help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on December 15, 2005
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2005-0905
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/3/1195    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Curlewis, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Curlewis, J. D.

Submitted on July 19, 2005
Accepted on December 2, 2005

Mechanisms underlying the diminished sensitivity to prolactin negative feedback during lactation: reduced STAT5 signalling and upregulation of Cytokine-Inducible SH2-domain-containing protein (CIS) expression in tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons

Stephen T. Anderson*, Johanna L. Barclay, Kent J. Fanning, Daphne H. L. Kusters, Michael J Waters, and Jon D. Curlewis

School of Biomedical Sciences and Institute for Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Queensland. 4072 Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephen.anderson{at}uq.edu.au.

Hyperprolactinaemia during lactation is a consequence of the sucking stimulus and in part due to reduced prolactin negative feedback. To date the mechanisms involved in this diminished sensitivity to prolactin feedback are unknown, but may involve changes in prolactin signal transduction within tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic (TIDA) neurons. Therefore we investigated STAT5 signaling in the TIDA neurons of lactating rats.

Dual label confocal immunofluorescence studies were used to determine the intracellular distribution of STAT5 within TIDA neurons in the dorsomedial arcuate nucleus. In lactating rats with pups removed for 16 h, injection of oPRL significantly (P < 0.05) increased the STAT5 nuclear/cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio compared with vehicle treated mothers. In contrast, oPRL injection did not increase the STAT5 N/C ratio in lactating mothers with pups, demonstrating that prolactin signal transduction through STAT5 is reduced in TIDA neurons in the presence of pups.

To investigate possible mechanisms involved in reduced prolactin signaling, we examined the expression of Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) proteins. Northern analysis on whole hypothalamus showed that CIS (cytokine-inducible SH2-domain-containing protein), but not SOCS1 or SOCS3, mRNA expression was significantly (P < 0.01) upregulated in suckled lactating rats. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR on arcuate nucleus micropunches also showed up-regulation of CIS transcripts. Immunofluorescence studies demonstrated that CIS is expressed in all TIDA neurons in the dorsomedial arcuate nucleus, and the intensity of CIS staining in these neurons is significantly (P < 0.05) increased in lactating rats with sucking pups. Together these results support the hypothesis that loss of sensitivity to prolactin negative feedback during lactation is a result of increased CIS expression in TIDA neurons.


Key words: prolactin • negative feedback • SOCS • CIS • lactation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. Misztal, K. Gorski, D. Tomaszewska-Zaremba, E. Molik, and K. Romanowicz
Identification of salsolinol in the mediobasal hypothalamus of lactating ewes and its relation to suckling-induced prolactin and GH release
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee
What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans?
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. M. Anderson, P. Beijer, A. S. Bang, M. A. Fenwick, S. J. Bunn, and D. R. Grattan
Suppression of Prolactin-Induced Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5b Signaling and Induction of Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in the Hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus of the Rat during Late Pregnancy and Lactation
Endocrinology, October 1, 2006; 147(10): 4996 - 5005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society