help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on September 27, 2007
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-0658
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
149/1/32    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hazlerigg, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hazlerigg, D. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH

Submitted on May 17, 2007
Accepted on September 18, 2007

Redefining the limits of day length responsiveness in a seasonal mammal

Gabriela C. Wagner, Jonathan D. Johnston, Iain J. Clarke, Gerald A. Lincoln, and David G. Hazlerigg*

School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, AB24 2TZ Aberdeen, UK; School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH Surrey, UK; Department of Physiology, Monash University, VIC 3880, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, EH8 9JZ Edinburgh, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.hazlerigg{at}abdn.ac.uk.

At temperate latitudes, increases in day length in the spring promote the summer phenotype. In mammals, this long-day response is mediated by decreasing nightly duration of melatonin secretion by the pineal gland. This affects adenylate cyclase signal transduction and clock gene expression in melatonin responsive cells in the pars tuberalis of the pituitary, which control seasonal prolactin secretion.

To define the photoperiodic limits of the mammalian long day response, we transferred short day (8-h light / 24-h) acclimated Soay sheep to various longer photoperiods simulating those occurring from spring to summer in their northerly habitat (57°N). Locomotor activity and plasma melatonin rhythms remained synchronised to the light-dark cycle in all photoperiods. Surprisingly, transfer to 16-h light/day had a greater effect on prolactin secretion and oestrus activity than shorter (12-h) or longer (20 and 22-h) photoperiods. The 16-h photoperiod also had the largest effect on expression of circadian (per1) and neuroendocrine output ({beta}TSH) genes in the pars tuberalis, and on kisspeptin gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, which modulates reproductive activity.

This "critical photoperiodic window" of responsiveness to long days in mammals is predicted by a model wherein adenylate cyclase sensitisation and clock gene phasing effects of melatonin combine to control neuroendocrine output. This adaptive mechanism may be related to the latitude of origin and the timing of the seasonal transitions.


Key words: photoperiod • seasonality • pars tuberalis • circadian • kisspeptin







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society