetric transponder surgery.
Telemetric transponders (HRC 4000 VitalView; Mini Mitter/Respironics, Bend, OR) for recording TC, HR, and spontaneous physical activity (SPA) were inserted into the abdominal cavity, with the leads positioned sc and secured to the chest muscles on either side of the heart with sutures. In experiment 3, animals received a smaller telemetric transponder for recording TIBAT and SPA (G2, VitalView; Mini Mitter/Respironics). The skin overlying the IBAT pad was opened and the transponder positioned on the right side of IBAT, avoiding the midline vessels and nerves, and secured with sutures to the overlying muscle. In experiments 1, 4, and 6, separate groups of animals were implanted with IPTT-300 (Bio Medic Data Systems, Sealord, DE) transponders that measured only the TIBAT.
Experimental procedures
Cannula position verification.
At least 7 d after surgery, fourth icv cannula placement was assessed by measurement of the sympathoadrenal-mediated glycemic response to 5-thio-D-glucose [210 µg in 2 µl artificial cerebral spinal fluid (aCSF)] (28). A postinjection elevation of at least 100% of baseline plasma glucose level was required for subject inclusion. The medullary raphe placement was determined histologically after the experiment with injection of pontamine sky blue at the 100 nl volume used in the experiments.
Habituation training.
Before the start of experimental testing, rats were acclimated to handling and injections used in a given experiment (fourth icv, parenchymal, ip).
Food intake and body weight monitoring.
Food was removed at injection time (early in the light cycle, between 0930 and 1100 h) and returned 8 h later, late in the light phase. Thereby, food was not available during the period of energetic response measurement. Food intake and body weight measurements were performed 24 h after the injection of drug. Given this design, all noted differences in food intake reflect longer latency effects of MTII (from 8–24 h after injection). For ad libitum-feeding rats, food was always available during the dark cycle, and a minimum of 48 h was allotted between experimental testing for all animals.
Experiment 1: effects of stimulating caudal brainstem MC-Rs via fourth icv MTII injection on energy expenditure
Neurologically intact rats (n = 11) received fourth icv injections early in the light cycle. Three conditions were run in a counterbalanced fashion across separate days with at least 2 d between conditions. Responses were examined following a control condition with fourth icv vehicle (1 µl aCSF) and two doses of MTII: 0.1 and 1.0 nmol (dose selection based on Refs. 8 and 9). HR, TC, and SPA were continuously monitored for 8 h at 5-min intervals (TC and SPA) or 30-sec intervals (HR) in rats with implanted HRC-4000 transponders. TIBAT was monitored every hour for 7 h in experiment 1.
Experiment 2: effects of systemic MC-R ligand injection on energy expenditure
This experiment was designed to determine whether any of the energy balance effects seen with fourth icv MTII injection could be attributed to actions on peripheral MC-Rs via drug efflux from the brain. All other features of the design were identical to experiment 1 except that vehicle (0.2 ml saline) and MTII (1.0 nmol in 0.2 ml saline) were injected ip (n = 12).
Experiment 3: effects of stimulating medullary raphe MC4-Rs via intraparenchymal MTII injection on energy expenditure
All rats received two counterbalanced conditions (100 nl injections of aCSF or MTII 10 pmol) separated by at least 2 d. Pilot studies determined that 5 or 10 pmol MTII delivered fourth icv were without effect on TC (data not shown). In experiment 3A, in one set of rats (n = 8), TIBAT and SPA were monitored with G2 transponders every 5 min for 8 h. In experiment 3B, in a second set of rats (n = 12), HR, TC, and SPA were monitored with HRC 4000 transponders for 8 h at 5-min intervals (TC, SPA) and 30-sec intervals (HR).
Experiment 4: effects of stimulating caudal brainstem MC-Rs via fourth icv injection on TIBAT in chronic decerebrate (CD) rats and intact control rats
Diet maintenance.
CD rats do not spontaneously ingest food (27); therefore, they were maintained with four daily gastric intubations of 9 ml liquid diet (AIN 76A rodent diet; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ). This maintenance regime provides 79 kcal/d and adequate hydration; rats gain weight on this regime. Feedings were separated by intervals of at least 2 h. CD and gavage-fed (GF) intact control rats were maintained on this feeding paradigm except during experimental testing when animals were only GF three times: once 2 h before experiments commenced and twice after the experimental testing. TC of CD rats is more variable than that of GF control rats. Rectal temperature was measured at each gavage feeding, and rats were cooled or heated if TC was less than 34.0 or above 38.5 C (except during experimental testing).
Test days.
The experimental design was identical to that of experiment 1, with the exception of the dose. All rats (CDs: n = 10, GF: n = 9) were tested under control condition: fourth icv vehicle (1 µl aCSF) and 1.0 nmol MTII.
Experiment 5: effects of stimulating caudal brainstem MC-Rs via fourth icv MTII injection on TC, HR, and SPA in CD and intact rats with and without oral food access
Diet maintenance.
CD (n = 6) and GF control (n = 11) rats were maintained as in experiment 4. A third group, meal-fed intact rats (n = 11), was included. These rats had oral access to the same diet that was intubated in the other two groups. Meal-fed rats were presented with 9 ml liquid diet at the same times that the other groups received the diet by gavage. In all cases the 9-ml aliquot was consumed within 5–10 min. The feeding maintenance condition of the intact rats in the GF and meal-fed oral access groups were subsequently reversed to allow within-subject comparison. Rats were retested with MTII and vehicle injections after 2 wk on a given feeding maintenance regime.
Test days.
The experimental design was identical to that of experiment 1.
Experiment 6: effects of stimulating medullary raphe MC-Rs via intraparenchymal MTII injection on energy expenditure in CD and GF intact rats
CD (n = 4) and GF intact controls (n = 5) rats received medullary raphe injections early in the light cycle. The design was identical to that of experiment 3. TIBAT was recorded every hour for 7 h.
Statistical analysis
All energy expenditure parameters were analyzed by ANOVAs on 5 or 6-h postinjection averages, and followed by post hoc t tests and Tukeys honestly significant difference test as appropriate. Twenty-four-hour food intake and body weight were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by post hoc t tests and Tukeys honestly significant difference test as appropriate. All statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA software (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
HR.
Figure 1B
shows that MTII dose-dependently increased HR, compared with saline control. A one-way ANOVA of average HR values for the 6-h period after injection yielded a significant drug effect [F (2, 20) = 33.33; P < 0.0001]; post hoc analysis showed a significant effect of both doses of MTII on HR (0.1 nmol: P < 0.0005; 1.0 nmol: P < 0.0001).
Spontaneous physical activity.
It was not significantly increased by fourth icv MTII [F (2, 20) = 2.45; P = 0.11] (Fig. 1C
).
Food intake and body weight.
Both MTII doses significantly decreased 24-h food intake [F (2, 20) = 17.28; P < 0.0001] and body weight [F (2, 20) = 17.75; P < 0.0001] (Fig. 1
, E and F).
Experiment 2
Peripheral delivery (ip) of the higher dose of MTII (1.0 nmol) was without effect on all of the measured energetic and food intake parameters (Fig. 2
).
|
|
|
0.0001), but surprisingly, no effect on GF control rats (P = 0.212) (Fig. 7D
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The qualitative profile of results for CD and for chow-fed control rats was similar; increases in energetic and cardiovascular parameters were observed in both groups after hindbrain MC-R stimulation. However, quantitatively, the magnitudes of the mean energetic responses were 2- (HR) to 4-fold (temperature) greater in CD rats than intact rats after fourth icv MTII application (Table 1
). Quantitative differences between neurological groups were also observed with application of 10 pmol MTII to the medullary raphe. Here, intact chow-fed rats increased TIBAT by approximately 0.5 C on average. By contrast, the same dose of MTII increased TIBAT of a CD rat by approximately 3.0 C (Figs. 3A
and 6A
). There are several interpretations for these quantitative differences between decerebrate and intact rats. The endogenous agonist for the caudal brainstem MC-Rs originates from two anatomically disparate sources: one in the hypothalamic arcuate (ARC) nucleus (30) and the other in the hindbrain NTS commissural nucleus (31). Transection of the descending projections from ARC POMC neurons could eliminate a significant percentage of the endogenous agonist for a given caudal brainstem nucleus. This could result in a compensatory increase in expression of MC-Rs in hindbrain nuclei. Up-regulation of MC-Rs in response to decreased agonist availability has been reported (13). Although projections from both ARC POMC and NTS POMC neurons terminate in the caudal brainstem (32, 33), it is not clear what the source(s) of the endogenous agonist is for each of the individual MC-R-expressing hindbrain nuclei. For each nucleus it is possible that the agonist is supplied entirely by NTS POMC neurons, ARC POMC neurons, or some combination of the two (32). Sim and Joseph (33) showed that ARC POMC projections innervate midline caudal brainstem nuclei, whereas lateral caudal brainstem regions receive projections from NTS POMC neurons; in some cases, structures received terminal fields from both sources. In collaboration with H. R. Berthoud (34), we have begun to examine tissues from decerebrated rats to quantify the percentage of
-MSH fibers that originate in ARC POMC neurons and project to various hindbrain MC-R-bearing nuclei. For the NTS, we recently showed that approximately 70% of the MSH fibers terminating in all subregions of the NTS originate in ARC POMC neurons (34). Additional work is needed to determine the source of MSH ligand for RPa, RVLM, and other relevant hindbrain nuclei, and whether eliminating a major source of endogenous ligand (ARC POMC neurons) increases exogenous agonist binding and receptor expression in caudal brainstem nuclei.
|
The responses of GF intact rats differed qualitatively from those of chow-fed intact rats and oral-fed rats (Table 1
). However, the variability of these responses was great, yielding trends, but no significant differences between the intact rat subgroups. Nonetheless, the pattern of these between-group differences is clear, with lesser response magnitude for the GF intact group than for the two intact groups with oral access to food. This outcome suggests a role for oral stimulation in the observed responses. Saito et al. (40) demonstrated that oropharyngeal stimulation contributes to IBAT thermogenesis. Gavage feeding reduced oropharyngeal stimulation and decreased IBAT norepinephrine turnover relative to that seen in oral-fed rats. Our studies are consistent with the view that gavage feeding decreases the magnitude of sympathetically mediated energy expenditure output. Our data place components of the melanocortin system within the sympathetic nervous system output circuitry that is altered by oral exposure to food. Two provisos are worth noting. First, CD rats responded robustly to the MC-R agonist, yet they were gavage fed. This suggests that the inhibitory effect of bypassing the mouth on MTII-driven energetic responses is forebrain mediated. Second, even though the energetic response magnitude of GF intact rats was attenuated, the animals still exhibited significant weight loss after the drug treatment (Fig. 8
). This result underscores the contribution of MC-R-induced energy expenditure to body weight control because the food intake of these rats was matched to that in the vehicle condition such that weight loss could not be attributed to the anorectic effect of the treatment.
The energetic effects obtained from selective stimulation of the MC4-R-bearing neurons of the medullary raphe and with fourth ventricular agonist delivery highlight the role of hindbrain MC-R-bearing neurons in the control of sympathetic, thermic, and cardiac responses. That said, there is also a role for hypothalamic-forebrain processing in melanocortin-mediated energetic effects. Many reciprocal neural projections exist between hypothalamic (especially PVN, ARC, and the lateral hypothalamic area) and hindbrain nuclei. In fact, the literature on sympathetic outflows and energy expenditure control emphasizes a role for these hypothalamic nuclei (for review, see Ref. 41). The neural circuitry underlying the expression of thermic and cardiac responses to hindbrain MC-R stimulation may well involve descending hypothalamic projections. We have already discussed that ARC POMC neurons project to a variety of sympathetic pre-motor targets in the hindbrain, and, therefore, it is appropriate to consider that the application of the MC-R agonist to MC4-R hindbrain neurons mimics, at least in part, the effects of endogenous ligand input from ARC. In addition, nonmelanocortinergic projections from hypothalamic nuclei may also play a role in the control of MC-R-driven energetic response. MC-R-bearing PVN neurons receive ligand from ARC and project to the caudal brainstem (42). At the same time, the results from the decerebrated rats make clear that forebrain processing and forebrain-brainstem communication are not required for caudal brainstem stimulated responses and that downstream circuits endemic to the caudal brainstem mediate the observed responses. The current data are consistent with those from previous studies from our laboratory (43) that show that the increase in uncoupling protein-1 gene expression driven by fourth ventricular MTII can be mediated by circuitry intrinsic to the caudal brainstem and spinal cord.
The increased energetic response to fourth ventricular application of MTII in chow-fed intact rats reported here is consistent with results from an earlier report by Zheng et al. (44). However, responses in that study were of lesser magnitude and duration than those observed here with MTII doses within a similar range. In the Zheng et al. (44) study, rats had access to food during energetic response recordings, and recordings took place during the dark/active phase. In our study, rats were tested in the light phase in the absence of food. These paradigmatic differences appear to explain the observed differences in responses. We observed that rats stimulated with MTII in the light phase without access to food have greater response magnitude and duration than when the same rats are examined in the dark phase with access to food (unpublished observations).
We showed that hindbrain MC-Rs contribute to the energy expenditure observed with central melanocortinergic stimulation. This result would seem consistent with the recent perspective of Balthasar et al. (45). These investigators selectively expressed MC4-Rs in neurons of the PVN and amygdala in mice otherwise lacking the receptor. They found that this selective MC4-R expression reversed the hyperphagia seen in the MC4-R knockout mouse but did not increase the reduced energy expenditure profile of the knockout. Balthasar et al. (45) suggest that the energy intake and energy expenditure effects of the central melanocortin system are controlled by anatomically distinct portions of the system. Although we would agree that the melanocortin contribution to energy balance control is distributed across different brain regions, our data and those of others (e.g. see Refs. 46 and 47) do not support the view that feeding function is uniquely associated with basal forebrain elements of the melanocortin system and that energetic function is controlled uniquely by more caudal elements of the system. In our view, stimulation of MC-Rs in a variety of central sites, including the hypothalamus and caudal brainstem, reduces feeding and increases energetic response. For example, the present findings show that in addition to the energetic effects of fourth ventricular MC-R agonist delivery, food intake was also significantly reduced. Previous work shows that hindbrain parenchymal application of pmol doses of MTII or the synthetic MC3/4R antagonist SHU-9119 results in a respective decrease or increase in food intake (48). However, the idea that stimulation of anatomically disparate receptors can drive the same functional effect is not new. We and others have already shown that the feeding effect of central injection of leptin, urocortin, ghrelin, neuropeptide Y, fenfluramine, and norepinephrine is observed with basal forebrain, as well as caudal brainstem ligand application (46, 47, 49). It seems then that such a similarity in the functional output resulting from stimulation of anatomically distinct sites represents a degree of redundancy in the melanocortin system. Although this suggests common outputs, it is likely that there are differences in the pattern of input received by MC-R-bearing nuclei in different regions of the brain. Both energy intake and expenditure change in response to long-term exposure to calorie-dense diets (50, 51) and also in response to pathogens. The melanocortin system plays a role in mediating the energetic effects triggered by these diverse physiological conditions (11, 52). It is possible that responses resulting from these distinct challenges are processed at different levels of the brain, making the receptors divergent based on input but still producing the same functional output: decrease in intake and increase in expenditure.
MC-Rs are expressed on peripheral organs, like the heart (24) and adrenal medulla (53), implicated in metabolic and cardiovascular activity. Peripheral application of high doses of the MC-4R agonist increases HR, blood pressure, TIBAT, as well as locomotor activity (7). Therefore, some part of the energetic effects obtained after central application of MC-R agonists to the brain may occur from an action on peripheral receptors. To evaluate this possibility, we applied the highest dose of the agonist used centrally to the periphery and showed no effect on any measured energy expenditure parameter. Although this result does not eliminate the potential role of the peripheral MC-Rs in energy expenditure, it confirms that energetic effects observed in our study are induced by stimulation of central and not peripheral receptors.
We showed that hindbrain targeted MC-R stimulation and medullary raphe MC4-R agonist injection increases energetic responses, including hyperthermia, IBAT thermogenesis, and tachycardia. The source of the endogenous agonist for caudal brainstem MC-Rs occurs from both local (NTS) and forebrain (ARC) sources. It is still unclear to what extent each nucleus contributes to the endogenous agonist supply of the specific MC-R-bearing nuclei of the caudal brainstem mediated energetic responses under normal conditions. Therefore, the neural circuitry underlying the expression of thermic and cardiac responses to hindbrain MC-R stimulation may well involve descending hypothalamic projections. However, that the same pattern of response was observed in decerebrate and intact rats shows that the output circuitry responsible for the observed effects lies within the hindbrain and does not require forebrain processing or forebrain-caudal brainstem communication. The results of this study suggest future investigations designed to determine the range of factors and environmental conditions (e.g. diet, pathogens, cold exposure) that engage the previously underappreciated caudal brainstem portion of melanocortin system as it participates in the control of energy expenditure.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online March 27, 2008
Abbreviations: aCSF, Artificial cerebral spinal fluid; AgRP, agouti-related protein; ARC, arcuate; CD, chronic decerebrate; GF, gavage-fed; HR, heart rate; IBAT, interscapular brown adipose tissue; icv, intracerebroventricular; MC-R, melanocortin receptor; MTII, melanotan II; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; POMC, proopiomelanocortin; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; RPa, raphe pallidus; RVLM, rostroventrolateral medulla; SPA, spontaneous physical activity; TC, core temperature; TIBAT, interscapular brown adipose tissue temperature.
Received December 19, 2007.
Accepted for publication March 18, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Melanocyte stimulating hormone: immunohistochemical identification and mapping in neurons of rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:6300–6304This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. P. Skibicka and H. J. Grill Hypothalamic and Hindbrain Melanocortin Receptors Contribute to the Feeding, Thermogenic, and Cardiovascular Action of Melanocortins Endocrinology, December 1, 2009; 150(12): 5351 - 5361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. C. Yosten and W. K. Samson Nesfatin-1 exerts cardiovascular actions in brain: possible interaction with the central melanocortin system Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): R330 - R336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Balthasar Feeding signals to the hungry mind Exp Physiol, August 1, 2009; 94(8): 857 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Hayes, L. Bradley, and H. J. Grill Endogenous Hindbrain Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Activation Contributes to the Control of Food Intake by Mediating Gastric Satiation Signaling Endocrinology, June 1, 2009; 150(6): 2654 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Skibicka, A. L. Alhadeff, and H. J. Grill Hindbrain Cocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript Induces Hypothermia Mediated by GLP-1 Receptors J. Neurosci., May 27, 2009; 29(21): 6973 - 6981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Skibicka and H. J. Grill Hindbrain Leptin Stimulation Induces Anorexia and Hyperthermia Mediated by Hindbrain Melanocortin Receptors Endocrinology, April 1, 2009; 150(4): 1705 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Nautiyal, M. Dailey, N. Brito, M. N. d. A. Brito, R. B. Harris, T. J. Bartness, and H. J. Grill Energetic responses to cold temperatures in rats lacking forebrain-caudal brain stem connections Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): R789 - R798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |