help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on July 19, 2007
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-0716
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
148/10/5105    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaitu'u-Lino, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Salamonsen, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaitu'u-Lino, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Salamonsen, L. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*PROGESTERONE

Submitted on May 30, 2007
Accepted on July 10, 2007

Estrogen is not essential for full endometrial restoration following breakdown: lessons from a mouse model

Tu'uhevaha J. Kaitu'u-Lino*, Naomi B. Morison, and Lois A. Salamonsen

Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 5152, Clayton; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tuuhevaha.kaituu{at}princehenrys.org.

The current dogma surrounding endometrial regeneration following menses includes a critical need for estrogen primed proliferation. Whilst some evidence suggests that estrogen may not be required for the initial re-epithelialisation of the uterine surface, it is widely believed that it is essential for successful stromal renewal. This study aimed to identify proliferating cell types during endometrial repair and to examine whether estrogen is required for successful repair using a previously developed mouse model. In the model, decidualisation is artificially induced, and progesterone support withdrawn; the endometrial tissue progressively breaks down by 24 h after progesterone withdrawal and by 48 h has usually undergone complete repair. Although the mice are ovariectomised, restoration of both the stromal and epithelial components proceeds rapidly following breakdown and results in what appears to be a normal endometrium. However, potential estrogenic influences from extra-ovarian sources (particularly the diet and fat) remain. In this study complete removal of extra-ovarian estrogen was achieved by maintenance of animals on a soy-free diet and administration of aromatase inhibitor letrozole. No significant differences in uterine weight or estrogen responsive genes, lactoferrin and progesterone receptor, were observed compared to control ovariectomised but otherwise untreated mice, whilst significantly higher measurements were obtained from an estrogen-added group. Importantly no significant difference in the rate of endometrial repair was observed in the complete absence of estrogen demonstrating that estrogen is not essential for complete endometrial restoration in this model.


Key words: estrogen • menstruation • endometrium







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society