help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on April 13, 2006
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2006-0005
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
147/7/3484    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burrows, C
Right arrow Articles by Perks, C M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burrows, C
Right arrow Articles by Perks, C M

Submitted on January 3, 2006
Accepted on April 3, 2006

IGFBP-3 has opposing actions on malignant and non-malignant breast epithelial cells that are each reversible and dependent upon cholesterol-stabilized integrin receptor complexes

C Burrows, J M P Holly, N J Laurence, E G Vernon, J V Carter, M A Clark, J McIntosh, Z E Winters, and C M Perks*

Department of Clinical Sciences @ North Bristol, IGFs & Metabolic Endocrinology Group, University of Bristol, The Medical School, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Claire.M.Perks{at}bristol.ac.uk.

IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 is generally considered to have actions that counterbalance those of IGFs and is therefore being developed as a cancer treatment. In breast tumors however, high levels are associated with aggressive tumors and poor prognosis. Consistent with this we have demonstrated that although IGFBP-3 and a non-IGF binding fragment (SPD) reduced attachment and enhanced apoptosis of Hs578T breast cancer cells cultured on collagen or laminin, it promoted their attachment and survival on fibronectin, which is abundant in the matrix of aggressive tumors. We have now examined the factors that determine whether IGFBP-3 has positive or negative actions on breast epithelial cells. IGFBP-3 also promoted survival of Hs578T cells in the presence of an antibody to the {beta}1 integrin subunit or when cholesterol-stabilized complexes were disrupted. These actions were blocked by IGF-I or a MAPK inhibitor. SPD had similar actions on MCF-7 cells that were again reversed on fibronectin, or with disruption of cholesterol stabilized complexes and blocked by the {beta}1 integrin antibody. In contrast IGFBP-3 promoted growth and survival for non-malignant MCF-10A cells, but these effects were again reversed on fibronectin and blocked by the {beta}1-antibody, a MAPK inhibitor or by disruption of cholesterol-stabilized complexes. On Hs578T cells, IGFBP-3 bound to caveolin-1 and {beta}1-integrins, enhancing their aggregation, the recruitment of FAK and the activation of MAPK. In summary, with 3 breast epithelial cell lines, IGFBP-3 had positive or negative effects on growth and survival dependent upon the status of cholesterol-stabilized integrin receptor complexes.


Key words: IGFBP-3 • MAPK • apoptosis • fibronectin and breast cancer







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society