help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on June 5, 2008
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-1413
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
149/9/4421    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Omoto, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Omoto, Y.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*TESTOSTERONE

Submitted on October 15, 2007
Accepted on May 23, 2008

ER{alpha} signaling in growth of the ventral prostate: Comparison of neonatal growth and post castration re-growth

Yoko Omoto*

Department of BioSciences and Nutrition, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, SE- 141 86 Huddinge, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yoko.omoto{at}mednut.ki.se.

A role for estrogen receptor (ER) {alpha} in branching morphogenesis in the ventral prostate (VP) has previously been demonstrated: in the VP of ER{alpha}-/- mice, there are fewer side branches than in wild-type littermates. In the present study we show that in the postnatal VP, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 10 is expressed in wild-type mice but not in ER{alpha}-/- mice, and, since branching involves proliferation pathways also used in malignant growth, we investigated whether branching during re-growth of the VP after castration involves ER{alpha} and FGF10. ER{alpha} was not detectable in the prostates of sham-operated or castrated mice but was expressed in the prostatic epithelium between days 3–5 after testosterone replacement. Blocking either ER{alpha} or ER{beta} with ICI 182,780 had no detectable effects on epithelial cell proliferation during regrowth by testosterone. The ER{alpha} agonist, PPT, did not induce re-growth by itself, but exposure to PPT on days 3 to 5 of testosterone replacement resulted in cyclin D1-positive cells in the ductal epithelium, invasion of FGF10-positive immune cells in the re-growing prostate, and in budding 14 days later. Testosterone replacement alone induced neither cyclin D1, FGF10 nor bud formation. These results indicate that stimulation of ER{alpha} is essential for ductal branching during postnatal prostate growth. During re-growth after castration there is a window in time when selective stimulation of ER{alpha} can also induce ductal branching. The FGF10 for this growth comes from the immune system, not from the prostatic mesenchyme.


Key words: Estrogen receptor • Fibroblast growth factor 10 • Branching morphogenesis • Mouse ventral prostate • Re-growth







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society