help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on February 14, 2008
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2007-1515
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
149/5/2557    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herling, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herling, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Weight Control

Submitted on November 2, 2007
Accepted on February 5, 2008

Increased energy expenditure contributes more to the body weight reducing effect of rimonabant than reduced food intake in candy-fed Wistar rats

Andreas W. Herling*, Susanne Kilp, Ralf Elvert, Guido Haschke, and Werner Kramer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andreas.herling{at}sanofi-aventis.com.

The CB1 receptor antagonist, rimonabant, affects the endocannabinoid system and causes a sustained reduction in body weight in spite of the transient nature of the reduction in food intake. Therefore, in a multiple dose study female candy-fed Wistar rats were treated with rimonabant (10 mg/kg) and matched with pair-fed rats to distinguish between hypophagic action and hypothesized effects on energy expenditure. Within the first week of treatment rimonabant reduced body weight nearly to levels of standard rat chow fed rats. Evaluation of energy balance (energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in relation to metabolizable energy intake calculated by bomb calorimetry) revealed that increased energy expenditure based on increased fat oxidation contributed more to sustained body weight reduction than reduced food intake. A mere food reduction through pair-feeding did not result in comparable effects because animals reduced their energy expenditure to save energy stores. As fat oxidation measured by indirect calorimetry increased immediately after dosing in the postprandial state, the acute effect of rimonabant on lipolysis was investigated in postprandial male rats. Rimonabant elevated free fatty acids postprandially, demonstrating an inherent pharmacological activity of rimonabant to induce lipolysis and not secondarily postabsorptively due to reduced food intake. We conclude that the weight reducing effect of rimonabant was due to continuously elevated energy expenditure based on increased fat oxidation driven by lipolysis from fat tissue as long as fat stores were elevated. When the amount of endogenous fat stores declined, rimonabant-induced increased energy expenditure was maintained by a re-increase in food intake.


Key words: energy balance • lipolysis • fat oxidation • 0







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society